Barbara Kay

They can change their “gender,” because that is an idea. They cannot change their sex, which is an immutable fact. That is the point of contention.

1000% correct.

Thumbs up to Greg Gutfeld for shredding Greta's clueless Cuba crusade spot on, as always! Let the little eco-scold pack her bags for Havana or Gaza; a dose of real communist "paradise" or sharia treatment might finally teach her history over hysteria. Keep slaying, Greg!

NYC is done, completely Islamicized: Daniel Greenfield /NYC Council Threatens Councilwoman for Condemning ... danielgreenfield.org/2026/03/nyc-co…

@d_fanshaw @TheQu3stionR My understanding is that before sunrise and after sunset observant Muslims consume a LOT of food. Nobody is missing out on calories, they're just not spreading them out in the usual way.

@TheQu3stionR @BarbaraRKay And slimming, too! 😅

Isn't banning eating in a cafeteria the equivalent of banning peeing in a bathroom? Why don't the fasting students congregate elsewhere during lunch hour? Or is that too rational a solution?

Lady, check the responses to your hollow mantras. Read them all. Feel the rage at your ignorance and complicity with triumphalist Islam. You don't get such angry blowback for no good reason. Check your privilege and think about all the suffering in the world caused by Islamism. And then either speak truth or just be quiet.

Across the world, Muslims continue to face discrimination, hostility, and even violence because of their faith. This must change. Discrimination or hatred directed at any community because of its religion has no place in our society. Today, marking the International Day to Combat Islamophobia, we reaffirm our commitment to dignity, tolerance, and mutual respect. Standing up against Islamophobia is not only about defending one religious community. It is about defending our shared humanity.

It is not "because of their faith." It is because of their insanely disproportionate involvement in terrorism around the globe. Stop already with the mantras about faith.

If it was anyone else but Israelis, this would be hailed as across the globe as the magnificent feat of intel and execution that it is. Who else but Israel could have done this? NOBODY, that's who.

This is how grooming works. Just keep aligning all Jews with Zionism and keep aligning Zionism with evil, and do it so repetitively that it soon seems like a Big Lie is an everyday truth.

And when you find me - because I don't think men can actually *be* women - what are you gonna do to me? Beat me up? Be specific. BTW, I don't think girls can be boys either, but interestingly, not a single girl who thinks she's a boy haas ever threatened me like you have. It's almost like biology has a say in behaviour...

I am sure it won't be the last.

No need to "force" anyone. Let them come to the cafeteria if they like and be envious, but let them know there is alternate space available for socializing, food-free if they wish. How can that be discriminatory?

The menstruating- girls-at-the-back thing has already been done at a Montreal school. And I agree that modesty clothing will also be mandated pretty soon, perhaps even head coverings.

He loves himself very much. What he hates is the *particularistic* burden being Jewish imposes on him. He considers himself a universalist. He thinks siding with Zionophobics will liberate him. Just like the Russian Jews who thought Communism would free them from the same burden. Didn't work out so well for them. Nor will it for little Avi.

Avi Lewis must hate himself. That's the only explanation I can conceive of.

Is it finally ok to say Communism "has been tried" and it sucks?

All "ways of knowing" are welcome in post-national Canada.

That dog, unhampered by political correctness, is rightly offended by a creature who is not a dog mocking dogginess. As a woman, although I deplore violence, I identify with the dog, because he doesn't have "words" to express his humiliation, so he is clearly disadvantaged and deserves a pardon.

The funny thing is that she calls him a *Zionist* scum bag. Which is odd because he is doing everything in his power to pretend antisemitism isn't a problem, and he has never had a good word to say about Israel or Zionism, except, grudgingly, that Israel has the right to defend itself. So she must really hate Jews a lot. And yet, paradoxically, I am on her side in this vignette.

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

Correction: Threats by trans people against women are threats to women.