Nico Gründel

4.3K posts

Nico Gründel banner
Nico Gründel

Nico Gründel

@CarryWorm

Ex comp sci grad student, now physics undergrad at Heidelberg University | Co-founder Neodyme | 2025 GT4 Winter Series ProAm Champion 🏆 | Chaotic neutral

Katılım Nisan 2014
155 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@asymmetric_re @johnsaigle > Self-transfers of tokens always succeed > [...] > However, the token program does not contain such a silly bug This actually was a thing back in 2021 🥴
English
1
0
2
73
asymmetric research
asymmetric research@asymmetric_re·
New post: The most persistent security misinformation doesn't come from obscure corners of the internet, but from official docs, learning resources, and popular LLMs. @johnsaigle breaks down the Solana vulnerabilities that aren't, and why they keep spreading.
asymmetric research tweet media
English
4
2
20
2.1K
wavey cavey ∿
wavey cavey ∿@cavemanloverboy·
my high school history teacher was confused about why the middle east was called the middle east when it was <180º west from us. he literally told the class that it should really be called the "far west"
TrenTok-Chad ⚡️@tztokchad

???

English
1
0
6
2.4K
mert
mert@mert·
stablecoins are cool and will improve a lot of things but man they are so goddamn boring someone pls start an algorithmic stablecoin so I can feel something again
English
127
9
412
38.4K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@mert The real difference is that banks have monitoring and someone would notice something is up pretty much immediately if money moved without permission. On Bitcoin, you could syphon off money for years before someone notices
English
1
0
3
236
mert
mert@mert·
these people are idiots a decentralized system is uniquely vulnerable to such attacks precisely because it's decentralized you can ask a bank to reverse a fraudulent txn because the bank has ultimate authority you can not ask bitcoin for a refund
Quinten | 048.eth@QuintenFrancois

Quantum is a threat to Bitcoin

English
148
26
585
73.8K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@DrNickA Rocket launches have very well defined abort scenarios. "Illiquid gambling market crossing an arbitrary threshold" will definitely never be one of them
English
1
0
0
54
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@toly I'll let you know that my home-state of Baden-Württemberg is the far superior vehicle producer 😤
English
0
0
0
45
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@toly 80% of Germanies bureaucracy is entering data into SAP
English
0
0
0
36
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@toly @mert This is the graph I'll show my children when they ask me where all of our money comes from
English
0
0
1
141
toly 🇺🇸
toly 🇺🇸@toly·
We work in the shadows so others can touch grass
toly 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
167
26
468
29.7K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@mert @trentdotsol And with permissionless you mean censorship resistant I imagine? Because that's the thing blockchains uniquely enable? Because otherwise I can think of multiple ways, zkps being one of them.
English
0
0
0
14
mert
mert@mert·
@CarryWorm @trentdotsol this is such a germanic semantic argument, wittgenstein taught you well clearly I mean that you can not solve the double spend problem in a permissionless setting without a trusted operator otherwise if you disagree, show me the design
English
1
0
1
104
mert
mert@mert·
chris and haseeb are both partially correct and incorrect crypto is not web 3.0, it is capitalism 2.0 i) blockchains are explicitly financial architecture this is not an opinion, this is objectively why they must work with economic incentives at the core level agreeing on information on a neutral protocol was already a solved problem before crypto (see: email) the unique addition of blockchains is that they allow consensus on information with monetary value, namely they solve the double spend problem so using blockchains for a system that does not require consensus on money is by definition inefficient this is also why those decentralized social protocols like nostr, bluesky, and farcaster for example don't actually use blockchains ii) since this is the case, it [currently] makes no sense to use blockchains for any app that requires 0 integrations with monetary value. but more on this in a sec. iii) as a result, the market will necessarily use blockchains for financialized apps iv) but there are two historical issues. a) regulation, b) scale crypto is not actually 18 years old, that's bitcoin you know how bitcoiners say: "bitcoin, not crypto", well the converse is also true. that is "crypto, not bitcoin" the downsides of draconian regulation on the creation of new products is obvious so I won't waste time but blockchains that scale for finance really have only been a thing for, maybe, 2 years, with solana finally solving a bunch of crippling issues since '24 and with regulation still pending v) which means that this is now, finally, the age where we onboard apps to use blockchains as their universal API for money and finance vi) ok and now this is where it gets interesting and where we get back to ii) in the prior state, it did not make sense for non-financial use case to blockchains due to the overhead however, as more users onboard, they also bring with them their socieconomic graphs and in parallel, blockchains have to provide infrastructure primitives to meet these demands this has the effect that such a non-financial protocol or app developer can reasonably consider a blockchain for their app state as an alternative since identity, PKI, etc are all solved at scale one good example of this is integrity of AI-generated shit technically, you do not need a blockchain for this, all you need is 1) PKI, 2) a key directory, 3) proof-of-time, 4) a database to store key revocations however, at that stage, due to scale and existing integrations, it is very likely that the blockchain is a more pragmatic solution with more favorable economics it's a bit like how javascript wasn't actually the best solution for the browser, but it worked, and enough people kept using it until it became irreplacable vii) which means that non-financial use-cases are still very much in play, but structurally require the financial use cases to become bigger first
Haseeb >|<@hosseeb

With all due respect to Chris, I completely disagree with this take. Chris argues that "web3," particularly crypto-powered gaming and media, failed due to scams and regulation, and that better regulation will unlock these non-financial cases. OK, think about this for a second. Does this pass the smell test? Do you think web3 gaming failed because of Gary Gensler? Do you think web3 media plays failed because the scammers crowded out the honest media innovators? Really? If this is true, why didn't they kill financial crypto, which had WAY more of both? Financial use cases were right in the crosshairs of the regulatory harassment, and they also attracted way more scams. Why shouldn't we instead accept the more obvious answer: non-financial use cases for crypto have failed because no one wants them. Let's just admit it. They were bad products. They failed the market test. It was not Gensler or SBF or Terra that caused these things to fail, it was that no one wanted any of it. Pretending otherwise is cope. Enormous sums of capital and talent explored these ideas, and we should acknowledge what we learned. That lesson is not "if we just had better laws, then finally people would finally be using decentralized Spotify" or whatever. Call a spade a spade. Every single use case in crypto that has worked at scale has been financial in nature. 2008: Bitcoin - non-sovereign store of value 2014: Tether - stablecoins 2015: Ethereum - programmable money 2017: ICOs - capital formation 2018: Prediction markets (Augur, later Polymarket) 2020: DeFi - literally finance is in the name 2021: NFTs - non-fungible financial assets (to the extent they worked) 2024: RWAs (the year BUIDL took off) All this stuff was adopted bottoms-up. We as investors discovered that people wanted to do these things with crypto. The web3 consumer stuff, on the other hand, was primarily conjured up by investors and pitch decks, ZIRP accelerationism, and "wouldn't it be crazy if" blog posts. This was the opposite of the "what smart people are doing on their weekends" thesis. In fact, if you go back to the Ethereum white paper from 2014, almost every single Ethereum use case Vitalik describes is financial in nature: token issuance, stablecoins, derivatives, on-chain treasuries/DAOs, on-chain savings, insurance, price feeds, escrow, gambling, prediction markets. It's all in there. This is nothing to be ashamed of. Finance is almost 10% of GDP. It's an enormous part of the world economy, and banks are some of the lowest NPS score companies in the world. People hate their banks and the outdated financial architectures their money runs on. It's literally why Bitcoin was created. There is so much to innovate in the realm of finance, and I truly believe we are only at the beginning of that displacement. You don't need to assume anything more to project the next 10x in crypto. The old saying goes "crypto will do to finance what the Internet did to every other industry." I respect Chris's optimism. But 18 years in, we should not be propagating this meme about consumer web3 use cases as though they're inevitable. If you are hanging around the rim hoping that crypto is going to disrupt media and gaming, you should know the history and look at it with clear eyes. Now if you as a founder believe that despite that, you know the secret to cracking this market--I respect that, and I certainly don't begrudge anyone to follow their convictions. But I think it's important that investors be honest that all the evidence points the other way.

English
62
22
299
41.8K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@mert @trentdotsol That's just straight up not true, you don't need blockchains to solve the double spend problem. You don't even need blockchains to do so transparently or decentralized. The only thing blockchains actually solve is censorship resistance. Which is not inherent to finance at all.
English
1
0
0
52
mert
mert@mert·
@trentdotsol the entire reason blockchains exist and the way they are structured recursively is to solve the double spend problem, which is a financial problem otherwise you do not need any of this overhead to merely agree on non-financial information
English
6
0
22
1.5K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@wskish @lukeweston Calling probably the single most used connector in commercial products a non-commercial connector is pretty funny. If they actually use plugged in USB cables internally instead of soldering leads, then that's a skill issue, not an issue with USB.
English
1
0
3
1.2K
Bill Kish
Bill Kish@wskish·
Systems built using raspberry pi often use USB internally as a physical and logical connection to other I/O components. USB is not as physically robust (to e.g. shock and vibration) as hardwired or other commercial grade connectors. In addition, the device drivers for these types of I/O components are often built with the assumption the cable can be removed or the device rebooted by a hobbyist user in the event of transient errors. So while it works well most of the time it can be more fragile with potentially more glitches compared a traditional fully integrated system. This is based on my experience with lots of embedded systems as well as building stuff with rpi.
English
7
0
11
18.2K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@GillVerd Quantum Internet doesn't even have a theoretical application beyond key exchange.
English
0
0
1
96
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@danrobinson Oh my god man, ai really rots peoples brains. This has literally nothing to do with P vs. NP. Approximations algorithms for NP-hard problems have existed as long as the definition of NP, and they're significantly better and more performant than using LLMs.
English
0
0
0
34
Dan Robinson
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·
Software is becoming P ≈ NP—if you can rigorously define what tests a system needs to pass, agents will generally be able to build it (subject to computability limits) One implication for crypto is that security tooling is now developer tooling
English
25
17
313
41.7K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@mert Damn even just a smoothy every couple of days would fix this
English
0
0
1
59
mert
mert@mert·
I was feeling severely fatigued for over a week like a deep fatigue, no amount of coffee/redbull/nicotine/sleep even remotely helped did a blood test and submitted to this company Bioniq they gave me a personalized supplement that corrects everything I'm deficient in and now I am alive again (for reference, was extremely deficient vitamin d, b1, b12, b6 and pretty deficient folate, zinc, k2, iron and e)
English
157
9
501
77.5K
Nico Gründel
Nico Gründel@CarryWorm·
@mert If you buying watches leads to SOL dumping, then you melting down watches to sell their raw materials would probably lead to SOL pumping. So I'm all for this
English
0
0
2
28
mert
mert@mert·
in theory there should be an arb on gold/silver watches right now since gold/silver at ATHs but obviously the dealers can't update prices that fast interesting be a shame if someone were to lever up on rolexes here
English
34
2
75
10.4K