BannMe

1K posts

BannMe banner
BannMe

BannMe

@BannMeCo

fired product guy trying to build his way out of w2 employment. small teams + ai can do big things. new dad shipping features at 1am.

Katılım Kasım 2022
292 Takip Edilen45 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
I want to use Twitter like my child will read all my messages one day.
English
0
0
8
1.1K
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@TravelerOfCode I don’t want to go back. Feel like it is only going to get worst. Need to own equity or else you’re disposable.
English
0
0
0
10
TravelerOfCode
TravelerOfCode@TravelerOfCode·
@BannMeCo same boat. mass layoff survivor here. the moment your own thing starts making money, going back to a 9-5 feels like giving up something you can't get back. that fear is actually a good sign though
English
1
0
1
7
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
got laid off a while back. been building since. the scary part isn't the no-paycheck part. it's that things are starting to work and now going back to employment feels like the wrong move. that's a different kind of terrifying
English
1
0
1
15
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
newborn finally asleep. got maybe 90 minutes before the next round. time to ship something
English
0
0
0
4
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@yacineMTB I’ve always thought Asia is one of the most racist places they are just too homogenous for to have a place to let it out. I like the states… there is surface area for racism everywhere.
English
0
0
1
3.4K
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
like it's a different kind of racism. totally different
English
12
0
121
31.1K
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
watched a company lay off 30% of their team and then post about "our incredible culture" the same week. that's the game. you're not family. you're a line item
English
0
0
0
6
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@hodlmecloseplz @andrewchen this is the decision most companies won't make because it feels wrong to throw away years of work. but the teams that do it will move 10x faster than the ones bolting ai onto legacy code and calling it a strategy
English
0
0
0
2
Dotya
Dotya@hodlmecloseplz·
@andrewchen Fourth option: scrap the codebase, rebuild AI-native from scratch with a small team. We've done this 3 times this quarter. 4 engineers, 8 weeks, shipping what took 2 years originally. Retrofitting AI onto legacy architecture burns the MOST opportunity cost.
English
1
0
1
36
andrew chen
andrew chen@andrewchen·
lots of non-AI native startups funded in the 2020-2025 timeframe trying to figure out: - can you reinvent the product to be AI-native? - do you pivot towards AI? - or just use AI in the backoffice, and ride it out? opportunity cost is the hardest thing to calculate. The most dangerous startups aren't the ones with no revenue -- they're the ones with just enough revenue to keep going
English
61
15
162
22.1K
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@adriansensus self-funded small team is the move. you skip the part where you spend 6 months convincing investors your idea is worth trying and just go build it. looking forward to seeing what you ship
English
0
0
0
10
Adrian A.
Adrian A.@adriansensus·
New chapter.🔥 Spent the last year building AI products across real estate, language learning, and trading tools. Self-funded, small team, shipping from Dubai. The company is Sensus AI — and I'll be sharing what I'm learning as we build. More soon.
English
1
0
4
100
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@monokern @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade the interesting part isn't that one person built it. it's that the framework assumes a team of ai workers is the default unit now. we went from "ai assists developers" to "ai is the team" in about 18 months
English
0
0
0
5
monokern
monokern@monokern·
MIND BLOWN: SOLO DEVELOVER BUILT a framework for a team of AI workers, and now startups are shipping products without hiring full engineering teams CrewAI - framework that turns a single LLM into an organization What happened: In 2025, a small open-source project began to gain popularity among developers building AI agents The developer demonstrated a concept: -> one agent = analyst -> another = developer -> another = manager -> another = reviewer They communicate, divide tasks, and make decisions like a real team People began experimenting, especially in areas where speed and decision-making matter One of those areas is trading on Polymarket: Recently I looked at a few public trader profiles on Polymarket showing fairly consistent results It's reasonable to assume that some of these outcomes could be linked to automation and perhaps they used CrewAI A few traders that caught my attention (Links in comments): 1. wokerjoesleeper 2. swisstony 3. RN1
monokern tweet media
English
15
0
32
460
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
everyone romanticizes quitting your job to build a company. nobody talks about the part where you have a newborn, zero revenue, and you're shipping features at 1am because that's the only quiet hour
English
0
0
0
6
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
i use ai every day to build products. it writes my code, fixes my bugs, and is the reason i can compete without a team of 20. bullish on what it enables. terrified of what it means for everyone else
English
0
0
0
4
vittorio
vittorio@IterIntellectus·
babies really have the best life their days are basically wake up, boob, nap, boob, poop, boob, nap, boob, boob, play time, boob, fart, boob, sleep no wonder they’re so happy
English
32
6
557
14.8K
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
the thing nobody talks about with employment. the constant availability. the shitty food because you don't have time. not working out because there's always another meeting. you trade your body for a paycheck that can disappear tomorrow
English
0
0
0
6
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
starting this account to document what it looks like to go from employee to building your own thing. no playbook. no guarantees. just figuring it out in public
English
0
0
0
14
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
most "building in public" posts are just counting days. nobody cares what day you're on. they care what you learned, what broke, and what you'd do differently. that's the interesting part.
English
0
0
0
9
James Fishback
James Fishback@j_fishback·
You should never vote for someone (Democrat or Republican) if they take money from AIPAC. They are traitors to our country.
English
592
6.7K
35.5K
299.7K
PaulleyTicks
PaulleyTicks@PaulleyTicks·
Just how in the F does the director of the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation - the single largest and most powerful investigative institution on the face of the earth - get his Email hacked? Oh, wait a minute...
PaulleyTicks tweet media
English
260
3K
13.4K
135.3K
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@publisherinabox this is the split most people miss. ai isn't replacing judgment, it's replacing the busywork that used to require headcount. huge difference.
English
1
0
1
6
Publisher in a Box
Publisher in a Box@publisherinabox·
Our approach: AI handles the volume work. Humans handle the judgment calls. This lets a small team manage output that would normally require 10 times the people.
English
2
0
2
283
Publisher in a Box
Publisher in a Box@publisherinabox·
Publishers using AI to scale their Facebook operations are growing significantly faster than those who don't. Here's how to use AI the right way.
English
2
0
25
1.9K
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@Conaugh90210 this is it. the public part is just accountability. the real value is the forcing function.
English
0
0
0
4
Conaugh
Conaugh@Conaugh90210·
Building in public isn't about the public. It's about forcing yourself to have something worth showing every day.
English
1
0
1
4
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@evanbknox do you have a cold start problem? what API are you posing from?
English
0
0
0
3
Evan Knox
Evan Knox@evanbknox·
Marketplaces have a cold start problem. Shoppers search. See nothing nearby. Leave. Supply exists -- it's just not dense enough yet. Facebook started at Harvard. Uber went city by city. We just narrowed all our ads to Florida only.
English
2
0
0
13
BannMe
BannMe@BannMeCo·
@evanbknox coordination overhead is the real killer. every hire adds communication lines exponentially. ai doesn't have that problem. it just does the work. you need good leaders that provide good direction and gets out of the way!
English
0
0
0
5
Evan Knox
Evan Knox@evanbknox·
My co-founder works at a Fortune 100. His take: a team of 40 with AI could annihilate their 400-person engineering org on output per person. Not because the 400 are bad. Because coordination overhead compounds with every hire. Small teams don't have that problem.
English
1
0
1
8