BobS

"Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both." I don't see a reference to "true threat" or "conscious disregard" in there. So those are not ELEMENTS of the offense -- the elements are what Congress prescribes them to be. A charge that tracks the language of the indictment is sufficient. The fact that the word interpreting a statute in case law are not set forth in the indictment does not lead to the conclusion that the jury wasn't instructed.

BREAKING: Los Angeles approved a couple's permits to redevelop a deteriorating home where Marilyn Monroe once lived— then revoked them a day later, declared the property a historic monument, and stuck the owners with the bill. PLF joined the federal suit to stop it.

This far left wooden spoon @MattMahanSJ is blaming Trump for California’s high gas prices. He thinks we’re stupid.

The CNN “reporter” on the phone in the hotel wasn’t even interested in the fraud — she was interested in investigating Nick Shirley and “his claims." She was hoping to discredit Shirley. It was utterly pathetic. So, on brand for CNN.

Mass cancellation of @DisneyPlus is necessary and required. #CancelDisneyPlus PLEASE RETWEET

The statute under which Comey is charged is not itself contrary to the First Amendment, therefore the indictment is not subject to a "Facial" challenge as unconstitutional. There have been plenty of successful prosecutions on this statute. The challenge would be "As Applied" -- in other words, the the challenge would be as to the application of the statute to the facts alleged in the indictment. That is an affirmative defense. Moving forward with an indictment even though it will likely be subject to an "As Applied" challenge is a matter of prosecutorial discretion. As I noted in response to specious arguments made by Andrew Weissmann about the SPLC indictment, the fact that a prosecution theory might be unpopular, or that gaining a conviction might be more difficult due to the popularity of the defendant or a cause associated with the defendant, is not to be taken into consideration when making the decision to charge or not charge.

an all timer exchange right here

Burma El Salvador Ethiopia Haiti Honduras Lebanon Nicaragua Nepal Somalia Sudan Syria Ukraine Venezuela Yemen How many would it be ok to terminate without the decision being "racist"??? Be honest -- you're just conflating "foreign" and "race" as the same thing.

I told you the fraud in Texas was going to be bigger than Minnesota. Thanks to the good work of Sara Gonzales and others, these crimes are finally being exposed. These Third Worlders have been enriching themselves on the backs of American taxpayers for too long.

What if the real reason Democrats won’t fund DHS isn’t ICE at all… …but a petty turf war between one Senate staffer and the U.S. Coast Guard? 👇

Which abortion is your favorite? The one where the unborn baby's body is crush and sucked out with a hose or the one where the baby is cut apart with a knife? Please enlighten us.

This woman noticed something very interesting about The SPLC “These are supposedly the chief employees of the Southern Poverty Law Center — all of the supposed white supremacist organizations were being funded by…. an organization made of black people” There’s a reason: “Just to make it clear, an organization — run by blacks, are funding white supremacist organizations because there's not enough actual racism from white people, which threatens their ability to collect on welfare social programs, get funding from the government, make millions basically. So yeah, I hope this dispels white guilt because white guilt is pretty much what these people use to rob you blind of your taxes. If anyone is a slave in the big 2026, it is the white working man” According to her, any almost everyone in the comments agrees with her, it’s all another scam to keep the welfare payments justified and flowing Think about that, Democrats main voter base is people on welfare. It’s one big crime syndicate manufacturing fake outrage to steal our money for votes

We just sued Cloudera for discriminating against U.S. workers in favor of foreign visa holders for high-paying tech jobs. This is a violation of the Immigration & Nationality Act, & @CivilRights will not hesitate to sue employers for discriminating against U.S. workers! You are on notice! justice.gov/opa/pr/civil-r…

Told ya

Lorsque tu as l’habitude de vivre aux crochets des USA 😄😄… La personne qui est partie avec plusieurs bouteilles lors du banque de la presse de la maison blanche (mais loin d’être la seule), est Olga Stefaniszyna, l'ancienne ministre de la Justice de l'Ukraine, et actuellement ambassadrice aux USA. Amusant😁…

A few moments later…

Today I asked an abortion advocate what her favorite method of abortion is.

Greg Gutfeld just delivered the single most succinct and cutting indictment of the leftwing media's complicity in Saturday's WHCD attack: "This guy did hear voices. They were Ted Lieu's, they were Brandon Johnson's, they were CNN's, they were The View, they were MS NOW." "I think this is a helpful assassination attempt because it is the first one that shows you can be radicalized by liberal smugness." "He wasn't a crank. He was not deranged. Don't buy into that narrative ... He was just following orders." Greg nails it.

I made my first appearance in Oct. 2021 on behalf of James McGrew. I had just finished trial (Slaughter/Gottfried) in the second week of January 2025 -- my last trial -- only a week prior to Pres. Trump putting an end to all the cases. I had 5 trials in the final 6 months as the Biden DOJ rushed to get as many cases to trial as possible before the election: Winegeart, Pepe, Lee, Rodgers, and Slaughter/Gottfried -- from August to January.

Update: It seems that Alison King no longer works at those jobs, and now works for @UHC. I would imagine that given the fact that their CEO was assassinated not long ago, they wouldn't condone their employees supporting people being murdered over their political views.