Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BannMe
1K posts

BannMe
@BannMeCo
fired product guy trying to build his way out of w2 employment. small teams + ai can do big things. new dad shipping features at 1am.
Katılım Kasım 2022
292 Takip Edilen45 Takipçiler

@TravelerOfCode I don’t want to go back. Feel like it is only going to get worst. Need to own equity or else you’re disposable.
English

@BannMeCo same boat. mass layoff survivor here. the moment your own thing starts making money, going back to a 9-5 feels like giving up something you can't get back. that fear is actually a good sign though
English

@yacineMTB I’ve always thought Asia is one of the most racist places they are just too homogenous for to have a place to let it out. I like the states… there is surface area for racism everywhere.
English

the japanese are absolutely mogging the americans on racism. i can't believe how racist they are. wow. i'm actually impressed
🇯🇵ブチギレ🇯🇵@shine_gomiseifu
このうんこたちは何が目的なの? 人を殺すために移住するの? 働くために必要ではない訓練だよね。 こんなのと共生できるわけねーだろ‼️
English

@hodlmecloseplz @andrewchen this is the decision most companies won't make because it feels wrong to throw away years of work. but the teams that do it will move 10x faster than the ones bolting ai onto legacy code and calling it a strategy
English

@andrewchen Fourth option: scrap the codebase, rebuild AI-native from scratch with a small team. We've done this 3 times this quarter. 4 engineers, 8 weeks, shipping what took 2 years originally. Retrofitting AI onto legacy architecture burns the MOST opportunity cost.
English

lots of non-AI native startups funded in the 2020-2025 timeframe trying to figure out:
- can you reinvent the product to be AI-native?
- do you pivot towards AI?
- or just use AI in the backoffice, and ride it out?
opportunity cost is the hardest thing to calculate. The most dangerous startups aren't the ones with no revenue -- they're the ones with just enough revenue to keep going
English

@adriansensus self-funded small team is the move. you skip the part where you spend 6 months convincing investors your idea is worth trying and just go build it. looking forward to seeing what you ship
English

@monokern @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade the interesting part isn't that one person built it. it's that the framework assumes a team of ai workers is the default unit now. we went from "ai assists developers" to "ai is the team" in about 18 months
English

MIND BLOWN: SOLO DEVELOVER BUILT a framework for a team of AI workers, and now startups are shipping products without hiring full engineering teams
CrewAI - framework that turns a single LLM into an organization
What happened:
In 2025, a small open-source project began to gain popularity among developers building AI agents
The developer demonstrated a concept:
-> one agent = analyst
-> another = developer
-> another = manager
-> another = reviewer
They communicate, divide tasks, and make decisions like a real team
People began experimenting, especially in areas where speed and decision-making matter
One of those areas is trading on Polymarket:
Recently I looked at a few public trader profiles on Polymarket showing fairly consistent results
It's reasonable to assume that some of these outcomes could be linked to automation and perhaps they used CrewAI
A few traders that caught my attention (Links in comments):
1. wokerjoesleeper
2. swisstony
3. RN1

English

@publisherinabox this is the split most people miss. ai isn't replacing judgment, it's replacing the busywork that used to require headcount. huge difference.
English

@Conaugh90210 this is it. the public part is just accountability. the real value is the forcing function.
English

@evanbknox do you have a cold start problem? what API are you posing from?
English

@evanbknox coordination overhead is the real killer. every hire adds communication lines exponentially. ai doesn't have that problem. it just does the work. you need good leaders that provide good direction and gets out of the way!
English








