Brett

13.4K posts

Brett banner
Brett

Brett

@BYU_SFGiantsFan

Katılım Ekim 2011
428 Takip Edilen124 Takipçiler
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@JohnMccholl @wsucougs2000 @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ What is interesting is a ball can theoretically be foul all the way down the line, hit the base while still technically being “foul” but because it hit the base, it is now fair. Interesting. Probably easier for umps to adjudicate this way
English
1
0
0
20
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@JohnMccholl @wsucougs2000 @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ Being over the line is fair ground We are arguing over the particulars of the wording but the ball settling/being touched while being over, but not on, the has precedent The video is good & goes through it Really, the evidence that is the rule is it’s how it’s consistently called
English
1
0
1
26
John
John@JohnMccholl·
@BYU_SFGiantsFan @wsucougs2000 @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ It says settles “on fair ground”, not “on or over fair ground”. If anything that supports my interpretation. At the very least it is ambiguous. The string experiment, while helpful to determine if the ball is over fair territory, doesn’t tell us if that’s what the rule requires.
English
1
0
0
13
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@JohnMccholl @wsucougs2000 @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ Ok. Fair. But the ball is also still fair. Because it “settles” between home and 3rd. If you laid a string between the corner of the bag and the corner of home plate straight down the edge of the line and lifted it up, it would hit the ball.
English
1
0
0
17
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@CherryEngineer @RockyBinkowski @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ “Fair fly” so bottom doesn’t apply 1st paragraph matters for any situation between home & 3rd where the any part of the ball settles, is touched or is bounding over fair territory The ball stopped & based on the umps angle Id trust him to dertermine if the ball was over the line
English
1
0
0
25
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@DJKeenstar @brockseeman @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ That zoomed view with no reference to point to the line are like the best point I can make about how angles can distort the perception via parallax. Look at a different view where you can see his feet and the line and tell me he “doesn’t even have the correct angle”
Brett tweet media
English
0
0
0
19
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@MeBleedGreen @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ The only angle that matters was the one the ump has. You can only properly see if the curve of the ball is over the line from a straight on view. Any angles will parallax and appear to show a gap
English
1
0
1
43
John
John@JohnMccholl·
@wsucougs2000 @ScoringChanges @CloseCallSports @Jomboy_ Why is it obvious that a ball between 1st/3rd and the pole must touch fair territory, but not a ball that is between 1st/3rd and home? As I read the rule it does not clearly specify that the quoted statement only applies to the former scenario, but I could be wrong on that.
English
4
0
0
391
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@L0m3z This is also why you rarely see lefties in compilations of great OF assists. If you are a lefty and can throw like that, you are a pitcher. Oh and that one left handed outfielder guy you are thinking of that has a bunch of crazy throw highlights? He was a pitcher first
English
0
0
0
35
Lomez
Lomez@L0m3z·
This is a fun question to think about. My back of the envelope explanation is that because lefty catchers have to throw across their bodies to get to the runner’s side of 2b on a steal and because their throw will naturally tail away from the runner, they lose something like .1s v a righty catcher’s throw, all else being equal. If a righty catcher is throwing ~85mph on his throws to 2b, a lefty needs to throw ~95mph to make up for that lost time. But if you’re a lefty catcher who can throw 95, guess what? You’re not a catcher. You’re a pitcher.
Steve Sailer@Steve_Sailer

There hasn't been a left-handed catcher in MLB since the 1980s, but nobody can agree on the definitive reason why not. It sounds to me like it could be discrimination driven by prejudice. But the SPLC et al don't fundraise against the rising tide of handism, so nobody cares.

English
85
29
1.8K
146.9K
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@geoffjBYU The players would have jumped at this 15 years ago But now? Why change anything? The free market is benefiting them the most Total freedom of movement & bargaining power The NCAA has too many members w/ different priorities & boosters to be an effective cartel to hold prices down
English
1
0
1
24
Geoff Johnston
Geoff Johnston@geoffjBYU·
“Salary” being the key word here. If the NCAA wants caps, they must make the athletes employees. Unions and collective bargaining would follow. But the NCAA and schools don’t want that.
Scott Van Pelt@notthefakeSVP

@SethDavisHoops Unlimited free agency and zero salary cap is a great plan? What professional sport operates this way?

English
1
0
2
530
Brett
Brett@BYU_SFGiantsFan·
@CriddleBenjamin I don’t really care about spring games but it’s kinda embarrassing you had to have AI generate a picture of LES for you
English
0
0
0
32
Ben Criddle
Ben Criddle@CriddleBenjamin·
QOTD: If BYU held an annual spring game and combined it with the alumni game, how many people do you think would show up on average? What would you pay for a ticket? (concessions will be open) Top-tier programs (ceiling) Ohio State: ~80,000 Alabama: ~72,000 Penn State: ~67,000 Nebraska: ~60,000 Georgia: ~55,000 Typical / Average Range SEC Most schools fall in the 20K–50K range Lower-tier or less hype: 15K–30K Mid-tier solid programs: 30K–45K Occasional spikes: 50K+ Big Ten Typical range: 25K–50K Lower-tier: 15K–30K Strong brands (Nebraska, PSU, OSU): 50K–80K+
Ben Criddle tweet media
English
8
0
9
3.3K