Crecus Lohe

@fsporsen Jimmie Åkesson … folkkär?

💪🏻💪🏿

@fsporsen Det handlar om att införa ius soli genom bakdörren. Logiken i deras retorik rörande bl.a. ”anknytning” pekar på detta.

Varför ljuger media, politiker, mfl, för att moraliskt utpressa högern att bibehålla hål i lagstiftningen som ger incitament åt invandrare att trotsa deras uppehållstillstånd och stanna så att de sedan kan hävda att deras barn har anknytning?

@UEurasier En framtid så ljus att jag behöver solglasögon

Viktigt att detta sprids. Yttrandefriheten i Europa håller på att avvecklas helt och hållet.

YOUR 2026 #WORLDJUNIORS CHAMPS 🏆@trekronorse #IIHF

Here is the full length video report into the mysterious 'Global Disinformation Index' and how it censors political speech across Europe and the US. Please share widely, more people need to know.

@StaffanG_son @AssarChristian @fotbollsnerdy Vill moderater, sossar, liberaler mfl. ändra på detta måste ni göra av med er oikofobi och ta den stundande etnopolitisk präglade framtiden på allvar. För den kommer vare sig ni vill eller ej.

@StaffanG_son @AssarChristian @fotbollsnerdy När liberaler och antinationalister vägrar tala om rådande svenskfientlighet blir nationalister och den äkta högern de enda som hörs och syns i frågan. Gott så. Blir bara tydligare vem som står på vilken sida.

Det är något djupt obehagligt i att se makthavare unisont fördöma en fredlig minnesstund för ett barn som avrättats av ett invandrargäng – samtidigt som de helt ignorerar att det var extremvänstern som stod för våldet. För det var exakt det som hände i Salem. Det var heller inte deltagarna i minnesmanifestationen som kastade sten på polisen eller försökte sabotera en minnestunden. Det var vänsterextremister, samma gamla gäng som varje år dyker upp för att hindra andra från att minnas ett mord. Och återigen hyllade dessa element det som inte ens borde gå att försvara: mordet på Daniel Wretström. Och vad gör Ulf Kristersson? Han pekar inte ut bråkmakarna. Han pekar inte ut den som högg halsen av Daniel. Istället fördömer han… dem som hedrade ett mordoffer. Ett fullkomligt moraliskt haveri. I min granskning, ”Sveket mot Daniel Wretström”, visade jag hur den svenska rättsstaten, politikerklassen och medieetablissemanget valde att göra mordet på en 17-åring till något annat än vad det var. Istället för att tala om svenskfientligheten – valde man att göra offret till förövare. Man skrev att en “nazist dog i Salem” – inte att en pojke avrättades i snön. Och nu upprepar man alltså sveket. Fel människor sörjer. Fel människor tänder ljus. Fel människor visar lojalitet med en ung svensk som fick betala priset för ett samhällsklimat som under millennieskiftet inte hade plats för någon som bar fel jacka, hade fel vänner eller spelade i fel band. Och makten – vår regering – vågar inte ens ta ställning för den mänskliga handlingen att minnas en död. Det finns ett slags politisk moralism i Sverige som säger att du inte får uttrycka din sorg, din vrede eller din vilja till förändring, om du inte först avsäger dig allt det som etablissemanget ogillar. Om du inte först markerar mot “nazism”, “rasism”, “högerextremism”, “fel retorik”. Men att kräva ideologisk renhet för att få tända ett ljus är inte civiliserat. Det är totalitärt. En sund samhällsdebatt fördömer inte goda gärningar. Den fördömer inte människor som sörjer. Den fördömer inte moralisk lojalitet med ett mordoffer. Den förstår skillnaden mellan sorg och extremism. Den klarar av att hantera komplexitet. Den vågar säga: det finns fortfarande sådant som är rätt – även avsändaren är någon man själv ogillar. Den här helgen var det inte nazister som ställde till det i Salem. Det var den våldsamma vänstern. Det var de eviga yrkesdemonstranterna. De som hellre kastar sten på polisen än accepterar att någon annan får hålla ett ljus. Sveriges kommunistiska parti bar en skylt med texten: “The only good fascist is a dead fascist.” Terrorgruppen AFA, som i åratal hyllat mordet på Daniel, ekade åter sina gamla slagord: “En nere – nu tar vi resten.” Det är där problemet ligger. Att Ulf Kristersson inte klarar att säga det rakt ut visar hur svagt och korrumperat det politiska språket blivit. Det krävs mod att stå upp för någon som varit impopulär. Men det krävs ännu mer ryggrad att erkänna att ett mord på ett barn aldrig kan ursäktas, aldrig kan viftas bort, aldrig kan förminskas – oavsett hans miljö, kläder eller umgänge. Daniel Wretström blev 17 år. Han förtjänade inte att dö. Och de som minns honom, som håller honom vid liv i sitt hjärta, i sitt politiska engagemang, i sin längtan efter rättvisa – de är inte problemet. Problemet är de som vill kriminalisera sorgen. Läs mer: assarchristian.se/p/mordet-pa-da…

I decided to do a deep dive to figure out what it would take for European voters to change the law to allow them to deport migrants. For instance, say the voters of Italy wanted to deport Syrian terrorists to Syria. What would they need to do, legally to get that outcome? 🧵

Mass migration poses an existential threat to Western civilization and undermines the stability of key American allies. Today the State Department instructed U.S. embassies to report on the human rights implications and public safety impacts of mass migration.

@RnaudBertrand Globalist leftists basically invented debanking and now whine when it gets applied to them rather than to Canadian moms and British dads

In a normal world, this should be an immense scandal in Europe. Le Monde has a long article (lemonde.fr/international/…) describing the hellish life of Nicolas Guillou, a French judge at the ICC in The Hague, due to U.S. sanctions punishing him for authorizing arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant for war crimes in Gaza. Guillou's daily existence has been transformed into a Kafkaesque nightmare. He cannot: open or maintain accounts with Google, Amazon, Apple, or any US company; make hotel reservations (Expedia canceled his booking in France hours after he made it); conduct online commerce, since he can't know if the packaging is American; use any major credit card (Visa, Mastercard, Amex are all American); access normal banking services, even with non-American banks, as banks worldwide close sanctioned accounts; conduct virtually any financial transaction. He describes it as being "economically banned across most of the planet," including in his own country, France, and where he works, the Netherlands. That's the real shocking aspect of this: the Americans are: - punishing a European citizen - for doing his job in Europe - applying laws Europe officially supports - at an institution based in Europe - that Europe helped create and fund and Europe is not only doing essentially nothing to protect him, they're actively enforcing America's sanctions against their own citizen - European banks closing his accounts, European companies refusing him service, European institutions standing by while Washington destroys a European judge's life on European soil. Again, in a normal world, European leaders and citizens should be absolutely outraged about this. But we've so normalized the hollowing out of European sovereignty that the sight of a European citizen being economically executed on European soil for upholding European law is treated, at best, as an unfortunate technical complication in transatlantic relations.

@njordsier @xwanyex It does have something to do with replacement. It’s one of the main mechanisms.

@CrecusLohe @xwanyex An unfortunate state of affairs but that has nothing to do with immigration

Isn’t this just a silly semantic argument about the meaning of “replaced?”

@xwanyex This entire line of sophistry @noahpinion is engaged in glosses over the fact that old people die.

@njordsier @xwanyex Old people. A process called ”death”

@xwanyex Replacement entails removal of something before adding something in its stead. What is being removed?

After the Trump administration designated Rose City Antifa as a terrorist group, I can now reveal that its founder has resurfaced in Varberg, Sweden. Early this morning, I approached Johan Victorin for comment on the designation — and whether he fears prosecution.

I just read this WSJ article on why Europe's tech scene is so much smaller than the US's and China's. I'm afraid that, like most articles on this topic, it largely misses the mark. Which in itself illustrates a key reason why Europe is lagging behind: when you fail to understand the root causes of an issue, you have zero chance to solve it. What makes me competent to speak on this topic? Back in the late 2000s and early 2010s, I founded and led HouseTrip which at the time was one of Europe's top startups. We were the first historical startup in which all top 3 VC investors in Europe invested. So I have a pretty intimate knowledge of the European entrepreneurship ecosystem and what it takes to create and grow a tech company in Europe. We were pretty promising as a startup. In fact as promising as it can possibly get. We had a similar concept to Airbnb (with some notable differences I won't bore you with), except we created the company 1 year before they did. Which means we were the first-mover - globally - with a multi-billion-euro concept, strong financial backing by the 3 top investors in Europe and, at some point, a team of 250 people with some of the brightest minds in tech in Europe. Everything we needed to succeed. And yet we didn't succeed: ultimately we were essentially crushed by our American competitor Airbnb in our home turf - Europe - and we had no choice but to sell ourselves to another American company, Tripadvisor. Believe me, I've reflected long and hard on how that could have happened. In fact after I left the company in 2015 I even spent 3 months in isolation in the Annapurna mountains in Nepal to reflect full time on exactly that 😅 And I then moved to China, where I spent the next 8 years and where I had the chance to study their ecosystem to understand why they're successful and Europe isn't. So all in all, I think I have some degree of legitimacy to comment on this topic. The WSJ article says that Europe lags behind due to the usual suspects, the reasons you constantly hear about: too much regulation, fragmented European markets, limited access to financing, a culture that isn't conducive to the startup grind, etc. Some of those are true, but imho all are secondary. Take excessive regulations for instance, which gets mentioned all the time. If they were such a hindrance to startups, why would American startups succeed in Europe - like Airbnb in our case - and European startups not? We all face the same regulations 🤷 Or take fragmented markets. Same question: how could US startups successfully conquer these fragmented EU markets when European startups can't? Because that's the real elephant in the room, and really the story of the European tech scene since the advent of the internet: US startups have shown a remarkable ability to capture European markets despite the supposed barriers, making many of the "usual suspects" explanations for Europe's tech struggles very unconvincing. In other words, logically, any explanation where both US and European startups face identical barriers fails to address the fundamental difference in outcomes we consistently observe. Based on my experience, the key problem faced by European startups can be summarized in one word: patriotism. There is virtually none in Europe, and more than anything that's what's killing EU startups, or preventing them from developing. It used to drive me absolutely nuts at HouseTrip. What a startup needs first and foremost, especially a consumer-facing startup like we were, is marketing, to become famous. At first, when I created the company and before Airbnb was even a thing, I used to pitch the company to the media and the general response I would get was almost one of contempt, as in "why would I belittle myself to write about your startup? And furthermore, who would be stupid enough to stay in an apartment when there are hotels? You guys have no future..." And then Airbnb got launched and the American media started their thing, hyping the company like it was the greatest innovation since sliced bread, like they were national heroes, giving them hundreds of millions in free publicity. That's when European media started to take notice. Not of us, god forbid, but of Airbnb. The concept was promoted by Silicon Valley, see... so now it was valid. So I went back to pitch HouseTrip to European media. This time around I was met with a different kind of contempt: "So you guys are like Airbnb? Why would we cover a European copycat when we can just write about the real American original?" Luckily I'm not violent but lets say those moments really tested my civility 😅 All in all, we arrived in the absolutely grotesque situation where, despite Airbnb not having yet set foot in Europe, they were already a cultural phenomenon there, promoted by European media, for free, when the European original - yours truly - had to spend millions on paid marketing (mostly to Google and Facebook, American companies) to achieve a small fraction of the brand recognition. Which means that, insanely, Airbnb was probably doing more business in Europe than we did before even opening an office there, simply on the back of the free publicity they were getting. How on earth can you even compete with that? This dynamic was at play with general European elites too. I remember very clearly having dinner next to a legendary European entrepreneur and investor - who I won't name, a man who supposedly, on paper, is dedicating his life to furthering the European tech ecosystem. We naturally got to talk about HouseTrip and he literally told me, and this is an exact quote: "you know I don't really like copycats, they really hurt the European ecosystem." Another big test for my civility that night... And even if we had been a copycat, so what? That's how China got started, there's nothing to be ashamed of. You need to learn to walk before you can run. In fact if you study the history of innovation you'll find that every major tech power, including the US, started by imitating and adapting others' innovations before developing their own. Speaking of China, again a country that I know in depth for having lived there for 8 years after HouseTrip, I've come to the conclusion that patriotism, a deeply rooted mindset of sovereignty, is truly the magic ingredient behind their success. Contrary to popular belief, they don't do it in a stupid way by just banning competition. Those cases are actually very rare and only occur if the companies in question violate Chinese law in pretty egregious ways. Most of the time it's the exact contrary: they welcome foreign companies and competition, but create conditions where local alternatives can thrive alongside them, giving Chinese users and businesses legitimate options to choose domestic champions. Which means you end up with, for instance, Apple doing well in China but simultaneously allowing the rise of Huawei or Xiaomi. Or Tesla doing well in China but simultaneously allowing the rise of BYD or Nio. Etc. And China is, interestingly, more comparable to the EU than most people realize. It is, again contrary to popular belief, extremely decentralized when it comes to doing business, with various provinces competing against each other much the same way EU countries compete against each other. But they do it in such a way where, again, the overarching sense of Chinese sovereignty never gets sacrificed at the altar of provincial competition. And where the ultimate goal is to develop Chinese champions which can successfully compete on the global stage. So there you have it, the dirty little secret behind Europe's lag. We're essentially witnessing a "colonization of the minds" whereby Europe has structurally internalized its technological inferiority, celebrating American startups while dismissing its own homegrown companies. Why does this barely ever get talked about? Think about it: do you seriously think that the Wall Street Journal would start advocating for, essentially, policies hostile to American tech dominance? Much better to focus on the usual red herrings like too much regulation or fragmentation which, conveniently, would primarily result in clearing obstacles for American tech giants to dominate European markets even further, rather than nurturing homegrown competitors. This article is, in itself, an illustration of the "colonization of the minds".

Gotta Catch ‘Em All.

@hallen_a @NEETdrangheta99 Vad är syftet med vitböcker, förutom att ge AFA:iter vatten på deras kvarn?

@NEETdrangheta99 Jag gillar vitböcker! Jag korrläste SD:s.

Totalt poänglös efterhandsmoralism-men från HÖGER...