QueenBee Sarah🟧☮️🇺🇸🦅🐝🍯🌈🌺🦄🌊🌸💙🔥

33.7K posts

QueenBee Sarah🟧☮️🇺🇸🦅🐝🍯🌈🌺🦄🌊🌸💙🔥 banner
QueenBee Sarah🟧☮️🇺🇸🦅🐝🍯🌈🌺🦄🌊🌸💙🔥

QueenBee Sarah🟧☮️🇺🇸🦅🐝🍯🌈🌺🦄🌊🌸💙🔥

@Beebuzzin19

California Native🟧SPED 🐝A beekeeper🐝🍯SAVE THE BEES🐝 #Resister #DEMOCRAT 💕🌸💕LOVE is the answer! 💕🌸💕

SoCal Katılım Ekim 2013
11.8K Takip Edilen11.6K Takipçiler
QueenBee Sarah🟧☮️🇺🇸🦅🐝🍯🌈🌺🦄🌊🌸💙🔥 retweetledi
jcazgal
jcazgal@jcazgal1·
I lost my old page last night. It was @jcazgal. I’m looking for my blue resistors 💙💙💙
English
46
42
181
8.3K
QueenBee Sarah🟧☮️🇺🇸🦅🐝🍯🌈🌺🦄🌊🌸💙🔥 retweetledi
Heather Thomas
Heather Thomas@HeatherThomasAF·
🙏Want to thank you all for your very kind and thoughtful messages. We were an "us" for 36 years, and not a single day went by where I didn't feel like the luckiest girl in the world. I'll be back when I can function a bit better. ❤️
Heather Thomas tweet media
English
2.5K
663
12.6K
1.4M
Laura Pettigrew
Laura Pettigrew@Lauri_Pettigrew·
@CoffindafferFBI I have listened to you on Court TV and have respected your views, but after I heard you disparaging the jurors who have spoken out after the Karen Read trial, you should be ashamed. Those jurors did their civil duty and their opinions should be respected not condemmed.
English
1
0
2
90
Jennifer Coffindaffer
Jennifer Coffindaffer@CoffindafferFBI·
Judges and Jurors should be sacrosanct to the judicial process. It is hard to put in words my reverance for the judges and juries I stood before. The judges who presided over the many trials I have been a part of over the last 33 years have been amazing. The juries have always been what they shoud be- Untainted truth seekers. Many times, the jury members wrote me notes. I cherish each one. Many times, the judge allowed the jurors to meet us. I also cherish those interactions. I have spoken out regarding the jury process related to the murder trial of Karen Read. Why? Because I believe it to be a disgrace to all I have held to the highest esteem throughout my career. Was this a grand conspiracy? No. Just like the case, it was simple. Read and her propaganda team set out to taint the jury pool. It was not complicated and not disguised. They flaunted their goal. I believe they achieved their goal. Why? Look no further than juror 11. Watch what she has all too joyfully blasted all over SM and MM. Look at her follow list on X. Listen to her. Was she honest on her juror worksheet? I have also said I believe this case, like OJ, is a case of jury nullification. I stand by that likelihood. Let me further explain. In a nutshell, nullification occurs if jurors choose to ignore evidence and find someone either guilty or innocent based on other factors. Let's take the foreman who said if a dead man was on his front porch, police would have stormed his house. The facts show John O'Keefe was not on anyone's front porch. In fact, John was on the curtilage of 34 Fairview nearly as close to the neighbor's front door as the front door of 34 Fairview. The foreman seemingly disregarded this fact in evidence. Look at Juror 11. She talked about the jury's commitment to not hang influenced by their anger over the money spent. Take a look at her further statements. She said Read merely dropped John off. Read reversed 24 MPH according to the evidence. Her tail light was embedded in John's shirt. Juror 11 ignored this evidence. I could go on and on with this juror, but suffice to say, I believe she would have aquitted no matter what the evidence was based on her own admissions and her social media. That's nullification and has nothing to do with reasonable doubt. I have listened to every minute of both trials. I have read the court documents. I have talked with the victims - family and friends. I have felt their pain. Before anyone takes out of context my concern for what this case has done to our judicial process understand All the facts. I have the same sadness for our system that I had after the OJ verdict. I respect the views of those who don't share my concern. Freedom of speech is imperative. But it would be remiss and wrong of me not to share the truth as I know it and call attention to what I see as a failed process soiled by social media for unethical reasons. #KarenRead #KarenReadRetrial
English
324
66
426
64.2K
Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer@SenSchumer·
BREAKING: The Senate just passed our bill to liberate America from Trump’s reckless and inflationary trade war with Canada that only helps fund his billionaire tax cuts while making families pick up the tab.
English
1.4K
581
3.8K
152.8K
QueenBee Sarah🟧☮️🇺🇸🦅🐝🍯🌈🌺🦄🌊🌸💙🔥 retweetledi
Human☮🇺🇸🇺🇦🇺🇸🌊
Fox "News"? You paid $787.5 million for lying to your own viewers, maybe sit this one out. Now let’s talk “reckless allegations,” "Dr." Phil. These weren’t allegations. They were facts backed by indictments, convictions, and a paper trail that runs straight through Trump Tower to Moscow. Eric Trump bragged about their Russian money. Don Jr. met with Kremlin-connected agents. Manafort handed campaign intel to a Russian spy. That’s not gossip, that’s espionage. Trump asked Russia for help on live TV. Then he stood in Helsinki like a houseplant while Putin made him look like an intern. And now, three months into his comeback tour, we’ve got a tanking stock market, allies iced out by a tariff war, the dollar taking a dive, and the country inching toward a great depression all while Russia gets a free pass. So spare us the righteous outrage, Doc. This isn’t reckless, it’s reality. And if you’re siding with the guy making Putin’s wet dreams come true, maybe it's time for you to sit on the couch and answer some tough questions.
English
6
40
168
1.6K
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
Dr. Phil calls out CNN host for failing to challenge Democrat's 'reckless' Trump-Russia allegations trib.al/tV5re3C
English
99
83
618
85.3K
Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer@SenSchumer·
Donald Trump slapped tariffs on penguins and not on Putin.
English
1.5K
680
4.2K
165.4K
Ian Jaeger
Ian Jaeger@IanJaeger29·
Americans have a positive view of JD Vance, per a Rasmussen poll. This man will be our President in 2028.
English
1.1K
490
4.2K
999.1K