John retweetledi
John
806 posts


@MParallax33710 @FiggyEnjoyer_ @chromedmaserati @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary Imagine being a miserable fuckwad like this everyday. Seems exhausting.
English

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @chromedmaserati @Cap_Cagz @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary No, aren't you an Irish and male person?
Geez.. you are fucking stupid. Now is an insult.
English

@Pete___Cole @BeardsonBeardly Pete do you honestly believe Donald Trump cares about Iranians living under tyranny? I voted for Trump, dumb as I feel now, and it’s quite obvious that’s not why we’re blowing up brown people again.
English

@BeardsonBeardly Yeah let them live in oppression and tyranny, as long as your gas is cheap
English

@RobbieChri92608 @OrangeSpaceHawk @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich So proven that you’ve failed to prove it.
English

@Cap_Cagz @OrangeSpaceHawk @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich My answer is using logic.
I didn't say you will like it.
Fraud of Turin is a hoax.
A proven one.
English

@MParallax33710 @FiggyEnjoyer_ @chromedmaserati @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary “I have no rebuttal to facts so I’ll insult your heritage and make myself look completely foolish.”
English

@FiggyEnjoyer_ @chromedmaserati @Cap_Cagz @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary Ok, irishboy, deceive as much as you want, I don't really fucking care.
English

@RobbieChri92608 @OrangeSpaceHawk @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich At this point you’re scrambling and no longer using logic, just hurling insults at Christians and calling historical artifacts fraudulent. I would advise you do more research outside of whatever single outdated source you continue to reference.
English

@Cap_Cagz @OrangeSpaceHawk @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich The 2022 WAXS paper says the thread came from a sample “taken in proximity of the 1988/radiocarbon area”.
That’s hilarious because Christians often attack the 1988 carbon dating by claiming:
“It was from a repaired corner!”
“Bad sample!”
“Contaminated!”
Go figure.
English

@RobbieChri92608 @OrangeSpaceHawk @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich A single strip of linen (approximately 7 cm x 1 cm) was cut from a corner of the Shroud. This strip was then divided into three sections for the labs. Fairly accessible information. Have you ever looked into the WAXS testing?
English

@OrangeSpaceHawk @Cap_Cagz @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich 3 independent labs took multiple samples and you're saying all of them "coincidentally" picked the patch.
Is that what you're saying ?
English

@_Stalinkabaap_ @Francis32129751 @kingbez81 @Andrew_Moser @Sachinettiyil @miami_priest A communist Hindu shitting on Jesus. Surprise surprise.
English

@Francis32129751 @kingbez81 @Andrew_Moser @Sachinettiyil @miami_priest Nah man! Not into what the church does nor anything to do with Abraham and his fake stories.
English

@chromedmaserati @MParallax33710 @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary Worth mentioning that Garlaschellis recreation only further proved the improbability of the original shroud. The depth of the image was wrong, the image was almost completely 2D, and there was no presence of bilirubin or albumin.
English

@MParallax33710 @Cap_Cagz @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary Garlaschelli showed it’s possible to recreate something similar today, but that doesn’t prove the original Shroud is fake or disproves Christianity. It just offers one possible explanation - there’s still debate about its origin.
English

@MParallax33710 @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary Look at the way they seethe at the name of Jesus Christ. Embarrassing 😂
English

@Cap_Cagz @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary Cry, mother fucker. I wanna see you crying, your shroud was debunked and your god exposed as a man made up.
English

@TBB_studio @MParallax33710 @jamesmikejonzon @DarlingRosary “Anything beyond is interpretation” Why? Because you don’t like what others have found? Pollen from Jerusalem? A complete inability to explain why it contains 3D imagery? A large amount of claims that question the samples validity?
English

@Cap_Cagz @MParallax33710 @jamesmikejonzon @DarlingRosary Radiocarbon dating (1988) placed the cloth between 1260–1390 AD. Textile analysis matches medieval European weave patterns. That’s the baseline evidence….anything beyond that is interpretation, not consensus.
English

@TheTraderAvid @DarlingRosary The sheer oddity of it as a historical relic is worth investigating, Jesus or not. There are qualities of the shroud that are truly unique and hard to explain, especially for any of its proposed time periods.
English

@Cap_Cagz @DarlingRosary Anyone who knows the Word knows it is a fake.
Why bother spending time on a fake?
English

@DarlingRosary Or, let the Word itself prove it is a fake.
It is a fake
English

@mychalrwilson @DarlingRosary I’ll do that, and when I create a perfect negative image I’ll let you know. Dolts 😂
English

@DarlingRosary Put on makeup. Wrap a towel around you face. Look at it. Is it panoramic or is it a profile. Prove to yourself it's fake and do this little experiment.
English

@MParallax33710 @jamesmikejonzon @TBB_studio @DarlingRosary Source? You won’t have one, but it will be entertaining to ask you regardless.
English

@RobbieChri92608 @OrangeSpaceHawk @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich Truly hilarious how people disregard scientific theory when it comes to religion. Any other experiment and this guy would agree the sample had possible contamination, but since it looks like Jesus there’s just no way.
English

@OrangeSpaceHawk @MikeNumerical @AzPetrich 3 independent labs did the carbon dating.
THREE.
All yielded almost identical results.
Pls worship the god that Jesus himself pray to in Luke 6:12.
Stop drooling over a fraudulent evidence.
English
John retweetledi
John retweetledi

@Tony89Z @EsoGengar @jiffpb @Daily_MailUS @ShawnRyan762 I never said I believed anything. You questioned the validity of the scientific method humans have been using for decades. I have no idea if the shroud wrapped the biblical Jesus, but I’m not ignorant enough to use flawed logic to swat away something I can’t explain.
English

You can raise doubt, yes. Doubt doesn’t equate to your extraordinary claim that the shroud is. You forgot the part where you have to substantiate your claim.
I love how you say it’s unexplainable and then in the same breath, explain it is Jesus’s burial cloth and authentic. Cognitive dissonance.
English











