704mcgee

5.9K posts

704mcgee banner
704mcgee

704mcgee

@Anyone8utBiden

Joey Diaz Loyalist // Neo-Noir Enjoyer // Chud

Katılım Mayıs 2023
471 Takip Edilen148 Takipçiler
704mcgee
704mcgee@Anyone8utBiden·
@VERYKOOLLUKEY Nah, trust me. You don’t want the genetic risk of having a child with a woman who’s starved herself of vital nutrients for years.
English
1
0
1
152
704mcgee
704mcgee@Anyone8utBiden·
@AngloChud2001 I proudly worked 35-10,000 hours every week. Depending on the week. True story
English
0
0
1
75
Anglo Chud
Anglo Chud@AngloChud2001·
Boomers will look you straight into your eye sockets and tell you they worked 100 hours a week
Bluewater Karma@bluewaterkarma

@m1ndhunter_x @JeffBezos Yup, proudly worked 40-100 hours a week from age 16 to 54. You're welcome! And, now, I am rewarded for saving some of that overtime to live off now.

English
109
496
19.8K
682.6K
704mcgee
704mcgee@Anyone8utBiden·
@HardPass4 @growing_daniel He’s been pretty honest that the lawsuits drained his bank accounts and he was denied his pension for being a whistleblower. Sure, more nefarious things might be going on - but I believe him when he says: I just need money.
English
0
0
3
87
Paul Brown
Paul Brown@0xQuasark·
In case you didn't know: You can use a $1 bill as a scale. It weighs exactly 1.0 gram.
Paul Brown tweet media
English
49
121
4.3K
290K
𝕭𝖎𝖗𝖉𝖞 𝖛𝖘 𝕭𝖆𝖇𝖞𝖑𝖔𝖓
The Bible is very clear about witchcraft and sorcery. Do not touch it. Transcendental meditation, tarot, oracle cards, breath work, yoga, crystals, runes, pendulums, psychic readings, manifesting. Do not play with dark forces. Do not invite them in. Trust in God alone.
English
275
197
1.7K
71K
Dillon Lawrence
Dillon Lawrence@DillonLawrence2·
@Anyone8utBiden @fleshsimulator @grok Yep, that's the point that I was drawing between the two incidents. And not trying to minimize the killing in the UK or anything. I just want all these people back in their hellholes and I don't want them coming back.
English
1
0
1
17
Dillon Lawrence
Dillon Lawrence@DillonLawrence2·
@Anyone8utBiden @fleshsimulator @grok Again, you're missing the point. She's a Sikh, she's running cover for Sikhs as they use 18 Wheelers to plow into entire families of people, not just one guy. If news orgs were covering this story here, we would be having a conversation about our own problems with Sikhs.
English
1
0
1
23
704mcgee
704mcgee@Anyone8utBiden·
@DillonLawrence2 @fleshsimulator @grok I’m not at all a fan of pajeet dillon, but she has nothing to do with the miscarriage of justice that occurred in the UK. Nor would she be expected to make a statement
English
1
0
1
30
Dillon Lawrence
Dillon Lawrence@DillonLawrence2·
@fleshsimulator @grok Who is the assistant attorney general for the civil rights division in the US? What is her religious affiliation?
English
2
0
0
622
704mcgee retweetledi
Kitler
Kitler@Kitler512·
“Cheap starter homes” that the boomer generation grew up in are now almost exclusively in black neighborhoods where the murder rate is 5x the national average.
English
52
222
3.3K
25.1K
704mcgee retweetledi
doomer
doomer@uncledoomer·
baby boomers before they tell you that you can get rich packing a $2 sandwich for lunch:
English
510
570
8.4K
833.8K
Dean Turner
Dean Turner@DeanTTraining·
McDonald's patties in the US are made from 100% USDA-inspected beef with no fillers, additives, or preservatives They are grilled on a flat-top griddle with no added oil, butter, or fat 5 patties x $2 a piece = $10 The best lunch ever? No A viable option if out & about? YUP
Brian Wiley@BrianWiley_

Who says you cant get full on $10?

English
211
22
1.3K
3.2M
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'
Breaking news on Dalton's Case! Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown: • No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone. • Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful. • "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it. • "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal. • "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal. • "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator. • "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually. • Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings. • Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless. • Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one. • Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony. • Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

English
250
747
5.8K
466.2K
704mcgee retweetledi
Lo-Ping
Lo-Ping@GamingAndPandas·
"If u just eat bread & water for 3 years you'll have the down payment on a house from 3 years ago. But unfortunately it's increased in those 3 years, so you're going to have to do another 3 years of bread & water I'm afraid." *3 yrs later* "Bro you'll never guess what happened"
English
75
1.8K
20.4K
119.5K
704mcgee retweetledi
𝐂𝐍
𝐂𝐍@catnoodles99·
@BorjomiDrinker Been getting phenomenal mileage out of this graphic lately.
𝐂𝐍 tweet media
English
3
19
536
6.7K
704mcgee
704mcgee@Anyone8utBiden·
@NielsHoven Too… much… biohacking…. Make it stop
English
0
0
0
192
Niels Hoven 🐮
Niels Hoven 🐮@NielsHoven·
I never considered dodging illness by microdosing inactivated viruses from my kids This is awesome
Niels Hoven 🐮 tweet media
English
19
25
661
56.1K
jack
jack@jak_gotit·
@Akademiks Aligning yourself with a president sitting at a 32% approval rating is definitely… a decision.
English
13
0
567
12.2K
DJ Akademiks
DJ Akademiks@Akademiks·
Shut yo bitch ass up… talking bout a rapper need to “denounce” free promo from the f*cking White House. I’m so glad niggas like u is outta here. Ain’t no denouncing f*ck nigga .. take dat woke shit back to the f*cking dot era! It’s iceman szn 🧊 🧊 🧊
Jeremy Hecht@Jeremy_Hecht

the white house has now made 2 promos using Drake's album (which he hasn't denounced yet) but they thought we were crazy for saying "iceman" is a tone-deaf album title in this climate

English
1.8K
1.9K
19.7K
3.4M