
Does the @nytimes know what NATO stands for?
Frank at ADK Homeroom
4.4K posts

@AdkHomeroom
My entire life is an unpopular take.

Does the @nytimes know what NATO stands for?



In our cultural memory, 1866-1928 might as well not even exist. Lost decades, despite virtually the entire modern world as we know it conceived and built then.



Anyone who experienced the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion, like I did, is probably a bit hesitant to get too excited about the Artemis II launch today. I truly hope our children don’t have to experience such tragedy. May the Universe welcome them and return them safely home 🙏



Citizenship matters for a person's moral value. Species matters for a creature's moral value.


OK, two most interesting results from Moriond:

Tell me the one person in history who, if they had lived an additional one, five, or even ten years, could have significantly changed the world.

New analysis indicates humanity has exceeded Earth’s long‑term biocapacity, with sustainable population near 2.5B versus 8.3B today, intensifying climate, food, and inequality pressures. doi.org/hbvb6r phys.org/news/2026-03-g…



What's something that experts/practitioners in your field universally agree upon, but that remains a "hot take" among the general public?





🧵on where covid started. Early covid cases in Wuhan were centered on the Huanan market. Is that because the pandemic started there? Or were those cases just found with a biased search?



“The universe is too big, intelligent life can’t get to us (without FTL)” is one of those idiotic truisms perpetuated by endless Carl Sagan and Neil Degrasse Tyson specials. This is a common misconception based on ridiculous statements about Voyager. Voyager is traveling absurdly slow. If we were interested in sending a vehicle to Alpha Centauri inside of 1 human lifetime, entirely using nuclear and chemical reactional propulsion, we could. You can get to .2 or .3c with a large enough fission/fusion/rocket, which are entirely known regimes of physics. It would be a monumental engineering undertaking but not unlike the Hoover Dam or Apollo. We just aren’t that motivated. This is if we were compelled to send frail, living humans. If we sent AI the time problem disappears entirely. John Von Neumann figured this out like literally 100 years ago.

.@VP: "I would bet every dollar that I own that the next time the Democrats have control of the Senate, they will break the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court, and destroy this country. We have to do it NOW in order to save the country."

