Andris Ambainis

3.3K posts

Andris Ambainis banner
Andris Ambainis

Andris Ambainis

@AAmbainis

Zinātnieks kvantu stāvoklī. In a quantum state.

Riga, Latvia Katılım Aralık 2015
371 Takip Edilen4.9K Takipçiler
Andris Ambainis
Andris Ambainis@AAmbainis·
Atrasts Internetā: Hormuza šaurumu vajadzētu pārdēvēt par Šrēdingera šaurumu - var būt vienlaikus vaļā vai slēgts.
Latviešu
0
11
124
4.5K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Andrew Curran
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_·
Terence Tao responding to a question on what advice he would give someone considering a career in math in 2026: 'Yeah, so we live in a time of change. It is, as I said, we live in a particularly unpredictable era. And I think things that we've taken for granted for centuries may not hold anymore. So, yeah, the way we... do everything, not just mathematics, will change. In many ways, I would prefer the much more boring, quiet era where things are much the same as they were 10 years ago, 20 years ago. But I think one just has to embrace that there's going to be a lot of change and that, you know, the things that you study, some of them may become obsolete or revolutionized, but some things will be retained. There'll be a lot of opportunities for things that you wouldn't be able to do before. So, I mean, in math, you previously had to basically go through years and years of education to be a math PhD before you could contribute to the frontier of math research. But now it's quite possible at the high school level or whatever, that you could get involved in a math project and actually make a real contribution because of all these AI tools and lean and everything else. So there'll be a lot of non-traditional opportunities to learn. So you need a very adaptable mindset. There'll be one for pursuing things just for curiosity, for playing around. And I mean, you still need to get your credentials. I mean, I think for a while it would still be important to sort of still go through traditional education and learn math and science and so forth the old-fashioned way for a while. Yeah, but you should also be open to very, very different ways of doing science, some of which don't exist yet. Yeah, so it's a scary time, but also very exciting.'
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

The Terence Tao episode. We begin with the absolutely ingenious and surprising way in which Kepler discovered the laws of planetary motion. People sometimes say that AI will make especially fast progress at scientific discovery because of tight verification loops. But the story of how we discovered the shape of our solar system shows how the verification loop for correct ideas can be decades (or even millennia) long. During this time, what we know today as the better theory can often actually make worse predictions (Copernicus's model of circular orbits around the sun was actually less accurate than Ptolemy's geocentric model). And the reasons it survives this epistemic hell is some mixture of judgment and heuristics that we don’t even understand well enough to actually articulate, much less codify into an RL loop. Hope you enjoy! 0:00:00 – Kepler was a high temperature LLM 0:11:44 – How would we know if there’s a new unifying concept within heaps of AI slop? 0:26:10 – The deductive overhang 0:30:31 – Selection bias in reported AI discoveries 0:46:43 – AI makes papers richer and broader, but not deeper 0:53:00 – If AI solves a problem, can humans get understanding out of it? 0:59:20 – We need a semi-formal language for the way that scientists actually talk to each other 1:09:48 – How Terry uses his time 1:17:05 – Human-AI hybrids will dominate math for a lot longer Look up Dwarkesh Podcast on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.

English
29
228
1.9K
424K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Baiba Braže
Baiba Braže@Braze_Baiba·
Prieks uzņemt 🇱🇻 Kvantu kopienu pie mums ĀM, lai pārrunātu: 📍gatavību pasaulē lielākās kvantu konferences #QIP2026 norisei Rīgā; 🤝 atbalstu universitāšu, uzņēmumu starptautiskajai sadarbībai un LV iesaisti kvantu interneta izveidē; 🔹Transatlantiskās kvantu kopienas darbu.
Baiba Braže tweet mediaBaiba Braže tweet media
Latviešu
1
11
38
3.5K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Justin Skycak
Justin Skycak@justinskycak·
I went from 19 followers to over 25,000 in the past year and a half, mostly because of my writing on here. Here's the progression I followed to level up my writing and build an audience. It’s reproducible if you're willing to put in the work. == STEP 1 == Become a domain expert. Get lots of concrete experience in the trenches of some domain. This is obvious, but I'll say it anyway because lots of people waste their time looking for a shortcut that doesn't exist: The way you get interesting things to say is by accumulating a massive amount of hands-on experience doing interesting things. Without that experience, all you can do is effectively function as an LLM. You'll cargo-cult things that you've read but don't really understand, don't have any unique perspectives on, and don't even know how true they are beyond " said so." You want insight? So much insight that other people want to listen to what you have to say? Then you've got to get your hands dirty and do the reps. You don't get insight until you've been in the trenches. That's where the insight is. That's where you earn it, that's where you find it. If you don't wanna rough it in the trenches, then sorry, no insight for you. == STEP 2 == Now you have interesting things to say, so say them. Write on platforms where you're likely to get some kind of feedback. I started on Math Educators StackExchange in summer 2023 and moved here on X in summer 2024. You don't need a big audience, and you're not even ready for one anyway. You just need readers, even just a few, who respond. == STEP 3 == Study any comments you get, especially the ones where the reader is confused. Sometimes confusion is your fault. Sometimes it’s not. Either way, the more you study/poke the confusion, the more you figure out how to write in a way that avoids the confusion, regardless of who is to blame. Also study/poke comments that disagree. Sometimes disagreement turns out to be confusion that you can avoid with clearer communication. Other times it reveals common misunderstandings that are interesting to write more about. Every time you put out a post, get feedback, make improvements, and carry those improvements forward into future posts, that’s essentially a “rep” of deliberate practice. == STEP 4 == As you get better at writing, you’ll grow your audience and throw yourself into a compounding cycle: bigger audience → more feedback → more improvements → more traction → bigger audience. Once in a while you'll get a really good follow-up question that you didn't initially think people would be interested in hearing your perspective on, but you notice it's got some likes/engagement, and it dawns on you that "oh hey, there is actually quite a bit I can say about this." Be sure to answer those. After you get some traction writing about one particular thing, it can be hard to get yourself to write about other topics. But you have to, otherwise you pigeonhole yourself and become stale. So when there's an adjacent topic that your audience seems to be interested in, that you have things to say about, that just falls in your lap like that, take the shot and see what happens. Write a detailed answer to the question. Then turn your answer into a standalone post. If it does well, then BAM you just found another topic to write about. If it doesn't get much attention, then no big deal. It's a shot on goal. Most shots don't go in, but that's the only way you score. == Step 5 == Now you're regularly saying interesting things to a growing audience, and they're reacting to it. You're writing things that some people find valuable. Semantically, you've got something good there. Now you start to really focus on the structure and tone of your presentation, making it punchy, noticeable, compelling, etc. By this time, you should have a pretty good idea of what you can write about that other people are interested in, and what kind of "nerve endings" you can hit to spark emotional reactions. So you start leaning into things like creating a hook, keeping it punchy but not corny, making a smooth transition into elaborating on the hook, building narrative momentum, keeping it relatable, etc. == Steps 6+ == Step 5 is about the level where I'm at right now, so I'll stop here. I don't claim to be a writing expert. There's clearly a long staircase above this point, and I'm still climbing. Whatever's up there, I'm excited to work up to it over the coming years.
Justin Skycak@justinskycak

Beyond math/coding, another skill that jumps out to me as being insanely useful and relatively straightforward to train is writing. Not just grammar syntax, but also creating a hook, keeping it punchy but not corny, making a smooth transition into elaborating on the hook, building narrative momentum, keeping it relatable, etc. It's amazing how much attention a well-crafted piece of writing can attract, how many lucky opportunities can arise as a result, and how many people with interesting experiences miss out on all that due to weak writing skills. Now I'm not saying anyone can be the next Hemingway, but I do think lots of people have weak writing chops relative to the amount of interesting knowledge/experiences they've accumulated, and that they stand to benefit from seriously training up their writing. I also don't claim to be an expert writer myself, but I have leaned into writing the past couple years, I've experienced serious improvement, and it's been paying off in spades.

English
9
38
744
119.8K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
QIP 2026
QIP 2026@QIPConference·
🚨 QIP 2026 registration deadline EXTENDED! You now have until 9 December (AoE) to register and join us in Riga! 🔗 Register: app.onlineexpo.com/events/qip-202…
QIP 2026 tweet media
English
1
3
1
1K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Thomas H. Ptacek
Thomas H. Ptacek@tqbf·
The funniest thing has officially happened to the International Association for Cryptologic Research.
Thomas H. Ptacek tweet media
English
51
461
3.7K
218.6K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Michael Nielsen
Michael Nielsen@michael_nielsen·
In 2012 I participated in a small group discussion led by @doctorow. I chanced into it, but he painted a picture I've thought about often in the years since, and that has changed the way I see the world.
English
11
134
510
0
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
International Chess Federation
Five rounds down and six to go! The FIDE World Youth U14, U16 & U18 Championships in 🇦🇱 Durrës are heating up — with only two players still on a perfect 5/5! 🔥 🌟 🇱🇻 Marija Kuznecova (U16 Girls) and 🇰🇿 Mark Smirnov (U14 Open) have been unstoppable so far, standing alone at the top of their groups! Here are the current leaders after Round 5 👇 U18 🇸🇬 Jagadeesh Siddharth – 4.5 Artiom Stribuk – 4 🇪🇸 Diego Macias Pino – 4 G18 🇺🇿 Afruza Khamdamova – 4.5 Valeria Kleymenova – 4.5 🇫🇷 Manon Schippke – 4.5 U16 🇰🇿 Sauat Nurgaliyev – 4.5 🇨🇴 Santiago Lopez Rayo – 4.5 Isaak Parpiev – 4.5 G16 🇱🇻 Marija Kuznecova – 5 🇵🇱 Wiktoria Śmietańska – 4.5 Diana Khafizova – 4.5 U14 🇰🇿 Mark Smirnov – 5 🇦🇲 Manvel Arakelyan – 4.5 🇳🇱 Noah Ritzerveld – 4.5 G14 🇰🇿 Mariya Kholyavko – 4.5 🇵🇭 Jemaicah Yap Mendoza – 4.5 🇵🇱 Varvara Matskevich – 4.5 🔗 Full standings: s3.chess-results.com/tnr1265992.asp…
International Chess Federation tweet mediaInternational Chess Federation tweet mediaInternational Chess Federation tweet mediaInternational Chess Federation tweet media
English
0
5
27
7.2K
Andris Ambainis
Andris Ambainis@AAmbainis·
Nobela prēmija eksperimentālās kvantu skaitļošanas līderiem - galvenais Devorē un Martinisa darbs pēdējās desmitgadēs ir supravadošo kvantu datoru būvēšana (balstoties uz idejām, par ko piešķirta Nobela prēmija), gan akadēmiskajā vidē, gan vadot Google kvantu datora komandu.
The Nobel Prize@NobelPrize

BREAKING NEWS The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2025 #NobelPrize in Physics to John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis “for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantisation in an electric circuit.”

Latviešu
1
3
14
2.1K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
The Nobel Prize
The Nobel Prize@NobelPrize·
BREAKING NEWS The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2025 #NobelPrize in Physics to John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis “for the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantisation in an electric circuit.”
The Nobel Prize tweet media
English
403
7.5K
18K
4.8M
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Terrible Maps
Terrible Maps@TerribleMaps·
No one trolls with street names quite like Prague.
Terrible Maps tweet media
English
436
3.1K
30.7K
1M
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
The Babylon Bee
The Babylon Bee@TheBabylonBee·
Schrödinger's Neighbor Says Thought Experiment Very Interesting But He'd Really Just Like A Straight Answer On Where His Cat Is buff.ly/OS12ocL
The Babylon Bee tweet media
English
103
611
5.5K
263.8K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Tom Bennett OBE
Tom Bennett OBE@tombennett71·
Unfortunately creativity is almost impossible to measure, and equally hard to ‘teach’ directly, because it isn’t a skill separate to the domain specific content and skills it’s applied to. There is no transferable skill of being creative. A plumber can be creative in their role but useless artistically if they lack the domain expertise, and vice versa. This really matters because it’s too easy to denigrate and diminish the important of domain knowledge because we’re dazzled by the groovier outcome ‘creativity’. If you want students to be more creative, teach them subjects, well- and teach them examples of how others thought in novel ways and produced new ideas in that field.
OECD Education@OECDEduSkills

Creativity is increasingly becoming recognised as an important skill for workers. PISA Volume III measured creative thinking abilities in students globally. See what the top performing countries are doing differently: oecd.org/en/publication…

English
6
18
66
15.5K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
QIP 2026
QIP 2026@QIPConference·
We are thrilled to announce that QIP 2026 will take place in Riga, Latvia 🇱🇻  on January 24–30, 2026! 📢 The submissions are now open — join the world’s leading conference on quantum information processing. 🔗 Visit conference website for more information: qip2026.lu.lv
QIP 2026 tweet media
English
0
19
40
3.8K
Andris Ambainis retweetledi
Howie Hua
Howie Hua@howie_hua·
I saw this math question on Who Wants To Be a Millionaire. Would you win $125,000? What would your strategy be?
Howie Hua tweet media
English
60
55
487
63.4K