Halrod's Baby Brother

I've been demonized!!! Lord Help ME!

Todd Blanche is absolutely correct. Russiagate wasn’t an exaggerated narrative built on a partial kernel of truth. It was a systematically constructed political and institutional fiction. It was a wholly manufactured framework from beginning to end. Every part of it was invented.

What wasn’t a lie about j6

She needs to pay reparations

California gave ONE nonprofit $1 BILLION. To put solar panels on poor people's roofs. You know how much solar they actually installed? $72 million. That's it. So where the FUCK is the other $928 MILLION? I'll tell you exactly where. The same nonprofit that WROTE the law that gave them the money ALSO got the contract to run "community outreach." Same guy runs the nonprofit AND the program. Chris Walker. Two paychecks. Look it up. And their SISTER organization — same building, same staff, same donors — is a 501(c)(4) that endorses Democrat candidates and runs door-knocking operations in the EXACT SAME NEIGHBORHOODS. Connect the dots, idiot. You pay $7.50 a gallon for gas. Cap-and-trade takes a cut at the pump. That money flows to "climate justice nonprofits." Those nonprofits funnel it into Democrat get-out-the-vote machines. You. Are. Funding. The. People. Who. Are. Robbing. You. Every time you fill up your fucking tank, you're paying for a Democrat campaign volunteer to knock on a stranger's door and tell them how amazing Gavin Newsom is. $928 MILLION. GONE. And not one journalist in this state asked a single question until @jennyraeca and CAL DOGE pulled the receipts. You think this is the only one? There's a hundred more like it. This is how California works now. This is how a "blue state" stays blue when only 48% of the voters are Democrats. Wake the fuck up. @patrickbetdavid @VincentOshana @FoxNews @WallStreetApes @CalDOGEgov @elonmusk @libsoftiktok We're standing in front of the building right now. @raminrealtalk" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@raminrealtalk

Useful Idiots...

🚨OH. MY. GOSH!!! It has been revealed that the man who has been drawing Swastikas all over Fayetteville NC... ...is actually a BLACK MALE, "Taquon Jameek Vereen" He was let out on a $1500 bond and then IMMEDIATELY BEGAN WAIVING A GUN AT PEOPLE ON THE STREET. He was YET AGAIN given a $2500 bond. Curiously, although local media reported on the story, they miraculously failed to mention, AT ALL, the race of man who was drawing these swastikas. ...I wonder why 🤔

What’s funny is these folks want all the gun records, but they don’t want to give the federal government voting records. Hmmm

LONG RANT ALERT: I've worked in Big Tech my entire career. So let me say something that will confuse people: Big Tech is not left-wing. The default posture of Silicon Valley is center-right and technocratic. My first Big Tech job was with Amazon in 2005. I heard plenty of stories about Jeff Bezos rolling his eyes at Obama's antics. This is not a secret among people who've been inside. And yet Big Tech was among the loudest cheerleaders for BLM and DEI. How? I'll tell you how, though it requires me to be honest about something personal. I am diagnosed ASD. You know the experience: you make a factual point in a room. Ten people tell you you're evil. The "logical" structure of ASD leads you to start accepting you might be broken, not the room. You're more susceptible to believing you're the problem than believing consensus is wrong. I've watched this play out across Big Tech repeatedly. Not a prescription I give out lightly, and I acknowledge it might be projection. But I've seen too many brilliant engineers fold under social pressure that had no factual basis. So Big Tech leans right, but gets captured easily by DEI virtue signaling, and pays enormous amounts to prove it. Mark Zuckerberg... believe it or not, another closet conservative I've heard many rumors about — donated $400 million to influence 2020 election administration. In 2024, he explicitly committed to neutrality and spent nothing comparable. He learned. Slowly. But he learned. Here's where it gets complicated on China. Big Tech says: build data centers in America, not China. But I've worked inside China directly. I have never, not once, witnessed a Big Tech company put real protections on their IP in Chinese partnerships. ASD-adjacent minds tend to extend trust where cultures signal openness. China does this masterfully. So when anti-data-center people question whether "built in America" actually protects anything... they're not wrong. The rhetoric exceeds the practice. Now to Box Elder specifically. The Stratos Hyperscale project — 7.5 gigawatts, 40,000 acres, approved by Box Elder County Commission this month — is developed by O'Leary Digital. Kevin O'Leary, who along with Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen has "come out" as a staunch conservative. I respect that. It takes something to do that publicly. But I'm going to hold them accountable the same way I'd hold anyone else. O'Leary and others point to Arabella Advisors money funding data center opposition. That's true and I'll get into it. But they need to be honest that the vast majority of opposition in communities like Box Elder is organic conservative opposition... people worried about the Great Salt Lake, about water, about being near Utah's largest earthquake epicenter. Dismissing them by pointing to dark money is a way of avoiding the harder conversation. Here's what I actually want from people with the power to put 7.5 gigawatts in the Utah desert: If you have the capital and political leverage to pull this off, you have the capital and leverage to finance power plants. You have the leverage to fund serious water reclamation infrastructure. And you have the leverage to institutionally push back on the NGO network that is genuinely coordinating against you; groups like Mormon Women for Ethical Government, which I've written on at length, and which does not represent organic conservative sentiment despite the branding. Go all the way or don't make the argument. And one more thing: if a company wants to be a customer of these data centers, they need to commit to real, auditable IP protections regarding China. If O'Leary wants to make the "America first" argument for data centers, make it mean something.

These come from court transcripts

We’ve now hit the “we need to abolish a constitutional branch of government because we didn’t like their decision” stage of saving democracy

@donelkins @jk_rowling I'm only here for the RATIO of a MORON!

@jk_rowling Love your books, but you’re really losing it on this issue. It’s a case of a very rich successful person punching down on the less powerful.

Western society is currently divided between people who know this is a man and are prepared to say so and those who know this is a man but lie out of obedience to an ideology. There is no third option. Literally nobody on earth thinks "Roxanne Tickle" is actually a woman.

THIS!!! Brilliant

How many minutes elapsed between @NickKristof's "dog rape" column appearing in @nytimes and the opinion piece ending up as a source in a @Wikipedia citation? Months before the Times column saw light of day, a Wikipedia article — "Sexual and gender-based violence against Palestinians during the Gaza war" — had laid the groundwork for the narrative. One of the primary authors of the Wikipedia article, User:Ïvana, was permanently site-banned from Wikipedia after I exposed the account as part of a coordinated influence operation basecamped out of a Discord server run by a group called TechForPalestine (T4P). Among the handlers active on the T4P servers is Zei_Squirrel, a propaganda account that is among the top Hamas boosters on the internet today, operating across Substack, Wikipedia, Reddit, X, and Discord. But here's the real twist: Kristof's dog rape piece was added to the article as a citation by editor Cinaroot. The account did this not by writing that a notable opinion piece had been published on the topic. Instead, it savvily constructed the sentence to imply that the column was news reporting. Here's what Cinaroot wrote: "In 2026 claims alleging that Israel trained dogs to sexually assault Palestinians were reported." Seems a bit motivated, doesn't it? Well, let me tell you a little bit about this account. User:Cinaroot was registered in February 2023. The acount made a smattering of insignificant edits and then went dormant. The account reactivated nine months later, exactly 19 days after October 7. In fact, its first post-dormancy edit was to the October 7 article itself. There, Cinaroot argued on the Talk page that editors must present a justification for the massacre committed by Hamas. Cinaroot wrote: "According to UN Secretary-General António Guterres and we all know it, attacks by Hamas did not happen in a vacuum.The Palestinian people have been subjected to 56 years of suffocating occupation. "We need to add this. right now i feel this is very biased article" [sic]. What came next was far more significant. Over the subsequent two years, Cinaroot would take control over the most important Wikipedia pages related to Qatar's key influence machine: Al Jazeera. It would scrub negative references about Al Jazeera ties to the Qatari royal family, minimize the Qatari state's funding of the network, and accentuate the network's alleged editorial independence. But it went one step further, becoming (by far) the dominant editor on the entry Al Jazeera effect, whose central thrust is that Al Jazeera is a democratizing force in Qatar, the region, and the world. Cinaroot today is responsible for: > 68.2% of the content on the Al Jazeera effect article (second-ranked editor: 12%). > 40.5% of the Al Jazeera Media Network article (second-ranked editor: 12%) > 27.8% of the Al Jazeera English article (second-ranked editor: 11%) In less than three years, a single account took editorial control on high-volume, high-contention pages that have existed for: - 16 years (Al Jazeera Media Network) - 14 years (Al Jazeera effect), and - 21 years (Al Jazeera English). For any normal Wikipedia user—who typically spends months, if not years, learning the site's rules, procedures, and culture—that is beyond extraordinary. It defies rational explanation. I remind you, this is the account that swooped in to insert an opinion column with explosive allegations, falsely construing the column as reporting, into a key article. This is the face of a coordinated narrative operation. Look closely.

Hello Senator Thune, Wow. Just wow. Democrats didn't block Trump's nominees, @SenateGOP did. You had the majority. You failed. Republicans rejected Trump's picks. That's not on Democrats. We aren't Marxists; we believe in historical fact. And the fact is, you torpedoed @EagleEdMartin over manufactured outrage about January 6, while ignoring actual violence your constituents face. You don't get to revise the record. You own this. You talk about being the party of personal accountability. Stop attending lobbyist steak dinners and start showing it.

Mark Warner has been involved in a treasonous conspiracy against President Trump for a very long time. Warner coordinated with British intelligence operative Chris Steele, Soros-Hoffman sponsored Dan Jones and others. Kash should arrest and raid him

Lol...

Here it is: Published in Oct. 2018 by @epochtimes and @themarketswork, this infographic 👇👇 remains the single most comprehensive overview to date. Barack Obama used the entire federal government—including the media and foreign powers—to overthrow the duly elected president of the United States. And @DNIGabbard confirmed it all. theepochtimes.com/spygate-the-tr…

On This Day — May 15, 1948: The Jews Refused to Die Again While every newspaper & radio pundit on Earth was already writing Israel’s obituary, something completely insane happened. On this day, 5 Arab armies (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon) plus Saudi contingents invaded the newborn Jewish state with one declared goal: finish what Hitler started & “drive the Jews into the sea.” The math was grotesque: 600,000 Jews (men, women, and children) versus a combined Arab population of nearly 200 million with professional armies, British officers, and Soviet weapons. Israel had almost nothing — homemade Sten guns, Molotov cocktails, and whatever rifles could be scrounged. Britain and America both enforced a total arms embargo. The world waited for the slaughter. Instead, the Jews did the impossible. From the displaced-persons camps of Europe and from across the West came roughly 4,000 Machal volunteers — battle-hardened WWII veterans from Britain, the United States, Canada, and South Africa. Fighter pilots, bomber crews, and infantry officers dropped everything and rushed in. One of the most surreal moments: a young Jewish radio repairman from England arrived with zero combat experience. When asked what he could do, he said he fixed radios. The commanders’ eyes lit up. A shipment of broken walkie-talkies had just arrived. He and one Israeli partner spent weeks in a dusty former British camp bringing them back to life, one by one, so Israeli troops could finally talk to each other on the battlefield. Then came the miracles even the Bible might envy. Stalin, hoping to pull the socialist-leaning Israel into the Soviet orbit, secretly allowed Communist Czechoslovakia to become Israel’s lifeline. Prague sold the Jews Messerschmitt 109 fighters (assembled in secret), Spandau machine guns, rifles, ammunition, and bombs. Three B-17 Flying Fortresses were quietly bought in Panama, flown to Czechoslovakia, loaded with arms, and smuggled straight into a war zone — heavy bombers delivered to a country that didn’t officially exist two days earlier. Against every prediction, the tide turned. Israel lost 1% of its entire population in the fighting — a higher per-capita death toll than Britain suffered in all of World War II. Hardly a family was untouched. But by early 1949, the invading armies were pushed back and the armistice lines (the “Green Line”) were drawn — lines the Arab side itself insisted were temporary military lines only, never borders. This wasn’t just a military victory. This was the Jewish people — survivors of pogroms, exiles, and the Holocaust, joined by Jews who had never left the Middle East — declaring with their blood that after 2,000 years of wandering and persecution, they would never again be defenseless in their ancestral homeland. That is why a strong, sovereign, self-reliant Israel is not optional. It is the difference between survival and another chapter in the long book of Jewish tragedy. Never again will Jews have to beg strangers for the right to live. Never again will our survival depend on the fleeting “kindness” of empires that look away. Israel is the guarantee — secured by Jewish strength, not by the mercy of others. Am Yisrael Chai.🇮🇱

FLASHBACK: BBC and CNN are now in full panic after Israeli forces captured and interrogated Islamic Jihad spokesperson Tariq Salami. According to his interrogation, this is how the media game actually worked: - When rockets hit Gaza hospitals or schools → blame Israel. - When Hamas fires from inside those same buildings → Israel gets accused of “war crimes” for striking back. - Every explosion was pre-agreed to be blamed on Israel, even when Islamic Jihad rockets fell short (like the Al-Ma’madani hospital blast). This wasn’t journalism. This was coordinated disinformation between terrorist groups and major Western media outlets. The public was deliberately misled for years. Demand accountability. Share this. Don’t let them get away with it.

This is a devious rhetorical trick. Labeling someone a “Nakba survivor” is designed to evoke instant sympathy and a false sense of moral clarity, but it is little more than taxpayer-funded propaganda. Consider the absurdity: roughly 99% of Palestinian Arabs alive in 1949 survived the war and its displacements. Calling the displaced a “survivor” stretches the word beyond recognition. It is a newly coined term, crafted in academia and activist circles long after the events. Its real genius lies in creating false equivalence. It places ordinary Palestinian civilians who were displaced amid a war their own leaders launched on the same moral plane as Holocaust survivors (of whom only about one-third emerged alive). It airbrushes away the ~6,000 Jews killed in 1948, elevates the ~12,000 Arab deaths, and erases the thousands of Jews forcibly expelled from the Old City of Jerusalem and other areas. By anointing the displaced as sacred “survivors,” the term invites us to forget that the Nazi-aligned Palestinian leadership rejected the UN partition plan, chose war to prevent any Jewish state, and promised quick victory while urging Arabs to flee. It glosses over Israel’s Declaration of Independence, which explicitly invited Arab inhabitants to “participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship.” And it conveniently overlooks the ~150,000 Arabs who stayed put, accepted Israeli citizenship, and whose descendants now form over 20% of Israel’s population. This is international grievance politics pushed by the Mayor of New York City, who genuinely believes that Palestinians should be able to “return to their homes” – a nonsensical idea designed to justify perpetual victimhood and violence. The move weaponizes real civilian hardship while inverting roles: turning a war of choice and rejectionism into an unprovoked “catastrophe” inflicted by the intended victims. It sustain grievance and does not nothing to advance peace.