Called to Defend

Does Jake Brancatella know what the debate topic is tonight? Dude spent more time talking about David Wood than defending Muhammad and the Quran 😂😂😂

It's probably best Jake Brancatella wasn't physically present for the debate, because dude just kept crashing out instead of making arguments. Dude is okay with Muhammad being a pedo and okay with burying himself in a debate. Dude would rather cook himself with Momo than defend

I'll admit that David's first debate tonight wasn't his greatest, but woof...Jake's rebuttals for the morality of the Quran was atrocious. Jake just cooked himself in his own rebuttals

@ekaurpokhran @Ahraz__ Ah gotcha, I misunderstood and took it as you were saying it about me instead. My b

@CtD315 @Ahraz__ I meant to say that Muslims know the truth about Christianity, but they choose to lie because that’s the only way they can prove their religion is better.

Bro thinks salvation is a game You literally worship 3 Gods

@ekaurpokhran @Ahraz__ Enlighten me

@CtD315 @Ahraz__ He knows. He just chooses to lie.

@Joshharrop18379 @OhioSmitch @willinho101 @ParsonsJer14643 @Ahraz__ @EzzyBoy__ You are collapsing person and essence

@OhioSmitch @willinho101 @ParsonsJer14643 @Ahraz__ @EzzyBoy__ @CtD315 ok fairs, but now if i say matheew mark luke, each share one human essence, literally the share a body mind etc, then the only logical conclusion is that they would be eachother. theyre essentially just names referring to the same thing.

@Ahraz__ What is the historical teaching on the Trinity? Please enlighten me

@CtD315 If you don’t think the trinity is 3 gods then you don’t actually know what the trinity is

We got to do some street evangelism and some debates with Muslims yesterday. We were able to get some audio recordings of a couple that we will be posting and reviewing Tuesday on our stream. For now here is one of the 6 conversations we got to have youtu.be/p_H97ae7LRA?si…

Pulling up for the second round of the #seekandsharetruthconference

Muhammad's Law Is Not Peaceful For More Follow @CtD315 #christian #shorts #debate #islam

For more follow @CtD315 What actually happened with the crusades? #christian #apologetics #islam #history

@korrathetaymi Torah and Injil

Which Bible does the Quran confirm? Asking for a friend … 🤓

@Grantedyou35 @korrathetaymi For a second I thought that was Ben 10 but thankfully no omnitrix

@korrathetaymi Korra the explorer 🤭🤭can you tell us who is the God of your Allah 🤡🤡🤡

Show me where it says Alexander the Great.. oh wait you are doing what Christian missionaries do best , LIE! Mike Winger can you tell why the Bible says insects have 4 Legs ? (Leviticus 11:20-23)

@NeoAndTrinity_ @Good_Guy_Palp @KingsWord316 @JPuncut Bruh John 1 is about Jesus not the Bible. The Bible isn't Jesus but about Jesus

John 1 Shows the Word of God as a living person. John 5 Shows scriptures as one that testifies John 6 shows the word as a Spirit Hebrews 4 shows how it's living having the ability to divide or discern Ephesians 6 calls the word of God the Sword of the Spirit Proverbs 8 shows this as wisdom personified Let me ask you. Is an Angel a Person? Therefore is a Spirit a Person? What if that Spirit is poured into man? Can the Spirit of God be poured out into man and become a person? Word was made flesh. Jesus is that person. Scriptures in current form is also living and sharp. The Spirit of the Man Jesus. The words of God. This book is capable of manifesting. The question you ask is simple and silly. Lacks imagination.

I follow the Bible and the Bible alone, everyone else is fallible!

@ThoughtfulSaint @Rach4Patriarchy Seriously? She's talking about the value of a human being and how no one should be treated this way and you try to switch it to this? Seriously?

@Rach4Patriarchy He isn’t he justified in driving out Mormons who are leading people to hell? What’s worse… yelling bad words to damning people to hell?

I’m to the point where simply hearing somebody speak like this should qualify them for immediate deportation to Wakanda.

@pyfmuse @Sovereign_Beard @ThoughtfulSaint And? Smith came over a thousand years later

@Sovereign_Beard @ThoughtfulSaint By what authority can you say it’s not true? Your man-made creeds formed hundreds of years after Christs death and resurrection?

Jesus literally has a glorified body of flesh and bones right now.

@BaptistClips @vladorthodoxy Did suits exist during the time of Jesus? What about Israel? No? Ridiculous argument

@vladorthodoxy Pastors need to be preaching wearing a man's clothing, not wearing a dress

No Sitting Allowed At The Orthodox Church

@ThoughtfulSaint Wild strawman

The creeds that distort man’s relationship with God telling man they are a creature and not a child are indeed demonic. It’s demonic to tell Children they have no father and are mere creatures.

@Mormonger @joshuapbrink Apostasy doesn't just mean they screwed up. It means they have abandoned the truth/religion. Sure you can say not everyone apostasized, but the claim is still that generally we did. Secondly when is the apostasy? What is the evidence of it having taken place?

Joseph Smith did not teach that creedalist Christians weren't Christians. He taught that their churches had fallen into apostasy. Do you not see the difference? 😂 The First Vision condemns sects, creeds, and religious authorities. It does not say that every individual Protestant or Catholic ceased believing in Christ, ceased worshiping Christ, or ceased being a follower of Christ. In fact, the entire restoration narrative presupposes that sincere Christians existed and were seeking God despite institutional corruption. Your argument depends on collapsing two different categories: 1. "This church is false." 2. "Every member of this church is not a Christian." Joseph Smith clearly taught the first. He never clearly taught the second. And your supposed dilemma is false. There is no contradiction between saying that historic creedal Christianity was in apostasy and saying that many Catholics and Protestants were still genuine believers in Jesus Christ. Those claims coexist easily. Christians themselves make similar distinctions all the time when they call other denominations doctrinally corrupt while still acknowledging that some members are sincere followers of Christ. The real issue is that critics often want Joseph Smith's condemnation of creeds to mean something it doesn't. The phrase "all their creeds were an abomination" is a judgment on theological systems, not a declaration that every person attending a church was a conscious fraud or incapable of faith in Christ. So no, the choices are not "Joseph was right and all creedalist Christians were corrupt" or "modern Latter-day Saints have abandoned Joseph." The actual choice is whether you're willing to read Joseph Smith's statements carefully instead of inflating a condemnation of institutions into a condemnation of every individual believer. That's a distinction critics frequently ignore because it makes the argument sound stronger than the text actually supports.

As Mormons, we must be totally honest. Creedalists do worship a Jesus Christ. It's just not the Jesus Christ revealed in the Bible. It is a Jesus Christ that was invented by councils of men and who is not like the one in the Bible. Thus, they are not Biblical Christians.