𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣

42.3K posts

𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 banner
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣

𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣

@BckTrackPodcast

●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○● A Fool hath no Delight in Understanding but that his Heart may Discover Itself.

United States Katılım Ağustos 2017
1.3K Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
mowthebased
mowthebased@mowthebased·
Bunch of jibber jabber. Iran has the moral green light, as confirmed by anyone with eyes. They also have the guns to do so.
Bart 🌊⚓️@BartGonnissen

Does Iran have the legal right to create checkpoints in the Strait of Hormuz? According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, they do not. However, Iran signed but never ratified UNCLOS 1982, similar to the United States. As a result, Iran reverts to UNCLOS 1958. The key difference between the two conventions is that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 designates the Strait of Hormuz as an international strait, allowing for "transit passage." In contrast, UNCLOS 1958 refers to international straits with "innocent passage." The term "innocent passage" permits foreign vessels to navigate through a coastal state's territorial waters without prior authorization, provided their passage is considered "innocent," meaning it does not threaten the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state. Under the rules of UNCLOS 1958, Iran can enforce its domestic laws in the Iranian part of the Strait concerning: - Safety of navigation - Pollution prevention - Security and surveillance Iran asserts that the United States cannot enjoy the rights of "transit passage" as defined in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), arguing that the U.S. only has the right of "innocent passage" since it never ratified UNCLOS 1982. In response, the U.S. dismisses this claim, stating that "transit passage" has become a principle of "customary law." This means that if all countries adhere to a particular practice for decades, it becomes legally binding, regardless of whether the treaty has been ratified.

English
0
1
1
10
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
dane 🚩
dane 🚩@buckadeath_·
dane 🚩 tweet media
English
0
16
114
975
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
RTSG
RTSG@RTSG_Main·
@Lux_RS_emburg You are a member of the DSA. Shut the fuck up
English
7
13
169
2.1K
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
helix
helix@helixbase·
helix tweet media
QME
8
46
1.4K
33.7K
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
Liger
Liger@EdbieLigerSmith·
Delegitimizing your own country’s revolutionary leaders, struggles, and outcomes due to perceived morale imperfections is what the Chinese Communists call “national historical nihilism.” And they view it as a huge mistake for any Communist Party. You can’t apply modern morale standards to leaders of the past. You should appreciate their progressive elements & struggle to overcome the reactionary elements that they left behind. Most of the modern American left is historically nihilistic because they were taught by university professors to view history through a morale lens. On the other hand, Communist leaders like Ho Chi Minh appealed directly to the American Revolution & the founding documents of the US, which inspired him greatly when he read them while traveling through France.
English
11
32
134
3.2K
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
Darg
Darg@darg_2036·
The "fascist" (libtard) thinks world history is driven by male insecurity
Darg tweet media
English
3
2
52
799
𓆣 TheBacktrck🅿️odcast 𓆣 retweetledi
Amerikanets 📉
Amerikanets 📉@ripplebrain·
The world's largest embassy by area, $750 million to build, once had 16,000 personnel on site. So long.
Amerikanets 📉 tweet media
English
18
56
597
12.9K