
Ben McKay
277 posts




Christians, would you take someone seriously who said they had read 30% of the Bible and were sure it taught Arianism. (Yes this is referring to the debate)



You obviously copied this from Reddit 😂 "Jesus being born in Jerusalem"? The Book of Mormon says He would be born in the land of Jerusalem. Bethlehem was in that region. Not the devastating contradiction you think it is 😂 "Alpha and Omega"? You're attacking a translation choice. If Joseph Smith translated ancient concepts into familiar biblical English, then of course biblical titles appear in the text. That's how translation works.😂 "And it came to pass"? Seriously? Repetitive phrasing is your evidence against authenticity? The Bible is filled with repetitive literary formulas. If repetition proves a book false, you're going to have problems with scripture generally. As for horses, archaeology, and DNA... Notice how quickly your argument jumps from "there are unresolved questions" to "therefore the entire book is a fraud." Ridiculous 😂 The biggest problem with your post is that you judge the Book of Mormon by standards you don't apply consistently elsewhere. The Bible contains textual difficulties, archaeological debates, translation issues, apparent contradictions, and historical questions. Yet Christians routinely argue that such issues don't automatically invalidate divine revelation. Suddenly, when the Book of Mormon is involved, every unresolved question becomes proof of fraud. And your final point is simply mistaken. You say another testament proves Mormonism isn't Christianity. By that logic, the New Testament proved Christianity wasn't Judaism. Early Christians accepted additional scripture because they believed God had spoken again. Latter-day Saints don't claim to be another Protestant denomination. They claim a restoration of Christianity through new revelation. You can reject that claim if you want, but pretending that "additional scripture exists" is somehow a refutation just begs the question. The reality is that nobody becomes LDS by reading only the Bible because LDS theology explicitly teaches that God continued to reveal scripture after the Bible. What your post ultimately demonstrates is not that the Book of Mormon has been disproven, but that you've already decided it cannot be true and are reading everything through that conclusion. Lazy 🐂💩 😂








Joseph Smith was called of God.






From a 2023 @cworldreport with @TradVat2, a former member of the LDS: CWR: Mormons consider themselves Christians, although their beliefs are anything but orthodox, Trinitarian Christianity. Did you consider yourself a Christian in your days as a Mormon? Do you think most Mormons consider themselves to be orthodox Christians? Christiansen: I certainly considered myself a Christian as a Mormon. But by Christian, Mormons simply mean, “someone who purports to follow Jesus Christ.” The early history of Christianity and the import of those early councils is lost on most Mormons, who do not understand the context and controversies behind them sufficiently to understand why, generally speaking, the Nicene Creed is such a marker for who is and who is not a Christian. I do think most Mormons today consider themselves Christians; I do not think they would use the term “orthodox.” But again, what they mean is that they try to follow their own understanding of Jesus Christ, not that they follow the teachings of traditional Christianity when it comes to the nature of Christ. In his Introduction to Mere Christianity, C. S. Lewis briefly addresses the question of what defines “Christianity,” and he settles on belief, rightly, because he notes that if it merely about doing good for trying to follow Jesus’ teachings, anyone is a Christian if they so self-identify.








I worship and acknowledge the supremacy and legitimacy of one God. That God has always been God as far as I (along with all my scriptural canon and the overwhelming majority of all ecclesiastical leaders of my faith) am concerned. That God in my belief taught that man is not complete without the woman for a reason… Kolob is never explained as a planet and the entire story of Kolob is believed by many to be a representation of Jesus Christ being taught to Abraham using the night sky. That Jesus and Satan in a sense share God the Father as their Eternal Father, but that Jesus is eternally superior to Lucifer and forever will be. I, along with the majority of those who follow my religion don’t ascribe to the postulate of infinite regress with the addendum of a multiplicity of Gods similar in power and dominion to our God. And that I will, as the scriptures say, inherit all that God has and be granted to sit with him on his throne if I overcome by faith. How does that look? We’re not completely certain. @LostMyHats that was a very poor strawman of our beliefs. There is scriptural, historical, and modern prophetic backing for everything I said, so go ahead and claim that im being disingenuous or whatever because you’ve watched enough YouTube videos about us🤷🏻♂️




