Lee Castleton OBE

57.1K posts

Lee Castleton OBE

Lee Castleton OBE

@CastletonLee

Ex spm and very proud of the group. I accept Dm.

Katılım Haziran 2020
5.4K Takip Edilen5.9K Takipçiler
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
David Farnsworth
David Farnsworth@Farnsworth100·
Has become a grim history of stupidity, profound injustice and a lack of accountability in British society and political system. @stugoo17 @CastletonLee @chrish9070 @SeemaMisra_OBE @SarahKHolford @HelenGriffiths5 @policy_uk @LizWebsterSBF @edwardhenry1 @RegenerationEX @brucemcd23
Monsieur Cholet@stugoo17

#PostOfficeScandal #CAPTURE #StateSponsoredCrimes #HumanRights THE POST OFFICE'S "CHANGE IN CULTURE" — NOW WITH 40-PAGE COURT SUBMISSIONS Blair McDougall MP, Post Office Minister, would like you all to know there has been a "change in culture" at the Post Office. The evidence? The Post Office has filed a forty-page legal submission opposing the appeal of Patricia Owen, convicted of theft in 1998 on Capture software the Post Office now concedes was faulty. Mrs Owen died in 2003. She is therefore unable to attend the hearing at which the Post Office will explain why her trial was fair. Some highlights of the new culture: — £3.2m paid across a scheme with 200+ applicants. Twenty-four final payments. The arithmetic is left as an exercise for the reader. — Convicted sub-postmasters get nothing until their convictions are overturned. Their convictions cannot be overturned because the Post Office is opposing the Appeals. The Post Office of course is the body that prosecuted them in the first place. This is described as "due process." The Minister "perfectly understands the sense of frustration" but "cannot comment on individual cases." He can, however, comment on the abstract importance of "full facts and all the information laid out" — a sentiment the Post Office has spent twenty-five years experimentally rejecting. Post Office Chair Nigel Railton, asked about mass exoneration, says he supports it. Post Office lawyers, asked to stop fighting the Appeals, file another forty pages. One of these positions is the Post Office's actual position. Readers may guess which. The CCRC is sitting on 29 Capture cases. The first wrongful Horizon conviction took sixteen years to overturn through the courts. Parliament eventually had to legislate away the rest. Minister McDougall declined to rule out doing the same for Capture. He also declined to do it. We are told we are entering "the period where the scandal begins to conclude." On current trajectory, conclusion will arrive shortly after the heat death of the universe, at which point the Post Office will issue a brief statement noting that all parties received a fair trial. inews.co.uk/news/post-offi… @CastletonLee @Karlfl @rbrooks45 @Janetsk20073533 @VarchasPatel @PostOffice @liambyrne @CommonsBTC @HouseofCommons @UKHouseofLords

English
0
4
11
262
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Monsieur Cholet
Monsieur Cholet@stugoo17·
#PostOfficeScandal #CAPTURE #StateSponsoredCrimes #HumanRights THE POST OFFICE'S "CHANGE IN CULTURE" — NOW WITH 40-PAGE COURT SUBMISSIONS Blair McDougall MP, Post Office Minister, would like you all to know there has been a "change in culture" at the Post Office. The evidence? The Post Office has filed a forty-page legal submission opposing the appeal of Patricia Owen, convicted of theft in 1998 on Capture software the Post Office now concedes was faulty. Mrs Owen died in 2003. She is therefore unable to attend the hearing at which the Post Office will explain why her trial was fair. Some highlights of the new culture: — £3.2m paid across a scheme with 200+ applicants. Twenty-four final payments. The arithmetic is left as an exercise for the reader. — Convicted sub-postmasters get nothing until their convictions are overturned. Their convictions cannot be overturned because the Post Office is opposing the Appeals. The Post Office of course is the body that prosecuted them in the first place. This is described as "due process." The Minister "perfectly understands the sense of frustration" but "cannot comment on individual cases." He can, however, comment on the abstract importance of "full facts and all the information laid out" — a sentiment the Post Office has spent twenty-five years experimentally rejecting. Post Office Chair Nigel Railton, asked about mass exoneration, says he supports it. Post Office lawyers, asked to stop fighting the Appeals, file another forty pages. One of these positions is the Post Office's actual position. Readers may guess which. The CCRC is sitting on 29 Capture cases. The first wrongful Horizon conviction took sixteen years to overturn through the courts. Parliament eventually had to legislate away the rest. Minister McDougall declined to rule out doing the same for Capture. He also declined to do it. We are told we are entering "the period where the scandal begins to conclude." On current trajectory, conclusion will arrive shortly after the heat death of the universe, at which point the Post Office will issue a brief statement noting that all parties received a fair trial. inews.co.uk/news/post-offi… @CastletonLee @Karlfl @rbrooks45 @Janetsk20073533 @VarchasPatel @PostOffice @liambyrne @CommonsBTC @HouseofCommons @UKHouseofLords
Monsieur Cholet tweet media
Salfords, South East 🇬🇧 English
3
27
37
1.1K
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Monsieur Cholet
Monsieur Cholet@stugoo17·
THE FUJITSU WAY Ah yes, the now-famous defence from Fujitsu CEO Richard Christou: “Don’t worry, fitness for purpose was excluded.” Because obviously, when you commission a national accounting system handling billions in public transactions, the one thing you definitely don’t want is for it to be… fit for purpose. Perfectly sensible. Let’s admire the craftsmanship here: Remove the implied obligation for the system to work. Replace it with hundreds of pages of explicit obligations describing exactly how it must work. Then, when it doesn’t work, point back to the bit where you removed the label and say: “Ah — you see — no requirement for it to work.” It’s like buying a car where the contract says: “Engine must start, brakes must function, steering must respond…” …but also says: “By the way, we exclude any implied term that the car is fit for driving.” Car doesn’t start? Brakes don’t brake? Steering suggests rather than turns? No problem. “Fitness for purpose was excluded.” Brilliant. Even better when the High Court later observes the System was riddled with bugs, errors, and defects capable of causing phantom losses — but never mind that. The real issue, apparently, is that everyone misunderstood the wording. Not the system. Not the outcomes. Not the people prosecuted on the back of it. The wording. Because in this worldview, if you delete the phrase “fit for purpose,” you also delete reality. And that, Ladies and Gentlemen, is the FUJITSU WAY in miniature: The System didn’t have to work — it just had to look contractually sophisticated while not working. @Fujitsu_Global @fujitsu_uk @FujitsuAmerica @liambyrnemp @CommonsBTC @HouseofCommons @UKHouseofLords @darrenpjones @peterkyle @biztradegovuk @CastletonLee @Janetsk20073533 @DanNeidle @rbrooks45 @marksweney @SkyNewsAdele @edwardhenry1 @PostOffInquiry @PostOffice @voiceofthePM @nickwallis
English
20
94
172
12.1K
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Sky News
Sky News@SkyNews·
The Court of Appeal has rejected a request from the Post Office to delay a Capture scandal case News correspondent @SkyNewsAdele has the story trib.al/DWSU2YO
English
7
19
37
37.8K
Lee Castleton OBE
Lee Castleton OBE@CastletonLee·
Silpho forest this morning. Beautiful.
Lee Castleton OBE tweet media
English
0
2
29
418
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Janet skinner
Janet skinner@Janetsk20073533·
@stugoo17 It looks like the tide is turning at last. Let’s hope all capture victims are cleared sooner rather than later.
English
1
4
19
420
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Artur Nadolny
Artur Nadolny@ArturNadol7566·
THE LAWYERS WHO HELPED JAIL INNOCENT POSTMASTERS ARE NOW UNDER INVESTIGATION 10 barristers under investigation by the Bar Standards Board @barstandards. 20 solicitors probed by the SRA. For their role in the Post Office Horizon scandal that destroyed nearly 1,000 lives and killed at least 13 people. They weren't just defence lawyers doing their job. They were strategy advisers. They argued a broken IT system was fine. Some tried to remove the judge. Hearings expected this summer. Nobody jailed yet. Nobody compensated properly yet. The legal profession is now asking why so many lawyers "crossed lines." Bit late but sure, crack on. Source: @LawGazette |
Artur Nadolny tweet media
English
271
2.6K
5.5K
156.8K
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Monsieur Cholet
Monsieur Cholet@stugoo17·
#PostOfficeScandal #Capture The Post Office asked the Court of Appeal for two more months. The court said no. Steve Marston was convicted in 1997 over a near-£80,000 shortfall produced by Capture — the accounting system that preceded Horizon and shared its talent for inventing debt. He has waited twenty-nine years. The Post Office felt a further eight weeks was reasonable. The judiciary, at last, is naming the pattern: delay, deflect, deny. Roughly thirty Capture prosecutions still sit with the CCRC, each to be handled "case-by-case" — institutional shorthand for as slowly as we can manage it. Patricia Owen, the first Capture referral, has been dead since 2003. We were promised a new culture under new management. On this evidence the only thing that has changed are the faces in the PR Dept. share.google/FnKgQjHvBhDbTu… @Karlfl @ComputerWeekly
Monsieur Cholet tweet media
English
7
90
149
4.1K
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
David Joyce
David Joyce@DavidJo57069285·
@ArturNadol7566 How no one from Fujitsu or The Post Office has been charged with criminal behaviour is beyond me. Their behaviour led to people taking their own lives.
English
3
6
57
713
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Charl Hennessy
Charl Hennessy@charlhennessy1·
Nottinghamshire Police Chief Constable Kate Meynell made the press sign an NDA to prevent failings being exposed, when the Nottingham Post disclosed Meynell's forces incompetencies anyway, she complained about the papers coverage. Then she lied about the NDA..... Then she was allowed to retire and will be protected..... Now she's dragging her feet in handing over statements to the IOPC and causing traumatised families further distress..... Meanwhile, the Home Office tells the public all that we can't yet have a "Hillsborough Law" to prevent this type of Cover up.....because of National Security concerns.....🤔 Corrupt to the core #HillsboroughLawNow nottinghampost.com/news/local-new…
English
3
69
142
6.2K
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
THE OG GUNNER
THE OG GUNNER@THEHUSSY1·
#PostOfficeScandal Corrupt/Illegal/Criminal/Complicit #LockThemAllUp
Artur Nadolny@ArturNadol7566

THE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO CRACKED THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN UK LEGAL HISTORY Richard Roll @Fujitsu worked on the Horizon system. In 2015 he went on @BBCPanorama and told them Fujitsu engineers had remote access to subpostmaster accounts and could change the numbers in secret. @PostOffice called that impossible. It was their entire defence. 700 people had already been prosecuted on the back of it. Post Office response: send lawyers to intimidate the journalists' sources. Hide Roll's identity from them. Call it a briefing. Call it protecting the brand. Roll gave evidence in the 2019 High Court case. It helped prove the system was defective. Convictions started falling. Since the ITV drama aired, Fujitsu has collected around £510 million in new UK government contracts. Victims are still waiting for compensation. One man spoke up in 2015. The institution spent a decade making sure nobody heard him. Sources: @BBCPanorama / @ComputerWeekly / @guardian / Others

Español
0
4
11
428
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Ian Warren
Ian Warren@Threshersman·
I thought you would be interested in this story from The Times: Barristers face at least ten investigations over Post Office scandal. thetimes.com/article/eb6a3c…
Ian Warren tweet media
English
4
9
30
615
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Monsieur Cholet
Monsieur Cholet@stugoo17·
#PostOfficeScandal #HorizonInquiry #BarStandards #LegalEthics TEN GREEN BARRISTERS The Bar Standards Board has, for the first time, put a number on it: ten live investigations into barristers connected to the Post Office Horizon scandal. The figure did not arrive in a press release. It surfaced in the appendices to next week's Legal Services Board papers, and was confirmed only when the Law Society Gazette asked. The BSB expects matters to "progress to the Independent Decision-Making Body" this year. Five years after the first quashed convictions. Six years into the Inquiry. Twenty-five years after the prosecutions began. But this year. Definitely. The regulator's preferred euphemism for what the investigations may eventually find is zeal. It is not the word a member of the public might select to describe repeated representations to a court that an IT system was robust at a time when the prosecution's own technical witness had been told, on paper, that it was not. But zeal is the word the BSB has chosen, and zeal is the word we shall have. The duties at issue are the basic ones — candour to the court, disclosure, not misleading. They predate Horizon by a margin running into centuries. They appear in the Bar Code of Conduct in language no one of ordinary literacy could mistake. The BSB expects progress this year. This page will be counting down the days. T minus 249. share.google/MX4rnsEmsYcYhr… @CastletonLee @Janetsk20073533 @JohnHyde1982 @barstandards
Monsieur Cholet tweet media
Cap-d'Ail, France 🇫🇷 English
25
87
138
3.8K
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Artur Nadolny
Artur Nadolny@ArturNadol7566·
THE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO CRACKED THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN UK LEGAL HISTORY Richard Roll @Fujitsu worked on the Horizon system. In 2015 he went on @BBCPanorama and told them Fujitsu engineers had remote access to subpostmaster accounts and could change the numbers in secret. @PostOffice called that impossible. It was their entire defence. 700 people had already been prosecuted on the back of it. Post Office response: send lawyers to intimidate the journalists' sources. Hide Roll's identity from them. Call it a briefing. Call it protecting the brand. Roll gave evidence in the 2019 High Court case. It helped prove the system was defective. Convictions started falling. Since the ITV drama aired, Fujitsu has collected around £510 million in new UK government contracts. Victims are still waiting for compensation. One man spoke up in 2015. The institution spent a decade making sure nobody heard him. Sources: @BBCPanorama / @ComputerWeekly / @guardian / Others
English
27
1.3K
2.4K
39.7K
Lee Castleton OBE retweetledi
Artur Nadolny
Artur Nadolny@ArturNadol7566·
THE MAN THEY CALLED A NUTTER JUST GOT A KNIGHTHOOD In 2003, the Post Office fired Alan Bates from his small branch in Llandudno, Wales. The reason? He refused to repay £1,200 that the Horizon computer system had invented out of thin air. He invested £65,000 in that post office. He made 507 calls to the helpline. He kept meticulous records proving the software was broken. The Post Office's response was to terminate his contract and walk away. Their own internal documents called him "unmanageable." People at industry conferences called him a nutter and a thief. He couldn't afford a hotel room at one protest event. He slept in a tent. So naturally he spent the next 20 years building the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance, dragging the Post Office into the High Court, winning a landmark judgment in 2019 that proved Horizon was riddled with bugs, errors and defects, and triggering the overturning of more than 900 wrongful convictions. Over 900 people were prosecuted. Around 700 convicted. 236 went to prison. The scandal was linked to at least 13 suicides. The compensation bill has now passed £1.2 billion. Fujitsu (@Fujitsu_Global) knew about the bugs from 1999. The Post Office (@PostOfficeNews) knew. They prosecuted people anyway. Then they destroyed the evidence, sacked the forensic accountants when they got too close to the truth, and deleted social media comments from victims. Paula Vennells, the CEO who presided over much of it, collected a CBE. She kept it for years. Bates turned down an OBE in 2023 specifically because of that. He finally accepted a knighthood in 2024. After the ITV drama. After the public inquiry. After the nation had caught up with what he'd been saying since 2003. Twenty years. Sleeping in a tent. Called a thief by the people who were supposed to represent him. Sir Alan Bates was right from the start. The institution was lying from the start. That is the whole story. Sources: @ComputerWeekly | @BBCNews | @ITVNews | @guardian |
Artur Nadolny tweet media
English
316
3.5K
12.4K
195.3K