Alex Marconi

@guganoid @jpscleite Mate imagine the glory of max alonso Charles rolling into lemans in the 499p ferrari.

@jpscleite Pode ser que o Max consiga trazer mais alguns pilotos de F1 para estas andanças.

Obrigado Max por seres simplesmente um piloto de corridas, o melhor da tua geração, um dos melhores de sempre, quiçá só atrás de Clark (ainda vais a tempo desse trono) Mas fico sempre com a pergunta quando vejo este circuito Could he have done it in a van?

@Goatciello N24 changed the date this year to slot into the gap between miami and Canada because max wanted to do it... last year it was after lemans. Which this year clashes with f1. I wouldn't rule them out waiting on the f1 calendar again to release next year's date

This could very well be maxs last attempt at the race for a few years cause you can be sure Dominecalli and his gnomes will make sure there will be a clash between f1 and this race just so it doesnt take any attention away from f1 again Cause this has been a pr disaster for F1

@aoshiroyama Their immediate response is just 'he was pushing too hard and the others would have been faster if they also pushed' Max is generationally exceptional on par with any other driver in history

Так и хочется у каждого, кто говорил, что он не сможет конкурировать с опытными пилотами, спросить че как дела

Ладно, обдумав всю ситуацию на Нюрбургринге, пришла к выводу, что даже несмотря на поломку машины, Макс показал просто запредельный уровень, привозить отрыв +20-30 секунд со своего стинта буквально каждый раз, как только он садился в машину - это легендарно.

@carwheelinghonk Its incredibly bad luck for max and I understand his fans being incredibly disappointed. However the number of people putting 100% of the blame of this on Max is wild. Then celebrating the fact that his car failed and he didnt win.

these max fans are not built for endurance racing omg. they think a mechanical issue in a 24h race is some uniquely harrowing experience or grave injustice😭😭😭

@Doverweather @Verstappenn_ Im not saying you didnt want to see him succeed. But the chat when the 3 car entered the pits was disgusting. The number of vile people cheering and celebrating a mechanical issue because max was winning was shocking.

@Verstappenn_ Im not a max hater I'm gutted that his race was ended by mechanical failure but that's motorsport the theory everyone hates max is bull Most motorsport fans would have loved to see him do well hence why is was popular to be broadcast on different platforms Id take that as a win

Spastics like this are fucking hilarious. Not only has max won at the Nurburgring before and now gone toe to toe with the best GT3 drivers and was winning by 40 secs….Then the Winward racing ceo said the DNF was nothing to do with the drivers it was just a mechanical failure. Max haters make their own little stories up in their tiny brains

@JayQ2k @HugoLop83 @Verstappenn_ No dani jancadella was driving when the car failure happened

@HugoLop83 @Verstappenn_ Not diminishing, but still retarded. Anyway...was Verstappen in the car when the mechanical DNF happened, you ass-clown? With your careful...

I want Max to retire from F1, he’s already proven he’s the greatest do ever do it. He doesn’t need to chase records when he owns most of them. I’d much rather watch him in endurance racing because regardless of the DNF this is the best racing weekend I’ve ever experienced.

@rayontrack The only right answer is where does he go. Right now Mercedes has the best car. Kimi is locked in and George will only be replaced by max. Mclaren has the dominate merc engine. But they wont replace lando or oscar with him. Rbr? ferrari are better. So where should he go?

serious question: how many of you think leclerc needs to leave ferrari to win his first ever title? 👀

@FouEnPhase @ibiscuus_ @PerezNicolasLol Anyone that is not a gm has approximately 0% chance to beat magnus in a game of classical chess. The only way its above 0 is that he might get so bored playing you he forgets the game is on and times out.

@ibiscuus_ @PerezNicolasLol C'est pas du tout le plus atteignable, et les titres de champion d'un sport individuel n'ont rien de comparable avec un sport co. Selon le format, le plus atteignable c'est Magnus, c'est le plus haut taux de probabilité vu la nature des échecs

Ok l'embrouille du soir sur discord. C'est plus facile de : 1) Gagner un 1v1 au basket contre Victor Wembanyama 2) Gagner un tour de F1 vs Hamilton 3) Gagner une game d'echec vs Magnus Carlsen 4) Gagner un round vs Jon Jones en MMA Je veux des arguments

@Cuse714 @Jackal21O @Jacobtheclipper You dont get paid if your suspended a game. But they sure as hell care about missing games. Imagine sga this year. He misses every other game to keep flopping or he pulls his head in and plays properly?

@Jackal21O @Alex_Coni_ @Jacobtheclipper No they wouldn’t. The only way for these guys to stop flopping is fining them. All they care about it is money, start taking that away and you’ll see a lot less flopping

Can’t the NBA go back and review plays and punish players for this? Jaylin Williams got rewarded a 4 point play for being a great actor. LaRavia does NOT touch him at all! Nasty hoops man 🤢

@Jackal21O @Jacobtheclipper You want it rules out completely put all the punishment on the player. If you flop and your found to have done it in post game analysis, You miss a game. It stops immediately. No player is risking a game off for 2 ft.

@Alex_Coni_ @Jacobtheclipper The refs are allowing it, these players would stop immediately if refs called them for the flops.

@Jackal21O @Jacobtheclipper Nah not the refs. You flop like this the players gets a 1 match suspension.

@Jacobtheclipper To fix the problem they need to be reviewed and refs fined, trust me this shit will end tomorrow.

@DominicDavid22 @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL Its fundamentally not tho. He fumbled the pick up. He did not have possession of the ball due to the fumble. When he gathered the ball and claimed possession he was immediately tackled. You say he had prior somehow. But he didnt therefore play on is right call.

@Alex_Coni_ @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL It’s fundamentally prior. Purely because prior is an opportunity to dispose of the ball and he had that, had he not turned into Watson he gets rid of it, and he had time before that but no options teammate wise.

🤔WIZARD TACKLE🤔 Honest discussion, legends Not a fan of either so no bias-Frampton tackled late, clearly whilst holding the ball, loses it & play on Feels like that’s paid 9 times out of 10. Rule change or am I missing something? @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell #aflsc360 @AFL

@DominicDavid22 @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL The joy and frustration of football. But it was close enough that the umpires didnt see prior opportunity after he fumbled. I thought it was clear no prior. You think different. Umpires sided with me this time. Many times its not the case.

@Alex_Coni_ @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL You see it when players are over the footy that’s why holds aren’t paid as much. Right or wrong. He had control of it and even after the fumble he still had prior and turned into the tackle. It was quickly after but he turned into the tackle so that’s apart of it.

@DominicDavid22 @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL Fumbling is not taking control or possession. By Fumbling he no longer has prior opportunity. By the time he takes possession of the ball Watson tackles him almost immediately after. Therefore only genuinely attempting to dispose of the ball (attempting to handball) is required

@Alex_Coni_ @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL Let me explain why: - fumble but still has control - possession gathered - prior opportunity - turns into Watson tackle - tackled legally - incorrect disposal Should be HTB. Made even worse by the fact that a 50 is paid not long after leading to a goal the other way.

@DominicDavid22 @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL Imo you mistake what constitutes prior opportunity but that's the subjectivity of the rule. The umpire thought he didnt have prior opportunity after the fumble therefore its correct decision.

@Alex_Coni_ @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL He did fumble it and still had prior. He made a genuine attempt but it was incorrect disposal after having prior. It’s ball every day of the week.

@DominicDavid22 @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL ..... the only thing that happened from that list is he fumbled it. He genuinely attempted to dispose of the ball after he was tackled which is what he was required to do when your tackled without prior opportunity. Play on was the correct call.

@Alex_Coni_ @AFLSC360 @FOXFOOTY @tim_michell @AFL He threw it & he had prior. He fumbled it and still turned around into the tackler.

@peteguley @hasumpstuffedup Umpires didnt cost pies the win. Dropped marks in hawks forward 50 killed us. Umpires didnt cost hawks the win. 13 behinds host them. It was a fairly good game.

Really pleased to see a close game and yet hardly anyone is blaming umps on social media. Personally I thought the umps were as good as we can expect. @hasumpstuffedup #AFLPiesHawks

@MattWalshMedia @hasumpstuffedup Ok. But not having possession of the ball (fumbling) prevents you from having prior opportunity to dispose of the ball. Why should not having the ball count as prior opportunity?

@hasumpstuffedup I hate that making an error (bobbling the ball) doesn't count to prior.

This is a correct decision. No prior. As the second angle shows. Frampton bobbles it initially; he does not have a clear prior opportunity after he gets clear possession. Fantastic tackle by Watson, but it is not HTB. Good piece of umpiring #AFLPiesHawks #AFL

@McLarenF1 @JensonButton Montreal 2011? The greatest comeback win of all time? One of the best races I have ever seen.

Our Greatest Grand Prix is.... #McLarenF1