Adrian Booth

@CharlieBunyan Thank you. I will let Mark know ✔️✔️

@Adeb8888 I'll speak to Johnson tonight. I think he has the books at the ground so Mark only needs to ask him.

@CharlieBunyan my friend mark who comes with to Hyde United.. has asked me to send this message below. Can you help??

@MartinSLewis I would suggest any parent or student considering student loans to watch ‘borrowed future’ to see the impact on a loan for life. Student loan is still debt. Not a tax. Perhaps students should consider one trying to start adult working life, without a student loan.

“Martin, should I pay my daughter’s tuition fees so she doesn’t need a loan?” My answer… having already explained that the 1st priority is the ‘parental contribution’ for living costs. Watch the full The Martin Lewis Money Show Young Person’s Money special: itv.com/watch/the-mart…

@Liam_Tongue would you come back to Hyde?

@StanCollymore At least one game fully behind closed doors.. no room in this game for this behaviour.

Semenyo complained to referee that he was abused racially at Anfield, hence Taylor stoppage and informing managers.

@GiveBloodNHS I gave my 25th blood donation 5 months ago and given my 26th donation recently.. but haven’t received my 25th donation certificate and badge.. are these still sent?

@cineworld Has to be unlimited movies… going to the cinema and seeing films in the cinematic environment is what it is all about 🎬🎬🎬🍿🍿🍿

Unlimited Members... want your own Cineworld Unlimited Plushie? 👀 We've got 25 to give away to celebrate #Unlimited25. Answer this question to enter: What is your favourite Unlimited benefit? 🎬 T&Cs apply: bit.ly/4ktqshH Enter by 23:59, 25/07/2025.

@cineworld What about existing unlimited members? Anything for our loyalty over the years? Or should we cancel…..

25% off Cineworld Unlimited memberships! 👏 To celebrate 25 years of Unlimited, we’re giving YOU the gift. Use code UNLIMITED25 for 25% off any membership, until July 13. T&Cs apply. 🔗 bit.ly/CWUnlimited25

@UFCBaku the crowd are making this fight sadykhov v Motta Great atmosphere

@CharlieBunyan Happy retirement Mike

Tomorrow I retire. Since 1972 I've been a labourer at Woodmet, Dukinfield, and Park Cake; a postman; a sub-editor and was Ashton-under-Lyne Reporter Group sports editor before joining Tameside Council. Also worked for Radio Manchester. Next stop is sweeping up at Hyde United.

@Tompratt95 welcome back Tom to Hyde United✔️✔️ adding to your over 200 appearances

@DeadlineDayLive I suggest you and your son follow snd support a lower or non league local side… Great fun, cost effective. If you drink - you can have a drink in the stands. Good banter..

🚨 It's so sad seeing stuff like this, but it's becoming more of a regular thing in the Premier League these days. 😔

@StalyCelticFC new sound system is sounding good!! Could we have a bit of faithless or prodigy

@StalyCelticFC Sounds great!! Not before time!! Can we please have a scoreboard!! See you Saturday!!

We're excited to share that we've had a brand new PA system installed at Bower Fold! 📢 In addition to a top of the range system, we've had new speakers installed around the whole ground 🎶 Big thanks to Simon and team at Torpedo Factory Group and to the Football Foundation 🤝

@boswelltoday These are excellent summaries on a most pressing matter. Well done

Day 9 Peggie v NHS Fife & Dr Upton – Afternoon Session Science Denied, Due Process Ignored – NHS Fife’s Trainwreck Continues If Esther Davidson thought she could navigate Naomi Cunningham’s cross-examination with vague answers and corporate doublespeak, today proved otherwise. The afternoon session exposed not only NHS Fife’s blind adherence to gender ideology, but also the complete failure of the so-called investigation into Sandie Peggie’s treatment. Under pressure, Davidson tied herself in knots trying to avoid defining what a woman is, while simultaneously admitting that NHS Fife’s handling of Peggie’s case was riddled with bias, incompetence, and a blatant lack of due process. The most embarrassing moments came when Cunningham forced Davidson to confront the simple question of what makes someone a woman. The exchange was excruciating. Does growing long hair make someone a woman? No. Does wearing makeup? No. Does dressing in women’s clothes? No. But when Cunningham asked, "So what does?", Davidson panicked and pivoted to the standard ideological script, insisting that if a man identifies as a woman, then he is one. The shift was immediate and obvious. Up until that moment, she had been answering questions logically, but now, when faced with the core contradiction of NHS Fife’s position, she abandoned reality entirely. Cunningham didn’t let her off the hook. If “identifying” was all it took, then what objective criteria exist to define a woman? Davidson floundered. She mumbled about respecting beliefs and not being an expert, but could not explain the policy she was defending. At one point, Judge Alexander Kemp intervened, trying to soften the blow by stating that Davidson wasn’t a biology expert. But that wasn’t the issue—Cunningham wasn’t asking for a scientific thesis, she was asking a senior NHS official to say out loud that women are female. And she couldn’t do it. With NHS Fife’s core argument now in tatters, Cunningham turned to the practical consequences of ignoring sex. Davidson initially claimed that biological sex had no relevance in medicine, but under questioning, she was forced to admit this was false. Blood tests, heart attack markers, medication dosages, and even basic diagnoses all rely on knowing whether a patient is male or female. Bizarrely, she insisted that pregnancy was the only medical issue where sex mattered, prompting the judge to intervene again to clarify that she was speaking from ignorance rather than fact. The irony was staggering—an NHS official, pushing policies that erase biological sex, openly admitting she didn’t understand the medical implications of doing so. But the biggest collapse came when Cunningham turned to the utter failure of the investigation (IX) process. If NHS Fife was hoping to maintain the illusion that Peggie had been treated fairly, Davidson destroyed it herself. She admitted that NHS Fife condemned Peggie before she was even identified as being involved. On December 30th, Dr. Beth Upton’s supervisor, Kate Searle, had already “condemned” Peggie’s actions—despite the fact that, at that stage, Upton’s version of events had been the only one heard, and Peggie hadn’t even been spoken to. Under cross-examination, Davidson had to acknowledge that this was premature and entirely one-sided. The process only became more absurd when Cunningham revealed that Davidson had no experience in conducting an investigation, no training, and had only been in her role for three weeks. Yet she was suddenly responsible for leading the inquiry that would decide whether Peggie lost her job. When asked why it fell to her, she couldn’t provide a real answer, other than stating she was the clinical nurse manager. This was not a serious, structured process—it was a rushed, pre-determined exercise in justifying Peggie’s removal. Perhaps the most damning moment came when Cunningham exposed the so-called patient safety allegations—the “missing patient” and “resus” incidents, which had been repeatedly cited as serious concerns. Under questioning, Davidson admitted that no patient had actually been harmed, that these incidents hadn’t been flagged as urgent at the time, and that they were only suddenly treated as major problems after Peggie had objected to Upton in the changing room. If these were genuine safety concerns, why hadn’t they been investigated immediately? Why were they only brought up when NHS Fife needed a reason to suspend Peggie? The answer was obvious: they were looking for something—anything—to justify their actions after the fact. Cunningham then delivered the final blow. If Peggie had truly refused to work with Upton out of prejudice, as was claimed, then it would have been career-ending. She walked Davidson step by step through the consequences—if Peggie had walked out of resus because she couldn’t work with Upton, she would have been struck off and fired. Davidson agreed. But then came the problem—no one had actually investigated whether it was true before she was suspended. NHS Fife simply took Upton’s word for it and punished Peggie accordingly. By the end of the day, Davidson’s credibility was in tatters. She had admitted that she could not define what a woman is, could not justify NHS Fife’s policy, could not explain the medical consequences of ignoring sex, and could not defend the way Peggie had been treated. The tribunal room had become a graveyard for NHS Fife’s credibility, with Cunningham standing over the wreckage, methodically ensuring that every contradiction was exposed and every weak justification dismantled. Tomorrow, Cunningham will finish what she started. If today was anything to go by, Davidson will not last much longer under scrutiny, and the tribunal’s patience with NHS Fife’s evasions is already wearing thin.

@TheEvEngineer @datadev01 Auto trader website says 129k miles based in Yorkshire

@datadev01 What mileage ?

Understated, if anything

so all those v for vendetta type movies weren’t exaggerating about england

@CallumSpooner_ Can you appeal Callum…

Red card this apparently now 🤣

@MrZeroFuel Paying £21440 and having nothing to show for it at the end? Using a compound calculator with £3.5k and investing £299 a month at a rate of 10% will give you £29k cash

Dad is chuffed with his New Year’s Day arrival of the facelift Tesla model 3. He said the ride comfort is even better than the previous model. Admitted that driving without stalks feels weird. Got the 5 year lease deal for £299/mo, £3.5k deposit, 10k mileage/yr and 0% apr.