Grifters Won - without firing a shot

@lyaelsmith @MaureenSaysNo @jk_rowling You may be struggling a little here. My point is 100% about protecting women!While right wing propagandists have gone after toilets for years & years,millions of women are being raped,assaulted & murdered by men. You carry your obsession with toilets,I'l show my concern for women

@jk_rowling Discrimination seems to make you so giddy, how do you manage to convince yourself you’re a good person

Let me put it to you this way, if Kamala were president and all she did was sit in the Oval Office, drink wine and watch reruns of The View, our country would be ten times better off than it is right now.

Turns out Trump only had a two year window to file a lawsuit over his tax return release. That window closed long before Trump made a deal with the DOJ. The people of the United States owe Trump nothing for a payout. Andrew Weissman says this 1.776 billion dollar slush fund is flat out theft and is not part of his official acts. Trump has no immunity for theft. He said anyone involved in putting together this theft is also open to prosecution.

@DOWResponse @StephenM @SecWar You Trump boot lickers truly have no clue. White men who are so desperate and insecure.

Listen here you disgusting woman… This is a false equivalency. George Floyd was dragged from a car and murdered by a police officer who swore an oath to protect the public. The man posed no threat. In the event you’re as dumb as I think you are, here’s Floyd’s autopsy stating it was not drugs that ended his life, but the knee to his neck for 9+ minutes. Also…what six cities were “burned to the ground” exactly @ValentinaForUSA?

@Carl0vj3 @ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson @nikitabier @support this @Carl0vj3 is a bot account please kill it with fire x.com/i/grok/share/3…

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson LMFAO, tell us more about your intentional conflation of unrelated points. Typical cooker / disinfo bot strategy, with continuous goalpost shifting followed up with intentional obfuscation.

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson You’ve shifted from ‘dramatic transmission reduction’ to denominators, to RRR, to severity of infection, to public messaging, to AI summaries each time your previous position collapsed. The original claim remains unsupported by a single primary source. My claim stands

It is a shame to see this nonsense - this is what happens when you believe nonsense

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson If you were actually asking this in good faith, you would have already listened to any of the epidemiological experts who have spoken about this stuff at length, and/or googled and read any of the numerous studies on it. I don't have time to talk "methodology" with a cooker/bot.

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson I used one, which I acknowledged at the time and chose not to rely on. The difference is I then cited primary sources directly. You’ve referenced an NEJM study through an AI summary but never provided the actual citation. Produce the study and we can assess the methodology

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson My screenshot directly referenced an NEJM study. You aren't suddenly getting uppity about AI summary screenshots are you? Since you used one earlier, after all... 🙄

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson Your screenshot was a Google AI summary not a primary source. If you have actual post release studies demonstrating transmission reduction with controlled confounders, cite them specifically. You’ve had multiple opportunities to do so.

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson Fauci categorically never said that. The Walenski quote is a crafty bit of cherrypicking on the part of vaccine deniers, as while her statement was oversold, it was also from a time after we had several months of post release data showing strong mitigation of transmission. 🤡🤡

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson That’s demonstrably false. Fauci, Walensky, and Whitty all publicly stated vaccinated people don’t carry or transmit the virus. Walensky said vaccines prevent transmission. messaging was widespread. The ‘denier propaganda’ label doesn’t change what was actually said on record.

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson I never claimed the trial data stated any effect on transmission. They were also pretty clear about this. Nice try with yet another intentional conflation though. Post followup studies, like the one mentioned in my screenshot (among many others), did demonstrate Tx reduction.

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson If trial data didn’t address transmission, that cuts both ways you equally cannot conclude they were effective at transmission from trial data. And your ‘subsequent data’ was a Google AI summary household studies with uncontrolled confounders. That’s not demonstrating it plainly

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson Wrong again. All official public messaging when rollouts began explicitly called this out. Your revisionist history version that conflates the two things doesn't retroactively make the actual messaging that took place wrong, it just shows you've fallen for denier propaganda.

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson Thank you. you’ve just confirmed my original point. The trials measured severity of infection, not transmission. So the public messaging claiming vaccines would prevent transmission was never supported by the trial evidence. That’s exactly what I said at the start.

@ajrimmer42 @krassenstein Read to the end...

HOLY CRAP Trump actually accomplished a miracle. Here is what he got out of Iran: - Reduce its stockpile of enriched uranium by about 98% - Limit uranium enrichment to 3.67% purity (far below weapons-grade) - Cut the number of installed centrifuges by roughly two-thirds - Only enrich uranium at one declared site (Natanz) - Stop enrichment activities at Fordow and convert it into a research facility - Redesign the Arak heavy-water reactor so it could not easily produce weapons-grade plutonium - Ship out or dilute excess enriched uranium Allow extensive inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Permit continuous monitoring of nuclear facilities and supply chains - Accept “snap” inspections under expanded monitoring rules - Avoid building new heavy-water reactors for years - Stay within strict limits on uranium stockpile size and centrifuge development for set periods ranging from 10–25 years Ooops, sorry! That was the JCPOA that Obama signed with Iran, only to have him tear it up, kill 140 kids, get hundreds of Americans injured, 13 killed, and gas prices to surge 50%.

@MarjorieYo46257 Because it's a fat lot of bullshit, designed to con gullible conservatives? ...case in point 🙄

@NicHulscher I will never understand why no one is at LEAST serving life in prison for all of this.

Over 70% of humanity underwent a chemical lobotomy masquerading as “vaccination.” Two of our studies found 146 brain, spinal cord, and psychiatric CDC/FDA safety signals were BREACHED with the mRNA shots: 📈 Prion disease — 847× more likely vs. flu shot 📈 Brain clots – 3,000× more likely 📈 Psychosis – 440× more likely 📈 Dementia – 140× more likely 📈 Suicidal thoughts – 150× more likely 📈 Schizophrenia – 315× more likely 📈 Depression – 530× more likely 📈 Homicidal ideation – 25× more likely 📈 Herpes zoster meningitis — 1,200× more likely 📈 Toxic encephalopathy — 157× more likely 📈 Brain abscess — 120× more likely 📈 Violent behavior – 80× more likely 📈 Cognitive decline – 115× more likely 📈 Delusions – 50× more likely 📈 Many more...... The mRNA shots disrupt the blood–brain barrier, allowing mRNA, amyloidogenic spike proteins, and pathogens to penetrate the brain and spinal cord — an outcome consistent with the skyrocketing rates of cognitive decline now seen across the world.

@NicHulscher What an embarrassing incompetent fraud you are. And how embarrassing that a host of idiots click “like” to confirm their idiocy.

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson Again, the trial data didn't address transmission whatsoever. That doesnt mean you can turn around and imply they were ineffective at preventing transmission- subsequent data (as I've shown) demonstrated this plainly. But please, keep on demonstrating your own confusion 🤦‍♂️

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson You’ve spent this entire thread moving from ‘dramatic transmission reduction’ to ‘mitigating infection once caught’ which is exactly what I said originally. Approved for symptomatic infection, not transmission. The data confirmed they were ineffective at preventing transmission.

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson Because in your original comment you made 2 separate unsubstantiated and false comments. It's not my fault that you're intentionally conflating these while I've tried to address them with you separately 🤷‍♂️

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson ARR was unrepresentative of real world conditions, which experts perfectly understood, which is why the RRR data was used, since it reflected the value if the stated trial endpoint, i.e. reduction in severity of infection. But please continue deflecting and obfuscating 🤦‍♂️

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson You’ve now repeated the denominator point several times without answering the actual question what evidence base did the public messaging rest on, if not the trial figures you’ve just argued were unrepresentative of real world conditions

@Carl0vj3 @drterrysimpson Who said "solely"? Yet another strawman argument.

@ButHisEmails @drterrysimpson household studies have significant confounded vaccinated individuals behaved differently, isolated more carefully, and tested more frequently, making it impossible to attribute transmission reduction solely to the vaccine.