

ConservativesCryyyy
756 posts




The odds of Nithya Raman receiving 40% of the vote yesterday are “LESS LIKELY than picking ONE GRAIN OF SAND on Earth dozens of times in a row.” I believe elections tend to be fair. Someone help me make sense of math that seems impossible… I ASKED CHATGPT - “What is the statistical likelihood that 40% of votes from a “new batch” of ballots go to a candidate who received 24% of votes from all other batches that represented 95% of counted electorate. Give me a % odds.” The Answer (Part 1) - “Assuming the candidate’s “true” share is 24%, the odds that a random new batch lands at 40% or higher depends on batch size: 50 ballots 0.88% 100 ballots 0.028% 200 ballots 0.00004% 500 ballots ~0.00000000000018% 1,000 ballots ~0.0000000000000000000000000035%” My follow up - “Assume 40,000 ballots. Are the odds one in a billion? One in a trillion? Worse? This seems to be happening in Los Angeles Mayor’s race between Mayor Bass, Spencer Pratt and Nithya Raman.” The Answer (Part 2) - “If the 40,000-ballot batch were drawn from the same population that produced 24% support in the other 95% of votes, then seeing 40% support in that batch would be far beyond “one in a billion” or “one in a trillion.” 75 standard deviations is in an entirely different universe. The probability is approximately: ~10⁻¹²²⁰ or about 1 chance in 10¹²²⁰ That’s a number with roughly 1,220 zeros after the 1. Statistically, if the batch were truly a random sample of the same electorate, the odds are so small that statisticians would effectively treat the event as impossible. The usual conclusion would not be “wow, what a lucky fluctuation,” but rather that the batch is not representative of the earlier ballots—for example, it came from a different geographic area, voting method, demographic group, or subset of voters. So yes: much worse than one in a billion, much worse than one in a trillion, and vastly smaller than any probability encountered in ordinary statistical analysis.” My follow up - “More grains of sand on earth than the likelihood of this?” The Answer (Part 3) - “Yes. Much, much more. Estimated grains of sand on Earth are often put around 10¹⁸ to 10²⁰. Your odds example was roughly: 1 in 10¹²²⁰ So this is not just “less likely than picking one grain of sand on Earth.” It’s more like picking the right grain of sand on Earth correctly over and over again dozens of times in a row.” Sincerely, Jeremy Padawer Pacificpalisades.com @spencerpratt @BoredElonMusk @Hotshot_Movie @415FirePhoto #losangeles #la #fyp #mayor





Wildest takeaways from my time at the Ballot Processing Center today. ✍🏻 Signatures only need to be 40% accurate (!) this is the setting the machines are set at for LA County (called the ASV) 🗳️ The last two drops disproportionately supported Raman. Are those coming from specific neighborhoods since they’re such an anomaly? Or are the neighborhoods pretty spread out that you count from on a given day? “We’re not sure.” 💌 If you’re unable to sign, you can make a “mark” like a dot or slash instead of signing. A witness then signs below. I asked them how they verify these signatures. Turns out, they simply don’t. Well, you must check the witness signatures, right? “No, we don’t.” So what if I stole a ballot, made a dash by the person’s name, and signed my name? “You shouldn’t do that, but in theory it would be counted,” they said. How many of these “marked” ballots get in per election? “We don’t know,” they said. Ripe for fraud, no?








As @BoredElonMusk & the data show, Raman’s late mail in ballot surge was fueled in large part by ballots from Skid Row. Tens of thousands of homeless whose ballots are sent to central addresses (not the sidewalk) & can be filled out/returned by someone else. Suspicious…

אירוע ירי מתגלגל: 4 מוקדים בהם דווח על ירי עד כה, עם 3 פצועים. כוכב יאיר, צור יצחק, צור נתן וסלעית. הרכב ובו היורה טרם נלכד. חשד לפיגוע.


IT’S TIME. SEND IN THE MILITARY! Spencer Pratt had nearly a 12+ point advantage over Nithya Raman the night of election. After several days of non-stop fraudulent mail-in ballots, the latest update tonight shows Spencer Pratt is now on track to finish in THIRD PLACE. There will be ZERO Republican choices in the November election. Los Angeles will only be given democrats to choose from California rigged it once again.


Wait. Google is paying SpaceX $920 million per month for GPUs? Google. The company that builds its own TPUs. That runs one of the largest cloud infrastructures on earth. Is renting 110,000 Nvidia GPUs from a rocket company. I'm honestly not sure what to make of this. Either Google's AI compute needs have gotten so massive that even they can't build fast enough. Or SpaceX has built something in AI infrastructure that nobody was paying attention to. Or both. $920M a month. $30B over the contract. Whatever is happening behind the scenes at these companies is moving way faster than what we see publicly.











California has spoken. Thank you for standing with us. To every volunteer who made a call, sent a text, knocked a door, or showed up when it mattered most — this victory belongs to you. We're just getting started. On to November.








