Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Engelbert Humperdink
241 posts
18,000+ people in Japan voted on their favorite Pokemon in Pokemon Legends ZA!
gamewith.jp/pokemon-za/537…
English
You would be an incel if you were a man.
em@emilyreadey
If I was a boy I would be rich jacked introverted software developer hypebeast sneakerhead male manipulator
English
@BOOGERW0RM Also like almost all of the stuff that came out of the expansion was incredibly degenerate and got nerfed repeatedly. Drink Paladin, BSM, pdh, spell damage shaman, razzle dazzler shaman, taunt warrior, dungar druid, big hunter, lynessa paladin, etc
English
Hunter gets a Legendary that Flare deemed to be bad and this is his resulting take on the entire expansion:
Flare@FlareIsGone
I think it's been long enough to say that Perils in Paradise is one of the worst expansions they've ever made. Not only did multiple classes get nothing, it was horrifically imbalanced, and they buffed treasure distributor for this shit and it was committing war crimes in wild.
English
English
decided to sleep instead of day 1
mostly played ilgy/raza/hybrid
Streamed@ twitch.tv/sinf3rn0
Discord: discord.gg/WHVvt2jAprYT
YT Vod: youtu.be/eiFzfTrasaw (uploading)
@neon31HS @HS_Copa @glormagic
#TheLostCityOfUnGoro #Hearthstone #WildHS
YouTube
English
@Dankness01 Those are my exact two favorite bosses that's crazy
English
English
@cxpher11thirty @GarbageHuman23 People like him NEEDS TO BE PUT DOWN. Imagine kissing somebody who eats shit and you didn't even know.
English
English
I have been asked and given permission by @NeverSeenAMoose (The original poster on reddit front page) to amplify and post this on twitter, which I will gladly do.
For context this video is a comeback in Diamond 1 (99.65 percentile skill) with a 0/21 Fiora top lane.
I am ecstatic that this conversation about FF culture going overboard, has been brought to light finally.
The current perception of the average player about the chance to win games, is in my opinion, heavily distorted and skewed.
My original fear was that enabling non unanimous surrender at 15 will incredibly harm the quality of those next 5 minutes which I believe has happened.
We hear about "only 3-5% of games that are 4/1 votes are won" but it's quite literally impossible to have control for the stats. There doesn't exist a world where surrendering isn't enabled.
So a lot players after a failed surrender vote inevitably become a self fulfilling prophecy seeking the outcome they "predicted".
Even Riot Phroxzon laid out the problems accurately which begs the question, why doesn't Riot back it up with active decisions.
The way I see it, the game will not improve or get to a healthier state until we revert the surrender changes at 15 and either make it unanimous or we completely abolish FF at 15.
Before you lose your mind about playing games "You don't want to"(which is weird because you pressed Accept knowing very well game might go for 30 minutes or longer), keep in mind that snowball levels of the game have been brough back so much that we went stat wise 6 seasons into the past by Riot's own account.
I am aware I have no way to prove to you that after implementing these changes that the game will significantly improve within 2 months as all of this is theoretical and speculative.
What I can do is implore you to play the next 5-10 games with surrender vote disabled, as if they are a perfectly winnable and give your best.
Your results of this little experiment will do the work for me.
English
@Azzapp_LoL @DefineLiberal @NeverSeenAMoose Hell no 4-1 was the best change they've ever made and u wanna remove 15ff?????
English
@DefineLiberal @NeverSeenAMoose All we need is Riot to modify the system slightly and test it for one ranked split. The resulting feedback would make a compelling argument for the removal of surrendering at 15.
English
