C Gal
10.7K posts


@KGreenberg_ @Emolclause Me too! I hope he sues the bejesus out of them. He deserves several millions!
English

Now that a judge found that KIlmar Abrego Garcia was the victim of Trump DOJ’s vindictive prosecution, I look forward to his successful claim for compensation from Trump’s Anti-Weaponization Fund
Adam Klasfeld@KlasfeldReports
Kilmar Abrego Garcia‘s indictment must be DISMISSED for vindictive prosecution, a federal judge just ruled. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
English

@KGreenberg_ I disagree with your premise. But let's put that aside because if he didn't come here illegally none of this would have happened.
English

@acopo1024 @BradOwe84616776 @IAPolls2022 I don't think the GOP will keep the house either. That said, I agree it will be a razor thin majority for the Dems. If the gas prices drop, however, I think it will be a completely different situation.
English

@BradOwe84616776 @IAPolls2022 Maybe. A lot could happen from now until November, but the polling is not looking good if you believe that sort of thing haha
English

DNC Chairman Ken Martin released an incomplete, unedited version of the 2024 election autopsy.
✅️ Trump's transgender-focused ad ("Kamala is for they/them") seen as highly effective and damaging; Harris did not shift position in response.
——
✅️ Report paints a dismal picture: Democrats have lost ground since Obama era due to stagnation, failure to invest in states/local parties, and inability to project strength/unity.
——
✅️ Criticizes Biden White House for not adequately preparing/supporting Kamala Harris (e.g., no polling on her like Jill Biden, poor defense against "border czar" label
——
✅️Faults overall Democratic effort for failing to effectively define or attack Trump, relying on assumption his negatives were "baked in"
——
✅️ Harris campaign criticized for taking too much for granted: over-focus on suburbs/college-educated voters, neglecting rural areas, and relying on "not Trump" rather than affirmative messaging or clear self-definition.
cnn.com/2026/05/21/pol…
English

@Leodog121 @IAPolls2022 So much this.
But I really hope they lean into this report and continue as is. I'm not going to try to stop them from destroying themselves 😉
English

@IAPolls2022 It's beyond these points, it's the policies you embrace, they destroy Job's, Companies, families, while promoting crime, open borders & chaos. It's what this party has become. Not one city or state where democrats run is a success story, NYC will be destroyed by radical democrats
English

@CR07100710 @IAPolls2022 I don't think people fully grasp how this was a problem for average voters. There's gaslighting and there's premium grade gaslighting. It was obvious Biden was incompetent and yet we were told to shut up because it's mean.
English

But the main reason for the defeat was the fact that Democrats hid Biden’s mental incapacity which was in plain sight and hoisted Harris who was an abysmal candidate without Primary in the last minute in the most undemocratic way possible. This “autopsy” is such a disingenuous lipstick on a pig.
English

@EvaGeorge919 @IAPolls2022 America didn't vote for her because she sucks.
English

@IAPolls2022 Amerikkka didn't vote for Harris because Amerikkka wasn't electing a BLACK WOMAN as leader of the free world. Autopsy could've been done via a text msg.
English

@AJBayatpour @Mynamis_Private I don't really care about the semantics. There is no reason why we should be supporting the influx of people who cannot support themselves.
English

@Mynamis_Private 'Documented' is there to state they're not in the U.S. illegally.
These are non-citizens with various forms of legal status, as outlined by some of the cases in the very next sentence. Better yet, you can read the article and get even more info
English

More than 7,000 documented non-citizens in Wisconsin will no longer be eligible for food stamps, starting July 1.
That includes refugees, asylees and victims of human trafficking. Advocates worry this will strain food pantries already stretched thin:
cbs58.com/news/non-citiz…
English

@lifesoeasy @AJBayatpour Nah. We just don't think we should be an unending source of funding for the entire world.
English

@AJBayatpour The only conclusion you can draw based on the comments under this post is that Conservatives are bad people.
English

@ElkenrodKarmic @worthkittrell @DanFriedman81 @animal I believe she also threw her friend under the bus when it was pointed out the friend (Leland, I think) didn't corroborate her story. I think Ford said Leland was going through some difficult things, hinting she was not stable enough to be credible.
English

@worthkittrell @DanFriedman81 @animal She named multiple character witnesses that could validate her story. Every single one of them said they had no knowledge of what she was talking about.
Claims made under oath count as testimonial evidence. Not a single person she named would testify on her behalf.
English

Brett Kavanaugh, a man in his 50s, had been valedictorian of his high school, at Yale College and a star student at Yale Law, had clerked for the Supreme Court, had a top career as an appellate lawyer and federal judge and a pristine reputation, and then a random woman from the town he grew up in claimed he had groped her at a party 35 years earlier when they were in high school.
Kavanaugh didn’t try to argue that the incident was consensual. He didn’t claim he remembered things differently than she did. He immediately stated that he had never even met the accuser. Denying ever meeting the accuser is a much stronger claim than merely denying assaulting her, and much easier to refute. After Kavanaugh made this denial, Christine Blasey-Ford no longer had to prove he had sexually assaulted her to scuttle his nomination, she only had to prove that the two of them had attended a party together at which such an assault might have occurred.
She was unable to do so. She did not know whose house the alleged assault occurred at. None of the people she claimed attended the party corroborated any aspect of her account. Leland Keyser, a friend of Blasey-Ford’s, who the accuser claimed was at the alleged party, said she recalled no such event and had never met Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh produced a detailed calendar he had kept during the summer Blasey-Ford alleged she was assaulted, which included his whereabouts of every weekend night and listing who he was with. Kavanaugh argued that he could alibi himself and provide witnesses for any night Blasey-Ford claimed she might have been at a party with him. Blasey-Ford responded that she did not know the date of her assault and was not entirely certain it even occurred that year. Instead of being seen as persuasive, Kavanaugh’s calendar was mocked in both mainstream and social media because the reason he kept it was for a drinking contest he was having with his friends.
Nearly a decade later, there is still not a single shred of proof or a single witness who will corroborate the claim that Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey-Ford were ever in the same room before she testified at his confirmation hearing. Nonetheless, people like Nick Kristof still claim Kavanaugh was “credibly accused” of sexually assaulting this woman.
Nicholas Kristof@NickKristof
My new column: Would You Hire Brett Kavanaugh??? nyti.ms/2QhOXAN Read!
English

@htown_Joe @worthkittrell @DanFriedman81 @animal Any good lawyer knows you can't prove a negative. That's why it was on her to provide evidence that it did happen. This isn't just in a court of law. Even on a court of public opinion it's basic logic. You cannot prove something didn't happen.
English

@worthkittrell @DanFriedman81 @animal It’s fucking stupid to think she could prove when and where some random house party occurred. And there’s no way BK’s journal of where he went could somehow prove he didn’t engage in unscheduled party-hopping. It’s a fraudulent defense. Any good lawyer knows this.
English

@texasdemocrats I think this is Bernie, right? I'm going to go ahead and beg you to do this. None of us on the right will try to stop it 😂
English

@joyburke96 @Haleaziz @NickNehamas I would say it's even simpler. We can deny a green card simply vendor because we feel like it.
English

@Haleaziz @NickNehamas It’s NOT about criticism of Israel, it’s about supporting a terrorist group ie Hamas 🙄 I swear yall just pretend to not understand
English

Scoop: immigrants can now be denied a green card for expressing political opinions, such as participating in pro-Palestinian campus protests, posting criticism of Israel on social media and desecrating the American flag, according to internal documents.
w/ @NickNehamas
English

@jskdn @Haleaziz @NickNehamas No. They should not. They can say things here if they want to, and they won't be prosecuted for saying those things. But a green card is a privilege. A green card could be denied because the Secretary of State woke up on the wrong side of the bed.
English

@Haleaziz @NickNehamas For those arguing that the First Amendment exempts what can be considered, understand that there is no hate speech exemption to the First Amendment. Should those saying the most deplorable things imaginable that would be protected under the First be admitted?
English

@Haleaziz @NickNehamas We can deny them a green card because water is wet. Nobody is entitled to one. Good grief.
English

@MayorFrey What, exactly, did those businesses think would happen when they shut down "in solidarity"?
English

This week, the City of Minneapolis joined Attorney General Keith Ellison and the City of Saint Paul to file an updated complaint in our ongoing lawsuit challenging Operation Metro Surge.
kstp.com/kstp-news/top-…
English

@MayorFrey You are right. Illegal aliens shouldn't have been here in the first place. Had they not been here, Operation Metro Surge wouldn't have been a thing.
English

@ScruffMcGruff11 @MarcoFoster_ @RepAOC I don't know if she really does know that.
Facts are not important to her.
English

@MarcoFoster_ @RepAOC She should be sued for defamation. He was not found guilty of rape and she knows that. She should be sued and removed from Congress. She’s insane.
English

@zingo110_nerd I think we can end civilly here. Thanks for the debate.
English

@CruzGal2016 I will concede on the point that she had a right to be there. But if she were there to have civil discussion/debate, that would be fine... But she wasn't... She was there to antagonize.
English

@zingo110_nerd I didn't say she was a jackass. Context matters here. I was saying she could have been but it wouldn't matter as she still had the legal right to be there.
English

@CruzGal2016 But why go there to cause a reaction when the protestors were there because ICE wrongfully detained (or rather the more obvious term, incarcerated) their family members... It's insensitive to go there just to be a (as you called her) "jackass".
English





