English BullTerrier Appreciator

After my family and the dog, my first love is coffee.

If I had to distill biologically informed politics into its simplest expression, it would be this: different people respond differently to the same incentives. This means that, in biologically heterogeneous societies, everyone has to follow rules unsuited to their natural proclivities. High-IQ, trustworthy people can’t self-serve their drinks at McDonald’s, while low-IQ, untrustworthy people have to go through years of schooling without learning anything

We parked a floating airport on Iran’s porch, deleted their Navy/Air Force, killed all their leaders, shut down all imports/exports, took over the global flow of crude oil, negotiated deals with their allies like China, and now we are going to take all the uranium. Anyone claiming the US “lost”, in any capacity, is either a bot or a brainwashed simpleton. Not only did Trump and the US MIL win, it was arguably the most decisive and impressive military victory in human history. The US MIL barely even suffered a scratch at the hands of the Iranians. We even recovered downed pilots deep inside enemy territory, with zero casualties. This operation was so one-sided and precise, people hesitate to even call it a “war” because it has been more like a controlled extermination, by a vastly superior and advanced military force. Anyone saying that we “lost”, is either knowingly or unknowingly spreading Iranian/Democrat propaganda. They aren’t serious people. Their only objective is to smear Trump by any means necessary. Reality is irrelevant to them.

Usual frame: Immigrants Reframe: Replacements

💯💪 wow! talk about visual persuasion!! cc: @BowTiedTrance @joelpollak @JoshuaLisec @BJdichter @OwenGregorian

In Toronto, a young Jewish girl named Esther has been missing for over a week. To make matters worse, people have been ripping down posters about her disappearance, just like they did with the hostage posters after 10/7—one of the more appalling things I've ever seen in my life.

No Wonder Men Are Opting Out | Bettina Arndt, Zerohedge The warning signs have been there for decades. Back in 1983, American author Barbara Ehrenreich wrote a powerful book — The Hearts of Men: American Dreams and the Flight from Commitment — arguing that a male revolt was underway. Since the 1950s, she suggested, men had begun rebelling against the breadwinner ethic, inspired by Playboy culture, the counterculture and a desire for personal freedom. They were rejecting the cultural ideology that had shamed them into tying the knot and becoming a good provider, lest they be seen as immature, irresponsible and less than a real man. Ehrenreich understood that marriage was the mechanism by which society harnessed male productivity. Remove the shame and the yoke comes off. Forty years on, the yoke has disappeared. In April 2026, the American male labour force participation rate hit its lowest level since records began in the 1940s, according to the US Bureau of Labour Statistics. One in three American men — roughly 33% — were not working or actively looking for work. The overall male participation rate for men aged 16 and over stood at just 67%, down from 73.5% two decades ago and from 87% in the postwar years when Ehrenreich’s story begins. The trend is not confined to America. Similar declines — though less dramatic than in the United States — have occurred in the UK, Australia and Canada. The marriage collapse runs in lockstep with the workforce data. According to US Census Bureau data, married-couple households made up 71% of all US households in 1970; today it’s just 47%. As University of Virginia sociologist Brad Wilcox documents in his 2024 book Get Married, the marriage rate has fallen 65% in the last half century. Ehrenreich had made the argument that marriage and productivity were inseparable — that the same mechanism which got men to the altar got them to work. The data suggest she was right. What Ehrenreich did not fully reckon with — and could not have foreseen in 1983 — was that the inducements for tying the knot would collapse. The shame mechanism has disappeared, yes. But the incentive has simultaneously imploded. The product on offer has changed beyond recognition. If you want to understand why men are voting with their feet, you need to look not just at what marriage now costs them — and the costs are severe — but at what it delivers. Increasingly, what it delivers is a pretty dud deal. The modern woman: a prospectus: - They are the most miserable, anxious and insecure cohort in living memory — hardly great marriage material. - Most married women go off sex — and the husband who objects is seen as the problem. - Many women don’t actually like men very much. The more educated she is, the higher the contempt. - They’ve gone full throttle Left — and three quarters of college-educated women won’t even date a man who votes differently. - They’ve rigged the education system and colonised corporate and institutional life, turning universities and workplaces into man-repellent factories. - Yet their hypergamy is still running hot. Despite outnumbering men in education and careers, they still demand a tall, equally high-status unicorn. - The modern female threat-detection system is hyperactive. Almost any male behaviour — silence, opinions, jokes, breathing — gets flagged as a red flag. - They’re extremely well-versed in the lucrative economics of divorce, including a well-timed false allegation to eliminate tedious shared parenting. What rational man reads this list and thinks: yes, that’s exactly what’s been missing from my life? To examine more carefully what is going on here, let’s start by looking at the latest addition to this sorry reckoning. I’m referring to the finding published in the New Statesman last month that many young women don’t like men. A Merlin Strategy poll of young Britons aged 18 to 30 found three times more young women than young men held a negative view of the opposite sex. Only about 50% of women had a positive view of men compared to 72% of men feeling positive about women. For women under 25, it was even starker: only around one-third (35%) reported a positive view of men. This applies particularly to professional and managerial young women of whom just 36% hold a positive view of men, compared with 61% of working-class women. The contempt for men is hardly surprising – that’s what they have been taught. Mary Harrington, a British journalist and cultural critic who writes on Substack, frequently criticises what she calls the “femosphere” — the online feminist spaces where women bond through shared grievances about men. “The online feminist scene often feels like one long group therapy session for women to compare notes on how awful men are,” she writes, suggesting this makes men the universal scapegoat, where ordinary male behaviour is routinely framed as toxic or oppressive, while women’s collective resentment is rewarded and amplified. “Casual, low-level male-bashing has become the background hum of progressive online culture.” Not only does this toxic climate encourage women to be wary of men, but growing up in a hate-fuelled online sewer takes a toll on their mental health. Psychologist Jonathan Haidt has long been warning that the toxic world of social media would lead to a rise in mental health problems, particularly in girls and young women. “Since the early 2010s, young people across the developed world are becoming more anxious, depressed and lonely. The increases were even greater in young women,” he said. Recent large-scale surveys (Ipsos 202-–2026 across 31 countries, Gallup 2025) are showing Gen Z women currently report the highest recorded levels of anxiety, persistent sadness, hopelessness and depression of any female generation at the same age. Not much fun for their partners. Last year Psychology Today had a stark warning for men about these women as marriage prospects. The saying ‘happy wife, happy life’ may have some validity, but the lesser-known saying ‘anxious wife, miserable life’ has research-approved validation. … The more neurotic the spouse is, the less happy the relationship — but women’s neuroticism seems to carry more weight in the overall marital happiness equation. Then there’s the intriguing issue of married women turning off the tap, leaving sex-starved husbands as the norm. For as long as anyone can remember, men were shamed into showing up economically. Society has absolutely nothing to say to women who stop showing up sexually. One obligation was enforced by church, law and community for centuries. The other is now abrogated on the grounds of bodily autonomy. So here we have the portrait of the modern woman as marriage prospect: miserable, anxious, politically radicalised, contemptuous of men, often sexually rejecting and trained to see menace in ordinary male behaviour. And yet the puzzled chorus from commentators, economists and policymakers continues: why won’t men commit? Why won’t they work? The approved explanations are dutifully trotted out. The economic story: men have been displaced by automation and globalisation. The health story: opioids, disability, mental illness. The educational story: men are falling behind women in universities and therefore in the job market. The cultural story, favoured by progressive commentators: toxic masculinity is preventing men from adapting to a modern service economy. All of these contain a grain of truth. But they do not account for what is really going on. The obvious explanation — the one staring out of every data table — is intentionally ignored. Marriage was the primary incentive for sustained male economic effort. It has always been — Ehrenreich knew it in 1983, and the economists have now confirmed it. There’s an economic research paper, ‘The Declining Labour Market Prospects of Less-Educated Men, which establishes that the prospect of forming and providing for a family constitutes a critical male labour supply incentive, and that the decline of stable marriage directly removes it. Researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas calculated that declining marriage rates are responsible for roughly half the drop in the hours men work. Remove the marriage and you remove the responsibility. The data have been telling us this for decades. But here is what nobody in the mainstream conversation will say: it is not only that marriage has become too costly and too legally treacherous for men — though it has. It’s that many young women themselves have become, to put it plainly, not worth having. Half of young British women don’t trust men. More than half of educated young women view men negatively. They arrive at relationships pre-loaded with grievance, primed by algorithms that have fed them a diet of male failure and female outrage since adolescence. They are, by their own account, anxious, miserable and politically furious. What rational man, surveying this landscape, concludes that what his life is missing is a legally booby-trapped commitment to a woman primed to be impossible to keep happy? Ehrenreich feared in 1983 that if the shame mechanism collapsed, male productivity would follow. She was right. What she could not have anticipated was the other half of the equation — that the feminist revolution would produce not a generation of fulfilled, generous, companionable women, but one that is, by every available measure, angrier and unhappier than any before it. The yoke is off. The men have looked at what’s on offer. And many have, with considerable rationality, decided to go and play video games instead. dailysceptic.org/2026/05/19/no-…

Gonna try to explain this to tech CEOs again: Young Americans are pissed. They feel betrayed. Half have embraced the far right & want to cut off your access to cheap foreign labor. The other half have embraced the far left & want to cut off your head. One side will win. Choose.

IBM’s CEO created hiring policies to fire white men, and keep them from being promoted. This disgusting bigot will never been condemned by Tech and VC’s on this site. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…

The only reason… British police are hiding Henry Nowak’s final Snapchat and bodycam footage is that what happened is worse than anything we were told. He was clinging to life after being stabbed and the police handcuffed him instead of the murderer so they didn’t look racist.

@HiddenHistoryYT @karentraviss It’s incredible how the story of the Bismarck echoes Achilles. The one place the Germans left unarmoured. That one line vulnerable spot. The Achilles heel. Stuck by the enemy by chance, dooming Bismarck.

85 years ago today, in the freezing grey water between Iceland and Greenland, the most famous warship in the world died in under three minutes. HMS Hood. 48,000 tons. The pride of the Royal Navy for twenty years. The ship British schoolchildren drew in their notebooks. "The Mighty Hood." She was hunting the Bismarck. At 05:52 on 24 May 1941, Vice Admiral Lancelot Holland gave the order to open fire at 26,500 yards. He was closing the range hard on purpose, because Hood's weak deck armor could not survive shells falling from above at long range. He needed flat trajectories, and he needed them fast. He was three minutes too slow. Bismarck's fifth salvo straddled Hood as she turned to bring her rear guns to bear. A single 15-inch shell punched through her thin armored deck and detonated her aft magazines. Witnesses on Prince of Wales described a column of flame that rose higher than the mainmast, eerily silent at first, the sound arriving a moment later. Hood broke in two. Her stern rose vertically out of the sea, guns still pointed at the sky, and slid under. Her bow followed. Of 1,418 men aboard, three survived. Signalman Ted Briggs, Able Seaman Bob Tilburn, Midshipman Bill Dundas. They floated on a raft of debris in near-freezing water, watching their ship's oil burn around them, until the destroyer Electra found them two hours later. Briggs was 18 years old. He lived until 2008, the last man who had stood on the Mighty Hood. The Bismarck won the battle. But Prince of Wales, only just commissioned with shipyard workers still aboard fixing her main guns, had landed three hits before retreating. One ruptured a forward fuel tank. Bismarck began trailing oil across the Atlantic like a wounded animal. Churchill's order to the fleet was simple. Sink the Bismarck. Every available British warship turned to the chase. Three days later, at the edge of the Bay of Biscay, a Swordfish biplane from HMS Ark Royal, flying through a gale at near sea level, dropped a torpedo that jammed Bismarck's rudder hard to port. She could only steam in a slow circle, straight back into the Royal Navy. King George V and Rodney closed at dawn on 27 May. They fired on her for ninety minutes. Bismarck absorbed over 400 shells and at least a dozen torpedoes before she rolled over and went down with roughly 2,200 of her crew. The Royal Navy answered for Hood in 72 hours.

The tragic death of Henry Nowak is a perfect representation of what is happening in the UK today.

PAL/RPAL: I’m a Canadian born citizen. I’ve never committed a crime. After almost 50 years, I decided to get my firearms license. I had the references. I studied. I had my background checked. I took the tests. I did everything right. Why TF are temporary foreign workers, or any non-citizens cleared to obtain their firearms license? Do you think they aren’t just buying them and reselling them? This is not a partisan issue @LarryBrockMP @gary_srp @MichelleRempel @PierrePoilievre @MarkJCarney

Friendly reminder that the Danish government forcibly closed the sociology departments of the University of Copenhagen in 1986 because they had been completely hijacked by Marxists who converted them into ideological indoctrination centers. What must be done to the American university system is just as drastic, but it would require conservatives to abandon their commitment to procedural neutrality and wield an extraordinary amount of state power without hesitation or apology.

They had no right to enter Canada. How Canada dealt with the Komagata Maru is one of the proudest moments of Canadian history. We stood up to the filthy foreign invaders and showed them that Canada’s sovereignty and dignity were not up for negotiation. It’s time to put the rest of them on boats and send every last one back to where they came from. Mark Carney can go with them since he wants to live in India so badly.

Man, you could practically hear the collective groan in every newsroom across America. For about 12 glorious hours, the San Diego mosque shooting was absolute catnip for cable news. Two teenage white boys attack a mosque, three innocent people dead ... the “right-wing domestic terrorism” script wrote itself. Chyrons blazing, panels booked, every anti-MAGA hack already sharpening their knives. Then the manifesto dropped. And everything went dead quiet. Turns out Cain Clark and Caleb Vazquez weren’t exactly card-carrying conservatives. These two pathetic Jew-obsessed incel weirdos titled their murder diary “Sons of Tarrant” and filled it with deranged pages of “IT’S THE JEWS” on endless repeat. They weren’t right-wing, weren’t MAGA, weren’t Trump fans ... nah, they proudly called themselves Third Positionists who worshipped Nationalist Socialism and Eco Fascism. One was autistic and marinating in online poison. The other got force-fed mandatory “ethnic studies” classes that spent the first two weeks hammering “whiteness” and “white privilege” until he started hating himself and his own mixed-race family. Oh, and the system had been warned for over a year: FBI knew about Vazquez, 5150 psych hold, gun seizure attempt, the works. Mom was blowing up police phones for two straight hours while short-staffed cops treated it like a runaway kid case. But once the full, messy, politically inconvenient picture hit the internet? The 24/7 coverage didn’t just slow down. It died. Nothing kills a beautiful partisan morality play faster than facts that refuse to cooperate. The media isn’t in the truth business ... they’re in the narrative enforcement business. And this one didn’t confirm shit. (article below)

🚨Read this absolute piss-take of a trial regarding the brutalisation of Henry nowak … ‘The judge, William Mousley KC, told the jury that he had ordered Digwa to face a charge of manslaughter as an alternative to the murder charge.’ Manslaughter ?!!!! He was stabbed in the back of both legs and stabbed through the chest with a 21cm blade We need trials for these judges , absolute traitors to their people. It gets better … He claims Henry racially abused him , punched him and knocked of his turban. He said then in ‘self defence’ , he stabbed nowak in the back of both legs then…. Did not realise he thrust a 21cm blade through his chest There’s more , in response to this . That piece of shit judge said this "If a person may not have deliberately have caused the fatal injury or may not have intended to kill or cause reasonably serious harm, he or she is not guilty of murder.” HE WAS STABBED IN THE BACK OF THE LEGS TO STOP HIM RUNNING AWAY 🤬 This was clearly intentional Judge William wasn’t done their though he told the jury … ‘do not allow any feelings of sympathy , your decision must be unbiased’ Yeah the whole thing sounds real unbiased Absolute fucking bullshit We need body cam footage and real justice If this is normalised, it sets the premise that you can murder white people and get away with it if you claim racism bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

I think we need to build this. I designed this below image, representing Lewis and Clark on the Mississippi in the style of Argonath. At $1 Billion or more, I think it can be done.

The Komagata Maru was packed with parasitic invaders intent on destroying Canada, just like you. We're naming our remigration vessels the Komagata Maru and you'll be on the first one back to India.

WTAF?!