82 Sherlock

2.8K posts

82 Sherlock

82 Sherlock

@82sherlock

Katılım Şubat 2025
433 Takip Edilen117 Takipçiler
taoki
taoki@justalexoki·
most exceptional people had exceptional parents. which means if you don't have exceptional parents there's actually very little chance you will be. and if you're not exceptional, there's very little chance your kids will be
English
91
18
535
21.8K
🦣Tanimal
🦣Tanimal@Tanimal·
Idk if you were there or not but in 2016 we literally would upload a pic like this to instagram captionless and call it a day
🦣Tanimal tweet media
English
6
0
55
963
82 Sherlock
82 Sherlock@82sherlock·
@eptwts -Maverick by Ricardo Semler -Checklist Manifesto -Zero Marginal Cost Society -Less from More -This idea is brilliant (more scientific ideas, but several of the essays had a big impact on my thinking) -How to find freedom in an unfree world
English
0
0
0
246
EP
EP@eptwts·
has any book that actually impacted how you live your life & helped you get to where you are? i'm trying to stack up my bookshelf so gonna do a bulk order of books - any input would be appreciated ideally marketing, business, psychology, etc.
English
84
8
203
21.8K
Penny
Penny@pennyelizabeths·
Is this a universal guy fear or is it only all the guys I know?
English
370
379
3.5K
259.1K
82 Sherlock
82 Sherlock@82sherlock·
Re: Shredding books fpr copyright loophole... wouldn't the copyright holder/publisher have a copy of the book?
English
0
0
0
10
Hot Rails — oz/acc
Hot Rails — oz/acc@hot_rails·
This is the magnificent library @AnthropicAI amassed, before pulping it because it gave them a legal copyright loophole. These people do not understand Civilization.
Hot Rails — oz/acc tweet media
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets

🦔AI companies are bulk-buying rare books, scanning them through high-speed machines that cut the spines off, and shredding the originals. A service called ISBNdb facilitates orders of up to a million books and keeps buyers anonymous. Pre-2022 books are premium because they're free of AI-generated text. A federal judge ruled the practice is fair use because eliminating the original means only one copy exists at a time. Anthropic hired the former head of Google Books partnerships to obtain "all the books in the world." My Take This got to me. A bookseller told 404 Media that rare books with almost no surviving copies are being fed into this pipeline. Books that survived wars, fires, and centuries of handling are being shredded so an AI can learn to write a better marketing email. ISBNdb's website literally says "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy," and they still built an entire business around making it happen quietly. They offer NDAs as a feature. They coach clients to call it "digital preservation." I've covered AI companies scraping the internet, torrenting libraries, and stealing music. This is worse because it's irreversible. You can re-upload a website. You can reprint a bestseller. You can't replace the last three copies of an 18th-century botanical text once someone shreds them for training data. And the judge said it's legal. So it's going to accelerate. "We shred rare books and offer NDAs so nobody finds out" is a legitimate business model in 2026. What a timeline. Hedgie🤗

English
300
3.6K
14.7K
1.2M
MatrixMysteries
MatrixMysteries@MatrixMysteries·
A brand-new package of Jimmy Dean bacon is labeled 12 ounces. Put the unopened package on a scale and it weighs only 10.6 ounces — packaging included. U.S. law requires the marked net weight to reflect only the meat itself, not the package. We are being robbed in plain sight.
English
153
1.8K
6.5K
96.1K
82 Sherlock
82 Sherlock@82sherlock·
@HolderOftheFire Same with opening up to women, if you truly don't care, nothing she says can hurt you.
English
1
0
2
74
Michael
Michael@HolderOftheFire·
I used to care about apps having my info etc. Now I understand it really is truly impossible to conceal your tracks in todays day. While I value my privacy the real flex is being 100 comfortable with what you have done. The good, the bad and especially the ugly and embarrassing. OWN IT and nobody can use it against you. Do you understand?
English
5
3
55
1.7K
Vince
Vince@VinceInPrague·
@EODHappyCaptain What is it about water absorption and drying that increases hazard?
Kněževes, Česká republika 🇨🇿 English
1
0
4
657
Happy Captain
Happy Captain@EODHappyCaptain·
Here is your periodic reminder that no matter how old something is, it can still kill you. As a matter of fact, civil war cannon balls are more dangerous after they have absorbed ground water and then dried. If you found this stuff, call your local police department.
News 4 San Antonio@News4SA

MAJOR FIND | A Mississippi property owner uncovered more than 200 Civil War-era cannonballs while preparing land for commercial development, and historians believe even more artifacts may still be buried. --> bit.ly/4vPSjyg

English
125
91
1.7K
270.2K
MLGS
MLGS@mylocalgunshop·
@DoomerTapes until you wake up one day and your girl wiped the phone 🤣
English
9
0
1.3K
82.4K
82 Sherlock
82 Sherlock@82sherlock·
@BrianRoemmele Won't these books be available elsewhere? Maybe in the Library of Congress? Still shitty of anthropic... Just asking
English
1
0
8
734
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
Some folks don’t believe that a “principled AI company” would destroy books after they suck out all the information for their models, even one-of-a-kind books and manuscripts. Here it is admitted in open court.
Brian Roemmele tweet media
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele

Confirmation of Anthropic’s BOOK BURNING for their AI: The Great Forgetting of the Amnesia Generation In the quiet warehouses and shipping docks of 2024, Anthropic did not merely train an AI. It staged a quiet erasure of human knowledge. While the public was still dazzled by Claude’s fluent paragraphs and polished marketing emails, the company’s engineers and logistics teams were busy executing Project Panama—an internal campaign whose own documents announced the ambition to “destructively scan all the books in the world.” The method was industrial and irreversible: buy the physical volume SOMETIMES THE LAST COPY, slice its SPINE with a hydraulic cutter, feed the pages through high-speed scanners, then pulp what remained. Millions of books: scientific research, novels, rare technical treatises, obscure monographs, volumes that had already survived wars, fires, and decades of handling—were reduced to data tokens and then to wet mulch or burned. They literally burn the evidence of this crime against humanity. The company itself preferred the darkness. “We don’t want it to be known that we are working on this,” the planning memos warned. A federal judge later blessed the slaughter. Because Anthropic had purchased the copies and then destroyed them, the court held, the act was “transformative” fair use. Ownership plus obliteration equaled permission. The ruling handed every subsequent AI lab a legal license to treat the printed past as disposable feedstock. That license is now being exercised at industrial scale. In 2026, companies like ISBNdb openly market pre-2022 books as the last pure reservoir of human language—text uncontaminated by the synthetic sludge that large language models themselves have already poured into the open web. Orders arrive for tens or hundreds of thousands of titles at a time. Non-disclosure agreements are standard. The preferred language is “digital preservation.” The actual outcome is the same mechanical process Anthropic refined: spine cut, pages scanned, original shredded. Rare and near-unique copies are disappearing into the same pipeline. Booksellers across continents report sudden, strange bulk orders for specialized, low-demand titles that no ordinary collector would ever buy in volume. Once the pages are gone, they are gone forever. A website can be re-uploaded. A bestseller can be reprinted. The last three surviving copies of an eighteenth-century botanical text cannot. This is not progress. It is the Great Forgetting. An entire generation of machines is being taught to speak by consuming and then discarding the physical record of human thought. The companies that profit from the resulting fluency call the process necessary, legal, and even enlightened. They speak of curated knowledge and domain-specific expertise while the spines crack and the paper is carted away. Anthropic did not invent the hunger for data, but it demonstrated openly in private documents and then under court seal how far a well-funded laboratory was willing to go to satisfy it, and how readily the law would ratify the destruction. Just to gain a temporary AI benchmark advantage. The amnesia is already here. Future models will generate elegant sentences to beat Al sorts of tests about history, science, and literature. They will do so on the ashes of the books that once contained those sentences. The generation that built these systems will leave its children fluent machines and emptier shelves. That is the real product of Project Panama and its successors: not intelligence, but a carefully engineered cultural void, papered over with synthetic prose and non-disclosure agreements. We are left to forget to remember. We are The Amnesia Generation with our brains being put into a meat grinder and fed back to us.

English
281
7.2K
17.8K
424.3K
Daniel Burton
Daniel Burton@PubliusDB·
Someone gave us this washing machine ~20 years ago, when I was a poor grad student. When we could finally afford to replace it, Brittany said no: it’s better for her quilting fabric than anything new. Every 4 years a switch dies. Fixed it again this weekend. $10 part. Still going strong. They just don’t make them like they used to.
Daniel Burton tweet media
English
571
615
14.6K
366K
82 Sherlock
82 Sherlock@82sherlock·
@PubliusDB If dumb people don't kuve in your house, simply jump the black and white wire ;)
English
0
0
1
111
cars
cars@autofixx_·
You bought a 30-year old Mercedes instead of a Tesla.
English
112
254
4.4K
355.7K
rachel
rachel@rachcorrine·
MORE EXAMPLES: She says: “I’d love to try that new Italian place sometime.” Men hear that as an interesting observation, not an invitation to make a reservation. (Make the reservation.) Women: “I’m getting hungry.” aka I am starving let’s eat. Men hear: “She’s informing me that she’s hungry.” Me during an actual closet cleanout: Me: “You don’t wear this.” Client: “Correct.” Me: “…so let’s get rid of it.” Client: “Well you didn’t say that!” (Puts item in donate bag.)
rachel@rachcorrine

My favorite part about styling men is learning more about the male brain. They are very direct, very literal creatures. If you’re not direct and literal, they literally do not get it. Example: “Wear whatever you want.” She means, “Wear something nice.” Men hear, “There are no preferences.” And he literally wears ~whatever~ he wants. Another example. “I’m fine.” Women: So not fine. “I’m upset, please ask me what’s wrong.” Men: Great, she’s fine.

English
7
2
127
25.9K