Elizabeth Hudson

5.6K posts

Elizabeth Hudson banner
Elizabeth Hudson

Elizabeth Hudson

@ClarkPolner

if you fit in too well you'll disappear

Cambridge, MA Katılım Ağustos 2014
2.4K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Elizabeth Hudson
Elizabeth Hudson@ClarkPolner·
That much I knew; was thinking more about all the contextual data around the diseased tissue // how much (and profiled in what modalities and dimensions) do you think is necessary to get to the pt where you have a world model that gets you that unlock (or does disease alone do it?)
English
1
0
1
131
Ron Alfa
Ron Alfa@Ronalfa·
@ClarkPolner We generate the pretraining data from human tissues.
English
1
0
0
314
Ron Alfa
Ron Alfa@Ronalfa·
Massive unlock for biology comes from LLM-powered agents reasoning and running virtual experiments with human bio world models.
English
6
8
89
6.6K
Elizabeth Hudson retweetledi
Collins Timbela💜
Collins Timbela💜@collinstimbela_·
Make the Microsoft CEO search for an email on Outlook live on camera
English
333
14.1K
124.1K
3.3M
Elizabeth Hudson retweetledi
U.S. Army Reserve
U.S. Army Reserve@USArmyReserve·
It is with heavy hearts that we announce the deaths of four U.S. Army Reserve Soldiers supporting Operation Epic Fury on March 1st. “We honor our fallen Heroes, who served fearlessly and selflessly in defense of our nation.” said Lt. Gen. Robert Harter, Chief of Army Reserve.
U.S. Army Reserve tweet mediaU.S. Army Reserve tweet mediaU.S. Army Reserve tweet mediaU.S. Army Reserve tweet media
English
4.6K
5.5K
33.4K
1.8M
owl
owl@owl_posting·
@Dremontjones oh neat, where/when else was it tried?
English
2
0
0
266
owl
owl@owl_posting·
insanely cool ideas for a startup. i dont know anybody involved in these, but it just like such an retrospectively obvious play given the personalized cancer therapy trendlines kernis.health specicare.com
owl tweet mediaowl tweet media
English
7
10
100
6.4K
Elizabeth Hudson
Elizabeth Hudson@ClarkPolner·
We're mining underpowered relics from the scientific literature when fresh data generation costs pennies. AI co-scientists (like the knowledge-graph tools before them) lean on the academic literature to supply context for whatever the user brings. But what if the literature mostly sucks? How much cheaper and higher-quality does data generation have to get before it makes sense to regenerate the foundations instead of endlessly extracting from them? A typical paper takes a rich, multifaceted dataset → runs a few analyses (only some of the process is documented) → reduces it to a single result → wraps that result in a persuasive narrative (word-count capped, often ~50% marketing). Raw data and full metadata are almost never shared. Even if they were - most of the underlying data are small, skewed, missing metadata, and were generated on old platforms. Negative results were omitted, the research herded around fashionable topics leaving stuff like unsexy benchmarks and context elucidation untouched, and few replications were done because no one gets tenure for being a follower. We still use it because there is zero upfront cost to integrating it. But at what point do those costs exceed the cost of simply regenerating the basics with today’s cheap, high-throughput tools? Without regeneration as the core lever, there will be no science AI worth writing home about.
English
0
0
0
179
Elizabeth Hudson retweetledi
Josh
Josh@XJosh·
We need to start talking about legalizing electronic warfare devices under the 2nd amendment. I want radio jammers.
Josh tweet media
English
661
1.1K
15K
361.3K
Elizabeth Hudson
Elizabeth Hudson@ClarkPolner·
or scenario C with AI (5 shared, 5 unique): in-house: 10 × $20K = $200K/yr platform (20 customers): $5K + $100K = $105K + 30% = $136K saving $64K/yr. is that just "we'll just do it ourselves" territory?
English
0
0
0
23
Elizabeth Hudson
Elizabeth Hudson@ClarkPolner·
scenario B again (best case platform scenario with 8 shared steps and 2 unique): in-house: 10 × $20K = $200K/yr platform: 8 × $20K / 20 = $8K + 2 × $20K = $48K + 30% margin = $62K platform still wins on ratio. but you're saving $138K instead of $688K. is that worth it?
English
1
0
0
34
Elizabeth Hudson
Elizabeth Hudson@ClarkPolner·
lots of 'automate data generation' plays in industries that don't have a free internet to scrape for model training (eg bio). some are automating in-house (Lila, Recursion, Insitro). some are building cloud labs as a service for everyone (Emerald, Strateos, Ginkgo?)...but what does an industry have to look like for a third-party cloud lab to beat doing it yourself? napkin math:
English
1
0
0
115
Nima Alidoust
Nima Alidoust@nalidoust·
What if we scored drugs not by whether they kill diseased cells, but by whether they push them back to normal? New blog post from Tahoe: we applied cell-state reversal to colorectal cancer using Tahoe-100M, and the results are striking.
Nima Alidoust tweet media
English
11
16
132
16.2K
Denis Wirtz
Denis Wirtz@deniswirtz·
I will be giving talks at UC San Diego (Dept Bioengineering) and Sanford Burnham Prebys Institute this coming Friday and the following Tuesday in La Jolla. I will talk about 3D mapping of solid tumors and new CAR T therapies to resolve them. Hope to see you there.
English
7
48
479
21.5K
Elizabeth Hudson retweetledi
Karen Vaites
Karen Vaites@karenvaites·
The country is waking up to the issue of underprepared college students. The call is coming from inside the elementary school building. This story out of Boston is illustrative: “We do not have the number of students in the entirety of Boston Public Schools performing at grade level in ELA and math to fill the total available seventh-grade seats across the three exam schools.”
Karen Vaites tweet media
English
52
152
786
85.2K
Elizabeth Hudson retweetledi