
You must learn to be disliked or you will find yourself stuck in a prison of other people's beliefs.
Alan
789 posts

@Alangr6_
Software Developer | Building and Driving innovation

You must learn to be disliked or you will find yourself stuck in a prison of other people's beliefs.


NEW: Michael Saylor says the “end game” of Bitcoin is a digital bank account with an 8-10% yield driving the price to $10 million dollars with a market cap of $200 trillion.





Discreet Log Contracts (DLCs) are often presented as a natural building block for non-custodial Bitcoin-backed lending. We challenge this view. We argue that DLCs are a significantly weaker fit for Bitcoin-backed lending than is commonly assumed. Here's why: ✅Price liquidation is not a fixed-date event ✅Collateral top-up changes the conditions of the loan ✅Oracle infrastructure is not ready ✅Evidence from the industry Stop spreading the view that DLCs are a good fit for Bitcoin-backed lending. Read our full breakdown. Link in the comments.





This is absolutely insane: Venezuela currently has 303 billion barrels of crude oil reserves, which Trump says the US now controls. Oil prices are trading at ~$57/barrel, making Venezuela's total reserves worth $17.3 TRILLION. Even if the US sells this oil for HALF of the market rate, that's still $8.7 TRILLION. In other words, in 12 hours, the US has gained control of oil reserves worth more than the entire GDP of ALL countries in the world, aside from the US and China. That's 4 TIMES larger than the GDP of Japan. Most people do not realize how much the world just changed. Oil markets will react to this news for the first time on Sunday at 6 PM ET. The next few days will be critical.





We did use it in production, in fact our team invented most of the core cryptography and wrote the library for DLCs. Lava’s tech stack has evolved significantly since we first began building. Initially, we leveraged DLCs and atomic swaps and later moved away from pure-play DLCs towards a more hybrid model. We’ve updated our tech stack multiple times to improve security, reduce trust assumptions, and minimize risk. We still leverage some of that initial cryptography in our systems today, but we realized that the technology wasn’t secure enough for what we needed to build. In fact, there are vulnerabilities we discovered in the technology itself. The technology is promising in theory, but our team has spend years working with it in practice and found that it just didn’t offer the security we needed for our users. That wasn’t a compromise we were willing to make. We needed infrastructure that could safeguard trillions in wealth, and that’s what we’ve built.









Two possibilities: 1) China is overconfident, is overplaying its hand, despite having a weak hand overall and a weak economy; 2) the US is overconfident and underestimating/misunderstanding China’s moves as desperate power moves to gain leverage rather long planned tit for tat that only activates upon perceived US provocations. Overall, I find what the FT article portrays to be the US officials’ thinking to be quite comical. China’s govt is much more top down and centralized. The idea that finance and commerce depts would fight and one would step in front of the other sounds much more like the US rather than China, a constitutional and cultural difference I had discussed over the weekend. In China, no such serious policies are released without approval at the highest leadership levels. In the US however serious policies can be drafted 20/30 year old genius staffers or, many of whom hang out on this platform. Policies are often not fully coordinated across depts and agencies, which represent different centers of power and ideological spectrum or hawkish/dovishness. I can see a scenario in which one is used to such ways of operating in the US also projects such imagery onto China, which doesn’t operate this way at all.

