Buffed out Buffett

Fucking beautiful

@CryptoWendyO Retar dio

$XRP won.

@maplefinance Any plans on new product offerings? Would love to help out any I can I love the project!

syrupUSDC and syrupUSDT do not have any exposure to Resolv assets. Maple assets continue to be overcollateralized and all protocol operations continue as normal.

@piersmorgan Yes piers, the obvious answer is for him to stay away from the phone when people he doesn’t like die, not just not be a massive piece of shit of a human when you are president of the USA

Agreed. President Trump should stay away from his phone when people he doesn’t like die. RIP Robert Mueller, and thank you for your service.

@Marczeller Just whine

Just use… hmm nevermind.

@sloprules Yes, and the government shouldn’t be making that decision for you. Natural selection will

Gambling only hurts people who do it wrong.

@amitisinvesting @ARiHBARi @public This is exactly the car commercials from 2015 that said “we don’t let you give up control of the car” since they didn’t want to do *more* and add self driving. Now it’s desired and the ones that didn’t lose $

Robinhood never pulled childish marketing stunts to get people to leave Schwab or Fidelity. They executed with product. That’s why they are winning. Maybe something to think about for your marketing team. Maybe the better product is what wins & not ad-hom attacks on competitors.

Sound familiar?

@amitisinvesting Just because you can do more with less, doesn’t mean there isn’t less to do 😉

$NVDA Asked Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang about his thoughts around the market’s reaction to the software selloff: “Please tell these investors that they are just completely wrong. AI is only going to help software companies accelerate the amount of engineering, not replace them.”

@chainlink @SECGov @CFTC Would rather yall be required to give profit to Link

JUST IN: The U.S. @SECGov and @CFTC issue a joint interpretation officially classifying the LINK token as a digital commodity. We congratulate the SEC and CFTC on this landmark milestone that provides a clear legal framework for the institutional adoption of digital assets.

@GovMikeHuckabee @IsraeliPM Amazing, despite saying “he sure looked alive”, if I turn my phone 90 degrees it looks like he is dead as hell laying in a casket

My meeting w/ @IsraeliPM was today. He sure looked alive & was in great spirits. News to the contrary? Phony as a Kosher pork chop.

@pmarca That is how it normally works. People who don’t introspect don’t care how annoying or retard they are and it bothers others, not always them, and they don’t care.

It is 100% true that great men and women of the past were not sitting around moaning about their feelings. I regret nothing.

@ARiHBARi @unusual_whales More time to doing useful things for the employees at least and hopefully encourage long term investing

@unusual_whales how retarded

BREAKING: The Securities and Exchange Commission is preparing a proposal to eliminate the quarterly earnings report requirement and instead give companies the option to share results twice a year, per WSJ

@adam3us @theonevortex So many chains can do basically what bitcoin does. It’s long been becoming a waste on the environment

"Bitcoin is literally already money, 110 makes it a worse money" @theonevortex

@amitisinvesting @ARiHBARi @KobeissiLetter Could be good, it would stop some astrologist-esque traders who think they are doing anything useful

@KobeissiLetter This would be a disaster. Yes I am biased because I cover earnings intensely but man less transparency would not be fun.

BREAKING: The US Securities and Exchange Commission is preparing a proposal to eliminate the requirement to report earnings quarterly and instead give companies the option to share results twice a year. The proposal is expected to be published as soon as next month.

@chainlink @Zharta LMAO their Twitter bio says oracless

Zharta has adopted the Chainlink data standard to power its RWA lending markets. By leveraging Chainlink Price Feeds, @Zharta enables reliable collateral & LTV calculations to secure lending markets around RWAs, BTC, and ETH. Chainlink 🤝 Real-world assets

@ARiHBARi @chainlink Token releases don’t indicate a loss at all. If they can take X cash and turn it into something yielding 20% give or take 20% y/y, then they should do as much to acquire cash as possible. If people value link lower during that period then, well cest la vie or whatever

🚨A BIG QUESTION FOR $LINK MARINES WOULD BE; WHY DO WE FOCUS SO MUCH ON SHITTING ON $XRP AS IF OUR TOKEN HAS ANY PROOF OF VALUE ACCRUAL. IT SEEMS AS THOUGH WE ALREADY WANT TO TAKE A VICTORY LAP, EVEN THOUGH ITS CLEAR THAT CHAINLINK ECOSYSTEM+ @CHAINLINK LABS IS CLEARLY STILL OPERATING AT A LOSS (HENCE THE TOKEN RELEASES)...AND NO, IT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL WHITEPAPER (WHICH IT WAS NOT) IS NOT AN ACCURATE RESPONSE🚨

@YuvalRooz @JabroniVille69 I don’t think they want to be amazed, richer rather

It would be sad to see you leave, but honestly, the types of organizations we’re bringing onchain don’t move on Dec–Mar timelines. I understand you want to see the move. I do too, and we’re working toward it. Still, when you zoom out and look at what $CC achieved in such a short time compared to others, you’d be amazed.

$CC has been really disappointing but I’m nowhere close to giving up on it. I’m less concerned with the token price than I am with the erratic and lackluster daily burn revenue growth trajectory. There was incredible growth from early December (when I first learned about Canton) to mid February: I saw burning go from $700k to $3M daily. I also love the consistent, clear and confident messaging that comes from our leader @YuvalRooz and I can tell they will actively make governance moves that make sense for us $CC holders. I’d just love to see burning get back to a nice linear or exponential pattern.

@ARiHBARi @chainlink NO IT MEANS MANY RETARDS IN XRP

🚨CURRENTLY, THE $XRP TOKEN IS MORE IN-DEMAND THAN THE $LINK TOKEN🚨 THIS MEANS THAT THE @CHAINLINK LABS TEAM HAS A LOT TO WORK ON FOR ITS INVESTORS

@Vet_X0 Yes, cause shitcoin

The Chainlink folks are upset with XRP.

@JoelKatz @ChainLinkGod @unb0rnsupremacy Yeah holding a shitcoin for years that has no value accrual, rather value extraction, I’m sure they’re so thankful. You all should get sued again it’s criminal to dump all these tokens with the implication they’ll have use/value when there’s hardly any for xrp

@ChainLinkGod @unb0rnsupremacy One could equally well (actually, equally wrongly) make the argument that all of this is great for people trying to make a profit by holding XRP because it means that they can buy at a much lower price than they would have to otherwise.

By owning $XRP, you are funding a company that has openly stated it will prioritize its equity shareholders over you Ripple wrote the playbook on this. Let me walk you through how it works👇 When a company sells both tokens and equity to investors, it creates two competing stakeholder groups whose economic interests may not, and often do not, align For example, when there’s excess revenue or profits, where does that value ultimately go: to equity holders via buybacks/dividends, to token holders via buybacks/staking rewards, or some split between the two? There is a fixed pot of revenue to distribute, and equity investors often have superior, clearer economic rights to that revenue that can be legally enforced, while token investors often do not Look at Circle’s recent acquisition of Interop Labs (Axelar team), Coinbase’s acquisition of Tensor, PumpFun’s acquisition of Padre, Ripple vs XRP. etc These are all situations in which equity holders benefited at the expense of, or isolation from, token holders In Ripple’s case, they have spent the past decade+ systematically selling XRP to retail while spinning a story of inevitable institutional adoption In reality, Ripple uses the proceeds of XRP sales to acquire real companies and fund Ripple Labs stock buybacks, to the sole benefit of Ripple Labs shareholders No value is created for the XRP token, even Ripple admitted under oath in court filings that the bridge currency use case of XRP is demand neutral and does not impact price Ripple Labs socializes its costs to XRP holders to fund product launches and corporate acquisitions, then privatizes the value for its own shareholders XRPL is an obsolete ghost chain that's not even in the top 40 chains by usage. It has less than 1% marketshare in RWAs and less than 0.01% in stablecoins. There is no metric the chain leads in Ripple themselves issued 90% of RLUSD on Ethereum and have now expanded it to even more chains outside of XRPL including BNY Mellon's private EVM chain and L2s The list goes on By owning XRP, you do not have complete exposure to the success of the ecosystem Ripple is building, because you do not own the equity, you own some undefined percentage of the success This issue doesn’t exist for Chainlink, because there are no equity investors. There is only the $LINK token to accrue value from the network’s growth. Even CLL employees receive long-term incentives rewards in LINK, not equity Unfortunately, depending on how you want to put it, there is no mass social media misinformation campaign driving retail towards Chainlink like we see with XRP However, Chainlink‘s clear dominance in DeFi (70%+ marketshare w/ $60B in DeFi TVL secured) and its tangible verifiable institutional adoption by the largest institutions in the world (Swift, DTCC, Euroclear, SBI, UBS, JP Morgan, Fidelity, ANZ, etc) will inevitably become too impossible to ignore While the XRP army comes up with bizarre conspiracy theories about why institutions don’t talk about XRP, enterprises adopting Chainlink have no issue publicly talking about their use of Chainlink And before you say Chainlink and Ripple/XRP are not competitors bc they do different things, I would agree from tech perspective, Chainlink actually offers useful products for banks and isn’t a retail grift Chainlink is the only unified platform that provides the critical data, interoperability, compliance, privacy, and orchestration standards that financial institutions need for advanced tokenization use cases None of these institutional use cases Chainlink powers have ever required a “bridge currency”, that is a fantasy narrative dreamt up by retail This has been proven time and time again The reality is that $LINK is the best index bet on the institutional adoption of blockchain, while $XRP is a bank themed memecoin that Ripple sells to retail to fund corporate acquisitions and stock buybacks Documented.📝

@cryptodylnews @ChainLinkGod Xrp isn’t important

The people would love this @ChainLinkGod Let’s make it happen, The people are tired of the same propaganda of you straight up fudding $XRP only to be shilling $LINK Chainlink holders only marketing tactic for $LINK is to say outlandish negative things about $XRP and then when proven wrong they don’t accept the facts for facts and continue to lose money holding a depreciating useless wanna be utility coin like $LINK that thinks they compete relevantly close to what $XRP has to provide. Which is quite comical, but let’s do it Zach!