Balanca ☯ 🐸

@MDXreal Looks lame af either way lol

I was about to post this saying ‘Dubai is back’ 🇦🇪 #Dubai Then Iran start firing missiles again, only been back 2 days 😆

@MoneyLord $aliens going to the billions 👽

Three biggest narratives on ETH chain $ASTEROID space x mascot (new shib type of token in the making with deep lore related to elon) 150m mcap (will trade at 1B+) $AIB (America is Back, new trump slogan) trading only at 2m, very likely pulls 100x $ALIENS ( biggest mystery of our lives about to be revealed, will be all over media, elon will def talk about)

@KingBootoshi Low iq tweet

anybody who seriously uses AI at this point deeply understands this shit is not replacing humans in anything because we are all working 10x more since we are 10x more productive everyone is just going to operate at a new layer that was never seen before and it's MARVELOUS

@haider1 Exactly

sam altman: "many current jobs will go away, but we will find a lot of new ones" idk, but if we reach true AGI, any new jobs created will likely be done by that same AGI system so if sam thinks humans will still have work, he needs to explain what those jobs are and why only humans can do them because if AGI can't do it, maybe it's not true AGI

@jasonpizzino lol, look at yourself. perfect bullish scenario

Watch how cocky they get and that'll give you a good indication of where we are in the cycle. I'm speaking from experience #Bitcoin

@sircryptotips Insanity

The new US Surgeon General. The US is SCREWED👇

It’s not rocket science. Buy now!

@bryan_johnson Eating ass?

guys you’ll never believe where I found the fountain of youth

On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for all Bitcoin bears drops to zero.

@Dan_Jeffries1 Cool story bro, but ai/robots at agi/asi level are designed/programmed to be better, faster and cheaper than anything a human can do, at any stage or level, with radical automated self improvement. Any ‘job’ that is ‘created’ will be handled. Wake up

AI will create more jobs than any other technology in history. The doomers' fundamental error isn't just the lump of labor fallacy. It's deeper than that. They assume a finite problem space. This is the fundamental error of AI and job doomers. They look at the economy and see a fixed amount of work to be done, a pie that can only be sliced thinner as machines take bigger bites. They see humans a competitive resource for a finite amount of work and a finite amount of problems to solve that must be eliminated. This is fundamentally, totally and completely wrong. The pie isn't fixed. It never was. And the reason it isn't fixed is baked into the very nature of technology itself. Technology is nothing but abstraction stacking. And abstraction stacking is infinite. Therefore the work is infinite. The hammer didn't reduce the amount of work. It moved the work up the stack. And the new work was more complex, more varied, and more interesting than the old work. Complexity breeds more complexity and more variety. Once you have houses instead of mud huts, you have a cascade of new problems that didn't exist before. Plumbing. Wiring. Insulation. Roofing materials that don't rot. Drainage systems so the foundation doesn't flood. Fire codes so your neighbor's bad wiring doesn't burn down the whole block. Each of those problems becomes a job. A plumber. An electrician. An insulator. A roofer. A civil engineer. A building inspector. None of those jobs existed when we lived in mud huts. They exist because we solved the mud hut problem. Think of all of human technological development as a stack of abstraction layers, each one built on top of the ones below it. At the bottom: raw survival. Finding food. Building shelter. Making fire. These are the base-layer problems. Each major technology wave solved a base-layer problem and in doing so created an entirely new layer of problems above it: Agriculture solved "how do we reliably eat?" — and created problems of land ownership, irrigation, crop rotation, storage, trade, taxation, and governance. Writing solved "how do we remember things across generations?" — and created problems of literacy, education, record-keeping, law, bureaucracy, and literature. The printing press solved "how do we spread knowledge at scale?" — and created problems of intellectual property, censorship, journalism, publishing, public opinion, and democratic discourse. The steam engine solved "how do we generate mechanical power without muscles?" — and created problems of factory design, worker safety, urban planning, railroad engineering, coal mining, labor relations, and environmental pollution. Electricity solved "how do we deliver energy anywhere?" — and created problems of grid design, power generation, appliance manufacturing, electrical safety codes, utility regulation, and an entire consumer electronics industry. The Internet solved "how do we connect all human knowledge?" — and created problems of cybersecurity, digital privacy, online commerce, content moderation, network infrastructure, cloud computing, social media dynamics, and an entire digital economy that employs tens of millions. Notice the pattern? Each solution didn't just solve a problem. It created an entirely new problem space that was larger, more complex, and more varied than the one it replaced. The stack grows. It never shrinks. It's turtles all the way down and all the way up.

Until no job is left that a human can do better than AGI itself. Wake up people 🚨

@bryan_johnson 😂

If you have a complicated relationship with me, I understand. I do too.

Women in the 60’s don’t use TikTok bro

@naval This hurt the world in so many ways

Designed by NIH in N. Carolina. Assembled in China.

@RandPaul Push harder!

The COVID cover-up goes all the way to the top. Fauci funded the Wuhan lab. Senior intelligence officials hid classified evidence from the president himself. Scientists were silenced. Millions paid the price. The DOJ has until May 11th to prosecute Fauci before the statute of limitations runs out. I am not letting this go. The American people deserve justice.

@sama @TylerJnstn Classic Scam Altman

@TylerJnstn many current jobs will go away i think we will find a lot of new ones, though they may look very different

I honestly miss the Sam Altman that used to call out his peers for downplaying this risk.

@bryan_johnson 😂👌

and my girl got that 1%

@sama Yeah yeah we believe you me billionaire eating our jobs

we want to build tools to augment and elevate people, not entities to replace them.

@nikitabier and longer like 30 or 90 days

Would it valuable to know how many of your followers have been active on X in the last 24 hours?