Chatbreast

1.6K posts

Chatbreast banner
Chatbreast

Chatbreast

@Chatbreast1

Chattanooga, TN Katılım Ocak 2023
348 Takip Edilen40 Takipçiler
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@pgipe @sterlingkoonce I really don’t know why @mcuban keeps going. He’s amazing to keep talking about. I know his company but most billionaires would have given up by now.
English
0
0
1
10
Dr. Gripesalot
Dr. Gripesalot@pgipe·
Mark brings this point up repeatedly and I’ve said it before-yet it gets little traction. The ‘lose money on Medicare’ trope is tired. These systems spend money like drunken sailors because they are raking in massive profits. Fix the monopolies and you’ll see the P&L fix itself.
Mark Cuban@mcuban

@thoughtson_tech Hospitals can definitely make money on Medicare/caid , if you build your hospital to be able to make money from those programs. But that doesn’t get CEOs or PE paid.

English
6
4
22
1.7K
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@pgipe Estrogen dominance. Ah a world I dream of !!!! Aka women in charge. 💙🤷🏼‍♀️
English
0
0
1
9
Dr. Gripesalot
Dr. Gripesalot@pgipe·
PSA from local ARNP ‘Wellness’ Clinic. Just in case some of yall out there had ‘sluggish’ livers you need checked out. 🤦🏼‍♂️
Dr. Gripesalot tweet media
English
8
0
8
981
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@pgipe The reason people don’t trust doctors. This makes my job harder everyday
English
1
0
2
26
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@daviddorg @JeromeAdamsMD Yeah, they didn’t have to worry about what crazy shit the president was doing all the time because they didn’t know
English
0
0
1
9
David Daines
David Daines@daviddorg·
Stanford paid 35,000 people to quit Facebook and Instagram for 6 weeks Depression dropped. Anxiety dropped. Happiness went up. Women under 25 on Instagram saw the biggest gains That was 6 weeks. I'm going a full year.
David Daines tweet media
English
1.4K
9.9K
47.7K
3.6M
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@DrJMarine @ashishkjha Because the everyday person is great at risk analysis and stats. And rational decision making. We know that’s not true. Look who won the presidency.
English
0
0
0
9
Joseph Marine
Joseph Marine@DrJMarine·
@ashishkjha "We should explain risk and let adults decide" This should be the foundation of public health practice. But this did not happen during the covid debacle.
English
10
0
20
2K
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@pgipe 😂idiopathic hypogonadism. Aka over 50
Suomi
0
0
1
22
Chatbreast retweetledi
Lovell Martin Jr
Lovell Martin Jr@Mints2u29·
Yet again The KABC KY All Star game will be played at Lexington Catholic while the Indiana All Star game will be played inside Pacer Arena Our kids deserve Rupp, Memorial or Even The YUM. Marketing Manager / Planning Committee the good ole boy system is NOT working
Lovell Martin Jr tweet mediaLovell Martin Jr tweet media
English
15
7
71
29.9K
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@Rick_Ferri @ewarren Except they have been supposed to do that for 40 years but haven’t. Instead voodoo economics destroyed America and normal working class jobs
English
1
0
0
72
Rick Ferri, CFA
Rick Ferri, CFA@Rick_Ferri·
@ewarren How about instead if those smart entrepreneurs used their money to start new businesses that employed people instead of you confiscating it and giving it away? Your socialism will NEVER create 1/100,000 of the jobs and prosperity that capitalism creates.
English
7
1
77
3.3K
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
A wealth tax on the top .15% of the richest families would generate $6.2 trillion in revenue. That could pay for: Universal childcare Millions of new homes Slashing child poverty Medicare for people aged 55+ Universal paid family leave Tuition-free community college And more.
English
12.8K
2.4K
9.7K
1.3M
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@CoffeeBlackMD 1. I call results. I always start with is now a good time or do you want me to call back. The patient decides. Sometimes it’s call back. And I also do agree with original post. Then give results immediately in clear word. I also noticed Sasse doesn’t seem to understand mets
English
0
0
1
10
CoffeeBlackMD
CoffeeBlackMD@CoffeeBlackMD·
We have ZERO clue what was actually communicated verbatim. We do know what Sasse *heard* (or thought was said) based on his telling. He’s not lying. Delivering bad news is hard. And the ability to do it well probably runs a spectrum. Trying to ride a fine line of the facts as we know them, the unknowns that we do not, and the ability at the time for the partient or family to take in, process, or understand the bad news is an art and also a bit of guess. It can always conceivably be better but perfect delivery is tough to touch. There isn’t ONE way for every situation. You can have an approach that tries to get at it best but expecting it to be right every time is a recipe for disappointment and even resentment. I have my way. And I hope it’s right or at least good enough most of the time. Often in the ICU you can tell family is not ready yet for the full conversation and I don’t force the issue but I always explain the facts as I see them. I think you have to shoot straight. And always give recommendations based on that. But I never argue about any of it. I’m not the enemy. And there is no reason to set yourself in opposition. And as a natural optimist maybe I tend towards hope in my delivery too much based in my own biases. None of it is easy. Not for docs and especially not for patients and families.
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO@marklewismd

Much of the eye-opening @BenSasse interview is instructive as to how NOT to communicate as an oncologist 1) get to the point quickly (before the “tinnitus of terror” sets in) and 2) make it clear that the primary & metastatic sites are the SAME cancer nytimes.com/2026/04/09/opi…

English
9
1
33
8.4K
Chatbreast retweetledi
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
The journalist who took down Harvey Weinstein just spent 18 months investigating Sam Altman. And what he found out is genuinely insane: The people who built OpenAI went on record saying he can't be trusted with the future of humanity. A Microsoft executive even compared him to Bernie Madoff. This isn't just some hit piece. It's 100+ interviews, secret memos, HR documents, Slack messages, and private notes that had never been seen before. Here's everything you have to know about Ronan Farrow's investigation: Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI's former chief scientist and CO-FOUNDER, compiled 70 pages of internal evidence against Altman. Slack messages. HR files. Behavioral analysis. The word at the top of his list of Altman's "consistent patterns": lying. He sent the documents as disappearing messages because he was "terrified" someone would find them. They became legendary in Silicon Valley. Insiders just call them "the Ilya Memos." Dario Amodei, another co-founder who left to start Anthropic, kept his own private notes. One line: "The problem with OpenAI is Sam himself." Paul Graham, the man who RECRUITED Altman to run Y Combinator, told colleagues Altman had been "lying to us all the time." Multiple YC partners had complained about Altman's behavior by 2018. He was effectively forced out in 2019 despite publicly claiming for YEARS that he left voluntarily. Former board members described him as "unconstrained by truth." And the investigation found that Altman reportedly lied to the board about obtaining safety approvals for some of ChatGPT's most controversial features. That's the man running an $852 billion company with 900 million weekly users and a Pentagon contract. But here's where this gets really crazy: The New Yorker investigation dropped on Sunday. SAME DAY, Altman publishes a 13 page policy paper proposing robot taxes, a public wealth fund, and a four-day workweek. The most ambitious social policy document in OpenAI's history. Dropped within HOURS of the most damaging article ever written about him. That's not coincidence. Monday: Elon Musk files a court motion demanding Altman be REMOVED as CEO. He wants the for-profit conversion completely unwound. Then Friday at 3:45 AM: a 20yo throws a Molotov cocktail at Altman's San Francisco mansion. It bounces off the house. Lights the gate on fire. An hour later, same guy shows up at OpenAI HQ threatening to burn the building down. Police arrest him on the spot. Nobody was hurt. But within hours, Altman posts a photo of his husband and 1yo child on his blog. Writes that he hopes the image "might dissuade the next person." Then blames the New Yorker article for making things "more dangerous" for him. In 5 days, Altman went from the target of the most devastating investigation in tech history to the sympathetic father whose family was attacked. Now anyone who criticizes him has to do it in the shadow of a firebombing. The New Yorker spent 18 months building the case that Altman is dangerous. Altman turned it into the reason HE'S in danger. And none of this changes what Farrow actually found: - The co-founders don't trust him - The former board doesn't trust him - The chief scientist documented 70 pages of evidence and was too scared to send them through normal channels - Paul Graham says he was lied to - A Microsoft executive put him in the same sentence as Madoff The trial starts in 16 days. If Musk wins, the for-profit conversion gets unwound and Altman is removed. If Altman wins, the man that every person who helped build OpenAI has publicly warned about gets permanent, unchecked control of the most powerful AI company on Earth. Either way, one thing is now undeniable... The people closest to Sam Altman are the ones screaming the loudest warnings. And this week proved he knows exactly how to make sure nobody listens. Peak manipulation.
English
289
6.3K
14.7K
651.9K
Chatbreast retweetledi
Barry Rosen
Barry Rosen@brosen1501·
I was thirty-something years old when Iranian students dragged me into a room and told me I wasn't going anywhere. Four hundred and forty-four days later, I walked out. I've spent the decades since trying to make sense of what happened — and what keeps happening — between our two countries. So don't talk to me about Iran like it's an abstraction. I lived inside that confrontation. I felt it. Which is why I'm not ready to write off this ceasefire, even though everything about it is maddening. Negotiations in Pakistan may produce nothing. The talks could collapse before they get started. I've seen American diplomacy with Iran fail more times than I can count, and usually for the same reasons — too much pride, too little patience, and Israel holding a match in the corner of the room. But here's what I know in my bones: another war won't break Iran. We just tried. It didn't work. Iran doesn't break — it absorbs, it adapts, and it waits. I watched that stubbornness up close for 444 days. What bothers me most isn't that Iran is winning this moment — it's that we handed it to them. Tehran's framework is running these negotiations. Iran still controls the Strait of Hormuz. Still collecting tolls. Trump looked at their proposal and called it workable. I never thought I'd see the day, but here we are. Iran wants everything on the table — sanctions, enrichment rights, American troops out, and a deal that covers what's happening in Lebanon and Gaza too. That's a lot to swallow. And Israel, which wasn't invited to this conversation, is already making clear it has no intention of being constrained by it. That's the part that worries me the most. Because if Israel keeps bombing and Washington can't or won't stop it, none of this holds. And yet — and I say this as someone who has every reason to distrust Tehran — I don't think we go back to all-out war. Not because anyone has suddenly gotten wise, but because the math doesn't work. A second round ends the same way. Iran still controls the Strait. The global economy still flinches when Tehran flexes. What we're heading toward isn't peace. It's something smaller and more precarious — two countries silently agreeing not to destroy each other today, with no paperwork and no guarantees. I know what it's like to survive on something that fragile. For 444 days, that's all I had.
English
513
2K
7K
806.7K
Marc Johnson
Marc Johnson@SolidEvidence·
I had a hypothesis, and decided to test it. Here's the hypothesis. Kids just a few years old have probably been exposed to COVID, but the only lineage circulating has been JN.1-derivatives, so they are going to be more resistant to JN.1 than anything else. 1/
Marc Johnson@SolidEvidence

I’m amazed. It’s really true: the BA.3.2 COVID lineage is infecting children at a much higher rate than previous lineages. I’m late to this party, but I couldn’t really believe it was true until I did the analysis for myself. 1/

English
13
35
316
37.3K
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
@NASA Are we there yet ? Said every parent
English
0
0
0
11
NASA
NASA@NASA·
Lock in, we’re Moonbound. Artemis II astronauts are more than halfway to their destination, and preparations for lunar flyby are underway. During their trip around the far side of the Moon, they will capture imagery to share with scientists (and you, too!).
NASA tweet mediaNASA tweet mediaNASA tweet media
English
1.9K
15.3K
113K
3.4M
Chatbreast
Chatbreast@Chatbreast1·
More admins
Heath Veuleman@HeathVeuleman

Most people don’t realize that many of these jobs are not caregivers. In fact, we are seeing physicians elect for early retirement and finding a clinical RN over 50 is like finding a unicorn. In fact, majority of these jobs are non-clinical are actually parasitic to the host: the buyer and the seller (the physician and the consumer). Recent job-posting data from 2025 shows employers listed 180,800 non-clinical healthcare roles (up 8% from 2024). Key drivers included: >>Financial/billing roles (medical billing and collections): 37,500 postings, +47% year-over-year. >>Administrative roles: 59,700 postings, +15%. >>Roles like patient access specialists and intake coordinators also surged as organizations focused on throughput. BLS projections reinforce this: medical and health services managers are expected to grow 23% from 2024–2034 (much faster than average), with low unemployment rates in areas like medical secretaries/admin assistants (3.7%), claims adjusters/examiners (2.4%), and medical records specialists (1.0%). And while we need jobs in the United States, and good paying jobs, the irony is that these jobs aren’t enhancing local economies like the government intends because they drive up the cost of healthcare. Therefore, the purported economic benefit of adding another manager at the hospital, for example, is off-set by the exponential cost created by the system itself. The costs are reflected in greater government subsidy and arbitrage, but also higher premiums.

English
0
0
1
23