Daniel Mazza

Orar é para os fracos. Por isso que eu oro.

@FLCons The song in this video has lyrics in Brazilian Portuguese, and they are extremely inappropriate, erotic, and vulgar. I recommend that you not use this song—or any similar ones—in your videos.

That guy has guts, I'll give him that. I get why the precision cuts, but I'm not so sure I'd be wanting to stand so close in order to make all the cuts needed! 🥹 Is this kind of tree falling the way it's done or is he hot doggin' it? 🤨

John 13:35 35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

It reminds me of the following passage: [Luke 12:37] NET [37] Blessed are those slaves whom their master finds alert when he returns! I tell you the truth, he will dress himself to serve, have them take their place at the table, and will come and wait on them! bible.com/bible/107/luk.…

@DanielMazza @autocorrect2_0 Great passage! John wrote about something like that in Revelation 5 that he saw.

It’s just weird for a Christian to be anything but happy when someone is redeemed. We can’t even take credit for our good behavior, any Christian credits Gods spirit at work within themselves for obedience so again, it’s just strange to see a visceral reaction to a redemption testimony

@NotTheBaptizer @autocorrect2_0 Exodus 24:9-11 No one knows this biblical passage.

@DanielMazza @autocorrect2_0 Genesis 18?

[Exodus 24:9-11] NET [9] Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and the seventy elders of Israel went up, [10] and they saw the God of Israel. Under his feet there was something like a pavement made of sapphire, clear like the sky itself. [11] But he did not lay a hand on the leaders of the Israelites, so they saw God, and they ate and they drank. bible.com/bible/107/exo.…

@autocorrect2_0 @NotTheBaptizer They had a picnic with God, and God was stepping on something that looked like a piece of heaven on earth.

@DanielvsBabylon 🙏

I'm a Christian who didn't wait til marriage. I'm a Christian who has battled anger. I'm a Christian who has put others down. I'm a Christian who has lied to get their way. I'm a Christian that has chased the wrong things. I'm not a Christian because I "check all the boxes" I'm a Christian because I'm weak & broken and I need Jesus Christ. And by God's Grace, He builds me more into the man He wants me to be daily. If you're not a perfect Christian, this page is for you.

I’ll share my own experience as an example. When I was brought back to Jesus, pornography was suddenly and completely removed from my life. Even so, I feel that I am still being gradually freed from it. It’s as if Jesus immediately froze the damage and lingering effects of that sin so He could heal it little by little, over time. In other words, I no longer watch pornography, but I still don’t feel entirely free from the risk of falling back into it. I constantly sense Jesus sustaining me, and it is only by His strength — and not my own — that I remain free from this sin.

So is anyone that gets married fully sanctified? No So why are we assuming that we are more sanctified than another because they sinned differently? A man has a history of extensive porn use Very few trials in his life. A woman has a history of promiscuity, single motherhood, and abuse The woman, tired, comes to Jesus is born again. Meets the man dates him and drags him to Jesus. He reluctantly gets born again. Your formula assumes the man is more sanctified When actually the woman is due to the trials she’s faced. She’s learned more. Shes more grateful to God. She’s more zealous The man has a faux self righteousness and is like warm. The woman has actually rested in God Sanctification is spiritual maturity gained by response to trial

Promiscuity creates deep wounds that a single experience of being "born again" cannot heal.

@visegrad24 We live in a world that prefers to leave criminals at large and to kill the innocent.

🇪🇸 A young Spanish woman will be euthanized today, after a group of illegal migrants gang-raped her while she was in state care. In 2022, the teenager Noelia Castillo Ramos placed in a state institution amid family difficulties and placed in a state-run home together with North African migrant minors where she was raped by them. The trauma broke her. Months later, Noelia attempted suicide by jumping from the 5th floor. She survived, but the fall left her paraplegic. The rapists were never arrested and remain free. Instead of delivering justice or adequate long-term support, the authorities offered assisted suicide as the solution. Today, March 26, 2026, Noelia Castillo Ramos will be euthanized. The system that failed to protect her is now "solving the problem" by ending her life

How the west came to accept lies as truth.

You are completely correct. I would also ask you to understand the following: the context in which something is said fills in the unspoken implications of what is left unsaid. For example, the statement “Jesus threatens the power of the Sanhedrin” was praise when spoken on the streets, because people would mentally complete it with “and indeed the Sanhedrin is corrupt.” Yet when said inside the Sanhedrin itself, it becomes a legal accusation, because it would be understood as “therefore you are threatening the order established by God through His representatives.” So when you make a statement like yours—omitting the part you have just correctly supplied—even without intending to, you may be providing material for a heated discussion. For instance, if I post “women are sinners” while omitting the obvious fact that men are sinners too, people will start speculating about why I left out the other part. In another example, if I post the passage saying that no one can come to Jesus unless the Father draws him, it will sound as if I am defending Calvinist predestination. But if I post John 15 in isolation, about being cut off from the vine, it will sound as if I am defending the Arminian view. A great deal of discussion ends up revolving around what is implied between the lines rather than the actual topic itself. It is wise for us to keep this in mind whenever we post anything; otherwise this will always happen.

@DanielMazza @autocorrect2_0 The core takeaway I want people to have from the top level post is simply this: Forgiveness ≠ Healing A former life of deep sin makes the post-conversion healing process harder than it would have been if you avoided that original way in the first place.

@annamlulis 🙏✝️

In 2 hours, a young girl will be euthanized for depression Spain will give her poison to stop her breathing, suffocating her to death It’s scheduled to happen at St. Camil Residential Hospital at 6:00 PM local time Pray Noelia Castillo Ramos changes her mind and embraces Jesus

I think what she meant is that you are stating a technical truth, but intending it to carry a different impact from its strict technical meaning. In the technical sense, sanctification is indeed a process. However, in the way this notion is commonly used in debates, it implies that a person would not be fully justified after being born again. Which sense did you intend?

Semantics? These are biblical concepts. St. Paul had arguably the greatest before/after conversion experience, and he still attested to how much sanctifying work there is to do afterwards. Both yours and my wounds still need healing. Our sins are forgiven (when confessed), but their impacts aren't automatically healed. Forgiveness is not the same thing as healing.

There are people who do the equivalent of a DoS attack, but directed at humans online. They pretend not to understand what is being said, hoping that eventually the other person will lose their patience. Talking to people like that is literally casting pearls before swine, as Jesus said. So, my friend, if you wish to continue playing dumb, I will simply ignore you, just as the others are already doing.

@banxton11 @bitcoinpam @autocorrect2_0 If you think that converts are those who don't sin, you haven't even read the Bible.

Coward blocked me so here’s a subtweet. The backwardness of all this is that they don’t stigmatize active prostitutes and unrepentant promiscuous women. They don’t abuse the women actively sinning. They wait to abuse and stigmatize the women who have repented and sought Jesus. So what they’re actually stigmatizing is repentance. This is how you know who their current father is. @BonifaceOption

@farmingandJesus Yes, and this is so strange. A self-proclaimed tare-puller who is himself a tare.

Do you see that tiny RED dot? That’s Israel, the only Jewish state in the world. They want you to believe that the tiny RED dot is the oppressor and colonizer, and that the GREEN Muslim countries surrounding it are the oppressed. Do they realize how ridiculous they sound?

As a former promiscuous man—who was once a slave to every kind of sexual immorality, but who was graciously set free by Jesus—I can say with certainty that there is no happiness in sin. Pornography and even illicit sexual acts are like rejecting a succulent picanha steak (a faithful marriage) in order to roll around in the foul, stinking meat of a skunk (sexual immorality). The process of liberation is indescribably difficult. Every time you say “no” to a sin you once said “yes” to, it feels as hard as a full conversion. It is like having to accept Jesus over and over again and cling to Him. Promiscuity causes deep damage. But do not think that virgins are pure, because Jesus said that looking at someone with lust is already adultery in the heart. This is not an exaggeration—it is simply the truth. I see that the devil has succeeded in making women hate men and men hate women. That is not the way. And the Pharisees who trust in their own righteousness are farther from God than the tax collectors and the prostitutes, Jesus said. Marriage is a blessing because it was instituted by God. We are the difficult ones, not marriage itself. And if Jesus is Jesus, He has the power to make us pure—whiter than snow, purer than wool. Jesus died on the cross for this very reason: so that there would be no accusation against those who repent. And if God has wiped away someone’s sin, who are we to accuse them?