Sach

The Premier League CEO saying they have “strategic plans” to get different title winners is crazy😂😂😂

It’s gotten to the point where I have to root for my own club to lose games just so that things might change long-term Fuck Clearlake Capital.

Rosenior big game aggregate: 12-18 PSG (H): 0-3. L Newcastle (H): 0-1. L PSG (A): 2-5. L Aston Villa (A): 4-1. W Arsenal (A): 1-2. L Arsenal (A): 0-1. L Napoli (A): 3-2. W Arsenal (H): 2-3. L Quite embarassing. Creating chances isn't an issue for Rosenior. It's his lack of ability to coach a defense.

After all my threads "defending" the project it's time for me to say what I really feel about it on a personal level – as objectively as I can. For the past couple of years I have tried to explain what the project actually is and why decisions are being made. I've always chosen to have faith in the project as long as visible progression has been evident. Up until this point I believe it has, now, however, it looks more and more like the project – with it's current execution – has arrived at a standstill. To start I will talk about the model. The "model" refers to several different things. Transfer strategy, wage structure, staff setup, dividing of power and control etc. I will start talking about the transfer model. When it comes to our transfer strategy, I do agree and I do have high belief in it, in theory. The theory of signing the best young players in the world and having them develop together is a genuinely good theory. However, in order for it to work, you have to actually sign the best talents. Signing random talents or signing players because they can be "saved" should not be as big of a part of our strategy as it has been up until this point. If you look at our squad now, only a few players actually fits into the category of signing we actually should be looking to make all the time (Estêvão, Quenda, Enzo, Caicedo, Hato, Gusto). Keep in mind, I'm not talking about how they have done at the club, I'm talking about the stature of the player the moment we signed him. Some signings have turned out well because our directors knew them already (Palmer, Joao Pedro, Caicedo). And some signings is a product of actually good scouting, most of which initially ends up at Strasbourg (Santos, Penders, Barco, Sarr, Panichelli, Satpayev etc). In conclusion on this point, I think we're signing too many players below the shelf we should be signing from and I think we're ignoring the advice of scouts too often (obvious and reportedly). This brings me to my next point – dividing of power and control. The point of this entire project was initially supposed to be that we have a massive teamwork between different sections of the club. The coach and players are responsible for what's happening on the pitch. The scouts are responsible for identifying the perfect profiles. Medical team is responsible for keeping players fit. Sporting directors are responsible for signing the players the scouts recommend and the coach needs and for overseeing the other sections. The owners are responsible for overseeing that the work the sporting directors are doing is actually bearing fruit. This, however is, at least from the outside, seemingly not how the project has evolved. The coach and players are still responsible for whats happening on the pitch but the coach seems to have very little, if any power at all. If the coach is responsible for on-pitch performances, he should also be allowed to ask for specific profiles to perfect the system. For example, if the coach wants a winger with specific qualities, he should get that if he doesn't already have it – without being questioned and/or being told that he doesn't need it (which currently seems to be the case). As I alluded to above, the scouts should carry the load of finding the IDEAL players to be signed to fill specific profiles requested by the coach. They are the experts in this field and they should be trusted by the sporting directors – otherwise, what's the point of even having scouts at all? I do agree with the intervention of the medical team. They are the experts in this field and their main job is to keep players fit. A coach wanting to play his best players at all times or a player wanting to play a big game should not overrule that. 1/

The alarming thing is. PSG haven’t actually had to create anything themselves for most of this tie😂we’ve gifted them like 6 of their 7 goals. It’s pathetic

The alarming thing is. PSG haven’t actually had to create anything themselves for most of this tie😂we’ve gifted them like 6 of their 7 goals. It’s pathetic

Gary Neville on Chelsea’s huddle: 🗣️ "I thought it was extremely odd, really weird. I've never been a fan of huddle. If you've prepared for seven months of a season, four days before a game, weeks before for a football match, and then you have to do a huddle 10 seconds before the start of a match to talk to each other, to motivate each other, you've done something wrong in the build-up as far as I'm concerned. No words can help you, in my opinion. I never did a huddle here [at Old Trafford] in 20 years and we were actually against it, because no words should be able to help you five, 10, 15 seconds, 30 seconds before a football match." {Gary Neville Podcast}

I feel for Rosenior. He’s gonna be made the scapegoat for every single problem for the rest of the season just based on these past 5 days. Reece’s injury was predictable. I don’t bang on about preseason here for no reason. It wouldn’t shock me to see a few others soon.