Canadian Dissident

31.2K posts

Canadian Dissident banner
Canadian Dissident

Canadian Dissident

@CanadianDissid1

Historian, former teacher, anti-Communist, anti-woke. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever. ~George Orwell

Katılım Nisan 2022
1.1K Takip Edilen665 Takipçiler
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷
The amount of non-Iranians who believe the false story about Mossadegh and 1953, and then want to give their opinion or create policy based on fake news and communist propaganda, is astounding. This article provides an excellent summary of what actually happened in 1953 Iran.
Ole@DerCheapi

x.com/i/article/2050…

English
190
1.4K
3.9K
78.7K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
Candace Owens @RealCandaceO claims she and her husband don’t own a Ram 1500 TRX because she doesn’t want to come clean about the truck being involved in a DUI. Here is a Google satellite image from Google of the same truck in her yard in 2022. I have blurred her address. Because unlike Candace, I am not a doxxer. George Farmer’s DUI was on 8/10/2023. Here’s the CarFax that shows the truck was involved in a crash on 8/10/2023, the same day listed on George Farmer’s arrest report. And here is a publicly available list of all of the cars registered to Candace and her husband George that I pulled from publicly available information. Notice she confirms that she also has a black Range Rover, and a Range Rover is listed on this document. Candace is lying because her husband got a DUI while in possession of a firearm in Nashville Tennessee while he was a green card holder, and that is a deportable offense that disqualifies everybody else from being able to obtain US citizenship. He qualifies for denaturalization if State Department and DHS take action. @StateDept @DHSgov Candace is a stone cold pathological liar. RECEIPTS 👇🏻
Laura Loomer tweet mediaLaura Loomer tweet mediaLaura Loomer tweet media
English
543
1.2K
6.7K
225.5K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Viva Frei
Viva Frei@thevivafrei·
This is absolutely mind blowing! When Karin Bass was in Ghana as Los Angeles burned, the deputy mayor she left in charge was at home on house arrest. For phoning in a bomb threat. We are indeed governed by criminals. From @spencerpratt on @joerogan
English
655
11.5K
47.8K
1.1M
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
A Midwestern Doctor
A Midwestern Doctor@MidwesternDoc·
These triplets who all became severely autistic hours after the same pneumococcal vaccine is irrefutable proof vaccines cause autism. Notably all three also lost their cranial reflexes, mirroring decades of data vaccine-induced microstrokes cause brain damage SIDS and autism by causing the blood cells in the body to electrically clump together, thereby obstructing the smallest blood vessels in the brain (along with . Remarkably, these microstrokes are very easy to detect once you know how to look for them, and it eye-opening how common they are.🧵
English
79
2.2K
4.7K
112.9K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
M.A. Rothman
M.A. Rothman@MichaelARothman·
𝐖𝐇𝐘 '𝐄𝐌𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐘' 𝐊𝐄𝐄𝐏𝐒 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐃𝐔𝐂𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐓𝐘𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐍𝐘. A new working paper out of UCLA by political psychologist Samuel Pratt has just measured something American conservatives have been claiming for ten years and pretending was anecdotal. It is not anecdotal. It is now data. Pratt and his team built what they call the 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐂𝐚𝐧 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐦 𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐞 — a survey instrument asking respondents how strongly they agree with statements like "𝘐 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵 𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘐 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥." Three findings. 𝐎𝐧𝐞: the belief is stable over time. People who say it this week say it next week. 𝐓𝐰𝐨: the demographic profile of high-scorers is precise. They are 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐠, 𝐟𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐞, 𝐧𝐨𝐧-𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥. They self-rate as higher in intellectual humility, empathy, moral grandstanding, and — the key variable — 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞: they report lower emotional stability, higher anxiety, higher depression, and a stronger tendency to see themselves as 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐬 in everyday conflicts. In one sentence, the psychometric profile of the modern American "empathy advocate" is: 𝐚𝐧𝐱𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬, 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝, 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦-𝐜𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐝, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨-𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐮𝐩 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 Watch California Congresswoman Katie Porter at last week's gubernatorial debate, in real time, demonstrating how the empathy mechanism produces atrocious policy. "𝘐𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘴 [...] 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨." Empathetic. Reassuring. Compassionate. Also flatly false. Per CBS News' 2020 Los Angeles survey, only 𝟏𝟗% of homeless individuals had done any work in the calendar quarter they became homeless. A 2017 San Francisco survey found 𝟏𝟑% working part-time or full-time. The reason is no mystery — a substantial majority of street-homeless Americans are managing untreated severe mental illness, active substance abuse, or both. The "empathetic" policy that emerges from Porter's framing is to leave them on the street. The actually humane policy involves involuntary commitment, mandated treatment, and structured housing — every one of which the empathy-coded liberal reflexively rejects as cruel. Pratt's data and the on-the-ground reality converge on the same uncomfortable conclusion: 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭, 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐬, because empathy at scale stops asking 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘴 and starts asking 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘥. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐦 How does a fringe view — communist Twitch streamers, candidates openly excusing full-scale m∗rder, congressmen calling themselves democratic socialists — capture an entire major American political party? Nassim Taleb has the cleanest explanation. He calls it 𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. A family of four. One daughter — 𝟐𝟓% of the household — only eats organic. Mom faces a nightly choice: cook two meals or cook one all-organic meal. The all-organic meal is easier. The household renormalizes to the daughter's preference. The family then attends a barbecue with three other families. The host has the same choice: two menus, or one all-organic. The all-organic menu is easier. 𝟐𝟓% renormalizes 𝟏𝟎𝟎% of dinner. Now imagine the daughter's "preference" is not organic food. It is the belief that bank robbery is righteous, that Israel is a colonial regime which must be dismantled, that your health insurance executive should be eliminated by force, and that anyone who objects is a fascist. The mechanism is identical. The intransigent minority creates an asymmetric cost on resistance. The majority renormalizes for convenience. French physicist 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞 𝐆𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐦 has modeled the threshold formally. In his work on opinion dynamics, an extreme view captures a population at roughly 𝟐𝟎% activated support — provided the activists do three things consistently. They activate latent prejudices already present in the population. They impose a binary choice: "𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮." And they refuse, ever, to compromise on their core position. Pseudo-moderates then join — not because they have been persuaded by the full activist position, but because the binary has been imposed and the alternative ("siding with the oppressor") has been made socially intolerable. 𝐇𝐚𝐬𝐚𝐧 𝐏𝐢𝐤𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 This is the most important paragraph in this post. Read it twice. Hasan Piker — the Twitch streamer who endorses bank robberies, defends H-m-s, and lives in a $3 million Brentwood mansion — is 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚. He represents maybe 5-7% of the country. He does not move the needle by himself. The threat is the 𝐩𝐬𝐞𝐮𝐝𝐨-𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 — the 𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘠𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 reporter who profiles him sympathetically, the Democratic congressman who appears on his stream, the Hollywood actor who shares his clips, the Brooklyn schoolteacher who attends his rallies, the empathetic college freshman who decides he is "𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵." That coalition — Galam's 𝟐𝟎% — is what flips the country. Hasan is just the visible 5%. This is also why Pratt's UCLA paper matters. The trait that creates the pseudo-moderate flank is the same trait the activists exploit: 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐲, 𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐦 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬. That is the recruitable population. That is the lever Hasan and his industry operate. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐞 Empathy is not a virtue. It is a 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐲. Like physical sensitivity to heat, it can produce wisdom or it can produce hysteria, depending entirely on what is paired with it. What converts empathy into wisdom is 𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 — the willingness to evaluate consequences, to insist on results, to ask whether the policy that "feels compassionate" actually produces outcomes you would call humane in a year, a decade, or a lifetime. What converts empathy into tyranny is the 𝐚𝐛𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 of judgment — pure feeling, with no constraint, in service of a binary moral choice imposed by an activated 20%. That is the Democratic Party of 2026. The Pratt scale measures it. The Galam threshold predicts it. Katie Porter demonstrates it. Hasan Piker exploits it. 𝐅𝐢𝐱 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐲 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰.
English
66
493
1.3K
56.9K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Lisa Robinson
Lisa Robinson@LifelibertyLisa·
CITY RIGGED THE SURVEY TO PAVE 9,300 ACRES OF Canada's BEST FARMLAND — Option 4 Was NEVER an Option The City only gave you 3 fake options to pave our best farmland. Option 4 (keep ALL 9,300 acres as farmland + add to Rouge National Urban Park) was deliberately left off the table. ENOUGH. SIGN THE PETITION NOW at dontpaveit.com I’m taking every name straight to council + Parks Canada. This is OUR land, OUR food, OUR Greenbelt! SHARE this video like crazy and let’s flood them with signatures before it’s too late! Sign here: dontpaveit.com #SavePickeringFarmland #Option4 #greenbeltmovement
English
18
252
548
11.6K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Larry Sanger
Larry Sanger@lsanger·
Wikipedia calls cultural Marxism a "conspiracy theory," but it is simply a fair name for what the Frankfurt School successfully pushed. We are living in the world they made—and it's time to dismantle it.
Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost@Ne_pas_couvrir

In 2011, Breitbart breaks down how Frankfurt School Marxists like Adorno, Marcuse, & Horkheimer escaped Germany for 1940s Golden Age California -only to hate the endless cheer, productivity, and capitalism. They devised cultural Marxism to subvert the US.

English
86
652
2.9K
59.9K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
There is no point in negotiating with Iran. It is an exhausting trap designed to waste time, cool down the situation, and bet on the American domestic front. What the United States and Israel must do is return to bombing with a different strategy, after most military targets have already been struck in the first and second phases. • Begin striking the remaining or newly emerged air defenses. • Strike the ports in the Strait of Hormuz, including the hideouts of the fast boats. • Israel, in parallel, should attempt to assassinate the remaining hardline leaders, especially Revolutionary Guard commanders, the new Supreme Leader, the new National Security Advisor, and other ideological extremists. • Strike the remaining and any newly appeared missile launch platforms and their stockpiles, as well as drone stockpiles. • Paralyze Iranian cities by striking the network of bridges, railway lines, and main roads. • Strike and completely destroy the main ports, especially the Caspian Sea ports, in order to tighten the blockade. • Completely destroy the industrial infrastructure, especially dual-use facilities. Postpone striking power plants as a last resort. • Monitor Iran’s borders with Iraq. • Re-strike all nuclear sites to ensure the enriched uranium is buried. • After clearing the Strait of Hormuz ports, conduct limited landings on some islands to begin opening the strait by force. • If Iran escalates its response, especially against Gulf states, then destroy the power plants and all Iranian energy sources. If this is carried out and the Strait of Hormuz is opened, monitoring the nuclear situation will become a routine operation to prevent any further development. However, there is a step that must precede all of this: an official declaration of war on Iran. So far, the war has cost $25 billion, which is a trivial amount for a major war against an evil state. Declaring war will provide flexibility in time, costs, and expanding the targets. The Iranian issue must not be left hanging for the future. In my estimation, this is a rare opportunity and America’s last war on Iran. No future American president will dare to do it. The Middle East and the world must be rid of this evil that has persisted for half a century.
Magdi Khalil مجدى خليل@magdi_khalil

أيران وفخ المفاوضات، وماذا يجب على امريكا فعله؟ لا جدوى للمفاوضات مع ايران فهى فخ مرهق لتضييع الوقت وتبريد الحالة والمراهنة على الداخل الامريكى. ما يجب على امريكا وإسرائيل ان تفعله هو العودة للقصف باستراتيجية مختلفة بعد ضرب معظم الأهداف العسكرية فى المرحلتين الاولى والثانية. - البدء فى ضرب ما تبقى او ما استجد من الدفاعات الجوية. - ضرب موانئ خليج هرمز بما فى ذلك مخابىء الزوارق السريعة. - قيام إسرائيل بالتوازى بمحاولة اغتيال ما تبقى من القيادات المتشددة ، وخاصة قيادات الحرس الثورى والمرشد الجديد ومستشار الامن القومى الجديد وغيرهم من المتطرفين الأيدولوجيين. - ضرب ما تبقى وما استجد من منصات إطلاق الصواريخ ومخزوناتها، ومخزونات الطائرات المسيرة. - شل المدن الأيرانية بضرب سلسلة الكبارى وخطوط السكك الحديدية والطرق الرئيسية. - ضرب الموانئ الرئيسية وتدميرها تماما ، وخاصة موانئ بحر قزوين من اجل احكام الحصار. -ضرب البنية الصناعية تماما، وخاصة مزدوجة الاستعمال. وتأجيل ضرب محطات الكهرباء كخيار اخير. - مراقبة حدود ايران مع العراق. -اعادة ضرب المواقع النووية جميعها للتأكد من دفن اليورانيوم المخصب. - بعد تطهير موانئ مضيق هرمز عمل انزال محدود فى بعض الجزر، لبدء فتح مضيق هرمز بالقوة. - إذا تجاوزت ايران فى ردها ، وخاصة على دول الخليج، يتم تدمير محطات الكهرباء ثم كل مصادر الطاقة الأيرانية. إذا تم فعل ذلك وتم فتح مضيق هرمز يكون مراقبة الحالة النووية مجرد عمل روتينى لمنع اى تطور فيه. ولكن هناك خطوة تسبق كل ذلك، وهو إعلان الحرب رسميا على ايران. حتى الان تكلفت الحرب ٢٥ مليار دولار وهو مبلغ زهيد لحرب كبرى ضد دولة شريرة، إعلان الحرب سيعطى مرونة فى الوقت والتكاليف وتمديد الأهداف. لا يجب ترك الموضوع الأيرانى معلقا للمستقبل، فهذه فى تقديرى فرصة نادرة واخر حرب أمريكية على ايران، ولن يجرؤ رئيس أمريكى آخر للقيام بها. يحب تخليص الشرق الأوسط والعالم من هذا الشر المستمر من نصف قرن.

English
41
164
566
17.5K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
TRIGGERnometry
TRIGGERnometry@triggerpod·
Helen Andrews On The Problem With the Feminization of Society
English
111
632
3.6K
160K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Lisa Robinson
Lisa Robinson@LifelibertyLisa·
Do YOU Think Doug Ford is a Conservative? Bill 100 Just Proved He’s Not Watch as I cut through the bullshit on Bill 100 — The “Better Regional Governance Act” that’s about to let Ford personally appoint unelected regional chairs with total veto power over your elected councils in Durham, Peel, York, Halton and more. Your mayor? Powerless. Your councillors? Overruled. Your local vote? Neutered. This isn’t conservative. It’s a full provincial power grab by Ford’s hand-picked yes-men — exactly where residents have been fighting reckless sprawl. Ontario didn’t elect him to dismantle local democracy. So I’m asking you honestly: Do you still think Doug Ford is a Conservative? Drop your answer below. Share this before it’s too late. Call your MPP NOW and kill Bill 100. Your voice is on the line
English
60
271
668
9.3K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
So these idiots mean Karl Marx was Jewish therefore Communism was invented by Jews because Karl had Jewish "racial" lineage even though his father was a Lutheran convert who raised little demonic Karl as a Lutheran. Notice nobody ever accuses Communism of being Lutheran. Karl renounced his Lutheranism and took up with Satanism in his late teens and declared himself an atheist and then became a Communist in his early 20s. Karl's own (Lutheran) father accused him of having taken up with the devil and being demon-possessed. He did not accuse him of Jewishness. Think about that for a second, though. Marx BECAME a Communist. That means Communism predated him. That means he didn't invent Communism, or revolutionary Communism, for that matter. He BECAME a Communist after being a demon-possessed lapsed Lutheran who arguably may have sold his soul to Satan in his late teen years, or tried to, at any rate. The first revolutionary Communist, which is the stripe of Communist Karl Marx represented, was the French revolutionary Francois Noel "Gracchus" Babeuf, who was eventually executed by the Jacobins for being too radical (let that sink in). Babeuf was a messianic Christian (heretic) who believed he was expressing the real Christian ethic with his Communism. Babeuf and others in his movement were inspired toward their Communism in party by going more radical with ideas drawn from Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Maximillien Robespierre. Rousseau was raised Calvinist, converted to Catholicism, and then kind of made up his own quasi-Christian beliefs. Robespierre was baptized Catholic but turned deist, openly detesting atheism with vigor and eventually founding a Cult of the Supreme Being based on Deism in opposition to Catholicism and the rival Cult of Reason, which he also detested. Marx wrote about Babeuf and said that Babeuf had the right idea executed wrongly. What Babeuf left out was an inner transformation to Communism (a Christian-ish concept) and the dialectics of Hegel. Hegel was a Hermetic esotericist posing as a Lutheran trained at the infamous Tubingen Stift (a Lutheran seminary in Bavaria). One could properly accuse Hegel of having created a Hermetic social philosophy by hammering the dialectic into a pseudo-Christian mold. Of course, Marx rejected all this spiritualism because he was a staunch materialist atheist (not a believing Jew) like most of the Young Hegelians (the Leftist cult of Hegel after Hegel's death). The connections between Marx and the French Revolution are also easily drawn, both in philosophical currents and conceptual inspirations. Marx was a member of the Communist League (joining shortly after it was formed in 1847, after he had begun writing about Babeuf and Communism) and the earlier Communist Correspondence Committee, which he helped form in 1845. (Note: Marx was writing about Communism in 1843, if not earlier.) He got involved in those currents of radicalism, however, by being involved in debates about socialism and radicalism that were hot at the time in Leftist and Young Hegelian circles, particularly drawing socialist influence from Saint-Simon, Fourier, and Proudhon, all of which is very obvious in his early writings. All three of these men were Catholics and not Jewish and with no evidence of Jewish ancestry. It's worth noting that all these Catholic influences are likely present because of Catholic social teaching, particularly among the Jesuits, going back a couple of centuries at the time (so maybe even 1500s). The Jesuits developed the concept of "social justice," and all of these European Catholic early socialists would have been familiar with and inspired by that idea. The Communist League itself was a fusion of the Communist Correspondence League (a letters and theory club) with the French-Bavarian radical esoteric secret society called the League of the Just, which was derived from the League of Outlaws and likely a source of inspiration for the Communist Correspondence League. The League of Outlaws was a Antifa-like group of post-revolutionary French radicals and what was left of the Bavarian Illuminati (an occult secret society) after the king tried to eliminate that group completely. The Bavarian Illuminati was created by Adam Weishaupt, who was a Jesuit (Catholic) turned mystic esotericist and cult leader. The League of the Just was derivative to the League of Outlaws, which was a derived from a Christian Socialist group that abandoned Jesus for with Babeuf's more vigorous radicalism. All of these groups were secular in their official organization and only had minority Jewish membership. In no way whatsoever did Jews "invent" Communism. You could maybe blame the French for it, or the Jesuits, or French Jesuits, which would still be rather wrong but at least more plausible than "Jews did it." Of course, the point these idiots are making is that Marx is guilty because he's ETHNICALLY Jewish, which also means they believe that conversion to Christianity is false, given Marx's father and his own raising. I thought Christians generally believed that once someone becomes a Christian, they're Christian. There is neither Jew nor Greek in Christ-Jesus, wrote Paul. That's not fringe or debatable Christian doctrine. Of course, these demon-worshippers aren't Christians, though, are they? But why is anyone listening to them?
Dan Bilzerian@DanBilzerian

@ConceptualJames Jews invented communism you fucking retard

English
258
548
2.6K
112.1K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Billboard Chris 🌎
Billboard Chris 🌎@BillboardChris·
Spencer Pratt is really good at this.
English
867
9.6K
43.4K
1.3M
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
ZXX
3.8K
13.1K
77.2K
32.6M
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Keri Smith 🌱Deprogrammed
Keri Smith 🌱Deprogrammed@RealKeriSmith·
The Woke Right and Woke Left are merging. It’s not even horseshoe theory anymore.
Keri Smith 🌱Deprogrammed tweet media
English
27
32
223
6.8K
Canadian Dissident retweetledi
Laurence Fox
Laurence Fox@LozzaFox·
More of this please.
English
63
293
4.2K
133.4K