Citizen Ø

5.2K posts

Citizen Ø banner
Citizen Ø

Citizen Ø

@CitizenNonePod

Semper Liberanda. Host: Citizen None Podcast Libertarian, Constitutionalist, Aristotelian in some ways, Socratic in others.

City of Demons Katılım Kasım 2020
319 Takip Edilen183 Takipçiler
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
It all started with Strunk and White. (Of course I jest, they’re a symptom of the movement) People peeving about things that never mattered, stripping culture of its heritage in favor of something more sanitized. Progressives continued pushing this in every arena: arts, history, education, science, music, etc. Brutalism was soul destroying.
The American Tribune@TAmTrib

Media from the past is so immensely Radicalizing A whole different world of dignity, grace and decorum once existed And this is London after much cultural and economic decay! Yet it is still gorgeous, polite, and refined in a way very little of our world now is All because equality was put first, and as a result civilization was destroyed

English
0
0
0
9
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
Trying to keep relevancy after quitting Congress is tough. Stop doing the left’s job. Trump clearly said (and explained) focus on Epstein, the files, all those past crimes and networks was a deliberate distraction to derail any coalescing on current pressing issues: border issues, economic, etc. People spinning wheels on this is taking valuable time away from making real moves in the limited time we have. I don’t think people take the Left and Dems seriously as a threat.
Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸@mtgreenee

MAGA should never be told that a convicted pedophile and his circle of elite friends raping girls when they are 14 or 16 years old is a Democrat hoax. And I still can’t believe I had to fight President Trump to release the Epstein files, and to this day no one has been arrested or held accountable. This was what killed MAGA. I don’t have Trump Derangement Syndrome, I have Trump Disappointment Syndrome.

English
0
0
0
34
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
I’d actually argue libertarianism is not axiomatically founded on the NAP, but property rights. The NAP is derived from property rights. When you divorce the NAP from property rights, you veer into leftist pacifist territory. Keeping it tethered pushes you into territory very, very similar to republican and conservative free market views. High compatibility there.
English
0
0
0
15
Andrew Wilson
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon·
@Vitasecurus @ReallyAmerica Libertarians rely on the NAP as their foundation for political ethics. Republicans and Democrats both share the axiom of constitution and how they interpret it. Libertarians generally seem to abandon constitutional principles (Good or bad) for the NAP.
English
17
0
51
1.4K
Andrew Wilson
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon·
Let's make this easy. If there is a single viable option outside the Binary of Republican and Democrat. Let's hear it.
English
854
70
1.8K
106.2K
Citizen Ø retweetledi
Billboard Chris 🌎
Billboard Chris 🌎@BillboardChris·
Spencer Pratt is really good at this.
English
857
9.5K
43K
1.2M
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
So? 🤷‍♀️ Nothing is hidden or secret. What was the point of this “research”? It seems to imply: - Genetic Fallacy - Guilt by Association - Poisoning the Well What relevance does it have to the suit? Not exactly earth shattering stuff here…
Danks@danksterintel

📢 The lawyer suing Candace Owens is Ben Shapiro's brother-in-law at Dhillon Law Group (who is also a working on retainer for a REGISTERED FOREIGN AGENT FOR ISRAEL) Jacob William Roth. Married to Ben Shapiro's sister Abigail since 2018. Associate at DHILLON LAW GROUP. Heritage Foundation alum. Specialty: litigating "antisemitic and anti-Israeli discrimination." Now stack what else his firm is doing. Dhillon Law Group is led by Harmeet Dhillon, currently DOJ Civil Rights AAG and rumored AG nominee. The same firm appears on page 14 of FARA Registration 7653 as legal counsel for Show Faith By Works LLC, the registered foreign agent of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. A foreign agent of Israel pays Dhillon Law for FARA compliance. Ben Shapiro's brother-in-law works at Dhillon Law. Ben Shapiro's brother-in-law is suing Candace Owens for criticism of Israel. Same family. Same firm. Same fight. Two years after Ben Shapiro fired Owens from The Daily Wire for criticizing Israel, his brother-in-law is co-counsel on the federal lawsuit against her. Full video uncovering the BS ⬇️ @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman Thanks to the live investigation w/ @RealBayes @alleytopfiles and your boy DANKS!

English
0
0
0
5
Texas_Voice of Liberty
Texas_Voice of Liberty@OfVoice35353·
Yeah, make sure that criminals are further empowered. Great plan. Make sure stolen cars are now harder to find. Make sure that wanted violent felons are more difficult to locate. Dumbest plan ever. Hopefully you get caught doing this, except those who post this type of shit are usually too scared to do it themselves.
English
251
1
51
28.2K
Jason Bassler
Jason Bassler@JasonBassler1·
⚠️ Definitely DO NOT point a 1000nm wavelength green laser at Flock cameras. It totally won't damage the sensor and render the camera ineffective. So please don't consider it, okay?
Jason Bassler tweet mediaJason Bassler tweet media
English
447
4.8K
24.2K
1.4M
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
@DrJayRichards @jeffreytucker Xlear is such a hack. The research on Xylitol is astounding and has been established for a while, yet is little talked about.
English
0
0
0
39
Jay W. Richards 🇺🇸
Jay W. Richards 🇺🇸@DrJayRichards·
Absolutely. Since I started using NeilMed sinus rinse and Xlear, I have far fewer colds, and the colds I do catch tend not to last long. If I've been in publc around people who are coughing or sneezing, I'll take a few puffs of Xlear. Personal experience not medical advice.
Jeffrey A Tucker@jeffreytucker

I heard @BretWeinstein say that hand washing was a great hygienic push of the 19th century, while daily saline nasal rinses are a 21st-century insight. I tried it. Astonished at the difference, super clear breathing all day. Not a paid endorsement but I'm wild for this product. amazon.com/dp/B000M4W2E6?…

English
2
1
25
5.5K
Tim Pool
Tim Pool@Timcast·
Trump is a blundering idiot who can't do anything right, there is no plan, he even bankrupted a casino Also he orchestrated an assassination false flag with a fake Democrat intel sleeper in front of hundreds of journalists pulling off a circuitous plan to justify his ballroom
English
3.2K
994
13.2K
706.1K
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
Farming does not and should not require synthetic fertilizers, which are also a net negative to the water table land ground contamination. Our ability to eat does not need to rely on plants. The vast majority of our nutrients come from animals. Which the progressives have made the most fragile part of the food chain. And none of you complained. Ranching and husbandry can be done smartly with lower cost inputs using a combination of current science and tradition that has proven science. We have more than enough land in the US, so internal resources are not an issue.
Lukas Ekwueme@ekwufinance

Diesel and jet fuel shortage is worsening. - Asia accounts for ~37% of global refining - ~2/3 of its crude comes out of Hormuz - Those imports are down ~22% YoY - Refineries were forced to cut runs by ~2.7 mbpd The problem isn’t just “less crude,” it’s which crude. Middle Eastern grades are medium density, medium/high sulphur = more diesel and jet fuel To replace that, Asia turned to US barrels, mostly light sweet crude, which gives you more naphtha and gasoline instead. - Middle East barrels: ~60% middle distillates - WTI: ~40% middle distillates Middle distillates = diesel, jet fuel, kerosene, gasoil. In other words, the world is structurally short diesel and jet. Given diesel and fertilizer are the biggest costs in farming, the energy crisis is quietly turning into a food crisis. Now add diesel and fertilizer export restrictions from major exporters and you have the perfect recipe for a food crisis

English
0
0
0
12
DL Cummings (LibertyDad)
DL Cummings (LibertyDad)@libertydadpod·
@ComicDaveSmith @LibertyLockPod Clint and I haven't been cool since I rightfully criticized his failed VP run (as equally as I have others). But folks in the comments really need to learn when to criticize and when to stand behind someone and say, "he is right and made a great response." Clint does that here.
English
1
0
4
575
Dave Smith
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith·
If you didn’t catch it, @LibertyLockPod response to Randy Fine on Tim Pool was excellent.
English
118
168
3.4K
274.1K
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
Why are we against this? Domestic spending using private money that can improve the ability to receive foreign dignitaries, conduct events securely, etc. Unless we’re totally dismantling FedGov (I wish!), there are legitimate State functions this helps with (and long term reduced security and event costs). I know why left hates it: they hate Trump. What is the reasoning for libertarians?
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith

We don’t need to build a new ballroom. It’s a stupid idea.

English
0
0
0
12
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
@PerBylund @jeremykauffman Principles and reality (vis-à-vis pragmatism) aren’t necessarily opposed. Jeremy knows this as well, and it is possible to marry libertarianism with reality.
English
0
0
6
223
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
@jeremykauffman @AP4Liberty Which is why the party colors are black and yellows To be unattractive like a hazard sign or a bee. “Stay away!” It cautions people. Don’t accidentally make us win!
English
1
0
1
97
Tal Hagin
Tal Hagin@talhagin·
Lol Lmao even
Tal Hagin tweet media
Jvnior@Jvnior

I’m going to say the truth. I’m a Muslim Palestinian on X. Yesterday my X payouts went from $8,000 every 2 weeks to $1,000. I complained about it to @nikitabier. Many Zionist accounts targeted me. Told him to remove my monetization. 3 hours later, my monetization is gone. Look… if it’s temporary, I get it. I deserve it. But if it’s a permanent ban, then hear me out: The rollout of creator payouts on X initially transformed the platform into a place where time invested actually paid off for many users. Engagement translated into real revenue, encouraging consistent posting, community building, and honest discourse. It rewarded creators who showed up daily, fostering an ecosystem that felt merit-based and alive. But now, the signals from the platform point in the opposite direction: reduced visibility for certain content, algorithmic tweaks that favor “original” or “high-quality” posts while punishing others, and reports of sudden drops in impressions for accounts that step outside approved lanes. We’re essentially being told we shouldn’t spend as much time here anymore, at least not in the ways that built the payout culture in the first place. That shift undermines the very incentive structure that kept users hooked and contributing. This creates a deeper problem. People won’t simply stop engaging because the algorithm or moderation policies discourage it; they’ll adapt in messy ways. Some will chase whatever metrics still reward visibility, leading to more performative, low-effort content or echo chambers. Others will grow frustrated, posting less or migrating frustrations elsewhere. The result is more division & chaos, not less. When the promise of open participation collides with opaque restrictions, whether labeled as anti-spam, anti-manipulation, or “freedom of speech, not reach”, trust erodes. Users feel gaslit: the platform profited from our time and attention when it suited growth and revenue goals, only to dial back the oxygen once that foundation was laid. We all know the trajectory this follows. It starts with throttled reach for posts that don’t align with evolving internal priorities. Then come temporary restrictions, demonetization, or “temporary labels.” Eventually, for too many, it escalates to full suspension or permanent silencing. Elon Musk positioned X as the free speech platform, a digital town square where ideas could compete without legacy gatekeepers. Yet persistent complaints about shadowbanning, especially for critics of the platform or its owner, alongside massive account suspensions (hundreds of millions cited for manipulation in recent years) and selective deboosting reveal the gap between rhetoric and reality. “Freedom of speech, not reach” sounds principled until reach becomes the quiet enforcer of conformity. Payout incentives pulled creators in; visibility controls risk pushing them out or forcing self-censorship to stay viable. That’s why I’m dropping all my links here: link.me/jvnior. I’m stepping back to focus on streaming. I will post a YouTube video that lays out everything that’s unfolded on X since January. The threats on my life, the defamation, the doxxing, the false reports, the bans. Everything. I truly appreciate every bit of support from everyone along the way. I love you all. I’m going take a break unless @nikitabier responds to me. This break is necessary for my mental health as this is weighing heavier than it should. I never did this for money. But if X genuinely wants to retain the creators who built its energy, it needs to confront whether it’s truly delivering on the free speech promise or just managing a more sophisticated version of a dictatorship. The chaos ahead won’t fix itself.

HT
10
8
98
5.2K
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
I appreciate your take. Not yet convinced this is the message they aiming for, but will go with an open mind. On the surface — most viewers current intelligence level will likely look no deeper — it’s an anti-Corporate message, which at its core, is anti-capitalist. I can easily be corrected if the presentation allows for it. And I know trailers and clips are always cut to try to get the most attention, so there’s a huge possibility that the narrative as presented will surprise people who’ve only seen trailers. Here’s hoping 🤞
English
0
0
0
104
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
Sure, be like the left and keep saying the shooting wasn’t real, false flag, all that. With no evidence. And real time evidence to the opposite. Cool. Seems really smart. If we have evidence that it was a false flag, let’s go, I’m not opposed. But every large or catastrophic event isn’t a false flag or conspiracy.
English
0
0
0
9
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
@libertydadpod Something Ron Paul did via Mises: applying logic and reason consistently to the fundamental concept of private property.
English
0
0
1
35
DL Cummings (LibertyDad)
DL Cummings (LibertyDad)@libertydadpod·
If you're a libertarian, why did you become one? Don't give me, "I believe in freedom" or "because I have principles." I'm asking what led you to decide that libertarianism was the idea you should support.
English
636
8
204
27.3K
Citizen Ø
Citizen Ø@CitizenNonePod·
I can repeat this enough. Progressivism has been slow marching since at least 1910-1911. They infiltrated all levels of education. State and local governments. Churches and religious institutions. FedGov. Why do people still act like they are just one election away from losing? It’s a slog.
Angela McArdle@RealAngelaMc

The left did a 100 year long march through the institutions. We are a year and a half into this administration. Now get your sea legs and man the cannons. We have a ways to go.

English
0
0
2
15