LaserCat397.eth2.0

我的想法从来都没有替我赚过大钱，总是我坚持不动替我赚大钱。 对市场判断正确不足为奇，能够同时判断正确又坚持不动的人很罕见，我发现这是最难学的一件事。

如果投了1W U的 Space现在能拿到700U的币吧。 还不如退款拿25%呢。 这种诈骗项目怎么还有 Kraken Kucoin要上的啊。 反正当归零了，希望 @abyssofgambling 维权成功把项目方送进去。我亏的少，帮不上太多忙，声援下是必须的。 不过几家交易所Kraken Kucoin MEXC都一点不作为的？ 这么劣迹斑斑的项目方都不做背调的吗？ Listing人员上币前用AI搜下争议负面都不会？ 这样上币以后谁去玩？

@cryptojiuyi 是的，我感觉就是自从你加杠杆之后心态出现问题的，心态出问题就会导致操作变形，但是也别怕，币圈最重要的是审美，你有选币的审美，就不需要怕回撤，加油。

@BitCloutCat 是啊不加仓就好了高位，我也不会大亏怎么都是赚的，底部筹码啊。 像猫哥一样拿到现在，也开开心的。猫哥是真的钻石手了。

@cryptojiuyi giggle不加杠杆不会加速你的崩溃的，我是这个意思，giggle我的成本均价是30多m，因为是现货所以一直全都拿着，比币安人生还久208天了。

@BitCloutCat 我真不玩合约猫哥，除了Giggle跌下来加杆杠了，别的币都1X杠杆当现货买😂

网上说说得了，现实里谁不想急头白脸过一回币安人生？ 币安人生已经相当于完全ATH了，之前链上的507m其实价格是虚的。 有些人说我晒单即高点要结束了——那你确实不了解我。pepe、ordi、bome、neiro，我都是边晒边飞。 虽然卖飞了不少，但也挺开心的。 下一个会是 $giggle 吗？还是哈基米？

@erichsu_eth @_NaokiSaito 是的体验一下历史的味道

@BitCloutCat @_NaokiSaito 是能开出初代喷的 初代卡包吗？

接触ptcg一个半月了，今天入手了一张最想买的卡，20周年御三家的皮卡丘。 设计这张卡的人是斎藤直树（@_NaokiSaito），我们NFT玩家都熟悉的画师。 还买了几包年纪和我一样大的初代包刺激一下。

@CryptoYunqi @_NaokiSaito 干就完事了

@BitCloutCat @_NaokiSaito 卧槽 无敌了 这次抽卡能不能继续欧皇啊

@theunipcs @traderpow

are memecoins about to do that thing again? 👀

@based16z 6

@justinsuntron 最支持你的一次，2年以后解锁纯cs

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.

@AWeb3Going 才玩一个多月，新手

@BitCloutCat 我去，猫哥你已经玩tcg很久了么？感觉今年tcg突然就火起来了，我之前感觉大家就是发发推吹吹牛，但是很多玩家啊都是正儿八经的高玩呢。

有审美不怕回撤，只怕买的币不能涨。

@AWeb3Going 开盒太上瘾了，平均每天开5盒以上，m2a、151、符文战场、op13😂

@BitCloutCat 猫哥不开盒么？

@Magicstarsx 小白，才玩了一个多月

@BitCloutCat tcg你也有所涉猎呀

@banbendaan 我是真holder阿

@BitCloutCat 万万没想到 你还在车上。

镭射猫2.0版 2.0就是定好的卖出价格就严格执行，哪怕觉得还能涨。这是我这几年在无数次大回撤之后学会的唯一一件事。 191天前，3400刀买了0.68%的币安人生。涨了10倍出了个本，了解我的朋友知道我一般都不出本的，但当时觉得这名字太敏感，币安大概率不会上现货，特别是这个币只有几m的市值，不确定性和风险性会更高。 结果呢？人家真上了。链上市值最高冲到5亿美金。过于信仰，一分没出。 所幸的是熬过了191天寒冬，现在浮盈1m，到手1m。 这一波上涨，有个明显的启动信号：币安人生在50m的时候出现了大额托单。并且这几个月对于链上玩家来说，真的太难了，需要一些能点燃情绪的东西。加上币安对做市商规则的调整，币安人生又是目前中文币板块唯一的现货，凭啥只有英文名能炒？ 筹码结构清洗干净，剔除了很多弱手。因为很多人都觉得：CZ新书落地，币安人生等于利好落地，会暴跌。实际懂的人都知道，币安人生从一开始就不是和那本书绑定的，它是第一个中文现货概念。 结合上面这些分析，50m的时候我就在群里说过：人生低于100m是低估。让大家不要买竞品，不如买更有确定性的币安人生——它已经是现货了，不需要再幻想“xx是不是要上合约或者是上现货”。 所以，下一个会是谁？ 哈基米？🗡️🐶🛡️？还是 $giggle ？ 反正……网上说说得了，现实里谁不想急头白脸过一回币安人生呢？

@LNudt 真正的跌幅是这样的，跌到你连抄底这个事情都不会在脑中想起。

@BitCloutCat 原来猫哥也这样，人生都快要成为我的心魔了，一度回撤痛苦到不敢打开看仓位

@0xmmu 是呀，我之前其实也都设定了卖出价格，但是到位置的时候总舍不得卖，要不是会想我会不会卖崩，其实这些事情很好解决，分批卖就好。

@BitCloutCat 过去一年看你回撤了无数个单币A7了 感觉真的不容易

@NFTMILK 没看过，目前只喜欢海贼王和宝可梦的

@BitCloutCat 猫哥不玩游戏王吗