Brandon Music

Evergreen tweet.

@BitcoinBoomer12 @mkeBucks11 @tavi_chocochip What the heck do you think the HLS is intended for?

@mkeBucks11 @tavi_chocochip Did they want to?

I find it weird that Elon didn't mention NASA's Artemis II mission at all, despite posting quite a lot on other topics. He keeps saying space exploration is super-important to him. So does he really care about human missions to space, or is it only when it's a SpaceX program?

It is not unconstitutional.

@charlie_savage @rgoodlaw Yeah, he’s full of it.

New memo by Trump's 36-year-old OLC chief, Elliot Gaiser, says Congress's Constitutional power to make laws necessary & proper to regulate how the govt works is just a power to "assist" the president--so laws are valid if they increase Trump's power but not if they restrict it.

Godspeed Artemis II April 1, 2026 -- 18:35 EDT

@NOELreports If Russia would withdraw from the Donbas region it would create prospects for a settlement and an end to hostilities .

❗️Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov says a withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from Donbas would create prospects for a settlement and an end to hostilities. #Russia

i ain't going to register for anything. This president can kiss my rear end.

@bresreports Yeah that ain’t gonna happen.

Just a stunning executive order from Trump on voting by mail. The US Postal Service will monitor who gets mail-in ballots for federal elections & who mails them in

@Timodc As long they can find 11,000 in Ga, would that be acceptable?

77,302,579 more tweets like this and i will be able to move forward.

@deanwball most systems have trained on copyrighted data. I love AI, but you paint with such a broad brush. And, many of those who are argue that it's world changing, don't place it in the context of the real world, but their own pockets. It has some massive "web 3" "crypto bros" energy.

My theory about why so many on the left remain in denial about AI is that their worldview rests on a load-bearing notion of “the tech industry” as being composed of vapid morons whose accomplishments will always be superficial, never “real,” always based on some grand theft. With social media and search, the theft was manipulation of people’s minds. With Amazon it was worker exploitation. With Apple, it was a mix of these. In the left retelling of the story, no value whatsoever was created from these technologies. All a trick. With AI the “grand theft” in the telling of the left is the use of copyright-protected data in pre-training. This one is a particularly dangerous mindworm for them, since they identify with the “artists and writers” from whom they imagine this training data was “stolen.” This is why things like “mode collapse” from synthetic data, stochastic parrotry, “it can only mimic things it has seen on the web” and similar are so core to the argument for the left: it supports the notion of “tech bro” thieves—who lest we forget, and they never will let us, have no “liberal arts” training!—continuing their unbroken string of robberies. Of course the “grand theft” notion is an old motif on the left, relating as it does to a zero-sum mindset about economics, business, and growth that is. more traditionally associated with the left, though the lines have always been blurry, since the zero-sum mindset is above all else a *human* fallacy and thus a useful tactic in mass politics of all valences. The lines have become especially blurry lately, as has been widely observed. Anyway, the notion that AI *is* a genuinely world-changing technology, that it can “go beyond” its “stolen” training data, breaks this load-bearing conception of the tech industry as vapid and superficial and, more importantly, of the people within it as blood-sucking thieves.

Someone had to do it.

@bkb29JD I still hate Laetnerr.

Duke loses in the best fashion. Suck it Duke

@realBigBrainAI This is stupid nonsense.

Marc Andreessen says raw intelligence might be the worst qualification for leadership — and it changes everything about how we should think about AI. "If the leader is more than one standard deviation of IQ away from the followers, it's a real problem." Andreessen points to the US military, one of the earliest and most rigorous adopters of IQ testing, as the source of this insight. They slot people into specialties and leadership roles based on IQ scores. And over the years, they kept seeing the same pattern. A leader who is significantly less intelligent than their people struggles to model how those people think. That part is intuitive. But the reverse turns out to be equally true. "It's actually very hard for very smart people to model the internal thought processes of even moderately smart people." A leader who is two standard deviations above the norm of the organisation they're running also loses theory of mind, that ability to hold an accurate model of what's happening inside someone else's head. The gap is too wide in both directions. Andreessen then takes this to its logical conclusion: "If you had a person or a machine that had a thousand IQ or something like it, its understanding of reality would be so alien to the people or the things that it was managing that it wouldn't even be able to connect in any sort of realistic way." An AI that vastly outthinks every human in the room isn't positioned to lead those humans. It's positioned to be completely incomprehensible to them. Leadership has never really been an intelligence problem. It's a connection problem. And no amount of raw intelligence closes that gap — past a certain point, it only widens it. The world will not be run by the smartest thing in the room for a long time. Maybe ever.

@patrickc @conor64 This how people react to a pandemic that occurs once a century.

Offhand — * Vacillation on masks, with abundant motivated reasoning in every case. * Promulgation of made-up thresholds with no evidentiary basis (e.g. 6 feet). * Authoritarian delight in nanny state intrusiveness (policing the beach and such). * 180 on many issues around BLM. * Lack of effective response from science funding bodies. * Denial of aerosolized transmission. * Changing of trial readouts so that they’d occur after the election. (Confirmed to me by senior OWS officials.) * Crazy criteria for vaccine distribution. * Adamant insistence on vaccine efficacy beyond what was supported by data. * Almost complete lack of follow-through on OWS (on pan-variant vaccines). I’m sure there are more, but those are the ones that stick out.

A question for everyone: survey data suggests that by the end of the Covid-19 emergency trust in public health institutions had decreased significantly. If you are among the people who reacted that way, why specifically? I'm hoping for long, diverse, individualized answers.

This is pretty dope. I won't lie.

@MadamSavvy @AaronParnas You know when you look outside to see if it’s raining, that’s doesn’t mean that’s all the rain there has been during the storm. Seriously, this is just terrible reasoning.

lets be generous and give you 15 million total. Actually, lets do 20 million because im such a nice person. there are 341,000,000 roughly in the USA. That would be rougly 5.9%~ of the population. but you didn't have 20 million. which means you didn't even get what I said. And if we are to believe in your love of democracy, then that means you do not hold a majority view...and not nearly enough turned out to impact anything. Everyone else was busy working or enjoying weather. maybe offer them more than 20 bucks next time~

NEW: Organizers have confirmed to me that more than 8 million people attended today’s no Kings Day protest—one of the largest ever.

@carlquintanilla @TheRickWilson How can you say this???? When the DOW is over 45k! 🤣

The #BondiTop 📉

@lthomasnews The C in Colby shall stand for collective communism! lol

The real heel turn would be becoming a Bernie Bro

@MobiusDick @elonmusk There is corruption in the current government. The invisble hand is a pimp a hand without regulation. Any idea to the contrary, is just ignorance of the fact that human beings are greedy, and captialism does succeed without regulation.

@elonmusk Except we don’t have a free-market. We have people that use the government to oppose the efficient honing by Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand, and use Government to enrich themselves against market forces. We need a Separation of Business & State and an end to PACs

Exactly

@jdcrowley @elonmusk He's a dork. simple as that. He got stuffed into a lot of lockers as a kid. And he's constantly shoving praise and success in our faces, in a vain attempt to mask his insecurities.

@elonmusk You are one of the dumbest people alive and the reason you hate the left is because we can all tell. The reason you’ve embraced the right is because you’re deeply insecure and need an audience who’ll give you the praise you’re so desperate for. Pathetic lol.

@matloff @elonmusk There is no "winning" the "race". There is no race. It's as technological advancement--it's a story that's repeated itself in many different forms over time. ONly those with a vested financial interest in the area, think its a race, or they are drinking the kool aid.

@elonmusk This is the part I've never understood. What exactly does it mean to "win" this "race"?

Yes