Cookies94₿

Daily reminder: If you dont stack sats with your money, somebody else will stack sats with your money ! Start stacking now kyc free @relai_app Use code COOKIES to get 0.5% fee off! Happy stacking my frens 🙏🧡 #bitcoin

@cryptorover My grandma would have been my grandpa if she had balls.

🚨THIS IS REALLY UNBELIEVABLE FTX investment portfolio would have been over $100 billion today if they had not gone bankrupt. SBF was literally behind every best crypto and TradFi investment, and numbers back it. The first one was Anthropic. FTX invested $500M for an 8% stake and sold it for just $880M after bankruptcy. At $1.1T valuation, their stake would now be worth $88 billion. The 2nd one is Robinhood. FTX acquired a 7.6% stake in Robinhood for approximately $648 million. At this peak last year, the stake would be worth $10 billion. The 3rd one is Cursor. FTX bought 5% of Cursor for just $200K and sold it for the exact amount in 2023. Now, SpaceX has offered to buy "Cursor" for $60 billion. If FTX hasn't sold it in 2023, the same stake would now be worth $3 billion. The 4th one is SUI. FTX secured 888 million $SUI tokens for its $100M investment in Mysten Labs. After bankruptcy, the entire stake was sold for $96 million. At its peak in 2024, this stake would have been worth $4.8 billion. Apart from these, FTX also had investments in SOL, APT, and several other tokens. Only if SBF hadn't become greedy and used his own money instead of customers', things would have been a lot different.

Bitcoin allows people to own their own money, like cash and gold, without a custodian, and can be used globally. It enables person-to-person transactions on an “innocent until proven guilty” basis, unlike any money that relies on a custodian. BTC has a fixed supply that will never change, allowing me to plan decades ahead without a central banker altering the rules or diluting my value. It also provides a way to capture value from otherwise wasted electricity, a small price to pay for the benefits it offers to anyone. It’s the most net-positive form of money for society since cash. Gold was a natural gift. Bitcoin is an invented gift. It’s arguably the only real way to exit the financial-industrial complex and boycott the harms that traditional financial products may support. How is that a net negative?

@SimonDixonTwitt @Schteeveb @ElFacundoARG @xueqinjiang Cause the just salty and didnt put in the work to understand shit. Keep it going Simon, big respect

Bitcoin is simply a set of rules that cannot be broken by anyone. They are enforced by maths and code on the largest distributed supercomputer in the world, backed up by tens of thousands of nodes. @xueqinjiang happy to do another debate to explain where the servers are, respectfully.

@Schteeveb @ElFacundoARG @SimonDixonTwitt @xueqinjiang Rekt.

@ElFacundoARG @SimonDixonTwitt @xueqinjiang Because btc doesn't produce anything or increase overall GDP, the increase in btc price is paid for by the purchasing power of new users alone. That and the massive opportunity cost caused by the mining, means it's a net negative for society. Basically the worlds biggest ponzi

@2140data "But the security budget"

Bro the block subsidy was 25 BTC after the 2012 halving and it was worth like $300 bucks at the time The current subsidy in 2026 is 3.125 BTC and it is worth like $238,000 dollars Stop crying about the fucking fees dude

@GddxJhff @lopp He is just another shitcoiner who thinks he knows "whats good for bitcoin"

@lopp its almost insane that you as an engineer think its a good idea to set precedent to freeze coins at all my mind is blown that 'this' is bitcoin

When a controversial BIP appears... Healthy discourse: "I object to A, B, & C because of X, Y, and Z." Unhealthy noise: "STFU this is stupid." Absolute retardation: "We gotta kick this guy out of the ecosystem for wrongthink!"

@nic_carter @lopp Fuck off scammer

@lopp funniest one I saw was "these are not bitcoin devs" ok... so that whole "just submit a BIP" thing, "anyone can do it", that's null and void now? so there IS an elite secret cabal of devs that controls things is what you're telling me

@BTCBreadMan @caprioleio 😂😂😂 Spot on

@caprioleio “I’m retarded and don’t understand bitcoin” -you

This is a wild and concerning trend for Bitcoin. This is far worse than I had realized. This is a list of all the major public Bitcoin miners. ALL have made statements to pivot to AI. ALL are targeting major shares of revenue from AI from here, not Bitcoin. On average current Bitcoin revenue is expected to drop from 90% to just 30% in the next 2-3 years! Do you see a pattern? The stocks doing the best in recent years all jumped into AI big time. Those with 80%+ AI share of revenue targets saw their stocks climb up over 500% on average. Those targeting <60% AI revenue saw 1/10th the growth, with many having negative 2 year returns. The message is clear. If these numbers are even half accurate, and they are based on direct company statements, the energy and commitment to Bitcoin is under significant threat over the next 2-3 years. All while Quantum computing is taking off and poses an existential threat to Bitcoin unless we change the code. Many of these miners are not even planning to upgrade or renew Bitcoin mining hardware at all, simply running out lifespan of the existing and reinvesting only in AI. The market has been voting with its feet. Now the miners are voting with their feet. Just as Bitcoin is about to approach its biggest ever threat in the coming years, the backbone of its security is leaving the industry. Bitcoin used to be famed for having the biggest computing network in the world. It's now collapsing into AI at record pace.

@bullTat2 If you understood it, it wouldn't be a subject of liking or disliking.

@MrHodl @AnselLindner Sounds kinda geh, gettin forked by servers 😂🤣

@AnselLindner The servers.. the servers are in me

🚨 "People recognize [bitcoin] is the CIA. I want to know where the databases are, where the servers are, physically.” - Prof Jiang This is the opinion of so many midwits. It's also the reason even some gold bugs cannot comprehend bitcoin to this day, and why midwits believe in centralized scam sh*tcoins. They don't understand decentralization.

@JBTMBT @bitcoinwell The coins are not the network. Dig deeper you might get there

@bitcoinwell You buy all the coins on the exchanges all the time no matter the cost.

Everyone is laughing at Prof Jiang for asking where the "blockchain servers" are and floating the CIA Bitcoin theory. But I'm not laughing. You might be watching a psyop play out in real time. Jiang is a tenured professor. Are we really supposed to believe he doesn't understand distributed computing? Does he know what BitTorrent is? When you download a torrent file, nobody asks where the central "torrent server" is. The participants are the network. The nodes are the infrastructure. A credentialed academic pretending not to grasp this is not ignorance. It is a red flag. This feels like manufactured confusion. Ask yourself: who wins if the public believes the CIA created Bitcoin? The fiat system is dying. The money printer is destroying middle class purchasing power. Bitcoin is the mathematically guaranteed escape hatch. The state cannot hack the network. They cannot ban the math. Their only remaining weapon is narrative control. If they convince the masses that Bitcoin is a government surveillance honeypot, those people stay trapped in melting fiat. Forever. That is the goal. Here is the thing: I run a "bitcoin server". And you can too. The code is open source. The cryptography is transparent. The 21 million hard cap is verifiable by anyone running a node. You don't have to trust Satoshi's identity. You don't have to trust the government. You only have to verify the SHA-256 math. Don't laugh at the confused professor. Recognize this might all be a performance. They are trying to scare you away from the exit doors right before the fiat system collapses. Don't trust the narrative.

@JBTMBT @bitcoinwell Hahahahahah wild one.

@bitcoinwell They could have just bought the network with fiat many times now & in the past. So why didn’t they?

Fixed

The value of the block reward is what secures Bitcoin’s uptime for the foreseeable future. That reward is made up of the subsidy + fees. And I’ll repeat: even as the subsidy keeps dropping, the total value of the block reward has still been going up. I dont think I'd hate ordinals as much if people had to aquire 1 bitcoin to inscribe. Unfortunately, the only requirement is 1 sat.

@imabearhunter And then they all get rekt.

They called it a fad. A bubble. A scam. A relic. Governments tried to ban it. Banks tried to bury it. The media tried to kill it. But here we are. It’s still here. Still winning. Still orange.🟠 #NeverunderestimateBitcoin

@XRPArmyNews1 @FinancialPhys Hahahahahahah get rekt shitcoinboyyyy

@FinancialPhys I agree…but you want anything to do with Epstein/Iran Coin? I don’t! My momma raised me better. Did yours?

Serious question here If Bitcoin is so useless, and just a worthless Ponzi scheme with no value Why the fuck does anyone care if Iran wants it for tolls? EXPLAIN IT Nobody should care, right?

@SeanObud111 @BitcoinNewsCom Oh no ! Anyways...

@BitcoinNewsCom Shitcoin scammer attacks another shitcoin scammer!

JUSTIN SUN ACCUSES TRUMP-LINKED WLFI TOKEN OF BACKDOOR BLACKLISTING Justin Sun, founder of TRON, claims the Trump family–linked World Liberty Financial token (WLFI) contains an undisclosed smart contract backdoor allowing unilateral blacklisting of holders. Sun alleges the function enables the issuer to freeze, restrict, or effectively confiscate tokens without notice, cause, or recourse. Sun says the mechanism contradicts decentralization and was never disclosed to him or other investors. He claims he was the “first and single largest victim,” alleging his WLFI wallet was blacklisted in 2025, violating investor rights and core blockchain principles. Sun also denounced what he described as “ongoing token scandals” involving WLFI, calling the design a “trap door marketed as an open door.”

@noufsmith @QuintenFrancois

@Cookies945 @QuintenFrancois To be fair Quentin is I think the only .eth I don’t actively despise because I value his TA for men.

Engagement on Linkedin outperfoms X by a large margin. WTF