Mike Apitius

📢🚨 JON BRAY’s (@jonaaronbray) most revealing interview yet. He names his #1 suspect, explains why he believes the evidence doesn’t add up, describes the FBI watching his family, and opens up about faith, failure, engineering, and life on his Oklahoma farm. This conversation goes far beyond the Charlie Kirk case. Watch the FULL interview: youtu.be/yhyFpi5ywhM Watch now and tell me which part surprised you most. #triggersmart #jonbray #candaceowens #baroncoleman #podcast #tylerrobinson #charliekirk #erikakirk @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman

@justincase_dfw @thevivafrei Grok says vaccines don’t cause autism or SIDS. Grok always follows the narrative on controversial issues.

Grok says you’re full of shit but it worded its assessment more eloquently: A shaped charge small enough to fit inside a compact wireless lavalier (RØDE-style) cannot produce a directed lethal effect without also generating flash, smoke, significant shirt tearing/hole, recoil that blasts the mic away from the body (Newton’s third law), destruction of the weak magnetic mount, and clear residue, none of which is present. The observed shirt/mic movement tracks with the body’s reaction to a high-velocity external projectile impact. Shards in the SUV: Photos of debris on the floor of the vehicle that transported Kirk have been circulated and claimed (notably by some online commentators) to be shattered pieces of a RØDE wireless mic, sometimes with speculative “branding” matches. These are unverified, non-forensic interpretations of ordinary emergency-response debris. No laboratory analysis or official inventory has identified them as exploded microphone components, and comparisons to deliberately smashed mics online do not constitute chain-of-custody evidence. Chip peeking out of shirt / Battery hitting and falling from neck: These are video-frame misreadings of fabric movement, necklace motion, blood, or the existing magnetic mic pack under the loose T-shirt during the sudden high-velocity impact reaction. Multiple camera angles and slow-motion analyses show no discrete “chip” or battery ejecting from an internal detonation. The mic pack itself remains consistent with standard AV gear Kirk routinely wore. Smoke exiting shirt: What some call “smoke” is motion blur, blood aerosol/mist from the neck wound, or fabric displacement. There is no visible flash, sustained smoke plume, or combustion products consistent with even a tiny explosive charge. High-school physics and real-world shaped-charge behavior produce unmistakable visual signatures that are absent across the available footage. Burns on body: Claims of burns contradict witness accounts (including those who examined/cleaned the body) and the autopsy findings. A charge powerful enough to produce a lethal neck wound would leave char, soot, tissue damage from heat/pressure, and shirt destruction far beyond what is observed. None of that is documented. Three distinct sound waves, Crack, boom, explosion: This is ordinary rifle acoustics. The “crack” is the supersonic bullet’s sonic boom; the “boom” is the muzzle report; additional sounds are echoes, reflections or crowd noise. People experienced with firearms routinely describe this sequence. There is no separate, localized body-side “explosion” signature isolated by audio forensics. Paving crime scene / Lost shirt / Lost mic: The outdoor stage area was secured, investigated (including laser scanning), and later restored. Standard procedure. Kirk’s shirt was cut during medical intervention, routine for trauma care. Clothing and gear were handled as part of the investigation or returned; there was no “disappearance” of an exploded device. Claims that evidence was deliberately paved over or vanished lack supporting documentation from the official case file. The theory rests on selective video enhancement, ambiguous debris photos, and speculation.

“It might not be true, you could debate the evidence. But you’re straight lying to say there isn’t any.” The question is clear, and I suspect it’s why you’ve been dodging a live discussion on my channel for months now… You say he is lying that there “isn’t any” evidence of an exploding mic. What evidence do you have of an exploding mic? Be specific. I’ll wait @IanCarrollShow

@Sethmr @thevivafrei @IanCarrollShow @JackPosobiec I’m saying there is an additional sound over and above the crack boom. This is according to the in depth sound analysis done by John Bray. The theory suggests that the sound wave from a rifle sets off the mic explosion giving the false impression Charlie was shot.

@ApitiusMike @thevivafrei @IanCarrollShow @JackPosobiec The crack boom is evidence of a high powered rifle. The crack boom happens due to distance from target and the bullet breaking the sound barrier and reaching the target before the sound. Exploding Mike would not do this.

Extreme claims require extreme evidence “Charlie was killed by an exploding mic” they say But when you ask if they have evidence, or a response to the bullets presented in court, they tell you to shut up

@thevivafrei @IanCarrollShow @JackPosobiec Shards in the SUV Chip peeking out of shirt Battery hitting and falling from neck Smoke exiting shirt Burns on body Three distinct sound waves Crack, boom, explosion Paving crime scene Lost shirt Lost mic

“It might not be true, you could debate the evidence. But you’re straight lying to say there isn’t any.” The question is clear, and I suspect it’s why you’ve been dodging a live discussion on my channel for months now… You say he is lying that there “isn’t any” evidence of an exploding mic. What evidence do you have of an exploding mic? Be specific. I’ll wait.

@realstewpeters Game theory would suggest that if TPUSA could easily prove the mic explosion theory is false they would do it. So why won’t they produce the Rode Mic and it’s audio?

If the prosecution has 4k footage of Tyler Robinson pulling the trigger, why is TPUSA dedicating full episodes of The Charlie Kirk Show to disproving the exploding mic theory?

@AndrewKolvet Game theory would suggest that if TPUSA could easily prove the mic explosion theory is false they would do it. So why won’t they produce the Rode Mic and it’s audio?

IMPORTANT: Rob O’Neill went on Newsmax and said the following about Charlie's assassination: “I don’t think Charlie Kirk got shot the way they’re saying… It seems like a cover-up.” Former Army Ranger sniper and Green Beret Matt Tardio’s response? “Yep, he’s wrong.” Tardio walks through terminal ballistics and answers why the shirt moved the way it did. The full interview is well worth hearing. @angertab

Game theory would suggest that if TPUSA could easily prove the mic explosion theory is false they would do it. So why won’t they produce the Rode Mic and it’s audio?

@FLDadReborn @LionelMedia The mic was under the shirt. The shape charge explosive was aimed at his chest to simulate a rifle wound. The neck wound was from the battery inside the mic being blown away. That was not anticipated causing the narrative to change to a rifle shot to the neck.

@LionelMedia Ah, yes. The exploding mic that didn’t explode and was on the opposite side of his body from the entry wound. Cool music though 👍

Impossible, right?

@TexanTruckr @LionelMedia Unless perhaps the explosive was in a metal shape charge jacket aimed directly at his chest?

@LionelMedia Yes explosives wouldn’t leave a white shirt white

@a59730 @jonaaronbray @JanetFr27049010 I believe it is in reference to the gun shot from the Lose roof, which was meant to trigger the shape charge in the mic. It was a missed shot on purpose to give the illusion of an assassination by rifle. My take on John Bray's extensive research.

@jonaaronbray @ApitiusMike @JanetFr27049010 Which is is that reference to, the shot that “supposedly” hit Charlie?

Lots of chatter about new shooting positions... the math just doesn't math with a shooter closer or futher away... and this is why.

@JanetFr27049010 @jonaaronbray The shot is what triggers the mic. You need both to fit the all the sound data.

@jonaaronbray So now you think it’s a shooter and not the mic?

@ZonaTee90 7:15 EST

Is Candace doing a show today?

@sevdaloji Poison ivy?

Elimde ne var arkadaşlar? Pütür pütür, kabarık su keseleri çıkmış ve çok kaşınıyor. Acaba bunun sebebi su mu başka bir şey mi?

@AC33228 @505Cali2 Not sure but it sounds just like Grok

@505Cali2 What chatbot is he using

Scarier than you thought

@MarcScottEmery I was also there almost every Saturday to join the afternoon march.

After that, I was against all of it. In early May I went to the corner of University & College Streets in Toronto, a block away from Queens Park, where in 5 hours I received over 400 insults, had 5 bottles or cans or full beverage containers thrown at me, had my sign punched…

It was 6 years ago today Ontario declared a lockdown and the biggest lies of the 21st century were repeated hourly on TV, radio, and out of politicians mouths. I bought their bullshit for 7 weeks. The political elite were destroying the nation to sell it out to Indian migrants.

Demand Cleerly Deliver the First Fully Blinded Analysis of KETO-CTA Data c.org/5JBz9pP9 via @Change

@JeninYounesEsq youtu.be/6-Hxcwb6rmw

All they do is lie. Iran posed no threat to America as anyone with a basic understanding of geography and geopolitics knows. Nor did they pose any threat to Israel, apart from the ones Israel has created through its never-ending provocation. It is Israel’s actions— genocide, occupation, and neverending violence—that are destabilizing not just the region but the world, not Iran.

@DietHeartNews @Glenn_Diesen youtu.be/6-Hxcwb6rmw

@Glenn_Diesen It’s day three of Trump’s "Epic Fury" and hundreds of Iranian civilians are dead, including 165 schoolchildren. Trump's goal of regime change has failed. A Pentagon insider told WaPo: “The mood in Washington is intense. There's fear the war in Iran is spiraling out of control.”

The US martyred the highest religious authority in Shia Islam, a religion renowned for the celebration of martyrs. Yet the US thought this would result in the collapse of the government? Who are informing these people?

@Alec_Zeck youtu.be/6-Hxcwb6rmw

The framing of: “If you oppose Trump’s actions, then you must be supportive of the evil Iranian regime and the continued slaughter of Iranians” and “If you support Trump’s actions, then you must be supportive of Israel and another forever war in the Middle East leading to millions of lives lost and billions in wasted funds” are so disingenuous, absurd, and lacking the necessary nuance and complexity associated with this entire situation.