CCOEJ

@SubRosaMagick Both are true based based on what they are doing at that particular moment

@mcgillmd921 Vespasian Titus and Domitian ?

There are 3 Roman Emperors in this painting. Can you name them?

@DefiantLs I agree with maximum age age limits . Biden was a disaster and his advanced age had a lot to do with it. Trump is also not nearly as sharp as he used to be.Maximum of 70 years to be eligible to run for President.

“There should be stricter parameters to who can be elected president”

@Iamivy05 People are more understanding of a mother leaving in the middle of the day for her kid then a father unless he is a single dad.

when my 4-year-old’s daycare held a “lunch with mom” event, every single mom showed up. we all have other jobs, which is why our kids are in daycare. but we took off work or found a way to get there in the middle of the day. now, they’re doing an event for the dads … at 6:30 in the evening. it’s a small example, but the double standards are real.

@LavenderGhast So your problem with an apocalyptic scenario is that you can't bully or cancel people on twitter from a safe distance in an apocalyptic scenario ? Pathetic

A lot of post apocalypse media is so scared of shifting away from modern society because there's still so many people who act like its modern day Seattle, you can still be openly queer like its nothing when really just days after an apocalypse people would default back to before modern days once you lose its protections. Reality is once society breaks down you'd go back to being utterly terrified of being different or standing out, you'd be vetting the sh*t out of anyone before you'd ever suggested you were queer to them if you ever admitted it again and didn't just get married to stay in a safe community and not be outcast. If some guy who is slightly of more higher standing or more use to the community takes issue now you can cancel them on twitter but in the apocalypse they're picking the guy who knows how to hunt or shoe a horse everytime and you're out on your ass just for disrupting the peace. There's no making the guy apologize with bigot sandwiches. It kind of annoys me how much apocalyptic media glosses over how hard it would be and make it for you to have any openly queer leanings post apocalypse. You don't get to be gay or trans after society falls. People think rights are under threat now, imagine when there are no system of rights.

@GloriousGod01 He does'nt have a wife he has a handler who has learned how to deal with an adult volatile child. And you are a piece of shit for thinking that this is a good thing.

I have a friend who used to beat his girlfriends. Apparently, two of them experienced his hot temper and physical abus3. He has now been married for three years, and he has never slapped his wife. Not even once. When I asked him if marriage had humbled him, he smiled and said: "My hot temper is still there, but my wife is just a very sweet woman. Whenever I am angry and talking, she does not talk back. She listens quietly when I speak. When I am yelling, she simply gets closer, hugs me, and lays her head on my shoulder. If I get angry and refuse to eat her food, she serves both of us and waits patiently until I am ready to eat before she touches hers." He looked at me and concluded: "Marriage did not humble me. My lovely wife did it with her respect and submission." Above all, love God.

@sw_holocron Had Thrawn been Force sensitive enough to use the Force he would have been a much better Sith lord then Vader who was in the end only a very powerful enforcer for Palpatine.

Grand Admiral Thrawn would’ve succeeded where Vader and the Emperor failed in the original Star Wars trilogy, says creator Timothy Zahn. “I thought how easy that first movie could’ve ended with a victory. ‘We’ve analyzed their attack, there’s a threat. You want to evacuate?’ No, Thrawn would’ve said, ‘Specify.’ ‘Okay, call a TIE fighter, have it sit on that vent.’ That’s all it would’ve taken. Thrawn will listen.” (Source: thepopverse.com/movies-star-wa…)

@TheBeeHolder8 @mykael_yuddy Marital rape only became illegal in much of the western world near the end of the last century.

@CCOEJ @mykael_yuddy Well it's illegal now, and mostly only in places that developed as a result of Christianity, like the West. So, in actuality, it did. You're referring to the violators of that law. Who exist in every culture and theological environment. Not a valid argument.

Of course humans spent thousands of years being immoral monsters until Christianity showed up 2000 years ago, and invented its very unique concept of "don't be an asshole". Sounds pretty legit.

@torisu845 No amount of training would increase your force sensitivity. A 5,8 man could practice/train basketball his entire life at the end of the day he is still going to be 5,8 and never make it to the NBA. Without the minimum ammount of force sensitivity you cant become a Jedi.

You don’t “become” force sensitive. Everybody is force sensitive. Some are just more sensitive than others. Sabine had extremely low sensitivity. This means she had to work harder to use the force. Lucas has talked about this extensively.

@TheBeeHolder8 @mykael_yuddy Christianity did not fix that

@mykael_yuddy The proliferation of the modern concept of "human decency" is very different from previous renditions. It was the decent thing to do in a lot of cultures, to commit marital rape and create male progeny by whatever means necessary. Christianity fixed that. You're welcome.

@rabbriansamuel What about Kosher meat ?

Halal meat is slaughtered according to Islamic law, and a blessing is spoken in the name of Allah. Should Christians avoid halal meat? Does this count as "meat sacrificed to idols"?

@DanielBene32 @DeeWaynee94 Young boys that where not roman citizens/free people

@DeeWaynee94 In ancient roman empire raping young boys was not illegal

Basic human decency predates Christianity by thousands of years. Humans had empathy, reciprocity, taboos on murder and care for each other long before the church turned up and tried to claim copyright over morality.

@DeeWaynee94 Humans had empathy, reciprocity, taboos on murder and care for each other for their own tribe/people not so much for outsiders/rival tribes/people before christianity. After chistianity this has not changed much in reality.

@lizzkelly7 It does'nt work that way biologically even if both where legal.

If men can have multiple wives why can’t women have multiple husbands?

@RonDeSantis Caesar not being murdered could have saved the republic.

Uh, yeah, which is why the Founders detested Caesar. They viewed the fall of the Roman republic as a civilizational tragedy.

@k_seguun13 @3rdLoginLetsGo Tony in CW1 was right in his viewpoint but went overboard in its application.

@3rdLoginLetsGo Yeah I don’t get how anyone looked at that and thought Carol looked good at all. Tony in CW1…I get where you can say he went too far obviously but Carol was just bad from the jump.

Doubly funny when you consider they were trying to push Carol hard during this period.

@zando75545384 @UpdatingOnRome No it would'nt Romes over reliance on slavery stagnated technological advancement. Things would have been better for the Roman Empire had Caesar lived longer not necessarily for the entire world. Caesar great as he was would not have a solution for the problem of slavery,

@UpdatingOnRome Caesar by far. Avoiding the collapse of the roman empire, avoiding the dark - middle ages of stagnation. A stable huge empire with massive resources and manpower, engineering project minded leader would have turbocharged technological advancement by up to 1000 years.

Tell me the one person in history who, if they had lived an additional one, five, or even ten years, could have significantly changed the world.

@hashaszegoat @RealPostFolder Un til the early 1990s a careful serial killer had a good chance of getting away with it due to no DNA evidence, weak cooperation between law enforcement and less digital surveilance.

@RealPostFolder how TF can you be caught for murder back in the 1800s like all u gotta do is leave the area and throw the weapon away

@ViewpointGeek @DCOfficial @MarvelComicsHQ Kingpin not having mental problems being a physical threat and being intelligent makes him a bigger threat then most of Batmans rogues gallery.

WOULD Wilson Fisk AKA Kingpin be a great villian for Batman if he was in DC?

@UpdatingOnRome Barbarossa if he does'nt drown infighting between Richard and Philip is prevented and the extra manpower greatly increased the odds of success for the third crusade.