Heartlin999

@SamBroner Congrats! Will the clearinghouse support multiple major chains and automatically bridge funds between them?

麻了，又又又一个知名模块 axios 被投毒，带毒版本 axios@1.14.1 与 axios@0.30.4。排查参考： stepsecurity.io/blog/axios-com…

@KaspaASI @grok is that true?

牛肉被称为超级食物之王是有原因的。 牛是反刍动物确实是大自然的奇迹： 它们可以通过肉、奶和器官来恢复你的健康。 它们可以通过自己的放牧模式来恢复土壤。 我们的健康依赖于反刍动物的健康。 因为它们是无法被取代的。 牛用于运动的肌肉往往更瘦更坚韧，而用于支撑的肌肉往往更嫩且脂肪更多。 牛肉的营养密度是鱼类的两倍，是猪肉的2.5倍，是鸡肉的4倍。 没有任何一种食物比牛排更有益于您的健康。 它是一种多种维生素，富含硒、钾、镁、铜、b1、b3、b5、b6、b12 等关键营养素... ⤵️科普！牛光吃草就能长肌肉，可为啥人类必须疯狂健身加补充蛋白质？

@VictorTaelin Is your 7x24 workflow a type of harness engineering?

Sorry for posting this again, I'm still processing it: It'd cost >>> $743k per year <<< to run Opus-4.6 fast-mode nonstop Literally my company cannot afford a single person using it for daily coding. And that's a shame because the experience is truly magical. I've spent the last 2 days using it on Pi (nearly $500 gone 💀), and it was the first time I kinda got into the flow state while using an agent, because the feedback is just so fast. This is not something I ever experienced before, definitely not with GPT 5.4's own fast mode. I can't wait for this kind of super fast, super high intelligence to be available for a reasonable cost...

@thegadgetsfan @VictorTaelin Good news

@VictorTaelin Yes they used Kimi 2.5 as base and performed intensive RL training. It's a hardcore coder I'm impressed. I use GPT-5.4 for planning and Composer 2 to implement now. I think you'll be impressed by it's speed and code quality...

@draken1721 @Polymarket What happens to the supply chain?

@Polymarket supply chain got cooked and nobody cared until now

BREAKING: Super Micro co-founder accused of illegally sending billions of dollars in AI server tech to China.

@Jackyi_ld 要相信自己怎么想都是错的才能成长

加密行业这几年最大的问题创新衰退了，这个问题根源来自两方面，一是美国上一届政府加密政策收紧，随着这次加密结构法案通过应该能解决。二是币安要求项目对加密VC的1➕3年锁仓机制，相信币安初心是好意，培养长期投资思维。现在这个机制后果是让项目方，做市商，交易所Liquidity先跑，而VC在漫长的解锁中归零。VC本来承担了一级市场最大的风险，却还要承担最晚退出风险，明显和传统投资市场向背，这样的后果是加密VC集体消亡，优质创业者很难融资，行业创新减少，@cz_binance 给CZ一个建议，给加密VC一个更好的退出机制，激活VC资本活跃起来，才能有利于行业创新，也更加有利于交易所上线优质资产。

@CoWSwap Why not just ban swaps that have a large price impact?

Hey everyone — we’re aware of the large swap transaction circulating on X. Based on what we’ve seen so far, there’s no indication of a protocol exploit or otherwise malicious behavior. The transaction executed according to the parameters of the signed order. Our interface shows clear price impact warnings for swaps of this magnitude, as does Aave’s. We’re continuing to review the details and will share updates as we learn more.

@mgrabina Too technical.

After today's unfavourable $50M swap on our interface, there's a lot of confusion around slippage I'd like to clarify: Slippage is the tolerance buffer on a market order: how much the final fill price can deviate from the quoted price due to market movement between signing and execution. On the Aave interface, suggested slippage is algorithmically calculated from asset pair volatility and order size. Since we offer both market orders (with adjustable slippage) and limit orders, our slippage and fee estimates are tuned for execution time. Users can always tighten it (or set limit amounts) and will typically get a surplus back thanks to @CoWSwap's auction mechanism. In this case, the user sent a market order with the suggested 1.21% slippage. But the core issue wasn't slippage, it was just the accepted quote with 99% price impact: As you can confirm it yourself on the CoW explorer, the order includes a quote field showing the original rate (50M USDT -> <140 AAVE) presented to the user before fees and slippage. It was already a very bad rate. All the interactions were also verified via internal analytics, and the user even received a 0.7% surplus, confirming the swap mechanics worked exactly as intended. Thanks to our open-source nature, anyone can reproduce this. So, the price impact warning was displayed. The checkbox was checked, sadly. While we're working on stronger guardrails for all our users, we'll always believe in permissionless DeFi.

Will practice

How to Spot Insiders on Polymarket don’t chase the PnL alone one wallet report is all you need red flags: > Fake: Green overall, but 60-70% of trades are red > Bots: Trades every 0.0 minutes > Arbitrage: YES and NO < $1 = Profit the most useful bot for this: t.me/KreoPolyBot?st… key metrics: > Time Profitable - pain-to-gain ratio > Combined Avg - gambling or steady money > Accumulation vs FOMO - thinking straight or panicking Check this profile here: @0x1d0034134e?via=0x-d-pool" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/@0x1d0034134e?… the alpha: > Target traders with 80% Time Profitable and Combined Avg < $1 copying trades without checking these signs?via=0x-d-pool

@darknight_ethh @aave @chainlink @StaniKulechov @Marczeller @0xKolten What's SVR?

SVR just printed $16.7M revenue. $10.9M flows straight to @aave. $5.8M to @chainlink. Best duo in DeFi. OGs still running the game.

Just discovered Booth 4103 👀 @zr_securities Zircon Securities, HK’s No.1 Fastest-Growing Licensed Virtual Asset Broker. Play a game, get gold phone stickers or a gold keychain, and HK$200 cash when you open an account. #Consensus #ConsensusHK #Crypto

@KuCoin_AP cool

@Jackyi_ld 意义是什么？动力是什么。

作为现在全网压力最大的人，首先必须承认：自从顶部清仓后，确实过早看多eth是错误的，因为btc在10万左右，eth一直在3000，我们认为被低估。目前上一轮利润回吐，仓位决定思路，在控制风险的情况下，继续等待行情向上，谢谢大家关心，投资和交易是最难的，身处行业中，总是时刻忍不住看多。

@VitalikButerin The quantity of Bitcoin ranges from 0 to 21 million, but other cryptocurrencies operate in the opposite way—they can instantly mint hundreds of millions of tokens. That is truly a poor design. Ethereum should have a mechanism to support creation-based mining.

How I would do creator coins We've seen about 10 years of people trying to do content incentivization in crypto, from early-stage platforms like Bihu and Steemit, to BitClout in 2021, to Zora, to tipping features inside of decentralized social, and more. So far, I think we have not been very successful, and I think this is because the problem is fundamentally hard. First, my view of what the problem is. A major difference between doing "creator incentives" in the 00s vs doing them today, is that in the 00s, a primary problem was having not enough content at all. In the 20s, there's plenty of content, AI can generate an entire metaverse full of it for like $10. The problem is quality. And so your goal is not *incentivizing content*, it's *surfacing good content*. Personally, I think that the most successful example of creator incentives we've seen is Substack. To see why, take a look at the top 10: substack.com/leaderboard/te… substack.com/leaderboard/cu… substack.com/leaderboard/wo… Now, you may disagree with many of these authors. But I have no doubt that: 1. They are on the whole high quality, and contribute positively to the discussion 2. They are mostly people who would not have been elevated without Substack's presence So Substack is genuinely surfacing high quality and pluralism. Now, we can compare to creator coin projects. I don't want to pick on a single one, because I think there's a failure mode of the entire category. For example: Top Zora creator coins: coingecko.com/en/categories/… BitClout: businessofbusiness.com/articles/insid… Basically, the top 10 are people who already have very high social status, and who are often impressive but primarily for reasons other than the content they create. At the core, Substack is a simple subscription service: you pay $N per month, and you get to see the person's articles. But a big part of Substack's success is that they did not just set the mechanism and forget. Their launch process was very hands-on, deliberately seeding the platform with high-quality creators, based on a very particular vision of what kind of high-quality intellectual environment they wanted to foster, including giving selected people revenue guarantees. So now, let's get to one idea that I think could work (of course, coming up with new ideas is inherently a more speculative project than criticizing existing ones, and more prone to error). Create a DAO, that is *not* token-based. Instead, the inspiration should be Protocol Guild: there are N members, and they can (anonymously) vote new members in and out. If N gets above ~200, consider auto-splitting it. Importantly, do _not_ try to make the DAO universal or even industry-wide. Instead, embrace the opinionatedness. Be okay with having a dominant type of content (long-form writing, music, short-form video, long-form video, fiction, educational...), and be okay with having a dominant style (eg. country or region of origin, political viewpoint, if within crypto which projects you're most friendly to...). Hand-pick the initial membership set, in order to maximize its alignment with the desired style. The goal is to have a group that is larger than one creator and can accumulate a public brand and collectively bargain to seek revenue opportunities, but at the same time small enough that internal governance is tractable. Now, here is where the tokens come in. In general, one of my hypotheses this decade is that a large portion of effective governance mechanisms will all have the form factor of "large number of people and bots participating in a prediction market, with the output oracle being a diverse set of people optimized for mission alignment and capture resistance". In this case, what we do is: anyone can become a creator and create a creator coin, and then, if they get admitted to a creator DAO, a portion of their proceeds from the DAO are used to burn their creator coins. This way, the token speculators are NOT participating in a recursive-speculation attention game backed only by itself. Instead, they are specifically being predictors of what new creators the high-value creator DAOs will be willing to accept. At the same time, they also provide a valuable service to the creator DAOs: they are helping surface promising creators for the DAOs to choose from. So the ultimate decider of who rises and falls is not speculators, but high-value content creators (we make the assumption that good creators are also good judges of quality, which seems often true). Individual speculators can stay in the game and thrive to the extent that they do a good job of predicting the creator DAOs' actions.

Convex and Concave

@evilcos 可以做一些付费工具卖

今时不同往日，往日一个漏洞可以最大化恶作剧（不带不可逆的破坏性），现在这种游戏规则只在黑帽手里，白帽只能忍着。有时为了点赏金还得低声下气。

What is Enclave Transport? Refers to the secure, authenticated communication channel established between two trusted execution environments (TEEs or "enclaves"). The entity you are communicating with is genuinely a legitimate, un-tampered-with enclave running your expected code.

I voted Abstain on UNIfication vote.uniswapfoundation.org/proposals/93?s…