Chase Canning

Modern Monetary Theory summed up: The currency can have no real value as long as the issuer has a monopoly on “money”, thereby forcing people to use it. Problem is, each unit will continue to lose value, and those not endeared by the monopoly will lose purchasing power.

@valentino_89489 @Holden_Culotta I’ve often thought this to be the hardest question for black pillers to deal with

@Holden_Culotta I have a question regarding the elites desires. It seems likely that most of these elites are focused on the long game rather than the selfish short term interests. Meaning, generational interests — results that won’t “bear fruit” in their lifetimes. Is this accurate?

Catherine Austin-Fitts just sounded the alarm. A pesticide liability shield will cause an “extinction-level event.” Why? It will absolutely destroy fertility. And she says this is no accident. It’s intentional. “Depopulation” is exactly what the elites want. “They’ve enjoyed so much success depopulating by giving vaccines corporate liability shields that you have Bayer, who bought Monsanto, coming around and trying to get both the feds and the states to give pesticide liability shields.” “If you look at the extraordinary amount of money and support that’s coming [from] the mega rich to support this, it’s no accident.” “There’s no way, given the science on this, that they don’t know.” “There’s no way it’s anything other than intentional.” “The battle for control of the food system is extraordinary.” “If you look at the Trump policies, you are looking at thousands of different actions by government to severely consolidate farming in agriculture.” Trump is pushing a pesticide liability shield on two fronts right now: First, House Republicans included a liability shield for pesticide companies in the 2026 Farm Bill. Trump personally urged Congress to pass it. Second, Monsanto is asking the Supreme Court to give them a liability shield in a case that will be heard later this month, Monsanto v. Durnell. And Trump’s DOJ sided with Monsanto. In case you haven’t noticed, Trump has completely abandoned and betrayed MAHA. @solari_the @paulbuitink

@alexstanczyk This implies only younger generations as possible buyers. It’s not that monolithic, and…what about investment companies? Also assumes selling has to happen and ignores inheritance. Oversimplified and not accurate.

Been talking about this continuously for several years now. Glad to see someone else talking about.

@leadlagreport Got your email today titled “will the gold and silver crash bring back Treasuries as the risk-off trade of choice?” Laughed then promptly deleted.

They are going to rug pull the ever living shit out of Gold and Silver again

@RealKeithWeiner It’s the same claim you constantly make towards BTC. Now it bites you 🙂

Every. Single. Claim. So glib, so self-assured. So Tu Quoque. And so rubbish.

@RafiFarber Bookmarked. Don’t delete.

No mercy for bitcoin maximalists. Don't ask us for any help. We warned you.

@operationdanish In what way and why?

Trump will intervene before the end of the day. Bookmark this. Big announcement incoming.

@mikealfred And you’re shorting silver. Irony?

It has begun.

@RafiFarber BTC 89,500, AU 4,913

@ChaseCanning Bookmarked. Don’t delete this.

Bitcoin now testing 18oz. The top was in a long time ago in October 2021 at 37.5oz with a failed breakout reversal of a triple top in December 2024. It’s over guys. It’s been over for over 4 years already. I did not get lucky. I understand money. You chase fantasy.

@BTCSpend @WatcherGuru HAHA

@WatcherGuru Great, not we can offload the off hours geopolitical induced market crash to something other than bitcoin.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 NYSE to launch 24/7 US stock trading through new on-chain tokenized exchange.

@DPGBehler This presupposes the idea/necessity of denominations. There’s only one Church. The one established by Christ through the apostles. Both visible and historical.

“You will pick a team, and you will pledge your unwavering fidelity to it, and you will like it.”

@AdamLaneSmith It’s almost like having kids then paying strangers to raise them isn’t a good idea. Dang, who would’ve guessed?

Daycare has been shown to harm attachments, especially for babies. Their mental health outcomes later in life are impacted. Saying this out loud can get you fired.

@LukeGromen How do you define “devalue the debt”?

With US government... -Spending at ~22% of GDP -"True Interest Expense" (Interest + Entitlements + Veterans Affairs) >100% of US receipts -Debt/GDP of 120%... ...cutting $1.5T in US spending too fast (fraudulent or not) would be guaranteed to collapse markets & the economy. Have to devalue debt/GDP 1st, THEN cut fraud to avoid that outcome

@operationdanish Thank you! Always thought this was cruel and no way it is God’s design. Same with creating a separate room to put the baby away from Mom. Again, no way that is God’s design. AND…the “sleep-training” is what “smart” people do! 🙄

What if the “Cry It Out” sleep training (aka extinction-based sleep training) has contributed to mental health issues in young people? In some ways, it’s the most insane thing to do to a child (and is based on incredibly poor science). For centuries, families co-slept without issues, but in modern times, it has become increasingly taboo… why? How can repeated emotional non-response to a baby be healthy? What does it do to their stress calibration, attachment expectations, and self-regulation? How does it play out in their long term relationships and social connections? I’ve read the studies and they are poorly designed and weakly supported. Yet, we have an entire generation of parents that blindly follow this insane protocol without reviewing the data themselves. To be fair, the data supporting co-sleeping is weak as well, but it has centuries of precedent so I feel much more comfortable supporting that than a new approach that was largely instituted since the 1920s. For some context, in the 20th century, behaviorist John Watson (1928), interested in making psychology a hard science, took up the crusade against affection as president of the American Psychological Association. He applied the paradigm of behaviorism to childrearing, warning about the dangers of “too much mother love”. The 20th century was the time when “science" was assumed to know better than mothers, grandmothers, and families about how to raise a child. Too much kindness to a baby would result in a whiney, dependent, failed human being. A government pamphlet from the time recommended that "mothering meant holding the baby quietly, in tranquility-inducing positions" and that "the mother should stop immediately if her arms feel tired" because "the baby is never to inconvenience the adult." A baby older than six months "should be taught to sit silently in the crib; otherwise, he might need to be constantly watched and entertained by the mother, a serious waste of time." The truth is the opposite. We now know that ignoring a child raising cortisol levels and hurts trust and attachment. Yet, every young parent I know today has been brainwashed to let their child cry in silence. It’s truly wild.

@naomirwolf So the White House doing that equates to Congress making a law respecting an establishment of religion….? No

Um, ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."… US Constitution.

@jonbrooks Uhhh…. The equity buildup and price appreciation of the home? Not a small thing, kind of the whole point.

Serious question: Why buy a house today when you can rent the exact same home for $600/month less? What am I missing?

@TheMattViera What a shallow and self-centered existence. Hard pass.

Not having kids is a life hack. I spend my summers in Europe, take cross-country road trips, and disappear off-grid on weekends. The money I’d spend on kids goes to investing, experiences, and freedom. Different priorities. Different definition of rich.

@EricLDaugh He’s talking about Powell getting fired not Bessent

🚨 BREAKING: Hilarious moment as President Trump tells Scott Bessent he'll be FIRED if he doesn't rein in Jerome Powell 🤣 "Scott's blowing it on the FED. Because the Fed rates are too high, Scott, and if you don't get it fixed fast I'm gonna FIRE YOUR A*S!" 😭 "Scott: 'Sir, please don't fire [Jerome Powell]. He's got 3 months to go, don't fire him.'" "I wanna GET HIM OUT, Scott! 'Please.'" "He's a voice of reason! You're [all] very lucky you have him. You've done a good job."

@LukeGromen Maybe they’ll work together for that Goldilocks scenario!

So AI and the US Treasury both need to borrow trillions in coming years... ...but positive real rates are mathematically certain to trigger a debt spiral for the US & world... ...and AI's trillions in borrowing will be spent on assets that undermine the US Treasury's tax base?

@daveweisberger @JoeCarlasare Great point. Really tired of hearing how adoption is “co-opted” and anytime someone you don’t like buys BTC it “ruins it”.

Who would have thought the "Final Boss" for Bitcoin to go mainstream would be OG Bitcoiners butt hurt that the financial system would begin the process of adoption???