Data Based DBNFT
4.5K posts

Data Based DBNFT
@DBNFT9
3D artist crypto enthusiast full of network spirituality. Autistic art specialist creating works AI can’t replicate.


Over 22% of the entire $PONS supply has now been burned (roughly $11.5M worth).

An Update on FAMILY. We really did not want to relaunch. But the original developer disappeared while the contract continued paying creator fees to his wallets. Across 61 payouts, those wallets received approximately: 6.798503 WETH 135,868,099.57 FAMILY We explored every realistic alternative. Pons confirmed that the existing contract cannot be taken over, and its creator-fee mechanism cannot be removed. So we have relaunched FAMILY on Pons. This is a new contract not a new FAMILY. The X account, X Community and group chat remain exactly the same. So do the people, the thesis and the home we chose for it. The relaunch was performed by someone I trust completely and personally vouch for. From now on, 100% of creator-side FAMILY fees will be burned. 100% of creator-side WETH fees will be used to buy FAMILY, and every token purchased will also be burned. That process will be handled manually at first and automated once it can be done safely. Every claim, buyback and burn will remain publicly verifiable onchain. We did not leave FAMILY. We left the contract that kept paying someone who did. New CA: 0xA65e9819de4885C3Aaa1dE3237078bf1ACA5eC40




TLDR for $PONS v2 docs > v2 earns from the first second of every launch bonding curve charges fees both directions before a pool even exists. in v1 fee streaming waited for graduation but v2 taxes the whole lifecycle > rug proof by design graduated liquidity is locked permanently, there is no unlock function > custom pairing assets launches can be priced in any token, stocks, stables, whatever. pons stops being a memecoin launcher and becomes the issuance layer for the entire chain, taking its cut in everything > every new fee stream feeds the same machine the wallet that buys and burns $PONS -> I measured it at ~$174k/day on v1 economics alone and v2 widens the spigot > currently ~0.74x mcap/revenue and 15% share of RH chain a revenue expanding upgrade landing on the cheapest multiple in the category and current on-chain dex volume makes up 15% of all RH txs idk... seems bullish?



Bitmex and Bitmart shutting down in less than a week.. Ascendex shut down a few weeks ago. I don't know but I wouldn't be surprised if other exchange follow suit. It wouldn't be a bad idea to withdraw your tokens to your personal wallet if you are using a tier-2 exchange


@Sheldonpig I’m all in on God, Family, Health and Work 🙏

In the past 24 hours @ponsdotfamily has generated ~$145k in protocol revenue, translating to $116k in buybacks of $PONS Annualized revenue is ~$32m, meaning FDV mc is sitting roughly $7m below ann. revenue. This is the fourth day in a row where revenue has been above $100k, and everyday that pons continues to make money means it should start trading at a 5x-10x multiple of ann. rev, not a discount. According to @that1618guy's dashboard, there is $440k in the treasury wallet ready to be used for buybacks, and the treasury is currently stacking ETH for buybacks at a 2.65 rate to burns, meaning everyday the treasury for burns gets even bigger as the protocol is making more revenue than is being burned per day. This is definitely the right decision as it means burns can be more consistent over a longer time frame. At a 3x MC:Ann. Rev ratio, Pons would be at $93m marketcap, and price would be ~$0.12 (not accounting for exact burn rate so price might be slightly higher or lower. Overall there is literally not a better fundamental based play you can take on any chain right now. $PONS is the most undervalued coin in crypto, and shows no signs of slowing down anytime soon. With V2 of Pons slated to come next week and introducing many features such as: fees being collected in exclusively non-token asset (no more devs dumping), CTOs, reflection tokens, and RWA pairs, I expect revenue (and by extension buybacks and burns) to only increase. In conclusion: higher.














