clay.c/
12.4K posts

clay.c/
@ClayCollins
Market buyer. Professional can kicker. Moves slowly, still breaks things. Can't exit Vim. Yesterday's price is not today's price.


Today, we're taking Manus out of the cloud and putting it on your desktop. Introducing My Computer, the core feature of the new Manus Desktop app. It’s your AI agent, now on your local machine.





This is wild. theaustralian.com.au/business/techn…



Introducing Manus Agents — your personal Manus, now inside your chats. 👉🏻Long-term memory. Remembers your style, tone, and preferences. 👉🏻Full Manus power. Create videos, slides, websites, images from one message. 👉🏻Your tools, connected. Gmail, Calendar, Notion, and more. Available now on Telegram. More platforms coming soon.



BPC-157 and VEGF is a tricky subject because in some studies it promotes VEGF and in others in lowers VEGF, such as in a melanoma cell line model. Given we don’t know the true extent of BPC long term for VEGF, especially not in the injectbale form, and the data isn’t super useful, I’ve settled on the following in a frank risk/benefit discussion with patients with limited insight: 1. BPC-157 should not be used in active cancer or in people at high risk of cancers 2. A short course of BPC-157 for an acute injury, even if it was a uniform VEGF promoter would not be concerning for oncogenesis given it takes years even for the greatest carcinogens to take effect, but the patient should be educated about these risks As far as TB4 and TB500 go, we have a little bit more clarity but that isn’t saying much. In some cancers, TB4 levels are elevated. Given that these promote cell migration, would strongly oppose using them unchecked for long term, especially in active cancers or cancer prone individuals The most interesting ptoential use case of all of these compounds is short term, targeted uses, like BPC-157 for an acute MSK injury or TB4 in the post stroke setting More research is needed. (My team discussed this this am and we may have some good news soon :) )















