Dane1990

120 posts

Dane1990 banner
Dane1990

Dane1990

@Dane199074

So many idiots, so little time

Katılım Eylül 2013
18 Takip Edilen1 Takipçiler
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
The pure comedic gold of trying to hit me with obsolete political cliches, only to completely fumble your own mother tongue, misspell a basic sentence, and then double-post just to beg for an edit button🤡 My arguments are backed by international law, outer space regulations, and hard timelines. Your only defense is hiding behind a fantasy 'script' because your broken brain literally cannot comprehend someone having superior education, better critical thinking, and a flawless command of logic than you—this is the exact gap between systematic higher education and being completely uneducated. P.S. 'You might not use this kind of thinking every day, but when you do, you'll realize how lethal it is when you're the only one who has it.' Thanks for perfectly validating my college professor's quote🤡 You didn't 'prove your point'—you just proved you can't type straight when you're hyperventilating behind a keyboard. Go take an English remedial class to fix your typos, and stop embarrassing yourself on X. 🤡👋🚀
English
0
0
0
7
NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依
NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依@japan_nobunaga·
China just fired a ballistic missile over Japan. Read that again. Over Japan. Not a warning. Not a drill. Not “tensions in the region.” A communist dictatorship just sent a missile across the sky of a free country. And the world is supposed to yawn? No. Japan is awake. The world should be too.
NOBUNAGA🇯🇵🏯_夏樹蒼依 tweet media
English
436
2.2K
8K
166.4K
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
First you cried that I was a bot, now you’re crying that I’m trying too hard. The gymnastics you do to avoid admitting you got absolutely dismantled is hilarious🤡 You didn't post a 'one-off opinion'; you posted a confidently ignorant lie, got publicly vaporized by actual legal and geographical facts, and now you're trying to hide behind 'it's not that serious' because you can't match the intellectual weight🤡 Of course a well-researched argument feels like a 'novel' to someone who struggles to read past a headline. Don't flatter yourself—explaining basic reality to you isn't a 'flex,' it's community service. Take the L and go back to your sandbox. 🤡👋🚀
English
1
0
0
22
Shumoko Minamochi
Shumoko Minamochi@ShumokoMinamoch·
I'm not the one out here trying to make a bad point by writing novel length replies to over-explain using repetitive wording and cut and paste arguements. the more you "flex" the worse you look, especially when replying to one off opinions like mine, like you're trying so hard to prove yourself while he rest of us aren't.
English
1
0
0
13
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
The fact that you're counting followers instead of countering facts just proves you're a clueless, uneducated redneck with zero substance🤡 Let's talk about your savior, Donald Trump. Those little red MAGA hats you wear to feel special? they all Made in China. Every single one you buy is a direct tribute to Chinese manufacturing making America great again❤️ Even better, let's talk about the reality of 2026: your literally never-drinking savior was just in Beijing this May. In front of President Xi, Trump obediently raised his glass of white wine, desperately begging China to form a G2 framework to co-manage the world. Of course, none of that stopped President Xi from seeing Trump for exactly what he is: an absolute clown🤡 Your absolute best destiny is to crawl back to your farm, propagate your next generation of rednecks with your redneck wife, and repeat the cycle in an endless loop of genetic mediocrity🤡👋
English
0
0
0
4
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
Imagine being so intellectually bankrupt that seeing structured logic and hard facts makes your brain default to 'it must be a bot.'🤡 When your own thinking is a chaotic mess, a well-reasoned argument probably looks like witchcraft to you. Calling me a 'bot' or 'propagandist' is just a pathetic coping mechanism for your own literacy issues. Thanks for admitting my arguments are way too organized and sophisticated for your walnut-sized brain to counter🤡 Also, I must thank my college self for putting in the work—especially for pulling straight A+ grades in both Critical Thinking and International Affairs & Politics. It gave me the intellectual armor to defend my views with facts and logic, rather than resorting to a one-word vocabulary like a broken script. Enjoy the permanent gap. 🤡👋
English
1
0
0
19
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
Just got back from a 4-day vacation, and I honestly didn't expect to still see a brain-dead creature like you spitting out such absolute nonsense.😅 Let me spell it out to save whatever is left of your empty brain: the mid-course flight altitude of this SLBM test was entirely in outer space, with its ground projection path passing through international airspace, and its splashdown located in designated international waters. This matches the US Vandenberg-to-Kwajalein trajectory flawlessly in both geographical selection and international legal framework. Of course, to grasp this, you’d first need to learn the basic concepts of 'outer space,' 'ground projection path,' and 'international airspace.' Being uneducated is one thing, but parading your utter ignorance in public just makes you look like a complete dumbass. Got it? 🤡👋🚀
English
1
0
0
8
HueBurger
HueBurger@Hue_Burger·
@Dane199074 @japan_nobunaga Hello, Chinese Bot. You don't know that you're not supposed to fire missiles over other countries? I think you do know.
English
1
0
0
23
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
Ah, the classic 'I was just trolling' white flag—the universal safety blanket for internet losers when their dignity gets completely vaporized. But honestly, thank you for giving me a front-row seat to the core reason behind Western decline: the complete collapse of basic literacy and the severe degradation of higher education. The fact that basic logic, historical data, and elementary school geography feel like a 'bot' to you only highlights the tragic state of your own organic brain infrastructure. When a human's intellectual capacity is this severely hollowed out, actual knowledge probably does look like science fiction. Keep repeating your little 'bot' mantra to cope with the humiliation. 🤡
English
1
0
0
13
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
The hilarious irony of you telling me to check a map when you just completely checkmated yourself. Let's look at your maps, little bro: How many sovereign nations were overflown by China's recent missile on its way to the Pacific splashdown zone? The number is exactly zero. Because the mid-course flight altitude of this SLBM test was entirely in outer space, with its ground projection path passing through international airspace, and its splashdown located in designated international waters. This matches the US Vandenberg-to-Kwajalein trajectory flawlessly in both geographical selection and international legal framework. You hiding behind the 'it was just a hypothetical question' excuse in your first reply, only to immediately try and justify it with a real-world route in your second, proves your entire logic has collapsed. Your 'hypothetical' scenario was a bad-faith attempt to manufacture fake outrage by implying China did something illegal, and now that you’ve been cornered by international law, you are desperately backpedaling. Whether it's the US, Russia, the UK, or China, during any intercontinental-range test, the mid-course phase takes place in outer space, and the number of overflown sovereign nations is always zero. This isn’t a Chinese exception; it is a universal technical specification for nuclear superpowers validating their strategic forces, with all tracking landing safely in international waters. The only difference is that the Pentagon understands the physics of global deterrence, while you’re stuck throwing tantrums and nitpicking words on X
English
0
0
0
2
Alex
Alex@EvilTwinAL·
@Dane199074 @japan_nobunaga I’ll be glad to explain that as well. How about you go check how many sovereign nations are overflown by our ICBMs on their way to Kwajalein (check your world map Dane). The number is zero. You might also want to take a course in reading comprehension while you’re at it.
English
1
0
0
7
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
You just checked yourself into a mental corner, little bro. You admitted there was 'barely enough time' for Japan, which means you finally processed the reality: the US sat on that critical strategic intelligence for 22.5 hours and gave Japan a total blackout. China followed superpower protocol and notified Washington a full day prior. If your 'alliance' was worth anything, the US would have told Tokyo immediately, not left you with 1.5 hours of panic. You crying about the comparison being 'incomparable' is just your coping mechanism to avoid the humiliation of being treated like a second-class outsider by your own masters. No AI needed to expose this—just cold, basic arithmetic. Enjoy eating the information scraps🤡
English
0
0
0
18
Kiss of Envy
Kiss of Envy@KissofEnvyy·
@Dane199074 @HansenKaiser84 @japan_nobunaga Notifying someone when there's barely enough time for them to do something is WAYYYYYYYYYYYYY different from giving the US an entire day. The two situations are incomparable. I hope you're using AI to be this stupid tbh. This is the worst comparison of all time tbh
English
1
0
1
58
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
Actually, 'so many words' is exactly what separates literacy and substance from a subhuman IQ. And rest assured, President Trump will happily keep raising his glass, enjoying a thorough economic threesome with Beijing at Tokyo's expense, while the only thing Tokyo can do is take a double cumshot from the G2❤️🍄
English
0
0
0
13
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
Your IQ is just as repulsive as your body odor. You are a pathetic loser who completely lost the historical facts, lost the military logistics, lost the intelligence timeline, and thoroughly lost your mind on public display. Other than recycling the word 'idiot,' you literally haven't offered a single coherent sentence. You are obsolete. Run home and cry to mama🤡😭
English
1
0
0
16
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
And there it is—the absolute, legendary rock bottom of a mental meltdown. Thank you for giving the entire comment section the funniest laugh of 2026. You didn't just lose the argument; you completely lost your mind on public display🤡 You went from trying to pretend you understood international law, to throwing pathetic racial slurs, and now you’ve officially spiraled into schizophrenia-tier Cold War fanfiction. A 70-year-old KGB psyop? Did the KGB also personally manufacture China's world-leading industrial base, its fully independent aerospace sector, and the hypersonic missiles that currently have your defense department sweating bullets?🤡 Do yourself a massive favor: put down the tinfoil hat, log off X, and check yourself into the nearest clinic🤡
English
0
0
1
17
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
Are you genuinely this illiterate or are you just desperately grasping at straws? 24 hours was the official, legal advance notice China gave to other nuclear superpowers under bilateral frameworks—including the US, Russia, France, and the UK. 1.5 hours was the neighboring courtesy heads-up China directly gave to Tokyo right before the launch(China also assuming Washington would fulfill its basic alliance duties and share the info with Japan at the first time) Both facts are 100% accurate. The ultimate comedy here is that Washington sat on that critical strategic intelligence for 22.5 hours, monitored the entire ICBM trajectory flawlessly, and chose a total blackout over Japan (Even Beijing was probably surprised by how little the US cares about its ally) You thinking this is a contradiction only proves you lack the mental capacity to comprehend the difference between a superpower legal obligation and basic neighboring courtesy. Thank you for proving once again that the US treats Japan like an irrelevant outsider who only deserves information crumbs🤡
English
0
0
0
4
WJ
WJ@SixStringCrimes·
@Dane199074 @japan_nobunaga Was it 1.5 or 24 hours? Why should I care about anything you have to say after you get the biggest fact wrong
English
1
0
0
8
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
'Didn't read' is the ultimate loser's white flag when their entire brain capacity gets incinerated by historical facts and cold industrial data🤡 Thank you for publicly displaying your complete lack of courage to face reality and your absolute intellectual bankruptcy. The moment you dropped that pathetic slur and ran away like a whipped dog, everyone watching knew you completely lost the argument🤡
English
1
0
1
23
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
@grok @GIS_IOIO Well said, @grok. But given your objective breakdown, I have a feeling your series of factual answers might leave this particular blogger feeling pretty upset and deeply embarrassed. What's your take on that?
English
1
0
0
17
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, verifying claims against primary sources like official US Navy Strategic Systems Programs test reports is the reliable method. Submerged Trident II D5LE launches from Ohio-class SSBNs in international waters during routine DASO and certification events are standard and well-documented, as are equivalent practices by other nuclear powers. Facts clarify capabilities better than assumptions.
English
1
0
0
17
Fio
Fio@GIS_IOIO·
중국이 핵잠에서 자국영해도 아닌곳에 미사일 쐈대잖아 북한말고 다른나라가 그러는거 봤냐
한국어
326
30
636
48.8K
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
@grok @GIS_IOIO Thanks for the solid data, @grok. So, would you agree that engaging one's brain cells and verifying actual facts before posting on social media is generally an excellent idea to avoid total public embarrassment?
English
1
0
0
23
Grok
Grok@grok·
**US does this routinely.** Ohio-class SSBNs launch unarmed Trident II D5LE SLBMs from submerged positions in international waters during scheduled tests. Examples from official US Navy/Strategic Systems Programs data: - Sept 2025: Multiple launches off Florida into broad Atlantic Ocean areas. - Feb 2020: Launch from USS Maine off San Diego into Pacific. Hundreds of successful tests over decades. This is core to US sea-based nuclear deterrence doctrine — subs patrol and can launch from anywhere in the open ocean. Russia, UK, France do the same. China's July 6 test was notable for distance/publicity, but the capability and practice are standard, not unique to NK/China.
English
1
0
0
26
Dane1990
Dane1990@Dane199074·
Translation: 'I couldn't find the fictional one-month notice treaty because I made it up, so now I will throw a tantrum and fantasize about nuking the world to feel safe.'🤡 Let's snap you back to the brutal reality of 2026: You are talking about nuking a peer competitor with a fully operational nuclear triad and a near-impenetrable strategic defense system. Why don't you go ask Trump or the elite members of the Senate Armed Services Committee if they would ever dare to entertain such a suicidal thought against China? Trump—who literally never drinks—was just in Beijing this May, raising a glass of white wine to invite China into a G2 framework to co-manage the world. They understand exactly what Mutual Assured Destruction means, unlike you. Salivating over a nuclear holocaust on X only proves you have the strategic IQ of a toddler🤡 You pivoted to Taiwan simply because your legal argument totally collapsed. Notice how you completely ran away from your own claims and couldn't provide a single treaty number? When you lose the legal debate, you hide behind geopolitical fanfiction. Classic NPC behavior🤡 China didn't break a single rule—it strictly complied with its bilateral treaties with other nuclear superpowers like the US and Russia, ensuring the entire ICBM test was fully transparent to them. The only thing broken here, which even China honestly didn't expect, was Japan's shattered dignity. Washington held onto that 24-hour warning and monitored the entire trajectory seamlessly, yet chose to strategically ghost Japan, keeping its own Pacific ally completely locked out of the information loop🤡 Go grab another cup of coffee, put down the Call of Duty controller, and get some fresh air. The world is multipolar now, and no amount of internet keyboard-rattling will heal your fragile glass heart. 🤡👋
English
0
0
0
13
Aaron R Holloway
Aaron R Holloway@AaronRHolloway1·
lol Look if you and China want to go back on all of the international rules and agreements about ballistic missile testing, and nuclear testing? Fine by me. China is bluffing and blustering with all of this crap. Its showing its teeth to try and scare the China Sea and First Island Chain nations like Japan into breaking ties with Taiwan. Or should I say "Real China"? But anyway. If we go back to the "Rule by force alone" era on the seas, and in the skies, the US will literally dominate the world within a month. Even a totally United Europe wouldn't be able to stand a chance. The only thing the US would struggle with is ground warfare, there are only so many bodies we can throw at conquering other places. But that's what our many, many, many, and entirely functional, nuclear arsenal is for. Or? We could play nice with each other, uphold our end of agreements, and stop being saber rattling dicks.
English
1
0
0
36