Clint Bronson

2.1K posts

Clint Bronson banner
Clint Bronson

Clint Bronson

@ClintBronson76

You’re probably taking all of this way too seriously.

United States Katılım Nisan 2024
500 Takip Edilen95 Takipçiler
Clint Bronson retweetledi
doomer
doomer@uncledoomer·
the way you know that baby boomers are lying about packing a lunch and working hard every day is that they all have disgusting fat bodies that can only have come from decades of fast food slop and sedentary lifestyles
Raven@raven_brah

Boomers seem to forget that fast food used to be a normal, everyday expense for them because it was affordable. You could get a burger easily on minimum wage, it wasn’t some fancy treat you had once a year as a reward for pulling yourself up by your bootstraps.

English
67
224
3.4K
71.6K
Kron
Kron@Kronykal·
@Iceyidiots The obsession with Jews on the Right is really pathetic.
English
33
3
123
3.1K
Former Constitutionalist
Well seeing how an AIPAC funded candidate just unseated, hands down the most constitutional congressmen in the past 150 years, I would say it's way more than a boogie man. The power of your ignorance is unmatched...
Kron@Kronykal

@FinalCutTile @anarcho_cat I am so fucking sick and tired of you people and your Israel boogie man. Jfc.

English
13
0
14
3K
Clint Bronson
Clint Bronson@ClintBronson76·
@LouisvilleGun In every job Ive worked, where it was possible, close to if not more than half the people there would eat out for lunch and most of those were getting breakfast on the way in.
English
0
0
1
9
Clint Bronson
Clint Bronson@ClintBronson76·
@Docquistador He’s not even saying you’re poor because you’re eating out for lunch every day. He’s just saying you’d be better off investing that $30 a day instead. I don’t understand how this is even controversial.
English
0
0
0
54
Docquistador
Docquistador@Docquistador·
I would like to apologize to everyone over 55 for not believing the average young person spends $210/week on lunch. You are right. The reason everything is expensive is lack of personal responsibility. Not 150 million scamming foreigners & a government who prints money & sells us out. I will gladly enjoy my goyslop rations, learn to code, stop drinking coffee & wait for 50 year mortgages to come out.
Mikli@CryptoMikli

Kevin O’Leary says Gen Z is financially cooked when people making $70K a year are spending $28 on lunch

English
63
48
606
28.3K
Clint Bronson
Clint Bronson@ClintBronson76·
@Docquistador Well that’s the premise from the clip. And I’d say it’s not as small a % as you’d think.
English
3
0
4
134
Docquistador
Docquistador@Docquistador·
Thats under the premise people are spending $28/day on lunch. Ridiculous argument that applies to very small % of retards Pinching pennies is now the indefinite answer to how do i afford to live when it used to be a few years for “early 20’s new career” or “fallen into hard times”
English
6
0
17
473
WeaponOutfitters.com
WeaponOutfitters.com@WeaponOutfitter·
Stopped drinking beer, beer belly went away, ain't that something. Was complaining to my wife how I would have preferred to be jacked in high school, and being jacked at 40 isn't that useful. She countered that it would have went to my head and I would have peaked in HS lol
English
9
1
147
3.5K
Clint Bronson retweetledi
InfantryDort
InfantryDort@infantrydort·
America is gonna be ok. Rumors of our demise are greatly exaggerated. This is national puberty, not peril. Here's to another 250.
English
79
269
2.9K
31.1K
Clint Bronson
Clint Bronson@ClintBronson76·
@agave_redux Everyone thinks they’re the founding fathers incarnate and they’ll just spontaneously be leading militias to fight tyranny. Like, brother, you’re not even leading your HOA
English
1
0
0
33
Clint Bronson retweetledi
Frank McCormick
Frank McCormick@CBHeresy·
America is so much better than Chud the Builder, Johnny Somali, Nick Fuentes, Hasan Piker, Destiny, and Dan Bilzerian. Social media elevates the loudest trash the same way oil rises on water, but that doesn’t mean the ocean itself is poisoned.
English
32
40
266
5K
Clint Bronson
Clint Bronson@ClintBronson76·
@thecavedaddy Why do I feel like this is going to turn into a race to the bottom and absolute co-witness is gonna be back in fashion in a couple months.
English
0
0
2
36
Caveman 🇺🇸
Caveman 🇺🇸@thecavedaddy·
I generally don’t run risers anymore unless it’s a T2 profile and it’s 1.93 tops. He’s right, honestly most risers do g benefit the average shooter. It’s a lot like the Grip pod. It has a VERY niche use case that its for, anything else it makes zero sense to run it. Risers generally have an extremely niche usage
Caveman 🇺🇸 tweet media
Lucas Botkin@LucasBotkin

Justifications I’ve seen this past month for super tall optic mounts: 1. “If I break my neck it’s great” (hasn’t broken his neck) 2. “Works great for gas masks” (rarely if ever trains in a gas mask, is not on a CBRN team, a literal 0.1% scenario to be prepared for as a civilian) 3. “I have a super tall neck” (is literally a 5’10 dude with average build) 4. “Excellent for night vision shooting” (rarely shoots at night, and tall mounts make indexing NVGs through an optic even harder due to less connection on the rifle. He would know this if he trained regularly at night with a rifle and moved aggressively during engagements) 5. “Better situational awareness” (you can literally just look over your gun/optic and see, the tall mount does nothing for actually looking at your surroundings) 6. “But so-and-so uses it” (names a guy who is a B class shooter at best) 7. “It made more sense on my wire-stock PDW with short length of pull” (YES. They are nice for this if you can’t drop your head down enough because of the shorter length of pull.) When did people forget the concept “exceptions aren’t the rule”? Pick the gear that is the best for 95% of engagements. Not that one weird niche thing.

English
8
0
24
3.6K
Lucas Botkin
Lucas Botkin@LucasBotkin·
Justifications I’ve seen this past month for super tall optic mounts: 1. “If I break my neck it’s great” (hasn’t broken his neck) 2. “Works great for gas masks” (rarely if ever trains in a gas mask, is not on a CBRN team, a literal 0.1% scenario to be prepared for as a civilian) 3. “I have a super tall neck” (is literally a 5’10 dude with average build) 4. “Excellent for night vision shooting” (rarely shoots at night, and tall mounts make indexing NVGs through an optic even harder due to less connection on the rifle. He would know this if he trained regularly at night with a rifle and moved aggressively during engagements) 5. “Better situational awareness” (you can literally just look over your gun/optic and see, the tall mount does nothing for actually looking at your surroundings) 6. “But so-and-so uses it” (names a guy who is a B class shooter at best) 7. “It made more sense on my wire-stock PDW with short length of pull” (YES. They are nice for this if you can’t drop your head down enough because of the shorter length of pull.) When did people forget the concept “exceptions aren’t the rule”? Pick the gear that is the best for 95% of engagements. Not that one weird niche thing.
English
111
55
787
54.2K
Fenix Ammunition
Fenix Ammunition@FenixAmmunition·
@DefiyantlyFree Imagine a so-called conservative bitching because a congressman didn't pass MORE laws. You are one stupid cunt.
English
35
60
1.8K
8.3K
Insurrection Barbie
Insurrection Barbie@DefiyantlyFree·
Thomas Massie isn’t a congressman, he’s a content creator. He built a brand he can fundraise off of. He hasn’t don’t a damn thing in his entire 8 terms.
Insurrection Barbie tweet media
English
249
424
1.4K
32.8K
Lucas Botkin
Lucas Botkin@LucasBotkin·
Strap in. Hot take: the statement "just do what works for you" and "everyone is built different" is the most retarded intellectually dishonest statement within the firearms training community. It implies the idea that everyone has a different sized body and mechanics and should approach shooting (or athletics) in their own individual way. When in reality - humans are highly standardized organisms with limited anatomical variance. For example, the average height of males in the United States is 5'9. With a standard deviation of 3 inches. 95% of men are within 6" of each other in height. This means our hands, shoulder structure, limb proportions, reach, grip compatibility are near identical. Unlike the implication that everyone is somehow a totally unique specimen of evolution. To get even more granular, the coefficient variation of things like our hands is only 5-10%. Limb lengths like 4-8%. What does this mean? It means we are all capable of driving the same vehicles, performing the same tasks, often with minimal adjustments from the factory. Heck, we all use the same sized keyboards and mice and smartphones to go about our day. So, why has the idea that all of us are different become so prevalent in the firearms industry? My answer: because most people doing the education are lazy and lack confidence in what they know. It's easy to tell someone "it depends. Everyone is different. Do what works for you bro." But is that actually helpful? Does that actually set the person up for success? Does that actually give them something to work towards? No. It's a cop out. If a person has the experience, the wherewithal, and the ability to explain - they should tell people HOW to do it. They should seek out the best possible technique and share it. Telling someone why tea-cup gripping is lame and how to grip a pistol better is way more helpful than telling them to try everything and to "figure it out yourself". There's a reason the top shooters and instructors in this industry settle on very similar techniques and equipment for performing at a high level. How is this possible? We are all built the same anatomically - in God's image. How we brace for recoil, hold a rifle, press the trigger, see our sight pictures, process information - is all the same. Only until you reach the top 95% will you see slight variation in technique, and even then - we're talking mere 1% differences in capability down range. The TLDR is: Some techniques and equipment are just better. They put out better times, better hits, more consistency, and don’t care about people’s boomer/brovet war stories. “Just do what works for you bro” be damned.
English
98
38
618
89.3K
Sin
Sin@SinPerfectt·
@_JesseCinco @thecavedaddy I don’t understand why people can’t run what they feel comfortable with in this community lmfao It’s always one side telling the other side how stupid they are, if you like risers then great, run one. If you don’t like risers then great DONT run one.
English
4
0
8
728
Jesse Cinco
Jesse Cinco@_JesseCinco·
“Why don’t you like foregrips on rifles?” “What do you mean tall risers suck!?!?!” “Yeah but Instructor Mega Valor Hero said on Shawn Ryan Show that that’s a good idea in the 90 second YT short I watched” Folks, if you want to know the answers or the rebuttals to the scenarios listed above my response is a full rifle course for which a lot of dudes with similar backgrounds would charge you $1800. @AdaptivDefense is putting this and other content up for free because we don’t sell gay war stories or a cigar smoke-filled beard / tattoo picture day but instead a legitimate and tested course that we stand behind. But Jesse, won’t someone steal your guy’s stuff? Brother, it isn’t secret and when you pay for a course you pay for the In-Person feedback, anything else you can get on YouTube. Next, I hope military, LEO and good folks everywhere use this to get better at running a carbine. Cheers
Jesse Cinco@_JesseCinco

Full 2-Day Carbine Course By Lucas Botkin And Jesse Cinco youtu.be/5WOXtEMxFc4?si… via @YouTube

English
24
21
424
28.9K