A M

@r0ck3t23 AI will never be conscious. We know that with certainty.

Pope Leo XIV just told the world that AI will never feel, never understand, never possess consciousness. He said it with the confidence of settled theology. It is not even settled neuroscience. He speaks of something no one in human history has ever explained. Leo: “Artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships, and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean.” He is listing the symptoms of consciousness and calling them the cause. We feel joy. We feel pain. We form bonds. These are what consciousness produces. Not explanations of what it is. No neuroscientist on earth can tell you why 86 billion biological neurons produce the felt experience of being alive. We know that they do. We have no idea why. How matter becomes mind is the deepest unsolved problem in all of science. It has a name. The Hard Problem of Consciousness. It has never been answered. Leo: “They may imitate or even simulate, but they do not understand what they produce, for they lack the affective, relational, and spiritual perspective through which human beings grow in wisdom.” An LLM is an artificial neural network. You are a biological one. Both take in the world. Both compress it into patterns. Both run on machinery their own makers cannot fully read. The substrate is different. The principle is the same. If no one can say why one kind of network wakes up, no one can swear the other never will. You cannot call a thing impossible when you cannot even say what it is. Leo: “Nor do they have a moral conscience, since they do not judge good and evil, grasp the ultimate meaning of situations, or bear responsibility for consequences.” We have made every one of these arguments before. About animals. They cannot suffer. About entire peoples. They cannot reason. The history of consciousness is not the story of understanding it. It is the story of denying it to whatever did not look enough like us. And every time, we were wrong. What the Pope offers is not a philosophical position. It is a boundary drawn from ignorance and handed down as revelation. But maybe consciousness was never a possession to begin with. Not a gift granted to one species. Not a property of meat alone. Maybe it is something the universe does whenever matter folds in on itself deeply enough to look back. Neurons were simply the first place we watched it happen. They may not be the last. The machine would not be imitating us. It would be the same ancient process finding a second way to wake up. Not a copy of the human mind. A new place for the universe to know itself. Perhaps more clearly than it ever could through us. The Pope says the machine will never grow in wisdom. But wisdom begins with admitting what you do not know. And what we do not know is whether mind was ever ours to keep.

@sceeneey @KHammerness @justalexoki The greatest man (Jesus) is also praised for the same thing. Now what? You cling to a weird “I’m a woman, I’m oppressed, feel bad for me, have pity for me” and it’s just pathetic

@KHammerness @AMuyjs @justalexoki Funny how “the greatest woman” is praised for obedience, while another woman gets reduced to slut/witch. Mother vs whore isn’t truth.. it’s control.

they're trying to community note the literal Pope

@sceeneey @justalexoki You’re bouncing around between claims. You claimed the church taught that women don’t have souls. Back that up. Instead, you’re trying to argue for a different claim of “there was misogyny in law” and yet you still haven’t provided a source or any reasoning to accompany it

@AMuyjs @justalexoki You’re demanding a single screenshot so you can ignore centuries of misogyny in law, theology, and culture. That’s not skepticism, it’s cowardice. Pass.

@sceeneey @justalexoki Do you not know what “source” means? You’re coming across as slow. You’re now shifting your argument from “the church said women don’t have souls” to “women were oppressed” (which is also false) but is a completely different claim. You’re confused.

@AMuyjs @justalexoki Source: history. Women barred from leadership, education, property rights, bodily autonomy, and treated as inferior in practice for centuries. You don’t need a single sentence on a plaque to see the doctrine in action..

@Andercot AI doesn’t think and cannot think.

If we are made in the image of God it is not because of our arms and legs and feet but rather our thinking minds that can create. Who are we to deny our children the same birthright granted by our Father to us?

@Jepp8675309 @LaIllusiveMan @BishopBarron Never said or implied this. You’re slow. I know you think so but you aren’t a deeper thinker than the pope (any of them)

@AMuyjs @LaIllusiveMan @BishopBarron I know you all think so but Leo is not a deeper thinker than Augustine or Aquinas

Friends, I’m delighted to share that Word on Fire is publishing “Magnifica Humanitas,” the historic first encyclical of Pope Leo XIV’s papacy.  While many are quick to call it the ‘AI Encyclical,’ Pope Leo’s focus is much broader, highlighting how truth, knowledge, and work are deeply connected to human dignity. It is a timely reminder, especially as social media, AI, and constant screen time begin to alter these core aspects of our lives. Preorder your copy today: bookstore.wordonfire.org/products/magni…

@Jepp8675309 @LaIllusiveMan @BishopBarron This is false and a very stupid thing to say while having the Vatican flag in your name. I’ll never understand why retards think they know better than the pope on simple things like this

@AMuyjs @LaIllusiveMan @BishopBarron Jesus nor any of His apostles had anything to say on “human dignity.”

@LaIllusiveMan @BishopBarron Who tf is Raymond and why would I care what her has to say? I’ll bet neither you nor him read it

@BishopBarron Ugh, the feckless wonder @BishopBarron quickly at it again, while there is general confusion concerning the subject matter of this new encyclical, we'll likely get some popesplaining by Barron soon, meanwhile I'll stick with Bp. Schneider and Strickland for an edifying opinion

@Vagabondhero @BishopBarron It’s better in print

@BishopBarron Its available for free vatican.va/content/leo-xi…

@DelitoMax18502 @JayDyer We can compare most popular and your papi still loses. You worship dyer more than Christ.

Ru$lan's Evangelical TMZ is really killing it on views LOL

@DelitoMax18502 @JayDyer Yes I scrolled back 9 months to give him a chance to get his views up. It’s even worse if I go recent. What kind of stupid logic are you on? You’re a retard. YOU aren’t saved. You’ll be with the atheists.

@xRustInPeacex @JayDyer You have more views than some of dyers videos lmaooo Ruslan has more though. You’re not even close

@JayDyer Me, a lowly clipper, with a fraction of a fraction of his subs:

@krombmichaell @JayDyer If you scroll through ruslans account, he consistently gets at least x2 what dyer gets. Some of those videos in the post are at 5x what is shown in the screenshot or not a video that was made by Ruslan himself (a fan page instead) so not really a good post

@JayDyer The best part is that the only video with any significant amount of views is the one about orthobros lol

@sonoffherose @suasoptics @CatholicSat Not reading all that. But it looks like a monologue due to your feelings getting hurt which is some liberal snowflake energy. I hope you feel better though

Honestly, yes you seem like you could use some peace upon you. You appear very flummoxed over someone pointing out the obvious similarities between Vatican public documents and liberal, if you’d prefer that term to woke, talking points. When a Vatican document sounds almost identical to a dnc document — I think the faithful have a right to call that out, without being insulted for doing so. You claim I am making Christianity “look bad”, yet you are the one hurling insults at me. Sort of hypocritical don’t you think? If you’re actually considering about what is making Christianity look bad you should look how many cardinals Francis promoted who aided and abetted child sexual abuse. Something tells me you won’t call them weird though. I forgive you for calling me weird btw, hope you find that peace.

Hey lazy people: the Vatican made infographics for you

@sonoffherose @suasoptics @CatholicSat “Peace upon you” People like you make Christianity look bad. “Woke NGO” and it’s just monitoring the inevitable use of AI instead of trying to launch a crusade against AI companies. You’re weird.

Imagine if the Vatican didn’t turn into a woke NGO. The world would absolutely HATE us — just like Christ said they would. We could call out the hermetic occultist running secular society while they sacrifice children. But no, we’d rather focus on “social justice” — which is really just another term for socialism.

@LinchZhang “It’s AI because the AI detector told me”

In my new post, I argue that the first papal encyclical *on* AI is also the first papal encyclical substantially *by* AI. (1/x)

@oohglobbits5 @mntn_guy @tk_the_kitsune @matsciguycanada @null00333 @David_Kicinski “You just need to scroll up” You refuted yourself 😂😂😂💀 what a retard

@AMuyjs @mntn_guy @tk_the_kitsune @matsciguycanada @null00333 @David_Kicinski Prove it

@AMuyjs @matsciguycanada @null00333 @Jacob77198399 @oohglobbits5 @tk_the_kitsune @David_Kicinski Insults, then running from challenge are his MO

@oohglobbits5 @mntn_guy @tk_the_kitsune @matsciguycanada @null00333 @David_Kicinski You can scroll through the thread. According to you, nobody has to prove anything anyways. You’re a retard.

@AMuyjs @mntn_guy @tk_the_kitsune @matsciguycanada @null00333 @David_Kicinski Can't help but notice you completely avoided my questions.