🌐 C.F. Ventures

@TakeWeightOffMD @DrJesseMorse yelp.com/biz/the-xtreme…)

@DrJesseMorse Some stuff he says is right sometimes dead wrong.

Be careful where you get your peptide information from people… “Doctor” 🤣🤣🤣

@Shooter663729 @DrJesseMorse Read his old reviews if you dont believe you're dealing with the scum of the earth yelp.com/biz/the-xtreme…)

@DrJesseMorse Jesse: in this space, MD doesn’t make you smarter than us. Just specifically point out where Trevor is wrong and you are right. Give us specific examples, and then let us make determination s whom we might listen to

@_RN03xx_ Yep Holding both

$Cashcat bottom likely in and confirmed this week You were too dumb to buy my shill at 3m & You'll likely be too dumb to buy Vlad's dog kitsu-2:native down here too x.com/_RN03xx_/statu…

$Wallet 0x0339f5459fc690ac85f1782e15782a151b4a9e1b I made a massive discovery that confirms WALLET is from the Robinhood Team once and for all. im not going to recap all we already discovered but there was a missing piece about the address that was funded on block 34 by what is supposedly a genesis wallet. This same address that funded the $Wallet deployer a few blocks later at block 41. So address 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 was funded on block 34 by 0x0829D37dbC25799F7cFf04B5AaCda94e8761a75a i went backwards till block 1 and couldn't find a trace of funding for this last address. I then checked the genesis .json wallets on the robinhood chain website and couldnt find the address in neither. So i went back to the very very beginning of the Robinhood chain deploymennt itself. And what i found is just MASSIVE. The Robinhood Chain Deployer address is 0xc8451c5DE260E7ea1b879e7994967077e71230Ca And this address was 1st funded by 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 etherscan.io/tx/0x7982d3d9d… The Robinhood Chain Deployer was funded by the same address that funded our $Wallet Deployer... The vanity address pair wallet funded the Robinhood Chain deployer wallet on Ethereum. So the full picture is now complete: 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 │ ─► Funded 0xc8451c5DE260E7... (Robinhood Chain Deployer) │ └─► Deployed the entire Robinhood Chain on Ethereum │ └─► Received ETH from 0x0829D37dbC25799F7cFf04B5AaCda94e8761a75a └─► Funded Paxos Hot Wallet from block 34 └─► Funded $Wallet deployer from block 41 This means 0xF718d37... is a Robinhood core treasury/operations wallet. • Funded the wallet that deployed the entire Robinhood Chain infrastructure on Ethereum • Has a vanity address pair with 0x0829D37... — both generated by the same person/team • Has been sending ETH to Paxos since block 34 This is Robinhood itself. The 0xF718d37dBC25799f7cFf04B5AacdA94e87619649 wallet is Robinhood's master operations wallet that funded • Their chain deployment • Their partnership infrastructure with Paxos. • The $Wallet Deployer So now its completely 100% undeniable this is @RobinhoodApp behind all those wallets.

@InspectorSlurp Looks pretty good.

$WALLET - everything we know so far no other token sparked as much heated debate over the last days as $wallet that's why I‘ve read all the threads, checked the blockchain, followed the crumbs and spoke to seasoned onchain sleuths so you don't have to this is all we know about $WALLET so far: 1/ the deployer aa33 (0x542718C390Ef1E4bEB46ce2023FfaA627db8aa33) - launched $WALLET on July 10, fee-share only, no team allo - aa33 active ~2yrs; first gas sent June 12 2025 to fresh addr; Vlad tweeted that addr's tx 18 days later for OpenAI stock-token demo - aa33 received funds on RH Chain block 1009 May 15 2026 (pre-public mainnet July 1, no RPC/bridge) -> this indicates early/internal access - aa33 uses Alchemy smart-account stack (RH Chain official infra partner); deployed exactly 1 token ever… which is $wallet - aa33 funded RH docs TSLA test wallet; sent to known Vlad demo wallet pre-leak so far so interesting… but there is more: /2 Robinhood employee ties & the funding paths Richard Reitzfeld - funding path 1: aa33 ← 0x...275d ← 0x...5091 (richiereitz.eth = Richard Reitzfeld, RH Senior iOS Engineer) Seong Lee - funding path 2: aa33 ← c289 ← a405/nomujia (owns seonglee.eth = Seong Seog Lee / @seongboii, RH Head of Product Crypto/Wallet/Onchain) prior link: funded his FriendTech from the same wallet that funded the Vlad test wallet that was used in the video demo - timing: launch same day as crumbs.robinhood.com went live controlled by RH ("we’ve left a trail") 3/ $wallet price coordination yesterday‘s extreme selloff was followed by whale wallet maneuvers that happened in sync and had one purpose - shakeout salad hands and accumulate lower: 0x058f346e53c21e55a6e48893e6af443c45101037 (DeBank: Protocol Definitive / DefinitiveFi) small sell to create panic, then bought back ~4.6M, now ~26M 0x32a1f3b5af48eba238b13be0704e80a14cd10a22 - DCA buys via SigmaSwap (~13+ txs, 0.4-1 ETH each) during dip, now ~7,9M DefinitiveFi clients hold #3 & #4 in $WALLET /4 the fud: there were two main issues that sparked controversy: /4.1 the test demo wallet used by Vlad was later compromised by a mmenomic seed leak and people used this to discredit the whole thesis, BUT: aa33 is not derived from that seed → $WALLET deployer is safe/not compromised by leak; strengthens “Vlad / inner-circle personally deployed” logic. also, all the other traces that to RH employees before the demo wallet got leaked remain true anyway / 4.2 the dexscreener bio had a spelling mistake „robinhodod“ - this is really dumb fud tbh. anybody can update it for a few dollars. irrelevant. TLDR: $WALLET deployer aa33 shows 2yr history with direct and indirect funding ties to RH Senior iOS Eng Richard Reitzfeld & Head of Product Seong Lee (via seonglee.eth + OpenSea NFT/FriendTech links), plus pre-public chain access at very early blick & Vlad demo wallet, the traces are real, despite the demo wallet $wallet is definitely the most exciting crypto hunt in a very long time and could be a megarunner sitting in front of our eyes if the hopium materializes. nothing is confirmed for now, but the blockchain doesn't lie. credit where credit is due make sure to honor the legends that uncovered and shared all the dots for us to connect. these are the real OGs in this case @tradertom1878 @genrih99999 @whisper_alpha @the_boss_crypto @moeno614 @AltcoinMatcha @0xextractvalue @chao_liu_w @ShawnThread @raylin51 @silverennial if you find out more or disagree with anything I wrote here, let's dig into it together - this is supposed to be a big resource for anybody doing their dd

@whisper_alpha Yep. Ive been in this about 3 days now. Looks real good.

$Wallet is getting noticed i see you @BlocksNThoughts

I remember telling many people, including @TheCryptoDaddi, that I think Alts like Eth, Link, and Sol will be the focal point next cycle. They will need one more cycle to fully get everything on the chain, and they will need things other than BTC as the ROI won't be as attractive

really think we are being given a generational spot bros

@Fitzybrypto Bro, just like degens didnt understand that, they aint going to understand your post. 😂

Noxa is living proof no one cares about fees if some numbers going up, 1% fees and 66% to launchpad 33% to token team with NONE going to LP. Degens have spent 2 years fudding and posting expert opinions on how to fix launchpads/chains then decided to push the most predatory one yet 😂😂

@JohnGoldman True, but there's only a small percent that can just pick up and do that. Biological changes precede motivation in most people. I don't have patients make very many lifestyle changes until phase 3 or 4. Then they come much easier

🚨WATCH: Andrew Tate breaks down how to beat the casino house with mathematics 👀🎰

fck altcoinist was right szn coming $TIBBIR to billions.🐸

@blknoiz06 @Leonardo_3200 🤝

CT has to understand that we drive the early stages of all bull runs, coinbase has 100M retail users and base never overtook solana with their onchain activity, not even close, there is a lot more work to be done than just having distro w/ a lot of retail accounts the people with serious size on chain blasting new narratives early are crypto native participants the people establishing which narratives devs should be focusing on for the upcoming cycle are crypto native participants the people with serious size deploying 10M+ into coins in the multi billions are crypto native participants what you really need to figure out is how to tap the large pool of latent capital external to crypto who want exposure to the asset class as they are not early but they are the ones who raise ceilings, ethereum achieved this, solana achieved this, hyperliquid achieved this, other novel coins will achieve this this cycle retail is a good additive necessary for the peak euphoria across the board but it is CT who establishes the trends first, & when something like dogecoin goes giga viral it was bc of CT+lead figure like elon & retail followed, it is great robinhood & arbitrum are building a chain together, i hope they bring some companies onchain who were not onchain before and that it improves their existing product offering so all robinhood users also have a crypto wallet, but vlad is a businessman before anything else, they are going to list the most successful projects on robinhood crypto regardless of if they originated on robinhood chain or not, they want volume & they will follow attention

Is it true Robinhood Chain will overtake solana. Your thoughts.

Occam's 1st Major Product Update Post $OCCAM TGE: An update directed towards profitability & platform growth. • 50% Increase in available algorithm data metrics • 30 Day market backtesting & simulations • Manual Buys on existing automated trades • Simulation speed improvements • PNL AutoForwarder & algorithm showcase • Welcome Back highlight screen • Social Layer additions • Hitrate table • Profitability table Slowly, then all at once NOW LIVE

@brwnpb 🤙

the first really large platform update since TGE rolls out TONIGHT contains so much more than we initially planned Occam users rejoice, patch notes out soon slowly then all at once

Strategy has sold 3,588 $BTC for $216 million to fund dividends on our Digital Credit securities. As of 7/5/2026, we hodl ₿843,775 in our BTC Reserves and $2.55 billion in our USD Reserves. strategy.com/press/strategy…

@iruletrenches 🤝

i’m very happy seeing the trenches alive again and volume back onchain, but at the same time, i have this really weird feeling abt the current state of things. I’m glad to see $ansem ripping. i think it’s a great thing, ansem made a lot of people made life-changing money, and it’s brought back liquidity, volume, and attention to the trenches. the fact i met a random stranger in japan talking about it says a lot about how viral it went and how it successfully brought back attention to the market. however, that said, it is clear that the biggest winners right now are the bundlers who bundle up the supply and send a massive allocation to ansem’s wallet. it’s no longer about communities, only which coin ansem’s public wallet is holding most of its supply. it sucks and it’s definitely ideal, but it is what it is, that’s what happens when a wallet is up 200m+ in a week, people will track it and buy whatever is trending on it in hopes of catching the next $ansem. imo, until we see organically built cult like community coins outperform those bundled grifters launches, I don’t think the trenches are truly back yet.