Crawdad

453 posts

Crawdad banner
Crawdad

Crawdad

@Crawdad_Inc

Last fair deal in the country; Last fair deal in the town

Katılım Şubat 2025
183 Takip Edilen150 Takipçiler
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@curl_justin The taxi medallion eases the transition. Few people realize this. Bills are being introduced to repurpose the taxi medallion as the AV license in NYC.
English
1
0
1
13
Justin Curl
Justin Curl@curl_justin·
This is spot on. Do you have preliminary thoughts on the normative implications of this view? How can govs ease transition for effected parts of workforce? (We don't want to repeat what happened with Uber and taxi medallion owners) How should companies adapt to these changes?
Alex Imas@alexolegimas

New essay on the economics of structural change and the post-commodity future of work. 1. Almost any question about the impact of advanced AI on the economy needs to start at the same place: what is still scarce? Answer that, and the analysis becomes pretty straightforward. This essay explores what becomes scarce if AI really can replicate most of what humans do in production, and what this mean for the future of jobs. 2. My conjecture, working through the economics: labor reallocates across sectors, and the sector it reallocates to has properties that keep labor a meaningful share of the economy. Ultimately this is about the structure of demand itself. For this, we have to go back to Girard, Augustine and Rousseau: once people's base needs are met, their preferences shift to comparative motives (e.g., status, exclusivity, social desirability). This motive is inherently non-satiated. 4. The key paper is Comin, Lashkari, and Mestieri (Econometrica 2021). As people get richer, they don't buy proportionally more of everything. They shift spending toward sectors with higher income elasticity. They estimate income effects account for 75%+ of observed structural change. 5. The ironic consequence: the sector that gets automated becomes a smaller share of the economy, not a larger one. Agriculture got massively more productive and its share of employment collapsed. Manufacturing too. The "stagnant" sectors absorb the spending and the jobs. 6. So the question is: which sectors have high income elasticity in a post-AGI world? I argue it's what I call the relational sector. Categories where the human isn't just an input into production, it is part of the value. 7. Why does the relational sector have high income elasticity? Because human desire has a mimetic, relational dimension. We don't just want things for their intrinsic properties. We want what others want, and we want it more when others can't have it. Girard, Rousseau, Augustine, and Hobbes all saw this. 8. In work with Kristóf Madarász, we showed this experimentally: WTP roughly doubles when a random subset of others is excluded from the good. And in new work with Graelin Mandel, AI involvement kills the premium. Human-made art gains 44% from exclusivity; AI-made art only 21%. 9. This all comes together for the core argument. The sector that absorbs spending as AI makes commodity production cheap is one where human provenance is part of the value, and demand for it grows faster than income. Exactly the profile that keeps labor meaningful. 10. To be clear about the claim: I'm NOT saying aggregate labor share must rise. It may fall. The claim is about sectoral composition, i.e., where expenditure and employment go once commodities get cheap, and the fact that the sector that will absorb reallocated labor maps to a substantial component of human preferences and desire. 11. If you're interested in the formal model, a linked companion technical note works out all the economics. Read the essay here: aleximas.substack.com/p/what-will-be…

English
1
1
2
1.4K
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@__paleologo Giuseppe - you realize there’s one public market company that holds the bottleneck to autonomous vehicles in NYC…. I’m waiting for Twitter to realize it :)
English
0
0
1
33
Gappy (Giuseppe Paleologo)
Also people: you want to give money to someone to take somewhere a bit faster and more safely? YOU ARE A MONSTER.
English
1
0
24
2.8K
Gappy (Giuseppe Paleologo)
Nice of this video to present NYC as "the jewel". Just yesterday, I took a cab from JFK to home after a 10-min wait. The driver did not understand the address, so I typed it in his Waze app (not joking! A Google company, like Waymo). Yet, he was unable to understand the directions from Waze, took a wrong turn and delayed the arrival by 10 minutes. Meanwhile, driving by nausea-inducing fits and starts, and very nearly causing a fender bender. All of this would be avoided by reserving a Waymo. But I won't be able to call a Waymo for the foreseeable future because our mayor just forbade it. I just saved you 13 minutes of insufferable advocacy. Good vibes only.
More Perfect Union@MorePerfectUS

NEW: If Waymo gets its way, 2 million workers will be out of work. When Waymo gets a firm hold on a city, wages go down. Some drivers now have to work 12 hours day, 7 days a week just to get by. This isn't inevitable — but Big Tech is spending millions to make you think it is.

English
22
27
1.3K
159.5K
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@niccruzpatane The medallion may actually be what bridges Waymo into the city. Retire the taxi drivers and limit congestion (NYC isn’t wanting more cars on the road now - just ask the congestion toll)
Crawdad tweet media
English
0
0
1
82
Nic Cruz Patane
Nic Cruz Patane@niccruzpatane·
History is repeating itself. > People who drove horse-drawn carriages lost work when cars replaced them. > Taxi drivers fought to stop Uber. The market then exploded, causing taxi medallion values to crash. > Now Uber drivers are the ones at stake due to the advent of autonomous vehicles. Each time, the old way was less efficient, more expensive, and actually more dangerous. Innovation isn’t the enemy of workers, stagnation is. The writing has been on the wall for years. In the end, millions upon millions of lives will be saved due to these vehicles, and that’s what is important here.
More Perfect Union@MorePerfectUS

NEW: If Waymo gets its way, 2 million workers will be out of work. When Waymo gets a firm hold on a city, wages go down. Some drivers now have to work 12 hours day, 7 days a week just to get by. This isn't inevitable — but Big Tech is spending millions to make you think it is.

English
11
20
141
10.2K
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@MorePerfectUS Retire the drivers and limit congestion. Allow the medallion to be the AV license
Crawdad tweet media
English
0
0
1
81
More Perfect Union
More Perfect Union@MorePerfectUS·
NEW: If Waymo gets its way, 2 million workers will be out of work. When Waymo gets a firm hold on a city, wages go down. Some drivers now have to work 12 hours day, 7 days a week just to get by. This isn't inevitable — but Big Tech is spending millions to make you think it is.
English
958
638
2.7K
3.9M
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@boujee_banker LPK for glass. MGTE for Waymo in NYC.. I can’t help myself. “when you’re right on something, you can’t own enough”
English
0
0
2
84
BoujeeBanker
BoujeeBanker@boujee_banker·
What are people looking at buying on Monday?
English
3
0
1
513
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@NYC_TMODA @AndSeparate @nyctaxi NYTWA stands for “Navigating Your Town Without Authorization” it’s time they prioritize yellow drivers when FHV are largely unregistered
English
0
0
1
26
Separate_and_safe
Separate_and_safe@AndSeparate·
Platforms like Uber require drivers to provide Social Security Numbers to set up a driver account, but illegal immigrants routinely circumvent this by buying or renting active accounts from other people who are legally allowed to have them.
Daniel Friedman@DanFriedman81

The New York Times has an article examining how a Nepalese Uber driver named Anup Baniya supports a family on $25k take-home pay. Midway down the article, we learn a shocking fact: Baniya pays $2,400 per month to rent a Toyata RAV4 hybrid SUV. A new RAV4 costs around $32,000 for a base model. The monthly payment on a 60 month financing plan is $629. So why is this guy paying four times that? Because NYC caps the number of licenses it grants for for-hire vehicles, so people with the licenses rent out their cars and plates to people who don't have them for hundreds of dollars per week. But why would anyone take such an arrangement? Why would Baniya pay $30k in overhead to earn $25k? Why doesn't he just walk into a McDonald's and ask for an application? Hourly fast-food workers earn about $40k per year in NYC. According to the article, Baniya drives under this arrangement because he likes being able to choose his own hours, though he complains about the impact of sedentary 10 hour driving shifts on his health. But if you find that unpersuasive, another possible reason someone might work under such an arrangement could be that his legal status bars him from other work (the article does not say whether Baniya is legally allowed to work in the US). Platforms like Uber require drivers to provide Social Security Numbers to set up a driver account, but illegal immigrants routinely circumvent this by buying or renting active accounts from other people who are legally allowed to have them. A recent Transunion survey of gig workers found that 45% of respondents had rented out or sold access to an account. The article mentions "a recent tax return," but that doesn't mean Baniya is here legally. Illegal immigrants in New York file tax returns under ITINs, which enables them to get refunds for taxes withheld, as well as qualify for public subsidies on health insurance and childcare. Illegal immigrants who file this way are protected from immigration enforcement by New York's sanctuary law.

English
2
0
2
195
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@DinnerWed @NYTWA This is why anyone bringing paid autonomous rides to NYC should first have to be a medallion holder. There are a few bills being introduced to accomplish this very thing (bill - intro 0094-2026)
English
0
0
1
11
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@DinnerWed @NYTWA And the way to bring value back to the medallion - is going back to the original intent of the medallion when it was created 100 years ago: to limit city congestion This puts a cap on the number of waymos and helps drivers who bought into the system regulated by the city
English
1
0
1
16
NY Taxi Workers
NY Taxi Workers@NYTWA·
“Waymo is underestimating us. We are organized, and we have battle scars to remind us of lessons,” said New York Taxi Workers Alliance Executive Director Bhairavi Desai, referencing the fights for taxi medallion debt relief, and a slew of labor protections for the new workforce of app-based drivers… cityandstateny.com/policy/2026/04…
English
3
10
39
1.8K
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@semaforben @PJVogt @bradlander @Waymo We have a current license - it’s called the medallion. The sellers? NYC Immigrant drivers who spent >200k per medallion The buyers: San Fran tech companies with unlimited money Retire the drivers and limit congestion. Win, win
English
0
1
6
613
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@DinnerWed @NYTWA We said no to uber and Lyft… then what happened? If we don’t protect the medallion as an AV license for WHEN (NOT IF) Waymo comes… then everyone loses
English
2
0
1
34
Drew
Drew@Drewharts·
Boots on the ground. I guess @Waymo is in nyc? Or at least testing despite @NYCMayor. Pier 36.
Drew tweet media
English
2
0
1
460
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@Drewharts @Waymo @NYCMayor “Autonomous is not engaged” according to the DOT and Waymo 😂. They are still on the road collecting data
English
1
0
0
25
Crawdad
Crawdad@Crawdad_Inc·
@MikeFellman The taxi medallion can be repurposed as the AV robotaxi license. The sellers? NYC Immigrant drivers who spent >200k on the medallion The buyers? San Fran Tech companies with infinite money that are going to put more cars on the street of congestion-concerned NYC. Win, win
English
0
0
2
43
Nicole
Nicole@nicolegelinas·
Supply creates demand. We saw this with uber 1.0. NYC cannot thrive - and won’t be safer - with a goal that makes it cheaper or easier to be in a private car. The city must set these parameters before, not after, any AV rollout.
montag@impossible_eng

@nicolegelinas "Stealing" from transit is a funny way for them to put it. It's just latent demand, that finally has a supply. Transit doesn't own customers.

English
9
4
19
4.1K