Carson

2.6K posts

Carson

Carson

@CarsonAtwood

Who can define themselves in 160 characters or less?

Katılım Ağustos 2012
177 Takip Edilen93 Takipçiler
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@TimONeill007 I don’t know if you are baiting or what, but the quote, “the Crusades were defensive and justified” is exactly what they started out as…they were to defend eastern Christendom and Christian pilgrimages to the Holy Places in the Middle East.
English
1
0
2
141
Mad Overlord Studios
Mad Overlord Studios@Mad__Overlord·
@BernfriedI @CarsonAtwood @DeutschOrdensKH What I'd really like is a map or something of where they lived. You can tell a lot about a people just by how they lived. Was it more like a monetary? A fort? We're they self sustaining? Or were they a local trade hub. Questions that need answers.
English
3
0
1
11
Mad Overlord Studios
Mad Overlord Studios@Mad__Overlord·
Hey historians! I know a knight usually started as a page, then a squire etc. But was there ever anything like a knight (or paladin) academy? Let's say you knew a war was coming or your kingdom was constantly under threat of war... how would one train up a bunch of Knights?
English
7
0
2
250
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@DieinPlace The 4th Crusade sacked Constantinople. Which further illustrates your point.
English
1
0
2
19
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@JohnFort68 @Nobleshield Exactly what I was about to post. Tossing darts every round at low levels gives wizards more attacks a round than fighters in melee. Not boring at all. That damage may not be much but the complaint is that monsters don’t have enough hp. Can’t have it both ways.
English
0
0
2
19
John Fort
John Fort@JohnFort68·
@Nobleshield That's the price spellcasters had to pay for their end-game power: early game struggles. My 1E magic users would carry as many darts as they could reasonably manage at low levels, so they'd toss those (3 per round rate of fire) when out of spells. Not useless at all.
English
1
0
1
66
Nobleshield
Nobleshield@Nobleshield·
Thus far, there are two major things I like more about 5e than old-school. Sorry, not sorry: 1) At-will Cantrips. While I DO think they need to be toned down a bit (should be the equivalent of a light crossbow, none of that scaling junk, and I wouldn't even give them damage types), but having casters with something they can do in combat rather than usually sitting there doing nothing is a good thing, rather than having them mostly sit there cheering on the rest of the group while they try to conserve spells for the important fights. I have a player playing an Illusionist and most of the fights he's sitting there doing nothing because he doesn't want to waste spells, and I've had to let him get creative (using Dancing Lights or Ghost Sound to distract creatures, giving them a small penalty) so he's not bored. 2) Monster HP. This was a tough thing to come to grips with, but seeing how "weak" even higher-level monsters are in most old-school games, especially when you have more than 4 PCs, means that while they are strong and can hurt if they hit, they generally don't even last that long. For example, I had my six 1st-level PCs face an Ettercop (C&C's name for the Ettercap), which is a level 5 (5HD) monster. Despite this, it only has AC 14 and 25 HP (averaged HP, not rolled). With 6 PCs (plus my wife's Druid has a lynx companion), I had to give it max HP to have an enjoyable fight, or it would have gotten killed the first round before it even struck a blow! Just like "unwinnable" fights are boring and lame, a big, scary monster that drops like a sack of potatoes with zero effort is also anticlimactic. I wasn't a fan of how HP is scaled up in 5e, but after this has happened several times, I see WHY it was done, and I can't disagree. Not everything new is lame garbage. Things change for reasons, and I'm starting to see that.
English
35
1
41
2.2K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@A_DungeonDelver If they released a true SRD and OGL for 1st and 2nd edition they would gain some goodwill. I still wouldn’t buy their product but I wouldn’t complain as loudly.
English
0
0
4
179
TheDungeonDelver
TheDungeonDelver@A_DungeonDelver·
They're just trying something different. They did this "appeal to the old guard" thing in 2000 when they hired Gary & Dave for private consultancy on D&D, they came crawling back after firing a good chunk of their customer base in 2014 with the OD&D wooden box, the 1e reprints and so on. And now that they've spent the 50th anniversary of D&D pissing on its legacy and realizing the modern audience doesn't buy what they demand, they're scrambling.
NewbieDM@newbiedm

I feel like #dnd is having an identity crisis. Now they are reaching out to Luke Gygax to work on a Greyhawk. But a few years ago they were ready to push out the old guard. I don't know. Something's going on.

English
9
6
143
5.2K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@BlackDragonCan @AgkistroZero One of the roles of the AD&D Druid is to allow a party to navigate animal encounters without wasting valuable resources so they can save them for the monsters with loot.
English
0
0
2
16
Black Dragon Games - Building Bhakashal
@AgkistroZero In AD&D 1e animals with no loot have XP for slaying them, so there is a reward. I guess I’ve never considered not using animals even if they give no loot. They are an environmental challenge, you will encounter them as they are part of the game world.
English
5
0
12
249
Black Dragon Games - Building Bhakashal
In AD&D 1e: - monsters don’t “drop gold”, some monsters hoard loot, and the corpses of former adventurers are a source - XP for gold is a solution to a gaming problem, e.g., how to handle character progression flexibly - animals have no loot - it emulates pulp stories
Old School Gamer@LibertyForAll19

But but but, muh Xp for G-g-gold. And my 45 year appeal to authority. "as a" Nope. LOL. Twitter is tiny island in a much larger sea.

English
18
8
117
10.3K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@Hjorimir @SandyofCthulhu I thought you only checked the skill if it was a check in situation where failure mattered? Jumping a fence when being chased by the town guard gets a check.
English
1
0
0
14
The DM behind the screen
@SandyofCthulhu I don't like how RQ has players just doing stupid stuff to get checks on skills. "As I walk up to the tavern, I'm going to JUMP the fence!" Let me get that jump check! Silly. I hit with my axe. Now, I drop that and pull my shortsword...need that check! Le sigh.
English
1
0
3
146
Sandy Petersen 🪔
Sandy Petersen 🪔@SandyofCthulhu·
Clear back in 1974 almost everyone I knew hated the XP for gold idea, but we also were so new to roleplaying games that we didn't have any other ideas. Some of us capped how much XP you could get for gold in a single sitting. Some of us removed XP for gold but multiplied the XP for killing enemies - this proved tough to balance. Eventually I moved onto games that simply didn't use XP for gold at all - The Fantasy Trip, Traveller, Runequest. Turned out there are great solutions. And even The Dragon knew it.
Old School Gamer@LibertyForAll19

The Trope repeated about XP for Gold is just false. It is a solution in search of a problem The system is poor and several Dragon articles have alternatives that were BETTER Dragon 35,36, and 95.

English
17
7
67
8.7K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@NotJonMollison @Dungeoneerhere Let me dig around a bit. The Jackson Wargamers played a campaign recreating the Mongol-Arab Battles that ended with the Siege of Baghdad. Was a lot of fun. It was the early 90s so I may be out of luck.
English
0
0
2
32
Mr. Wargaming
Mr. Wargaming@NotJonMollison·
@CarsonAtwood @Dungeoneerhere Two of those could work on the table, but I ain't found rules that do them: Screening = fast but not unpredictable melee strength, and should be priced accordingly (they rarely are) Pursuit = interrupt action (in an IGOUGO game) to potentially impact rear flank of fleeing unit
English
1
0
2
26
Mr. Wargaming
Mr. Wargaming@NotJonMollison·
I'm telling you, man. Light horse achers! They can work, you just gotta trust me!
Mr. Wargaming tweet media
English
6
11
84
2K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@WithNightDanger Goldi was decapitated in 1782…the Enlightenment was working but primarily on the educated.
English
0
0
0
7
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@A_DungeonDelver I partially blame Shadowrun and absolutely blame World of Warcraft for the rehabilitation of Orcs. Pre-1989 the only good Orc was a dead Orc.
English
0
0
1
34
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@osgamer74 I can distinctly remember that this is the point in my childhood when I no longer wanted the shiny and new, I wanted what I had lost. Guess that is why I am still playing AD&D.
English
0
0
2
11
Lee Bojangles
Lee Bojangles@osgamer74·
Dead Set. I remember being shocked, then sad, then angry I’m still angry
CountryGentlman@Gentlman_Gaming

After finally watching #Transformers The Movie. I understand why kids were upset after seeing it. It's the freaking Red Wedding for 10 yr olds. After the first 30 minutes you didn't want to see your favorite character on screen for fear they would die next. Good lord.

English
4
1
24
498
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@NWBroJaneway That is sound reasoning, but maybe push it to a single solar system. Multiple planets, star bases, space battles, expanded struggles for resources, etc. Still contained, but a little a larger “arena.”
English
0
0
0
22
NWBro Janeway
NWBro Janeway@NWBroJaneway·
@CarsonAtwood As I learned with Starstein II, big Braunsteins should be done on a single planet otherwise things are too spread out. A single planet has enough space for all factions and many oportunities for convergences.
English
1
0
1
119
NWBro Janeway
NWBro Janeway@NWBroJaneway·
40k used to be a vast universe full of Your Dudes. Your Dudes wouldn't kill Abbadon, they wouldn't drive off the Nids from our galaxy or destroy the C'Tan. They wouldn't move "the narrative" forward. But Your Dudes had victories and losses through playing the game that felt personal to you. And Your Friends Dudes did as well. And Their Friends Dudes did too. This all connected up. This all made the universe feel vast without endless corporate lore dumps and marketing videos. This collective universe of fanon through engaging with the wargame via modelling and playing felt more real than reading about Rowboat having a fight with Mortarion and winning the indomitus crusade. Because Your Dudes didn't do that. And Rowboat doing it means Your Dudes, the custom army you made, the fanon lore you created, none of it really mattered. Because really the main character of 40k isn't Your Dudes anymore. It's the official characters. And Your Dudes will never be allowed to have a spotlight in your own games again. This shrinks the universe from the collective imagination of the fans to whatever GW make and approve of themselves. And this is poison to any Wargame. No game lorelets will never understand that 40k was once a wargame with supplimental material. If you weren't playing 40k you weren't engaging with the universe. But now GW caters to those people and will die after they are abandoned.
Susan Ego@siuansanche10

Perhaps the biggest example of how 40k is now just a plot with a neat setting is how boiled down all of this is, like you had dozens of various regiments in the Second War for Armageddon all with unique aesthetics and now we’re just stuck with Cadians and Krieg.

English
42
110
1.1K
59.4K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@NWBroJaneway Really think the Koronus Expanse of the Rogue Trader RPG would be the perfect fit for this type of game. 1:1 time will be difficult due to the vagaries of Warp travel…but outside of that it should be fine.
English
1
0
0
150
NWBro Janeway
NWBro Janeway@NWBroJaneway·
You guys are going to love Crusadestein. A wargame/RPG hybrid using a mix of 3rd, 4th, and 5th edition 40k with alternating turns and command structure similar to Epic. Fought over a campaign map with individual player armies of multiple factions, each faction led by a player patron, and agents who are either solo PCs or groups who go into RPG sessions that affect the campaign and wargame sessions. And all of this is done with 1:1 time as in #BroSR Braunstein campaigns. With the ability to scale up and down seemlessly with one rule set.
English
6
1
28
4.8K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@BeirosBooks @Bdubs1776 I don’t know Cointhrall’s player. I shouldn’t have said that he was an idiot. But I think he had better options.
English
1
0
2
75
BeirosBooks
BeirosBooks@BeirosBooks·
@CarsonAtwood @Bdubs1776 There were also 20 crossbow men. The problem is that Ferigno is immune to mundane damage. The purpose of the ballistas was to fire the heavy chain nets to ground him, then Cointhrall and co could whack him with magic weapons. That said Cointhrall’s player is 100% an idiot 🤓
English
1
0
6
475
“Winning Secrets” on Kickstarter
Wargamers will be like “sure this #UMBROS event sounds fun & SEEN + GOSS are brand new #dnd #Braunstein ideas which inspire people to actually play wargames rather than just painting toys for hours like losers but this battle was only sKiRmiSh sCaLe with 120 per side and not 500”
“Winning Secrets” on Kickstarter@Bdubs1776

As of now you have no excuse for not knowing what “SEEN” and “GOSS” and “Docketing” are. They are laws created to run real #dnd campaigns with #Braunstein sensibilities. #UMBROS #WinningSecrets bdubsanddragons.blogspot.com/2026/03/the-wi…

English
2
4
34
1.5K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@Bdubs1776 I didn’t criticize the play style. I criticized the player. Boneheaded move. Play to win.
English
0
0
1
44
“Winning Secrets” on Kickstarter
It’s no surprise it took #dnd players of the #BROSR to figure out how to fix wargaming with Docketing, GOSS, and SEEN. Wargames could never. Imagine hearing about those 3 incredible concepts and getting bogged down with “how many ranger units” talk.
Carson@CarsonAtwood

@Bdubs1776 The point was that Cointhrall was an idiot. He would have been better served to gather his adventuring companions and facing the dragon than 100 dwarves. How many ranged units did they have? Two ballistas? It wasn’t a winning strategy.

English
2
3
26
662
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@Bdubs1776 When our characters got to name level and accrued domains we would assemble our followers and supplement with mercenaries and hired soldiers to go on grand campaigns. Clearing hexes of humanoids and evil lairs. Bringing down kingdoms. Fun stuff. No painted miniatures required!
English
0
0
2
49
“Winning Secrets” on Kickstarter
I shouldn’t be surprised that men who picked the most pathetic. Solitary & ick inducing hobby of “I paint toys alone for years on end” would choose 2die on the most pathetic of rhetorical hills: “your army size small”. The Total NonStop #Braunstein is not for ones such as these
English
4
2
24
1.1K
Carson
Carson@CarsonAtwood·
@Bdubs1776 It was a skirmish level battle. Cointhrall would have been better served to gather his comrades from his adventuring days and taking on the dragon in its lair.
English
0
0
2
121