Brett Aquila

68 posts

Brett Aquila banner
Brett Aquila

Brett Aquila

@BrettAquila

Founder of https://t.co/HmLaQ2asRz. OMAD carnivore, manly man, mountain athlete, AI developer, two German Shepherds, $BTC, relentless pursuit of excellence

Keeseville, NY Katılım Ocak 2012
214 Takip Edilen257 Takipçiler
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@adam3us @MayaPar25 There's good 'ol "Island" Andy Back intimidating and denigrating people into agreeing with him, as always. Just another day in Andy's manipulation paradise.
English
2
0
2
158
Adam Back
Adam Back@adam3us·
@MayaPar25 also didn't expect you to support 110 clown show, fwiw. you might want to research that more and be less vocal on it, politically, because it will fail embarrassingly in a few weeks.
English
19
4
442
15K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@SullyMichaelvan Unfortunately, a sizeable chunk of posts are from grifters, another sizeable chunk lacks knowledge, and about half are bots. How do you account for that?
English
1
0
0
121
Michael Sullivan
Michael Sullivan@SullyMichaelvan·
I didn’t want to write this. One of the deepest lessons I’ve learned from researching sentiment data is how irrational and angry people get towards the bottom of Bitcoin bear markets. People that are historically aligned often fall into conflicts that wouldn’t exist near tops. The BIP-110 debate increasingly feels like one of those moments. I wanted no part of that. I’ve been publicly cancelled before, and I have no desire to go through that again. I know how painful it is to have an angry crowd criticizing and shaming you, which gives me a strong bias to avoid situations exactly like this one. But I’m pushing against that bias because (for better or worse) I have a novel dataset that offers a unique lens on the BIP-110 debate. I’m going to attempt to keep this unbiased, but before I do, I’m going to lead with what will be my highest-conviction opinion of the entire piece: People like Mechanic and Luke Dashjr understand Bitcoin’s consensus mechanisms better than I do, while Adam Back and Jameson Lopp grasp Bitcoin’s technical nuances more deeply than I ever will. I am not here to pretend I understand these dynamics of this debate better than the people who have spent years studying them. That’s not why I’m writing this. “Then why should I care what you have to say?” Because there is another side of the debate that is also important, and it’s on this side I have a different perspective. The social layer. For those of you new to my work, I’ve been researching the language, narratives, and emotional patterns of different groups throughout Bitcoin. I’ve been (obsessively) studying the emotional regimes and crowd psychology associated with the space. That includes the people now publicly associated with both sides of the BIP-110 debate… and the differences between these groups are striking. I believe I would be doing a disservice by keeping that data to myself simply because publishing it might piss people off. So there will be no paywall on this piece, no call to action halfway through, and I won’t ask you to become a subscriber. I simply want these charts to exist publicly, where anyone can examine them or interpret them differently than I do. I will try to present it as fairly as I can, but I am not neutral, and neither is anyone reading this. People will inevitably see different things in these charts. This data cannot tell us who is technically correct. But it can help us to surface clues about how the debate is evolving, who thinks they are winning, and why I believe one of these groups is currently experiencing an engagement-reinforced narrative environment.
Michael Sullivan tweet media
English
40
27
185
23K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@SBakerMD Ya know, I started reading Bryan's entire article, but realized his body had already spoken the truth; his mouth lies all the time. So it's steak and eggs for this 8-year carnivore again tonight. Just spent time in the sun. Enjoying perfect health. Life is great. 🥩☀️
English
1
1
29
709
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩@SBakerMD·
Dude compares himself to Jesus cause he has a tummy ache
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson

The world wants me to die. My incurable disease diagnosis became global news. It was omnipresent on social media and 1,900 articles were written in a matter of days. Many were saddened. However, joy dominated the commentary. People pointed to schadenfreude, the pleasure of another's failure. Yes, there’s that. There is a special place in people’s hearts that loves to see others fail, especially when that person’s presence threatens their own psychological stability in some way or helps them feel better about themselves. But, if you look over the social media commentary about me, you’ll see that pattern: “he deserved it.” I deserved it because I challenged death. The crowd was running a deeply rooted psychological script that represents the oldest, most deeply embedded stories of human culture. This was the first story ever written down, 4,000 years ago. Gilgamesh sought eternal life after losing someone he loved, only to have the plant of youth stolen by a serpent as he bathed. Leaving him to accept his mortality. Asclepius became so skilled at rejuvenation that he raised the dead. As punishment, Zeus struck him down with a thunderbolt to enforce life and death authority. This is the story of Jesus. Pontius Pilate offered a choice between a thief and the immortalist, and the crowd demanded the execution. People need this story conclusion to keep themselves sane. The challenger must lose and the loss must appear deserved. It’s a shield of self preservation. For if death is inevitable, their existence and that of their loved ones is justified and unavoidable. If death is not inevitable, nothing about their reality is safe. I occupy the same philosophical and archetypal position as Gilgamesh, Asclepius and Jesus. This statement will draw outrage and accusations of blasphemy, hubris and narcissism. Nevertheless, it’s the pattern that has repeated itself for thousands of years. Death has been the omnipresent concern of the human race. It encapsulates our greatest fears, joy and curiosities. The discourse around it changes over time; however, the fundamentals remain unchanged. What’s different about this moment, that is unlike any other moment, is that physical death may no longer be inevitable. What if I didn’t deserve it? And what if I am your ally, and not a threat?

English
44
27
653
57.6K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@coinjoined You're lying. You don't find them acceptable. You're squealing like pigs about it! But it doesn't matter if you accept it, because we weren't asking anyhow; just like Core didn't ask the majority if they wanted the proposed changes. Knots for the win.
English
1
0
0
35
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@rodpalmerhodl You're confusing humble with compliant. No, we're not compliant with known Core scammers and infiltrators. Back's reputation just got his business deal squashed; now he'll lose this battle as well. Knots for the win.
English
0
0
0
25
Rod Palmer
Rod Palmer@rodpalmerhodl·
plebs might have stacked sats but they certainly didn’t remain humble
English
7
1
63
8.7K
George Saoulidis
George Saoulidis@georgecursor·
I'm absolutely convinced that any rushed anti spam soft fork or anything similar is a psyop. They want to damage bitcoin. Will not run it. My node my rules.
Adam Back@adam3us

@SimplestBTCBook because some of us feel sorry for the users who have been misled. read the longer post x.com/adam3us/status… we actively do NOT want bitcoiners to fork off because of confusion.

English
11
5
51
14.3K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@bubbleboi AI is not reliable enough yet to remove humans from the loop, and it actually takes more humans now to build, monitor, and maintain AI-driven systems than the human-driven systems they replace.
English
0
0
0
600
bubble boi
bubble boi@bubbleboi·
Why AI makes jobs instead of loses them. 1. There are more profitable ideas/projects than time, talent, and general resources there are to realize them. 2. AI lowers the talent and resources bar substantially leading to more ideas becoming reality. 3. Successful idea/project = more wealth, more work, and more jobs. The reason why so many people made the mistake of thinking it gets rid of jobs is they see a fixed pie. But in reality we are growing the pie. AI is really only bearish labor for bloated mismanaged incumbents not the entire economy.
English
68
115
1K
292.6K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@sama Well, quite honestly, the models aren't reliable enough to eliminate humans in the loop. You need even more humans around if you're going to implement it. 20+ year full-stack developer here. I love coding with AI, but it's not reliable enough yet.
English
0
0
1
916
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
so far at least, i'm pretty sure AI has been net job-creating. this was not what i expected--although i was much less pessimistic than others, i thought by this level of capability we'd have seen some impact. it is possible this direction keeps going!
English
1.9K
546
14K
2.5M
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@LorenHodl Oh, did I just hear the "we're all in this together" theme? You know, like during Covid, when an evil cabal tried to get everyone to fall in line so they could take advantage? Core is doing the same thing? Yap. Manipulators always use the same playbook.
English
1
1
4
203
Loren HODL™️ 🔆
Loren HODL™️ 🔆@LorenHodl·
As the dust settles on the BIP-110 debate, it’s becoming clear that this particular proposal is unlikely to achieve the miner signaling needed for activation. Whether you supported it as a necessary defense of Bitcoin’s monetary focus or opposed it as an overreach that risked innovation and chain stability, one thing is certain: the conversation revealed deep passions on all sides. Importantly, this debate hasn’t soured my view of the vast majority of Bitcoiners. On both sides I see people who care deeply about the network’s long-term health, decentralization, and success. We all want Bitcoin to thrive as sound money, a robust settlement layer, and a tool for financial sovereignty. Disagreements on the best path forward are natural in a permissionless system like ours; they’re a feature, not a bug. Now is the time to look ahead. If (or when) BIP-110 fades, we should focus on recouping, healing, and reuniting around our shared mission: building and growing the Bitcoin network. That means: • Continuing to run and support full nodes for a healthy, decentralized base layer. • Innovating responsibly: whether that’s improving scalability solutions, enhancing privacy, expanding Lightning, or developing practical monetary use cases that respect block space realities. • Engaging constructively across divides instead of deepening them. Bitcoin is bigger than any single proposal or faction. • Prioritizing education, adoption, and infrastructure that makes Bitcoin more useful and accessible for everyday people and institutions alike. Bitcoin has survived far greater challenges through its history by sticking to first principles and adapting as a living system. Let’s channel the energy from this debate into positive action. The best way to “win” is to make Bitcoin stronger, more valuable, and more antifragile together
English
46
8
129
23.3K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@BTCombs11 You say that, yet you use email with spam filters. Why? Why don't you let markets send you spam? I won't call you names, but I will say you haven't thought this through at a high enough level. Keep digging.
English
2
0
1
37
Reils
Reils@BTCombs11·
Call me whatever you want, but we need to be more focused on normie adoption before being worried about spam on the timechain If people want to pay to put dumb crap onchain, let them. Drive adoption to disincentize those transactions… What happened to being free market ppl?
English
9
2
34
7.9K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@adam3us @Fundamentals21m Oh yeah, your constant panic-posting shows you're super excited right about now about your chances of success. That's why you're so laid back and casual about it, right? 🤣💪 "It's a hostile takeover" 🤣
English
0
0
0
8
Adam Back
Adam Back@adam3us·
@Fundamentals21m cypherpunk summer🌞30 days left🍿🍿can't wait for the filter bippers to fork around, and find out!
English
4
3
55
2.8K
Fundamentals 40HPW
Fundamentals 40HPW@Fundamentals21m·
If you think the BIP110 discourse is bad now, wait until you see the gamma squeeze on it as we get closer to activation.
English
4
0
23
2.2K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@SBakerMD I love that you're calling this dude out. We are drowning in bullshit these days. You were right about carnivore. The movement picks up steam by the day. 8-year carnivore, 4-year OMAD carnivore, 54 y/o mountain athlete. Thank you for your courage. I'm behind you all the way!
English
0
0
4
144
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩@SBakerMD·
Brian Johnson record of solutions vs supplements sold so far Solve death = 0 Supplements sold = millions
Hashgraphian@Hashgraphian

@SBakerMD @reverohealth You're a retard. Instead of bitching or complaining, he looks for solutions. That's a great trait and anyone who puts down said trait is a piece of shit.

English
9
10
192
17.2K
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩
Dr Shawn Baker 🥩@SBakerMD·
Laughable and pure marketing nonsense for engagement- undoubtedly linked to ultimately more supplement sales or the like FTR we see people putting autoimmune diseases into remission all the time @reverohealth
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson

My plan to cure autoimmune gastritis To our knowledge, no one has ever done this to try and cure an autoimmune disease. Context: In May, I got diagnosed with autoimmune gastritis (AIG). We found it by taking a tissue biopsy of my stomach. My immune cells are confused, causing my stomach to eat itself. AIG stops your body from absorbing nutrients like iron and B12, and can eventually lead to cancer. It likely started decades ago when I was diagnosed with hypothyroidism when 21 years old. The thyroid and stomach are closely linked in your immune system. I feel fortunate that I've been taking such good care of my body for the past five years as my condition would otherwise be much more severe. Millions of people are affected by this disease and are undiagnosed. Standard of care tells you that you can’t do anything about it. That’s old fashioned. Here is how we are going to try and cure it: Step 0: find and diagnose the disease ✅ AIG is rarely caught early because symptoms are subtle. Early warnings are low iron and B12, but when hemoglobin and hematocrit look normal, doctors routinely miss it because there are no obvious signs of anemia. A standard colonoscopy won't find it either, because it only checks the lower digestive tract, not the stomach. It was only through a highly targeted stomach biopsy that we found it. Even biopsies can miss it if they don't sample the exact right spots. Most people with AIG go undiagnosed. Step 1: Map my immune system ✅ Last Thursday, I had a blood draw to isolate and decode 1 million of my immune cells. Think of your immune cells as trillions of soldiers. Each carries a unique key designed to unlock and destroy a specific threat, like a virus or bacteria. A standard blood test allows you to see how many soldiers you have, but not their keys. Sequencing one million individual immune cells allows us to read the exact pattern of the teeth on every single key. This is important for my autoimmune gastritis (AIG) because a specific platoon of rogue soldiers has developed keys that unlock an attack on my stomach lining. Right now, we don’t know who they are. This test will inform us of which soldiers have gone rogue and are attacking me from within. Once we know the soldier and key, we know what therapy path to pursue to shut them down. Step 2: Catch the rogue soldiers I will be getting a second biopsy from my stomach because we need to collect live tissue. We are currently planning out the logistics of getting the sample from my stomach to the lab. We need these live cells because the initial blood tests showed the antibodies, which prove that an attack is happening, but doesn’t show us the actual rogue soldier doing the damage which is a T-cell. The live sample will allow us to match the immune system mapping we did to the live T-cells. Step 3: Build an early warning system To keep an eye on the disease as we work towards a therapy, we’re building an early warning system. I'll have my blood drawn every two weeks and we’ll pair that information with wearable data to look for flare ups. This is important because the attack happens without producing symptoms that I can easily feel. Step 4: Create a “Bryan in a dish” testing model, a miniature of my immune system At the same time, we are taking a massive sample of my immune cells and deep freezing them (cryopreservation) for two reasons: a) we’ll create a living lab: using these cells to replicate my immune environment in a lab dish. This allows us to test experimental drugs and therapies on my actual live cells before putting them into my body. b) it creates a back up plan for me by preserving the raw cellular material needed for targeted rejuvenation therapies in the future. Step 5: Build precision guided therapies to end the attack Once we know who the rogue soldiers are, we will engineer a therapy designed uniquely for them. The trick is only turning off the rogue soldiers while leaving all the other healthy ones functioning as they are. For safety checks, we’ll do two test runs: 1) we’ll run the therapy through a computer model that has my biology to evaluate how my molecules interact. 2) We will take my actual cells that we froze in Step 4 and watch them interact for real. If both are successful, we’ll pursue one of four therapies: a) fix the mistake my cells are making, restoring my immune system's natural off switches b) teach the rogue cells to tolerate my stomach instead of attacking it c) design smart molecules that physically plug into the rogue cells and turn them off d) build soldiers who will track down and eliminate the rogue soldiers causing the damage

English
31
24
433
45.9K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@SBakerMD @reverohealth I was wondering when/if you would respond to his announcement. His poor results were obvious to anyone paying attention. It was clear his efforts were failing, but even I didn't expect an actual disease. He had the courage to try. The results speak for themselves. Now we know.
English
0
0
0
779
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
I'm being serious. I don't know the specifics of your condition, but I was wondering if you had given carnivore a real shot. It's intriguing that it would help, but not be sustainable. That seems to be contradictory on the surface. I'm also curious what kinds of foods are sustainable if meat isn't, because that's what we're designed to eat. I certainly wish you all the best, and I sincerely hope you figure it out.
English
1
0
1
10
Sam 🇺🇸
Sam 🇺🇸@SamMoline1·
I’m not sure if you are being sarcastic or serious 😂 It gives improvement in some ways but it isn’t sustainable. My ms attacked the nerves that work my small intestines causing permanent paralysis in some areas. That means meat eating has to be very intentional. That process completely changed my diet. I did micro dose shrooms tho, definitely recommend that if a clean eating diet becomes impossible.
English
1
0
0
16
Beaver 🦁
Beaver 🦁@beaverd·
Bryan, The immune system is not faulty in Autoimmune diseases, its functioning properly. The immune system is detecting and correctly identifying cells that have become electrically different and metabolically dysfunctional from the rest of the body. The standard cell has: -A cellular membrane voltage of ~70mV -Displays correct surface markers (like MHC class 1) that show which proteins it is making -Responds to growth control signals from other cells -Emits and absorbs biophotons in phase with surrounding tissue. A dysfunctional cell: -different membrane voltage -Viral proteins displayed on the markers, or MHC-I is downregulated -ignores growth control -biophoton pattern disrupted -Metabolic profile has shifted. This would be Warburg in cancer cells and an altered metabolism in infected cells. T-cells are really tough because they are the slow, specific and learned response. Very persistent. Specifically for Autoimmune gastritis and its cousin Crohn's disease, this would be sustained loss of mitochondrial performance in the gut wall, the immune response is a symptom. The enterocyte is the most vulnerable because it has the quickest life of any human cell, there is little headroom for error. The reason your stomach is eating itself @bryan_johnson is because your cellular metabolism is basically destroyed. You need sunlight and RAW animal fat from COWS that are GRASS FED. Animal fat is the only thing that can actually heal your gut. Cellular membrane lipid composition determines membrane impedance and therefore cellular performance. Your gut NEEDS replacement lipids, there is no other source. cooked fat is better than nothing but much more difficult to digest. RAW UNPASTEURIZED dairy such as yogurt, kefir and heavy cream will also aid in restoring cellular metabolism. You'll think I'm crazy but in a few years after you've tried everything, you'll see the light.
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson

Bad news #1: I have an autoimmune disease. My stomach is eating itself. Bad news #2: 2–5% of people have this, too. Likely more, because it hides. Good news: I'm going to try and solve it. Will share all. As a kid, I ate sugar cereal, drank sugary soda, and gobbled down fast food. I had a few healthy years in my early 20s but then became a young father of three and began building a business. Juggling that stress and grind, I let my health slip and gained 40 lbs. Within a few years I’d fallen into a deep, chronic depression. Somewhere in that timeline, my body began developing an autoimmune process affecting my thyroid and then my stomach lining. It’s called Autoimmune Gastritis (AIG). My hypothyroidism got diagnosed when I was 21 years old with a routine blood draw. That enabled me to begin proactive management, supplementing levothyroxine and Armour Thyroid. They are the hormones my body should be producing on its own but wasn’t. By taking these pills daily, my body was able to operate as though my thyroid was functioning properly. What I didn’t know was that something else was going on inside my body: my stomach had begun attacking itself. But there was no routine test to find out and I didn’t have any symptoms. I just discovered it in May. I'm unsure how long I've had it. AIG causes irreversible damage: nutritional deficiency, anemia, and over a long horizon, elevated cancer risk. When AIG is discovered today, standard medical care concedes defeat, stating that nothing can be done except managing the condition, no matter how awful or lethal the effects. Looking back over the past few years, I can now see the early signals we were picking up in measurement but hadn’t connected the dots. For 11 years, I’ve had low ferritin, without anemia. We continually tried to raise my iron levels with food and supplementation but nothing would work. We chased the obvious solutions first. A plant-based diet means all my iron is the hard-to-absorb, non-heme kind. Hard training, sauna, and hyperbaric oxygen all raise the body's demand for iron. But none of them explained the core failure: despite me taking iron orally, trialing every formulation, and using every timing trick, none of the iron would stick. What I didn’t fully appreciate until recently is how many stones my previous providers had left unturned. The low ferritin kept getting explained away but not fixed. I overhauled my medical team earlier this year. It was the rebuild to lay the groundwork for Immortals Care, our $1M a year protocol. With greater capacity, we revisited everything. On the surface, my low ferritin was easy to dismiss by most standards of care. My hemoglobin and hematocrit were normal. Ferritin measures stored iron, while hemoglobin measures circulating iron, and because the body drains its reserves first to keep hemoglobin normal, you can be fully iron deficient with a perfectly normal hemoglobin and hematocrit. This is why my low ferritin kept getting dismissed: the numbers that define anemia looked fine, so no one asked why my iron reserves wouldn't refill. My team pressed on that question. They first turned to a colonoscopy. I was 48 years old and overdue. It was good health hygiene to have while also serving a specific purpose of searching for a hidden source of blood loss such as a polyp or even cancer in my bowels. Either one of those would be an explanation of why the iron kept disappearing. At the same time, they began connecting the dots. Iron absorption depends on stomach acid, so one theory was that my stomach acid was disrupted. They also knew that thyroid and stomach autoimmunity often travel together, so often that the pairing has a name: thyrogastric syndrome. Put against my 27+ year history of autoimmune thyroid disease, the pieces pointed to a single hypothesis: my own immune system was attacking my stomach. To our surprise, my colonoscopy came back clean. A perfectly healthy colon, better than 95% of colonoscopies of men, according to the gastroenterologist. That ruled out the first concern and worst possible outcome: slow continuous bleeding from colon cancer, or pre-cancerous polyp. My team had exercised great foresight though, anticipating this possible outcome. In addition to a colonoscopy, they’d ordered an upper endoscopy to be performed at the same time. The combined procedure is a bi-directional endoscopy. Probes would look at my entire intestinal tract, up from below and down the throat. Additionally, we had several blood biomarkers measured ahead of the procedure to try and pick up on any signals that would give the gastroenterologist guidance for what to look for while doing visual inspections. Fifteen minutes before the procedure, my blood results returned, finding elevated levels of anti-parietal-cells-antibodies (APCA). They came back at roughly five times the upper limit of normal (103, against a ceiling of 20 Units/mL). It was a positive result confirming the suspicion of AIG being the culprit behind my low ferritin, the other type of gastritis, driven by a bacterial infection, was already ruled out, as we knew I am negative to H. pylori. Even before this finding, my team had ordered five biopsies to be taken from three regions of my stomach. The biopsies were the critical piece. Had they not been ordered, the bi-directional endoscopy would have been completed and AIG remained undiagnosed as there were no visual signatures of the condition in my intestines. Two days later, the results of biopsies came in, showing clear signs of early autoimmune gastritis: early atrophy confined to the acid-producing lining, with the rest of the stomach still spared. My team had anticipated this, methodically tracing every line of evidence. We now had a formal diagnosis. I have autoimmune gastritis AIG. My stomach is eating itself. So this was never one problem. It was three, linked to one another: the iron deficiency, the autoimmune gastritis driving it, and the autoimmune thyroid disease alongside it. Iron and thyroid feed each other both ways, low iron impairs the conversion of thyroid hormone into its active form, and an under active thyroid impairs how the body uses iron. Each made the other harder to fix. Autoimmune gastritis affects an estimated 2–5% of people, and likely more, because it hides and is challenging to diagnose. It's usually silent for years, surfacing only once the stomach has atrophied enough to do real damage: iron deficiency first, then B12 deficiency, then anemia from both, and over a long horizon, raised stomach-cancer risk. In one study of people with precancerous gastric lesions, roughly 18% carried the autoimmune antibodies, and only about 1% had ever been diagnosed. And the earliest clue, low ferritin, is the one standard medicine waves through. Low iron stores get normalized and rarely investigated at all when anemia hasn't shown up yet. That blind spot is what hid mine for a decade. The good news: the iron deficiency is now corrected. I received a 1,000 mg Monoferric iron infusion. This was chosen for two reasons after considering multiple formulations. First, it can safely deliver a full dose of iron in a single infusion (1,000 mg), while older options like Venofer require several separate appointments to reach the same total. Second, certain other IV iron formulations can cause a drop in blood phosphate levels, an important mineral for bones and energy. Monoferric is much less likely to do this, which matters given how closely we track long-term metabolic and bone health parameters. As mentioned earlier, current medical standards treat AIG as something to be managed, not resolved. It's worth noting that many of you give me a hard time, inviting me to "live life" and engage in self-destructive behaviors like a "normal person". I'm cool with the playful ribbing. Also, had I not taken care of my health during the past five years, my situation could potentially be very serious. You too may have a lurking health issue that is undiagnosed and could increase in severity from unhealthy life choices, without your knowing. The absence of symptoms is not the presence of health. A gentle nudge that minding your health, no matter your situation in life, is good decision making. My team and I are going to try and solve my AIG. This is how we’re approaching it: First, routine monitoring keeps the disease in view: ferritin and iron, B12, the pepsinogen I/II ratio, gastrin, and chromogranin A. Gastrin is the dial to watch. If it climbs, the disease is advancing, and the risk of gastric neuroendocrine tumors climbs with it. Second, we’re doing advanced characterization of the disease. We’ll do a repeat biopsy to read the immune infiltrate, deep cytokine profiling, and T-cell subset analysis, to see which pathways are actually firing. That testing drives the intervention plan, including the experimental approaches we intend to develop. + If gastrin and chromogranin rise: damp the gastrin drive (netazepide) and tighten endoscopic surveillance. If the profile is Th1 / interferon-driven: target JAK/STAT. + If it's Th17 / IL-17-driven: target IL-17 and STAT3. + If regulatory T cells are failing: rebuild them (low-dose IL-2, induced Tregs). + If it's antibody- and B-cell-driven and antigen-specific: engineered cell therapy (CAAR-T). Which organizes into four tiers, from available today to frontier: Tier 1, now: protect and support; zinc-L-carnosine, and acid replacement (betaine HCl with pepsin) under physician supervision. This is specific to my case and not something to self-prescribe, especially given the cancer-surveillance considerations above. Tier 2, target the signaling , JAK/STAT, GSK-3, IL-17, and damp the gastrin drive (netazepide). Tier 3, reset the cells, induced regulatory T cells (iTregs). Tier 4, frontier: engineered T-cell therapy (CAR-T / CAAR-T), custom AI-designed antibodies, or synthetic proteins, that can specifically seek out inactivate or destroy the rogue immune cells attacking my stomach lining. To be clear: there's no approved cure for autoimmune gastritis today. Medicine treats it as something to manage, not solve. Tiers 2 through 4 are investigational preclinical evidence at best, and in several cases therapies that still have to be built. If you're working on autoimmune gastritis, antigen-specific tolerance, regulatory T cells, or CAAR-T for organ-specific autoimmunity, please reach out. Modern medicine has normalized too many conditions that erode our health, function, and comfort, shrinking the goal to monitoring and management while a cure is rarely even attempted. Most of these verdicts were handed down decades ago, in an era that predates nearly all of our current tech and science, and they have gone largely unchallenged. We want to change that. In the age of AI, multiomics, and custom-built DNA, proteins, and cells, no condition should be presumed incurable simply because no one has yet tried to cure it with today's stack. I’ll end on a personal note. We fill our days mostly on things that are trivial next to what we ultimately care about. We know, deep down, however, that in the noise of it all, health is easily forgotten until it’s the only thing that matters. We spend a fraction of our lives truly sober to the preciousness of life. We feel it when someone we love dies, when a child is born, when we come close to death ourselves, or when a diagnosis marks our limit. In those moments, we are sobered, and the rarity of it all becomes self evident. Imagine the existence we’d build together if that clarity didn’t fade. I wish all of you the very best. Care for yourself, care for others, care for the planet and care for our animal friends. Care for life as it’s the most precious gift there is.

English
107
177
3.6K
384.8K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@SamMoline1 @beaverd So you're saying that a strict carnivore diet over several years didn't work? Fantastic eating, time in the sun, a solid exercise routine, great sleep - all the basics done right consistently over time didn't do it?
English
1
0
0
16
Sam 🇺🇸
Sam 🇺🇸@SamMoline1·
@beaverd I have an autoimmune disease and no amount of diet will actually stop my body from eating my nerves. I can slow it down, I can stop the progression and even trick some healing but I can’t stop my T cells from attacking me. It’s faulty programming in my RNA.
English
5
0
30
7.1K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@mattkratter OUCH! It's ironic that Back, Bailey, and the larps chose to attack our character and insult us rather than engage in technical discussions. But when you have neither good character nor the technical foundation to stand on, you only have bad choices.
English
0
0
3
290
Adam Back
Adam Back@adam3us·
@Tacitocu looking forward to the cypherpunk summer☀️ fork around and find out.
English
7
2
146
3.9K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@mattkratter Hysterics is the right word for him and Adam Back. Their desperation is growing by the day. Their scare tactics are getting more dramatic as the time approaches.
English
1
0
9
318
Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110
Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110@mattkratter·
When BIP-110 activates, what will happen to the valuations of David Bailey's UTXO Management funds? How full of spam cos and Bitcoin L2 affinity scams are they? Could that help to explain David's recent hysterics?
English
26
68
433
14.6K
Brett Aquila
Brett Aquila@BrettAquila·
@Mayhem4Markets I build AI-driven apps. Of all the things I can do, AI is only reliable for 5% of them. If AI is so amazing, why do most companies show zero bottom-line improvement? AI isn't replacing many people. I believe it's an excuse for companies that need to downsize for various reasons
English
0
0
0
62
Markets & Mayhem
Markets & Mayhem@Mayhem4Markets·
Microsoft cut 4,800 jobs today. The chief people officer sent a memo that put two ideas side by side: "These roles eliminated today are not being replaced by AI." "AI is changing how work gets done. Some of the tasks we do every day can now be automated." Both statements are true. They describe the same thing from different distances. Up close: nobody got fired because an AI took their specific chair. The decision was about structure, not displacement. From further back: the company is reshaping itself around AI. Roles that made sense before this technology matured don't make sense anymore. New work is AI work. Microsoft redeployed 4,000 people into new roles this past year alone. The Xbox division is cutting 3,200 positions. Four studios transferred. The head of Xbox called it "the most significant restructure in Xbox history." Coleman ended with: "There will be more changes ahead." Nobody is calling it AI replacement. But the functions disappear. The roles consolidate. The tasks get automated. The person Microsoft let go doesn't need a label for what happened. 4,800 jobs. One Monday. Stock down 1.5%.
Markets & Mayhem tweet mediaMarkets & Mayhem tweet media
English
11
8
49
12.2K