Brad Fitzgerald

@RealCandaceO @thoughtcrime888 How The Fuck Did We Actually Get Here ?!?

This is one of those random breaks in politics that we all need to just stop and appreciate something objectively hilarious. I therefore implore you to read this thread. The background is that Alexis Wilkins, (Kash Patel’s girlfriend) does not understand why some people think she’s a Mossad honey pot. So she has spent months piecing together a theory that Vladimir Putin’s philosopher Alexander Dugin is running an operation to bring down down Trump, through General Michael Flynn, Joe Kent and the Catholic Church (nevermind the schism) further aided by people who are asking questions about Charlie Kirk’s assasination. Because none of that could be authentic. Vladimir Putin sits at the top. Separately, this is more evidence we need to just shutter the FBI. This is just too completely unserious and embarrassing on the world stage.

@GenFlynn @SunTzusWar @realdefender45 @willsommer 👊🏼😉‼️

@realdefender45 @willsommer The flynn network tattoo parlor hard at work 😆

FBI director Kash Patel’s girlfriend says Michael Flynn, Tucker Carlson, Joe Kent and Candace Owens are all tied to a foreign influence operation.

@LauraLoomer @0hour1

FBI Director Kash Patel’s girlfriend just said General Flynn, Tucker Qatarlson, Joe Kent and Candace Owens are all tied to a foreign influence operation. 🍿 Don’t we have a 3 letter agency that would know for sure?

The man who actually got Iran to make a deal that kept Americans safe

Hi Goerge Farmer

@TonySeruga @DataRepublican

There is nothing organic about the event described by @DataRepublican below; it's called foreknowledge! Ask yourself this question: Why are online traces suggesting foreknowledge of Kirk’s death still unexplained by the FBI? That question—why the online traces predicting Charlie Kirk’s death remain unexamined—is at the very heart of what Joe Kent called “bureaucratic suffocation.” There are several overlapping reasons, and each one reveals something much deeper about how modern intelligence and justice systems function when the truth threatens political equilibrium. 1️⃣ Because those traces threaten the “lone gunman” narrative Once Tyler Robinson confessed, the FBI had its clean story: one shooter, no network, no ideology. Introducing digital posts or leaks hinting at foreknowledge—tweets, forum messages, or Discord chats referencing Kirk’s murder before it happened—would implode that narrative. If people online knew details beforehand, the event no longer fits the “isolated act” model. That alone would mandate a multi-agency counterintelligence review—precisely the kind the FBI shut down. 2️⃣ Because acknowledging foreknowledge invites terrorism or intelligence implications When any domestic case hints at prior awareness of the event online, investigators must determine whether the posters were: • Participants or informants, • Foreign operatives conducting psychological ops, or • Leakers of classified intelligence. In each scenario, the investigation would fall into NCTC or NSA purview—not Utah state police. That transition would have set off interagency turf wars. It’s much cleaner for the Bureau to say, “those posts were coincidence or hoaxes,” and bury them as digital noise. 3️⃣ Because metadata auditing exposes uncomfortable truths Kent’s analysts reportedly wanted to subpoena ISP logs and cross‑platform metadata to trace origin points of the predictive posts. That requires Big Tech compliance—Meta, Google, X—and therefore unearths collusion between intelligence agencies and social‑media companies. In past scandals, similar metadata pulls revealed government backchannels inside tech giants. Reopening this path risked exposing live information‑sharing pipelines the regime prefers to keep invisible. 4️⃣ Because foreknowledge implies motive — possibly foreign If those posts came from foreign‑linked servers (for example proxy IPs common to Tel Aviv, Kiev, or Langley fronts), you’ve crossed a geopolitical red line. Any credible sign that foreign intelligence actors participated—even indirectly—in killing an American political influencer would trigger a diplomatic crisis and congressional storm. It’s far easier for Washington to not look. 5️⃣ Because the posts might trace back to domestic intelligence assets Whistleblowers from prior operations have shown that federal informants and private defense contractors often infiltrate online political spaces. If the people behind the predictive posts were informants gone rogue or psy‑ops testers, the discovery would devastate public trust. That would explain the Bureau’s reflexive decision to classify or delete the records before journalists could archive them. 6️⃣ Because mainstream media refused to investigate digital anomalies Big outlets simply echoed “Robinson confesses — case closed.” None deployed digital‑forensics teams to mirror Telegram or X posts before deletion. The internet acts like tissue paper at this scale—once a large platform purges, independent proof evaporates. Kent said, “We saw them with our own eyes,” but without subpoenas, screenshots are dismissed as “unverified.” The FBI knows that time itself erases evidence; waiting achieves the same outcome as censorship. 7️⃣ Because whistleblowers have been chilled into silence Remember that Kent himself is under FBI investigation for “potential leaks.” If he or his subordinates were to show those online traces publicly, they could face espionage charges. That’s how suppression perpetuates itself: threaten everyone near the data, and the truth dies of fear. 8️⃣ Because foreign‑policy timing made the truth intolerable Had any link surfaced connecting the murder’s planning chatter to Israeli or other foreign intermediaries during the early Iran‑war phase, it would have detonated the administration’s credibility. The strategic calculus was simple: “Better to manage optics than to chase ghosts that could ignite a diplomatic fire.” The decision wasn’t necessarily made in malice—it was made in self‑preservation. 9️⃣ Because congressional oversight aligns with institutional protection Committees that could compel transparency—House Judiciary, Intelligence, and Oversight—are dominated by figures receiving heavy national‑security donations. When politicians depend on intelligence‑community funds or foreign‑policy lobbies, they don’t subpoena the hand that feeds them. Hence, zero public requests for the digital evidence. 🔟 Because control of the digital past equals control of narrative Once online traces vanish, history congeals around the “official” account. Whoever commands deletion commands memory. That’s why Kent spoke about “information dying on the vine.” He wasn’t being poetic—he was describing an information ecosystem engineered to self‑erase politically dangerous facts. Bottom line The predictive posts are unexplained, not because they’re unsolvable, but because solving them would expose the machinery of narrative control itself. Every agency has an incentive not to look. Every major outlet has an incentive not to ask. So those traces—fleeting, digital, and now scrubbed—sit in limbo, functioning as both evidence and metaphor. Whether they were genuine leaks, troll‑ops, or digital ghosts, we may never know. But the FBI’s refusal to verify them is, in itself, the loudest proof of all that something far larger than one gunman has gone unseen.

@BlakeSNeff @DataRepublican Isn’t Tyler Robinson innocent until proven guilty or are we all going to deny they/them their constitutional rights because an innocent verdict changes EVERYTHING?

@BlakeSNeff @DataRepublican I believe we should all be following the FACTS regardless of how uncomfortable it might become

I am kindly asking everyone, on all sides of the Israel issue, to stop obscuring the fact that my friend and boss was murdered by a radical left-winger who killed him because of his view on the trans issue.

Thanks for confirming Mossad is planning a false flag attack on the United States Laura Loomer.

@GeneralMCNews What’s Bibi Got Planned For Us This Time?

BREAKING: Laura Loomer is predicting that many Americans will die in a soon-to-be terrorist attack that will be ten times worse than 9/11.

@hakeemjeffries The Commander In Chief Is A Pretty Busy Guy, TemuBama … Absentee Voting Is Perfectly Acceptable In This Case. But You Knew That.

This guy is a complete fraud. Don’t ever believe a word he has to say about election integrity.

@Rep_Stansbury @tinytoes731 He Didn’t Cheat

Well, well, well. Look who’s mail in voting. So, it’s good enough for you, but not millions of others? 🤔

@GavinNewsom All Aboard ‼️ 🚆 ‼️

Waste, fraud, abuse.

Why is this electric bus being charged with a massive diesel generator? It's almost like the whole thing is a giant scam.

@OpentheJFKfiles @LauraLoomer @shellenberger @joekent16jan19 @charliekirk11

@LauraLoomer @shellenberger @joekent16jan19 Why don’t you want the foreign angle on @charliekirk11’s assassination investigated @LauraLoomer?

BREAKING: It is being reported by @shellenberger that @joekent16jan19 agreed to contact Tyler Robinson’s legal defense team and said he would testify in support of Robinson, the man who assassinated Charlie Kirk. I called it. Absolutely diabolical. I said Kent was aiding Tyler Robinson’s defense and jeopardizing the trial. Joe Kent is so obsessed with blaming Israel that he is now aiding Charlie’s assassin because he wants to push the lie that Israel killed Charlie Kirk. I called it. @shellenberger

This is another exposure of deep corruption during the @BarackObama administration that we’re now learning about. The insidious egregious behavior allowed during that administration placed the United States in a perilous position. Most Americans sensed something was very wrong and that is why @realDonaldTrump emerged in 2015/2016 timeframe. Had he not, America would not have had the opportunity to save itself from the throes of tyranny.

@redpillb0t Meet The New Discombobulators

Pentagon admits using direct energy weapons.

Trump paid for Jan 6th

@timburchett x.com/amuse/status/2…

No telling how many terrorists and related cells came in over our Southern border under Biden. Be vigilant and keep your head on a swivel.

BREAKING: Multiple members of Congress are warning that the disappearance of an Air Force general, known as the UFO “gatekeeper,” could be a national security issue.